Author: David Evans

Tricked us on vaccines

Tricked us on vaccines. By Jeffrey Jaxen at The HighWire.

A single poll of 1,000 people convinced the White House to tell Robert Kennedy Jr. to stop talking about vaccines.

The full results of that same poll were hidden from Trump and his administration. …

The poll and the globalist message:

In December 2025, a Fabrizio poll of 1,000 voters in key House districts was circulated to the White House and picked up wall-to-wall by the New York Times and other outlets, with the message that vaccine skepticism was bad politics and that candidates who questioned childhood vaccine requirements would pay at the ballot box.

Kennedy was told to stand down on vaccines and focus on food. The White House obliged.

The big lie by omission:

What the Daily Caller has now obtained is the rest of the Fabrizio data, from a poll conducted in October 2025 by Trump’s own longtime pollster, that was never released.

The suppressed results show that

  • 73% of voters expressed concern about childhood vaccine mandates,
  • 90% expressed concern about the pharmaceutical industry’s corrupting influence over government, politics, medical research, and news coverage
  • 70% across all political affiliations want vaccine manufacturer blanket immunity lifted.
  • Nearly seven in ten voters want more research into vaccines’ cumulative effect on infants.

The poll that shaped six months of White House vaccine policy told a fraction of the story. The rest was kept from Trump.

Trump finds out, does the right thing:

Against that backdrop, Trump just signed an executive order directing the CDC and ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] to review the scientific assessment and latest clinical data and take appropriate steps to update the childhood and adolescent vaccine schedule, with explicit language requiring that all actions fulfill legal obligations with respect to parental authority, religious freedom, disability accommodations, and equal protection.

Dr. Robert Malone, former ACIP co-chair, describes the order as potentially changing the vaccine debate forever, because the phrase “to the extent permitted by law” restores executive branch authority over vaccination policy and strips ACIP of its de facto rule-making power, confining the committee to an advisory role rather than the policy-setting function it has exercised for decades.

The Massachusetts judge’s stay on the ACIP restructuring had put Kennedy’s reform agenda on ice. This executive order moves around that roadblock.

The majority were tricked into believing vaccine skeptics were a tiny minority of crazies. Uh uh. We are the majority.

There are real doubts about the plethora of childhood vaccines — which in the US rose from 23 doses in 7 shots against 7 diseases in 1980 to 84–88 doses against 18 diseases in 2024.

We all know that children are more sickly today — asthma, autism, allergies, etc etc. — but vaccine manufactures have legal immunity from harming people. Look at the poll numbers above — left and right both want this fixed.

 

The Tragedy of John Cleese

The Tragedy of John Cleese. By anonymous on 4chan, via S.D. Wickett on Burnbrook.

Then:

He was a Progressive, Liberal degenerate in 1960s uber-white uber-polite Britain. He could take the p*** out of the people he saw as uptight and repressed while enjoying the clean, safe streets and quiet little hamlets full of those same uptight, repressed, polite-to-a-fault, helpful, white Christian Englishmen.

The best part was that those same British conservative Anglos were generally pretty humorous about themselves. So, when you made fun of them, they laughed along with you and shook their heads saying ‘Ha! You know, Margie, he’s got a point!’ It was heaven on earth for him, to be a popular counter-culture icon loved by conservatives and liberals alike for being hilarious, but also enjoy the benefits of a strong, stable and homogeneous culture.

Now:

Now, he’s an old man, staring at a desolate wasteland where in London, Britons are now in the minority. Everyone is suspicious, the hamlets and villages are economic dead-zones. Every week, there’s a new group you’re not allowed to make fun of, no one has a sense of humour anymore. Little girls are being sold as sex slaves, women are harassed in the street and the men are suspicious and surly over their lowered living standards.

The sinking realisation that the world he made fun of, but loved more than anything, is gone forever and will never come back.

The horrifying conclusion that his own counter-cultural irreverence may have helped to kill it. So, he impotently gripes on Twitter and wonders where the laughter went, when did the jokes stop? Where are those wonderful, repressed and uptight conservatives?

How the State Became the Enemy of the English People

How the State Became the Enemy of the English People. By Carl Benjamin.

Carl Benjamin is the founder and co-host of the English political and social commentary podcast, The Lotus Eaters, which has a very wide following.

