Author: David Evans

Britain: from affluent and high-trust to broken and low-trust

Britain: from affluent and high-trust to broken and low-trust. By Andrew Fox.

British, because he had a passport. Really?

 

This story has broken me. It has unleashed a rage so strong I can barely express it, but allow me to try.

Above all, I am angry with the decades-long malevolent incompetence of the British state: politicians of all parties, the judiciary, the civil service. Their collective uselessness has shattered the social contract and made us all poorer and less safe. In just 25 years, they have led us from an affluent, high-trust society to a broken, low-trust one.

I am sickened by the growth in sectarian politics. I am appalled by the foreign ghettos in our cities and imported, bent voting practices and resultant corruption in some of our councils. I hate seeing the clothing of female oppression on our streets. I am sickened by the fact our Jewish community lives under siege.

I no longer wish to pay tax to support those who have come here illegally and should be removed immediately. It is to our shame that we have accepted mass immigration without insisting on integration.

I am tired of being told that a British passport makes a foreigner as British as me. I assure you that the “British citizen” in this story is not. I am saddened that for so many people, the concept of “British” is essentially meaningless.

I am sick of the obsession with a minor war 2,500 miles away that barely affects us. I despise that £88m of our tax money is going to Hamas (because it will), when the tax burden is a record high, everything is expensive, welfare spending is out of control and we can’t even pay for our own defences when the global risk of conflict is the highest it has been since the end of the Cold War. And in spite of how much of our money the government steals from our pockets, nothing, at all, in this country works. Healthcare, transport, education — all broken.

It is a stain on our national politics that we have five Gaza MPs. It is our national shame that our government is intent on sucking up to the Palestinian entity which contains some of the worst monsters on the face of planet. It is a disgrace that our Foreign Secretary shook the hand of the representative of the Iranian regime that has slaughtered tens of thousands of its own people, and that he doesn’t seem to understand why that photograph will damn him forever. It is embarrassing that we had a Foreign Office minister dancing with and hugging the representative of the Palestinian Authority. The lack of serious statesmanship is mind-boggling and indicative of how far we have fallen.

They say the past is a foreign country, but my goodness, do I miss the country I grew up in. I feel so sorry for the generation that grew up after 2000 and will never know how good it was. It’s not coming back. …

The worst part of it is that there is absolutely nothing any of us can do about it. I just want to live in a happy, stable, prosperous country like we used to be, instead of one that is run by a state apparatus that does nothing but beat us down, obsess over irrelevances, take our money, and leave us poorer and less safe.

Fighting all the institutions

Fighting all the institutions. By Eric Weinstein.

Peter Theil asks:

What is something you feel is good and needs to be done, but on which almost no institution agrees with you and will fight to destroy you with their full force at a deeply personal level?

Eric’s answer:

Undermining faith in Anthony Fauci’s and Francis Collins’ scientific behavior during a pandemic.

Calling attention to the fact that the president of the United States with launch code responsibility was obviously demented during his presidency.

Opposing high levels of immigration for completley non-xenophobic reasons.

Openly discussing asymmetries in patterns of religious martyrdom attacks.

Fighting the loss of the word “Genocide” via coordinated social campaigns.

Pointing out that the history of Peer Review is retconned and fictitious and obviously false.

Fighting irreversible surgeries pushed on children leading to a reproductive holocaust.

Calling for an end to Diverisity-Equity-Inclusion and opposing “Black Lives Matter”, despite their branding genius, even during the Summer of Floyd.

Pointing out that conspiracies are well documented and ubiquitous and fighting for responsible conspiracy theorizing.

Promoting my own technical work and insisting that scientists get paid handsomely.

Truth seekers are rare:

You’re asking the wrong person. It seems I stand up for what I believe is deeply good and what is misperceived as evil all day, every day. This has stupidly become close to my whole life at times. I’m so bored by how silent everyone is. I can’t fathom it. “Managed Reality” has turned evil.

Something is pushing pure evil, disguised as “good” down our throats 24/7 via the institutions. And almost everyone puts up with it. I do not.

Who controls are the institutions? Why do they all move together, like fish in a school? Why are politicians who advocate political positions that were centrist and mainstream from 1990 to 2005 — such as Donald Trump, AfD, Marine Le Pen, Rupert Lowe and Nigel Farage, and Pauline Hanson — damned as “far right” and Nazi adjacent by all the institutions in the 2020s? Who decided to simultaneously weaken all white countries by mass migration from the third world?

