Ivermectin is currently used for about 28% of the world’s population. Countries where COVID-19 mortality is close to zero may not have incentive to adopt treatments. When excluding these countries, ivermectin adoption is about 39%. We excluded countries where the cumulative mortality over the preceding month was less than 1 in 1 million.
Western authorities are presenting our choices as either catch covid eventually (because it is so infectious and now spreading everywhere) or take vaccines every three months (according to the latest guidelines), apparently for the indefinite future. They hide and vigorously “omit” the third alternative: the anti-viral path.
Covid, vaccines, or anti-viral. Which is doing better?
Let’s do a scorecard, of official covid deaths per million population [and current daily cases, total, not per capita]:
Countries that did not close their borders and went to vaccines as soon as possible:
- USA – 2,509 [250k]
- UK – 2,161 [120k]
- Germany – 1,319 [40k]
- France – 1,871 [100k]
- Canada – 788 [20k]
- Italy – 2,265 [50k]
- Russia – 2,077 [25k]
Countries that did not close their borders and, after alarming infection, mostly adopted ivermectin:
- India – 342 [8k]
- Indonesia – 519 [< 1k]
- Japan – 146 [< 1k]
- Egypt – 205 [< 1k]
- Peru – 6,016 (the country hit hardest, until they used ivermectin) [6k]
- Columbia – 2,510 [ 3k]
- Venezuela – 188 [< 1k]
- Nigeria – 14 [4k]
- South Africa – 1,502 [20k]
Countries that closed their borders but have recently opened up:
- Australia – 84 [10k]
- Western Australia – 0.5 [2 cases yesterday, 7 in last few months]
- New Zealand – 10 
- Vietnam – 314 [16k]
- Taiwan – 36  (borders still closed)
Different policies, different health outcomes. Even a bureaucrat could work it out, eventually.
Meanwhile, Pfizer must be very pleased with themselves — producing the most widely used treatment in history!
Vaccines in the west are too big politically to fail — yet they are. There is only so much you can cover up with propaganda and voodoo statistics.