Long, but leading-edge inciteful:

 

There are very few civilizations on earth that have the same opinion as us [Australia] as a Christian heritage civilization. Immigration has brought that home to us very very sharply. Very sharply. In in Britain, we’ve had a decades long problem with Islamic rape gangs which would groom and rape and pimp teenage girls, English girls within the Muslim community.

The Islam communist alliance that is the Green Party. It’s almost naked in how vampiric and predatory that it is. It expressly states that it intends to take resources from the majority white population and funnel them to the Muslim population. …

On why Rupert Lowe:

I’m a member and supporter of Rupert Low and Restore Britain. …

I have joined many people in realizing that Nigel Farage is actually the tail end of the modern paradigm. Nigel Farage doesn’t want to restructure the state. He doesn’t want to he doesn’t concern himself about demographics. He he refuses, in fact, to address the issue of demographics. And he’s on record multiple times saying that this just isn’t a concern of his. He is not going to address these issues. He is just going to try and make the Blair sort of international liberal state function as he thinks it is intended to function.

And I’m sorry, I just don’t think that’s a project that can be redeemed. And even if it could be redeemed, why would we want to redeem it actually? It seems to be uh quite an evil thing that frankly is designed to rob us of our nations. And I just don’t want that. I just don’t want to have my country stolen out from underneath me through legal means. I don’t care if it can be done legally. I just don’t want it done.

Rupert Lowe represents a sensible patriotism in that he is speaking in the old language of duty and hard work and personal sacrifice. I’m sure you saw the video that went around where the the line that really struck out to me was that that fixing this problem is going to be incredibly painful. Yeah. He’s not promising us ease. He’s not promising us wealth. He’s not promising us a good time. He’s promising us that we will fix the problem, but it’s not going to be easy. It’s going to be a lot of labor and it’s going to hurt. And I think he’s right. And I think that’s honestly the only mature way to look at the issue.

[Restore is] already the fourth largest party in Britain. It’s catching up on and it’s overtaken the Conservatives. It’s catching up on the Labour party now….

British people have never once voted in favor of mass immigration and almost every or any immigration at all actually and since the days of Enoch Powell to now every opportunity British people had to vote against immigration They voted in the negative. They did not want it. And yet we have millions of people in our country who really shouldn’t be here and who are against here against our will.

So Rupert Lowe is saying, look, if millions of people who shouldn’t be here have to go, then millions of people who shouldn’t be here must go. That’s that’s a message that’s really resonated with people because you you should just see the state of the place. It is unrecognizable. in many parts unrecognizable. …

Example:

I’ve lived in Swindon for 30 years nearly. And when I moved here, it was just a normal English town. …

The demographic change has been immense. I used to I used to walk through the town center and bump into friends, co-workers, family, and it just be completely normal because everyone lived in the town. Now it’s full of foreigners. And I’m not trying to be mean or prejudicial when I say that. It’s just that is the only accurate way to properly describe what has happened

These are not a single community from one place. I mean if it … was just oh we have an Indian community living in the town now. Well okay fine you know I could get used to Indian customs habits. The English community and the Indian community could develop a relationship. But that’s not what’s happened. What we have instead are like the nomads of globalism where it’s people from everywhere who share nothing in common with each other who are just drifting through our streets and you can’t help wonder … How did you know when you were in Sudan or Bangladesh? How did you know Swindon even existed? How did you find yourself here? And the answer must be that the government has put them here.

It’s only Rupert Lowe who is actually addressing this issue.

Gold to US$17,250 in three years — mining legend Pierre Lassonde

Gold to US$17,250 in three years — mining legend Pierre Lassonde. By Jeremy Szafron at Kitco.

The global financial architecture is undergoing a structural transformation that positions gold to reach $17,250 an ounce as it replaces the U.S. dollar as the “currency of last reserve,” according to mining legend Pierre Lassonde. …

“The total debt in 1981, when Reagan was first elected, was $1 trillion,” Lassonde said. “Today, that’s the amount of money that the U.S. has to pay in interest every year because the total debt is approaching now $40 trillion.” …

With the U.S. budget deficit projected to exceed 7.9% of GDP, Lassonde argued the Federal Reserve is effectively “monetizing the debt and printing dollars,” providing a permanent tailwind for bullion. …

“I reiterate that my $17,250 gold price is as solid as can be,” Lassonde stated. “I’m convinced we will see this in the next… three years.” …

“Gold, 90% of the time is a commodity, but 10% of the time it’s the currency of last resort,” Lassonde explained. “When the dollar doesn’t perform its role as currency of last resort, guess what? Gold takes its place, and that’s what’s happening right now.”