We don’t pay no stinkin’ reparations

We don’t pay no stinkin’ reparations. By Daniel Hannan.

I’ve had enough of these grifters. If another government comes whining for slavery reparations from the country [Britain] that distinguished itself by its relentless global abolitionism, we should treat it as a hostile act and respond with economic sanctions.

John Cleese.

This is where the Arabs were ahead of us

By castrating all their slaves, they made sure that there were no descendants who could claim reparations

John Carter:

The lesson of the long twentieth century is that mercy gets you nowhere. You will pay for it forever. No one gives the Arabs a hard time about the slave trade, because the Arabs made sure there were no descendants of slaves. No one gives the Argentines a hard time about stolen land, because the indigenous peoples of Argentina were systematically eliminated. No one gives the Japanese a hard time about the Ainu, because there are no Ainu.

Video on western civilization

Video on western civilization. By the Claude AI. Pure eye-candy, but fun.

 

Now watch tv nowadays:

What is to be built for the Australian Navy?

What is to be built for the Australian Navy? By David Archibald.

The premise of the book Building Australia’s Defence is that while the situation is dire and the hour is late, it is still recoverable. …

China:

China has taken upon itself to be the main vector of death and destruction during this century. Thirty years ago they realised that their peak relative strength would be in the 2020s. That window of opportunity is running out. Their problem is that the advances in electronics over the last 25 years have favoured the defence.

Another problem is that their ancestors have already conquered the easy stuff, going out from the original Han heartland in Shaanxi Province. There is frozen wasteland to the north, deserts to the west and mountain ranges to the south. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was easy by comparison, with thousands of kilometres of flat land to drive across in armoured formations. To go anywhere, China has to put its troops in metal containers — ships and aircraft — which are easily detected and tracked on the modern battlefield.

It has been said that the cost in ordnance of sinking a ship, with cruise and ballistic missiles, is about five percent of the cost of building it. It doesn’t matter that China now has the world’s largest navy by hull count, because the cost of sinking them is a small fraction of the cost of building them. Ukraine is inspirational in this regard for, even without a navy, it has driven the Russian Navy to the eastern end of the Black Sea. A recent campaign saw Ukraine destroy over 300 Russian commercial vessels using drones. …

And Australia?

The most cost-effective way to sink warships now is with air-launched ballistic missiles. Radar systems on ships have a blind spot vertically above them in a cone about six degrees wide. That is the weak spot to be exploited. The US developed the PrSM missile, with a range of 500 km, to be the successor to the ATACMS missile. It weighs one tonne, and has a 90 kg warhead. Air-launching a missile doubles its range. Another rule of thumb is that with a warhead that is 10% to 20% of the missile weight, you will get a range of one kilometre per kilo of mass. Increment two of the PrSM missile was developed to enable the US Army to sink ships at sea. It has passive guidance with an infrared, image-matching seeker, combined with radio frequency detection (the target ship’s radar is effectively a location beacon). …

Unfortunately Australia doesn’t have any aircraft that can launch a two-tonne missile. The psychotic people running the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) buried the ones that could, our F-111s, in a pit.

But civilian aircraft could be converted to that purpose and would not come in harm’s way, given the stand-off range of the missile. For sinking ships, air-launched ballistic missiles are far more cost-effective than submarines. While a submarine might take weeks to complete a mission, an aircraft could service targets in the Indian Ocean one day and targets in the Pacific the next. Every Chinese ship in the Pacific and Indian Oceans needs to be sunk, including their fishing fleet. To sink a 500 tonne fishing vessel takes a 50 kg warhead.

The countries around the South China Sea will help. The Philippines and Indonesia have acquired the Brahmos supersonic, antiship missile from India, and Malaysia is evaluating it. Indonesia is particularly important, given that it is a belt 5,200 km long across the path between China and Australia. If Indonesia doesn’t want a Chinese armada to pass, then the Chinese armada will be heavily chewed up in attempting to do so. Fortunately China and Indonesia have recently had a falling out, with China dismantling US$14 billion worth of nickel production lines in Indonesia in response to an Indonesian hike in its take. …

The Virginia class submarines are a positive development. However, the Australian Government didn’t increase the defence budget to pay for them. Instead, it took funds from some 500 other projects, in effect hollowing out the ADF and making it more fragile. For example, Australia recently acquired 75 Abrams tanks that are fitted for, but not with, the Trophy system. So they are naked against ATGMs. On the other hand they don’t have protection against drones either, so they are useless anyway.

Hold a globe so that you are looking directly at Australia, and you’ll see Australia and ocean, and not much else. Australia is the nearest significant nation to about a quarter of the world’s oceans. Yet our navy is minuscule and outdated.

As of late 2025 and 2026, Australia’s merchant fleet has shrunk to only 20 Australian-flagged ships, most of them coastal traders, a dramatic decline from over 100 ships three decades ago. There are only four ocean-going, Australian-flagged ships actually engaged substantially in international trade. The decline is attributed to the high costs — due to union rules — of operating Australian-flagged and crewed ships compared to foreign-flagged alternatives, which carry the vast majority (99%) of Australia’s seaborne trade.

We have no Australian-controlled tanker fleet capable of sustaining energy imports, no fleet of bulk carriers able to guarantee critical commodity flows and almost no Australian-flagged vessels trading internationally that could be directed toward national priorities in a crisis

Read all of David’s article, covering land and air forces, here.

Matriarchies fail: How building women’s  self esteem is killing us

Matriarchies fail: How building women’s  self esteem is killing us. By Devon Eriksen.

The worst and most prolonged psychological torture you can inflict on a woman is to convince her she’s as good as any man.

This torture is lifelong, unendurable, and once you set up the initial conditions, the pain becomes self-inflicted.

You see, women are genetically programmed for two things. First, to raise children. Second, to select a man who is superior to her to bear those children for.

Not equal. Certainly not lesser. Superior.

There is no point in arguing about this. It is obviously true to anyone who looks around himself without blinders made of wishful thinking.

There is no point in becoming angry at me or anyone else about this. It is true whether I wish it to be or not, and whether you wish it to be or not.

There is no point in trying to talk women out of this. It is not a part of their culture or education. It is not an individual character flaw in them. It is part of their genetic recipe.

Therefore, if you convince a woman she is equal to most men, she will only be willing to bear children to a small percentage of exceptional men.

If you convince her that she is the equal of any man, she will be unwilling to start a family with anyone.

And she will remain genetically programmed to do so.

Biasing schools and work to favor women raised their self esteem, but made courtship and babies impossible for many:

When I was a child, and again when I was a young man, in high school and college, I noticed that the older adults who staffed the education system seemed to think “girls’ self-esteem” was our most precious resource …

Perhaps they thought half of humanity’s potential Newtons, Einsteins, and Da Vincis were hidden among the ranks of the fair sex, waiting to be unlocked by “Project Self Esteem”, and no, I did not make that name up. …

Self-esteem is not being happy. Self-esteem is not even feeling good. Self-esteem is how awesome you think you are.

And if you think you’re awesome, when you’re mediocre, then you’re miserable, because everyone around you treats you a whole lot worse than you think you deserve.

High self-esteem is great for young men. It makes them take risks. And to thrive men need to take risks, and achieve things, for many reasons, one of which is that women only mate up.

High self-esteem is not so good for young women. It doesn’t get them anything they wouldn’t have already had. It just makes them less happy with it.

Sure, there’s such a thing as self-esteem too low, but if a woman can look you in the eye, instead of in the shoes, when she talks to you, she’s pretty much good to go.

Anything more than that is superfluous at best, and at worst… well, eyeball the video for a moment and you’ll see what I mean.

 

 

But the misery isn’t just personal.

This is the fertility crisis in a nutshell. We, Western civilization, have spent the past five or six decades telling little boys that they are worthless sacks of protoplasm, and telling little girls that the sun shines out of their collective girl parts.

And look what’s happened.

The fertility crisis is stupidly simple. When you elevate the status of women by giving them a greater share of respect, and of society’s wealth, which is created by men, they refuse to have children.

You can reverse this by allowing men to keep the wealth they create, instead of giving it to women.

Then they will give it to women themselves, but the women will look up to them, and there will be children again.

Concrete problems:

During the Trump administration so far, 94% of new jobs went to women. This is not natural or organic. This doesn’t happen on its own. This is not happening because women are “crushing it”.

Women are the same women they have always been, risk averse, clustered around average intelligence, prone to wait for others to lead.