When the ruling class fails politically, you get populism. When it fails to manage the currencies, you get soaring gold prices.

If gold goes up 400% (US$4,300 to US$17,250/oz), the big gold miners will go up 1000%, and well chosen juniors will go up by far more.

Swiss anti-immigration referendum fails

Swiss anti-immigration referendum fails. By Lukas Leuzinger.

Today, Swiss voters rejected a proposal to cap the country’s population at 10 million. Switzerland is home to around nine million people today, and the initiative — launched by the Right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP) — sought to curb immigration in order to keep the population below that threshold. It was defeated, but only narrowly, with support projected at around 45%.

The result is striking. While the SVP is Switzerland’s largest party, it typically wins only around 30% of the vote. The initiative, therefore, appears to have attracted significant backing beyond the party’s own base, despite opposition from every other major political party. …

The fear of damaging Switzerland’s relationship with the EU was the central argument used by opponents of the initiative.

Next time. It’s obvious to everyone which way the tide is changing.

Ilhan Omar vs Elon Musk

Ilhan Omar vs Elon Musk. By Jared Dillian.

I have many more issues with Ilhan Omar being worth $30 million than Elon being worth a trillion.

Why? Because when Elon has more it does not mean anyone else has less, because he is creating new value. But when Ilhan has more the taxpayers of the US — or whoever else her Somali clans are ripping off in Minnesota — have less. It’s a moral thing.

Of course, the real reason the lefties hate Elon is because he freed Twitter from their censorship. If Elon was still nodding along with the woke mob, there would be congratulations from the left that he had become a trillionaire and helped thousands of others become millionaires.

 

Who are you going to believe?

Who are you going to believe? By Leo Kearse:

It’s mad that yesterday a Pakistani man stabbed a 17-year-old girl in the neck in the middle of the street in Britain — and it barely even registered in the news or on social media.

[Video too graphic too embed.]

The frog has been so effectively boiled that it’s just background noise.

People are so indoctrinated that for every person who finds this appalling there are twenty leftists with boilerplate excuses — “white men commit crime too”, “Statistically it’s never been safer!” “It’s because Tories closed the youth clubs” “Stop causing division.” “This is being exploited by the far right.”

 

Elon Musk trillionaire: Are you cerebrating or jealous?

Elon Musk trillionaire: Are you cerebrating or jealous?

Celebration:

If more trillionaires emerge because AI, robots, clean energy, genetic editing, and space access become vastly cheaper and more capable, everyone gains.

Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos, and the Google founders all started companies that sell an economically valuable product. Apple gave us the one device. Amazon built the everything store. Google became the internet’s front door. And as wealthy as those businesses made their founders, we assuredly made out even better. We always do when an entrepreneur builds a business around an innovative technology or a cheaper way to make something people want. Nobel laureate economist William Nordhaus actually ran the math, finding that innovators captured barely 2 percent of the value their inventions threw off across half a century, leaving the other 98 percent to the rest of us. …

In putting together his various companies, Musk has walked a long and rocky road, flirting with bankruptcy more than once and displaying near-supernatural engineering and managerial talents. (As I’ve written before, the largely untold story is how he managed to put together such huge teams of super talented people. I mean, Boeing can’t do that.)

Musk is a once-in-a-millennium piece of human capital, and he’s chosen to use his abilities for good. He should be praised and admired.

Creating millionaires:

SpaceX’s IPO created 4,400 millionaires, according to the New York Times. Critics like Bernie Sanders, AOC, and Elizabeth Warren have created one each — themselves. ..

These aren’t VCs. They’re SpaceX employees, and the list includes welders, technicians, and cafeteria staff, because for two decades the company paid every level of the workforce in stock instead of higher salaries.

Juan Hernandez immigrated from Mexico and took a $28 an hour contractor welding job in 2015. He says he didn’t even know what SpaceX was. The company gave him a $10,000 equity grant and let him buy more shares through payroll deductions. That stake is now worth $880,000.

Trevor Hise’s parents wanted him to take a stable job at General Electric. He picked SpaceX instead, stayed 12 years, and accumulated over 100,000 shares. At the $135 listing price that’s $13.5 million. He’s 37 and semiretired. His words: “The magnitude of this has been ridiculous.”

Jealousy:

 

Gavin Newsom tweets his rage. The FT compares him to a James Bond villain. The Globe and Mail publishes a guide to hating him. All that on the same day. …

Look closely at who’s panicking: it’s never the engineers, the craftsmen, the entrepreneurs, the caregivers, the farmers. It’s the politicians, the editorialists, the bureaucrats, the professional activists.

In short, all those whose job consists of commenting on, taxing, or redistributing the value created by others. Their terror isn’t moral. It’s existential. Consciously or unconsciously, they know one thing they can’t admit to anyone, not even themselves: their public action creates absolutely no net value.

Their entire status rests on a comfortable lie, that of the bureaucratic socialist: “wealth exists by magic, the problem is just to distribute it, and it takes people like us to do it.”

That lie held up as long as wealth creation remained abstract. But Elon is a living counter-example on a planetary scale. A thousand billion dollars created out of nothing, under everyone’s eyes, in real time. Every Starship launch is a public refutation of their worldview. It’s unbearable. Hence the rage. …

What really terrifies them: in the world Elon is building, status is no longer obtained through posturing, degrees, or platforms. It’s obtained by creating something. They’ll have to learn a trade. Develop skills. Produce.

Why jealousy is wrong:

The argument that Elon should be spending his money on “feeding the hungry” is stupid in a country where the federal government spends multi-trillions a year on just that, with dubious results.

It also betrays either a notion, or a lie, based on Musk having a Scrooge McDuck style Money Bin with a trillion dollars in it. In fact, of course, he owns assets that are busy producing useful things, not cash just lying around somewhere going to waste. Most of the people pretending otherwise know better, but hope their listeners don’t. The rest are just imponderably stupid.

People denounce Elon, and many other billionaires, for “greed.” But most self-made billionaires — which is 70% of all billionaires in America — weren’t operating from greed, so much as the desire to build something. That’s certainly true in spades for Elon Musk. Money for him is a tool.

Elon’s critics envy not just his wealth, but his significance. He is doing great things, and they are not, and they really, really need to feel significant. But they aren’t, and it just kills them. The attacks are about trying to assuage that narcissistic wound more than anything.

Back after Apollo 11, Norman Mailer wrote that Apollo was the revenge of the “squares.” The hippies, with their tie-dye and their music and their psychotropic drugs were trying to bring something into being that humans had never achieved. But in fact it was those squares in their short-sleeve dress shirts and skinny ties, with their crewcuts and slide rules, who actually went and did it. It was unforgivable, and the hippies turned their considerable cultural power toward killing it and making it uncool, and they almost succeeded.

Elon Musk Created a Space Program. Democrats Want to Seize It

Elon Musk Created a Space Program. Democrats Want to Seize It. By Daniel Greenfield at Front Page.

The record numbers for the SpaceX IPO led to a massive freakout with Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and every one of their minions posting hysterical messages demanding that the government immediately confiscate all that wealth because ‘trillionaires’ shouldn’t exist. …

Proposals to tax stock value aren’t even normative taxation, they’re simply government confiscation and nationalization….

SpaceX is now a viable space program backed by trillions. It can take the next step into the new frontier that the government that Sanders, Warren, Khanna and the other socialists uphold has failed to do.

Barack Obama had dismantled what was left of our space program to feed money to his backers and assorted grifters promising electric cars and solar panels. What was left of it was turned over to the Russians and we hitched rides on their Soyuz tin cans. We haven’t had anything resembling a space program now in nearly two decades. …

But even before Obama, our space program hit a dead end when the revolutionary men of the Air Force were shoved aside for NASA which after some early successes ossified into a progressive bureaucracy with no interest beyond getting government grants to conduct pointless studies. The Carter Administration and the space Space Shuttle, despite the hype, marked the end of any kind of real space progression.

NASA with the space shuttle was little more than a placeholder. NASA without the shuttle was there to push global warming.

The US Government lost its technical and adventuring mojo decades ago, as it became taken over by progressive arts graduates.

Elon Musk’s companies now do what the US Government would once have done — electric cars, satellite communication, space travel, going to Mars, etc. Elon Musk has emerged as the alternate government in the US — all without taxation!

Elon Musk trillionaire: Leftism is the enemy of humanity

Elon Musk trillionaire: Leftism is the enemy of humanity. By Robby Starbuck.

The immediate attacks by leftists on @elonmusk should make one thing crystal clear to everyone watching: Leftism is the enemy of humanity.