This is not an accident. This is spin on the ball. Women vote. And pandering is an easy way to get those votes.

But give a moderately pretty one a single email job at a Silicon Valley startup, and pretty soon she thinks that the father of her children should be a “post-economic” jet-setter with the body of a professional athlete who ticks all the boxes her therapist thinks are important.

And she thinks she can pick him off a shelf at age 35.

This is a vote, conscious or not, willing or not, for the extinction of humanity.

 

There are now more women than men working in the U.S. Over the past year, working-age men have LOST jobs, while women have captured virtually 100% of the net new jobs:

 

 

A fact that everyone should know, but sadly do not:

Throughout the genetic history of humanity, approximately 80% of women had children, as opposed to 37% of men. Those numbers don’t lie. Most men either weren’t exceptional enough to breed, or died trying to become exceptional enough to breed.

Women just had to not be in the bottom quintile. Not to be horrible, or horribly unlucky.

Which societies succeed?

And this is why Western civilization told women they were the weaker sex, the dumber sex, the more fragile sex. Why Eve was said to made to serve Adam.

Because this preserved civilization and the species.

Women were actually happier that way, because women don’t want to win. They want a winner.

But even if it didn’t, what choice would we have?

The only nations and tribes in the world which are still breeding are the ones where women are still of low status. And if you try to replace Westerners with them, try to make them into Westerners, not only will you fail, but even if you succeed, they’ll stop breeding, too.

And we know now why there are no matriarchies. Its not because men have superior strength, and enslaved women with violence. It’s because matriarchies don’t breed.

Humans are an animal, like any other animal. Every animal has mating rituals, and if those rituals can’t be conducted, there will be no next generation. This is why some animals can be bred in zoos, and others cannot.

We know what’s wrong. We just lack the political will to fix it. Because it’s “not fair”.

Well, of course it’s not fair. But look around you. Look at the universe. Look at history. Whatever made you expect that things would be fair?

Reality isn’t woke.

Standing up to the people who want a unicultural society dominated by themselves

Standing up to the people who want a unicultural society dominated by themselves. By John Cleese.

In response to this from Paul,

John Cleese writes:

In other words, the people who like the idea of a multicultural society must stand up to the people who want a unicultural society dominated by themselves.

The opposite of multiculturalism:

The lies about productivity, regulation, multiculturalism, debt, and carbon dioxide are coming home to roost. in Australia

The lies about productivity, regulation, multiculturalism, debt, and carbon dioxide are coming home to roost in Australia. By Paul Kelly in The Australian.

Don’t think the seventh intergenerational report (IGR) released this week by a confident Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, is about dry technical economics. This document is a political time bomb because it reveals the scale of Australia’s long-run redirection under Labor and signals that the 2028 election will be one of the most polarising and ideological contests in our history. …

What is the Labor plan? It is a double-down on the current Albanese government agenda. If you thought our existing tribulations might provoke a Labor rethink, you could not be more misconceived. Labor’s current policies will be entrenched as the Australian model for future decades, adapting them to a changing world.

While most economic indicators are predicted to improve, the big picture is enshrined over the coming 40 years:

  • slower economic growth
  • permanent budget deficits
  • higher government spending
  • higher personal income tax
  • more emphasis on renewables and net zero
  • strong immigration
  • falling fertility rates
  • an industrial base shaped by services, clean energy
  • AI as a revolutionary technology that delivers a dynamic economy and an eruption in productivity that means enhanced living standards.

Labor believes it has correctly diagnosed the times.

What do right wingers say?

Yet the three parties of the right wing — Liberal, National and One Nation — are embracing a radical agenda that at every major decision point rejects the Labor/Treasury/IGR vision and, indeed, views much of the document as an alarming prophecy of national decline and hardship.

Former treasurer Costello told Inquirer: “The IGR was designed to give a measure of how fairly current generations were treating future generations. When you compare the situation today and the situation in 2002, we are in a far worse position. We have had no increase in real wages for about a decade, our living standards are falling, our productivity is zero, we’ve got demand-driven programs that guarantee higher costs in the future, and the Albanese government produces a report to say how well we are doing.

“This is complacency writ large. The whole idea of the IGR was a call to arms, but this is a laying down of arms. Here’s the critical point. Rather than come up with a plan off the back of this IGR to do something about our economic decline, the essence of this IGR is to assume the problem away. …

“To put the future of the Australian economy into the AI basket is like embracing a cargo cult.”

Labor believes all the lies of the left, and will govern as if they are true.

Two tier justice

Two tier justice.

Lozzy B.:

Attacks against Australians = No Consequences

Attacks against any other race/ culture, ideology = JAIL

 

Lozzy B.

A White English man Del Somerville, 42, was given a 2 year sentence after he threw a plastic bottle.

Meanwhile feral leftists assault & smash Police with sticks & throw dangerous objects at them with no consequences or repercussions at all.

 

Paul:

A brown Muslim racist who spits in a white baby’s face in a pram, walks away free.

A white man throws an empty plastic bottle and says a swear word, gets 2 years jail.

 

Related:

Victoria has become the ‘Criminal’s dream state’

Victoria has become the ‘Criminal’s dream state’. By Eli Greenblatt and Ben Wilmot in The Australian.

Shopping centre property developer Chris Garnaut has labelled Victoria a “criminal’s dream state” after it topped national crime statistics with 263 offences every day.

Mr Garnaut — whose Fawkner Property has a $5bn mall network — says the theft rate is running at the highest ever levels at the group’s shopping centres in Victoria.

And it is making the state, which goes to the polls November 28, uninvestable.

“It is 50 per cent higher in Victoria than in all other states,” he said. “Criminals are not being charged or are immediately let off.

“The worst crime rate is in our Coles and Woolworths supermarkets in Victoria. Victoria is a criminal’s dream state; steal, bash security guards, walk off, don’t get charged, and on the rare occasion the criminal is charged they are not convicted, and if they are on bail, the bail is typically extended,” he said.

The commercial property investor and financial adviser is going on an investment strike. …

Billionaire Solomon Lew says retail crime is the worst he has seen in his 60 years of retailing, remarking he was shocked to see expensive steak in a Coles supermarket stapled with a security tag, while the Woolworths’ head of violence prevention argued Victoria’s weakened anti-retail crime legislation left supermarket staff “exposed to ongoing harassment and violence”.

Why No One Dares to Attack Australia?

Why No One Dares to Attack Australia? By Zhaozhong Observation.

Sort answer: The US Navy.

David Archibald:

I don’t often recommend videos. This bloke is the most popular military commentator on the Chinese internet.

The production quality in terms of the image and video library he is drawing from suggests it is state-directed.

He concludes that it would be difficult for mostly the same reasons that I have.

From the video description:

With such a vast territory and abundant resources …, why has Australia rarely been considered for invasion since the end of World War II?

The answer is far more than just “remote geographical location.” ,,,

From the Battle of the Coral Sea and the ANZUS Security Treaty to the Five Eyes alliance, Pine Valley base, US troop rotation in Darwin, and then to AUKUS and the nuclear submarine program, how has Australia’s security system been formed step by step? …

What has Australia paid for gaining security?

When a country’s intelligence, weapons, military system, and strategic layout become increasingly reliant on allies, how much strategic autonomy does it retain? Australia’s economy is heavily reliant on the Asian market, while its security is deeply intertwined with the United States. What strategic pressures will this “eastward-oriented economy, westward-oriented security” structure bring?

This unique case of Australia reveals an important logic in modern international relations:

hat-tip David Archibald

 

Can the West do Remigration?

Can the West do Remigration? By Douglas Murray in The Free Press.

Can a country allow mass lawbreaking and retain its integrity? For almost any crime you can think of, the answer is no. No country would allow people to walk into another person’s house or let them drive on the wrong side of the road. Yet many politicians behave as if they have no choice when it comes to mass illegal immigration. It appears that even some Republicans are losing their will to deport illegal migrants and reverse the lawbreaking trend.