It’s an extinctionist movement that hates excellence and, when carried to its inevitable conclusion, would kill off our species.

Watch the ragtag socialist/commie crew of AOC, Bernie Sanders, Platner, Mamdani, Elizabeth Warren, etc. long enough and you’ll see it clearly. They resent excellence. They’re suspicious of ambition. They demonize our best builders and capital allocators.

If you’re somehow on the fence because you’ve been led to believe that it’s immoral for someone to have a trillion dollars, consider this: They create precisely nothing of value themselves. They’re the professional version of the worthless critic we all know in our own lives.

No innovations. No companies. No major breakthroughs. No employees, aside from staff we’re forced to fund with our tax dollars.

On the other hand, Elon has created over 150,000 high-paying jobs at his companies. That doesn’t count contractors, suppliers or their employees. …

What’s important here?

He’s created tens of thousands of millionaires. His companies changed the car game forever, revolutionized internet access, gave us true free speech online again, helped the blind see, gave autonomy back to disabled people, changed the financial world and will make humanity a spacefaring civilization, which could ultimately save humanity if Earth faces an extinction-level event.

The question they want you asking is whether he has too much money. The question I want you asking is this: What kind of society do you want to live in?

One that celebrates excellence, advances humanity and makes the impossible possible? Or one laden with resentment, where we all need Daddy Government to provide the same shitty but equal standard of barely living for everyone, while choking innovation to death until there are no more rich people left to fund the welfare they promise?

Government or private enterprise?

Elon doesn’t use his wealth to shower himself in abundance. He invests it in advancing humanity.

If we gave the same amount of money to the government, they wouldn’t accomplish half as much as he has. How do I know? Because we’ve already given them trillions for decades. What did we get?

  • Bloated agencies.
  • Failed programs.
  • Generational fraud.
  • Wars.
  • Armies of consultants.
  • DEI.
  • Perpetual wokeness.

A society worth a damn celebrates its best capital allocators. Elon is the best in the business at turning dollars into more dollars by putting them to work in the right places and driving innovation. This uplifts humanity both now and later.

Do we need more government?

If you need someone to demonize as a way to make yourself feel better, then demonize the leftist politicians who do nothing but criticize the most productive, exceptional people in society. These people don’t want you to be successful.

They want you to be the cattle they herd. They want you dependent. They want you weak. They want your livelihood dependent on their hand filling your hand with scraps after they’ve robbed someone else’s.

The sooner everyone understands that, the better. Eventually, you’ll be the one they rob. Or they’ll simply run out of people to rob.

Humanity’s future:

And worse, humanity will stop advancing. Eventually, we won’t even merely survive. Why? Because a cataclysm on Earth isn’t a matter of if. It’s a matter of when.

We’re in an invisible race against time to push humanity into becoming a spacefaring civilization that can save itself before that day comes. Leftism would guarantee our deaths.

The only path for humanity to survive and thrive is to innovate and for us to celebrate and support the creators, builders and innovators who make that possible.

Anyone selling you the lie that those people are the enemy, IS YOUR ACTUAL MORTAL ENEMY.

That’s why leftism must be defeated and the woke mind virus must die.

AI is getting dumber already

AI is getting dumber already. By Nav Toor.

You have noticed it. ChatGPT feels dumber than it used to. Your prompts that worked six months ago produce worse results now. The writing sounds flatter. The ideas sound safer. The internet itself feels like it is shrinking. Every article reads the same. Every email sounds the same. Every answer sounds like it was written by the same voice.

You thought it was you. It is not you.

Researchers at Oxford and Cambridge published a paper in Nature proving what is happening. They call it Model Collapse.

Here is the mechanism in one sentence. AI trained on AI-generated data gets dumber every generation until it forgets what real human data looked like.

The internet is filling with AI-generated content. Blog posts. Articles. Reviews. Comments. Social media. AI companies scrape the internet to train the next generation of models. Which means the next generation of AI is being trained on the output of the current generation.

Each cycle loses information. Not randomly. It loses the rarest, most unusual, most creative parts first. The researchers call these the “tails of the distribution.” The weird ideas. The unexpected perspectives. The things that made the internet feel human. Those disappear first.

What remains is the average. The safe. The expected. The bland.

Then the next generation trains on that. And loses more. And the next generation trains on that. And loses more. The researchers proved this is not a slow decline. Major degradation happens within just a few iterations. Even when some of the original human data is preserved.