Their hesitation is understandable, since the public has little stomach for the reality of deportations, and the tactics of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have turned off many would-be supporters. A Gallup poll in June found that the share of Americans who support deportations has fallen to 39 percent from a recent high of 47 percent in 2024, while the share who oppose them has risen from 51 percent to 58 percent. On cue, Republican politicians are distancing themselves from the policy, going well beyond condemnations of the worst ICE excesses. …

Mandate needed first:

Ten years ago …I spoke with politicians across the Western world about the problem, which was already roiling global politics and seemed certain to get worse. One thing struck me: No matter how “right-wing,” “far-right,” or “populist” the politicians I spoke to were, almost none had thought much about how to actually reverse mass migration. …

“How are you going to do it?” I asked. Since there was little policy forthcoming, I sketched out how I saw it happening. On day one of the new policy, federal agents would have to put illegal migrants on buses and start taking them down the country to the ports of origin. By day two, the media would have swarmed all such buses. At least one photo would emerge of a person — perhaps even a family, a woman, a child — crying as they were put on the bus. By day three, there would be protesters, and by day four the political pressure would prompt almost any self-interested government to give up the plan.

There is a moral to this story. In order to follow through, a leader must first earn an electoral mandate to carry out the deportations, devote extensive resources and planning, and prepare to take the heat. …

When Nigel Farage, leader of the UK’s Reform Party, was asked whether he approved of the removal of illegal immigrants from Britain, he dismissed the idea. Only once part of his voter base rebelled did Farage reverse that position. After all, what is the point of voting for a party like Reform, which positions itself as a bulwark against mass immigration and globalization, if it is not going to do what other parties have shrunk from doing? …

Even Trump recognizes that the challenge is immense. “It’s a very difficult thing with the courts,” he said in April 2025, noting how much success detained migrants have in using appeals to delay their removal. On a good day, ICE has managed to deport a maximum of 1,200 people, meaning it would take decades of sustained effort to remove the number of illegals who came in during Joe Biden’s presidency alone….

Uniparty goes for repeated amnesties:

Given these realities, it’s clear why politicians across the political spectrum prefer to embrace amnesty. …

All such policies inadvertently increase the likely flow of illegals in the future by suggesting that lawbreaking will be rewarded …

The people will revolt:

Yet many people in the communities most affected by the wave have begun to demand a firmer response. British villages that are about to be completely overwhelmed by the placement of illegal migrants in their neighborhoods have started holding token “referendums” to declare independence from the UK. This has happened in places like the quintessentially English village of Piddington, which has a population of 350 but is about to have 1,200 male illegal migrants placed down the road.

It is imperative to deport many of these newcomers because in no country has there been any democratic mandate for such population changes. If Joe Biden and Kamala Harris had announced in 2020 that they were about to allow 10 million people to break into America, the presidential election would have swung the other way.

Deporting illegal migrants will also be necessary as long as generous public benefits exist, as they are certain to in every Western country. You can either maintain open borders or a welfare state, but you cannot keep both. In every country in which illegal migration has happened on a large scale, the numbers of arrivals have overwhelmed social housing, social security, and the welfare systems that exist. Where illegal workers have taken up work, they have done so on the black market, undercutting the salaries acceptable to native-born or legal migrant workers. Not long ago, trade unions fiercely opposed illegal immigration on this basis, but in their alliance with the modern left, many have gotten on board with open borders to their members’ detriment. …

Assimilation is the key, but it’s slow:

Immigration can work if the volume is manageable, the speed is moderate, and the people who arrive passionately wish to integrate into the society in question. Absent all three of these things, a society will face either revolt, collapse, or both.

To describe this issue as existential to the West is to understate things. And yet one government after another continues to drop it into the “too difficult to handle” bucket. …

Gloomy prediction:

Nations burdened by mass migration won’t get serious about reversing the trend until the situation gets far worse — when constant low-scale or significant mass-scale atrocities are carried out by people who should not be in the country, and when the hearts of even the softest swing voters begin to harden. Nobody can predict when that day will come. But it will come, and the leaders who failed to address these issues will have to answer to an angry public.

Only the ruling class cannot see it.

Epic reality denying of the Western ruling class

Epic reality denying of the Western ruling class. By Gad Saad.

The West: Why did you commit the terror attack?
Terrorist: My religion dictates it.
The West: So climate change?
Terrorist: No, my religion.
The West: So beard bullying?
Terrorist: No, my religion.
The West: So, violent video games then?
Terrorist: No, my religion.
The West: So, American imperialism then?
Terrorist: No, my religion.
The West: So the Zionist entity forced you to defend yourself?
Terrorist: FFS, it’s MY RELIGION.

Conclusion from the West: Terror attacks stem from a confluence of paleo-botanical-sociocultural-ethnopolitical forces that requires a nuanced analysis. What is absolutely clear though is that this has nothing to do with religion.

Commenters:

Bin Laden :
” I did 9.11, I hate the west and your values”

Leftists:
” It wasn’t you, it was Israel and you are fighting oppression”

Hamas live stream themselves with glee on 7.10:
“I killed ten Jews mom look at the pictures”

Leftists :
“It wasn’t You, it was Israel”

Hamas and Palestinians :
“From the river to the sea”
“Haibar ya yahud”
“We love death and want to be a martyr”

Leftists:
” you are oppressed and just want a state”

Every Time they kill:
“Alla Achbar”

Leftists:
” you are oppressed and just want a state”

Hamas bodycams on 7.10:
” let us kill 10k in the name of *ISLAM*”

Leftists:
” you just want a state”

Hamas kidnapper of Omer Venkart:
“I am planting this explosive here, if IDF will come both of us would be killed. I will go to heaven and you will go to Hell”

Leftists:
“You just want a state”

Hamas:
“Hamas acronym is an ‘Islamic’ resistance movement”

Leftists:
“You just want a state”

Islamic Jihad:
“Our name is literally ‘Islamic Jihad'”

Leftists:
“You just want a state.” …

If I mention anything factual but negative about Islam in comments on news, it’s deleted. It’s willful unbelief per 2 Thess. 2:11-12, “God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.”

The uniparty are dangerous idiots who will get us all killed or conquered.

The writing is on the wall:

 

Government defeats empirical evidence in New Zealand, but all-cause mortality is nonetheless up by 22% since covid vaccination

Government defeats empirical evidence in New Zealand, but all-cause mortality is nonetheless up by 22% since covid vaccination. By Tracey Schubert.

New Zealand’s all-cause mortality is up 22%. This is not a footnote! This is a national emergency that is not being treated as one. This has happened since the “vaccines” were rolled out in February 2021

According to data from Health New Zealand, 85.5% of New Zealanders over the age of 12 were fully “vaccinated” i.e. received two “vaccines” and many more went on to take booster shots. …

Facts from the best-placed whistleblower ever:

Barry Young was a senior Oracle Database Administrator who worked on New Zealand’s COVID Vaccination System. He was the sole administrator of New Zealand’s pay-per-dose vaccination database — meaning he had direct access to the most complete vaccination and mortality data in the country. No one else in the World had this position or opportunity which is why his disclosure is so vital and so important and so significant. …

Young identified sharp clusters of deaths following COVID “vaccination” — statistically impossible to attribute to coincidence. As a data analyst he stated clearly that being vaccinated gave a person a 60% higher chance of dying according to the data he was analysing.

He released anonymised data — with zero personal identifiers — because he believed the public deserved to know. …

The government comes down on him and the media pretends nothing happened:

For this act he was raided by police, arrested, and charged with accessing computer systems for a dishonest purpose. He has pleaded not guilty and his case has now dragged on for over 1000 days of legal proceedings in Wellington District Court.

His Whistleblower hearing was held on December 11-12, 2025 in closed court. Supporters held signs outside thanking him. New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS) attended in solidarity. No Mainstream Media covered it meaningfully!

The Crown’s position is that Young lacked “expert credentials” to qualify as a Whistleblower — despite the fact that he was the person who built and maintained the database containing the evidence. How does this work?

The judge reportedly told the court he wanted to see the data. The Crown gave it to their own expert witness — the one who had previously declared the vaccine “extremely safe.” …

Shuush:

Barry Young attempted to submit his evidence to the COVID-19 Inquiry. His submission was rejected under Section 20 of the Inquiries Act, citing a data injunction.

Think about that carefully. A man with direct access to the Government’s own “vaccination” mortality database was prevented from submitting that evidence to the Government’s own inquiry into COVID. …

So what’s doing all the killing?

New Zealand’s all-cause mortality is up 22% above historical baseline. This is a documented statistical reality. …

The official position is essentially that it remains “under investigation” or is “attributable to various factors” unrelated to “vaccination.”

The main idea of science is that empirical data is a higher source of truth than any authority figure or text — including the Pope, Aristotle, a government, the Bible, the International Panel on Climate Change, Pfizer, etc. All that has been turned on its head by the globalists.

The last fifty years has seen an unscientific revolution in the West, as the power mongering idiot class resumed control after three hundred years, taking us back to the old ways.

hat-tip Scott of the Pacific