They tested it on large language models. On image generators. On statistical models. The pattern was the same every time. The output converges toward a narrow, flattened version of reality that looks nothing like the original data.

The lead researcher put it plainly. “Large language models are like fire. A useful tool. But one that pollutes the environment.” …

The internet you grew up on was built by humans writing things no algorithm would have written. Strange, personal, imperfect, alive. That internet is being diluted. One generation of AI at a time. And the models trained on what remains are learning a smaller and smaller version of the world.

Model Collapse is not a technical problem. It is a cultural one. The thing that made the internet worth reading is the thing that disappears first.

The tails die first. …

Generation 1: the full distribution. Every rare idea. Every unusual perspective.
Generation 5: the edges are gone. Only the middle remains.
Generation 9: a single narrow spike. One voice. One style. One version of reality.

The weird, creative, unexpected parts of human writing are the first things Model Collapse erases. …

No model is immune. Model Collapse is not a bug in one system. It is a property of all systems that train on their own output.

Commenters:

By the way, humans have been doing the same thing for centuries. It’s called groupthink. …

Ironically, your post has the same rhythmic writing style as all the other AI posts on my feed. …

This is a typical AI language. You posted a thread about how dumb AI is getting, being trained by itself while using AI to write about it. Cannot get anymore ironic. Are you a dumb bot? …

The early Internet was wild. Crazy collectives on oddballs on USENET, MUDS, etc. On the early web, you could go down rabbit holes browsing everywhere. Lots was porn, but niche hobbies were everywhere.

Google changed everything. Their link centric algorithm changed everything. For years the Pre-Google Internet provided the link popularity that mattered, but a few generations of content later and the commercial spammed out Internet arrived. BBSes lost to well linked and crawlable sites. And that is what AI was trained on. … The knowledge graph keeps getting bigger and stupider.

When you had to learn HTML by hand to build web pages they were geeky and knowledgeable. They were niche, but knowledgable. … Each model gets dumber over time. Each new model is getting better at some raw technical skills, but dumber.

Alexandra Marshall:

Two young men sitting next to me discussing how they no longer read articles. They skim the AI summary.

So not only are major outlets using AI to write articles. The information AI scrapes for these articles is AI-generated. And then ‘humans’ are only reading the AI summary of the AI slop from AI data.

Do you have any idea how quickly information degrades in this situation? This is a f-ing nightmare for humanity.

UK Government funded ISIS, Russia, criminal gangs, Chinese military, etc. with over Four BILLION pounds per year, 2015 – 2021

UK Government funded ISIS, Russia, criminal gangs, Chinese military, etc. with over Four BILLION pounds per year, 2015 – 2021. By Sophie Church in The Daily Mail.

Britain gave more than £28billion in taxpayer cash to its enemies over six years, a leaked government dossier revealed last night.

Terrorists such as the Islamic State in Syria group, hostile states including Russia and criminal gangs received the vast sum from foreign aid, Covid relief loans and the benefits system, which an expert said was an ‘ATM for terrorists’.

Cabinet Office security officials commissioned the report in 2023 after it emerged that Covid loan schemes had been subject to widespread fraud. …

The report, which has been leaked to The Telegraph, revealed that Britain helped companies linked to the Chinese military pursue their own research between 2015 and 2021.

Much of the misappropriated funds went to criminal gangs, including human traffickers claiming housing benefits and disability allowances. …

The report was compiled by reviewing government grants between 2015 and 2021, consulting academics and think-tanks, and using open-source reporting on foreign aid fraud.

Professor Nicholas Ryder, a former adviser to the Commons home affairs committee and an expert on terrorism funding, said the findings were ‘staggering’, adding: ‘The link between fraud and terrorist financing is very clear.’

Richard Spencer at PJ Media:

The news is as appalling, infuriating, sick-making, inexcusable, and earth-shaking, but one thing it isn’t is surprising. The revelation that one of the chief financiers of the principal forces arrayed against Britain and the West in general is the British government is all too much in keeping with the suicidal leftism we have seen from that government (whether the Tories or Labour are in power) for years now. …

If the British government had really given 28 billion pounds to its enemies, it would have forked over the dough to Tommy Robinson. But instead, the learned solons in London gave the money to their friends. You know, like ISIS. …

Is it really all that shocking that the British government would be handing over taxpayer money to ISIS? This wasn’t just appeasement on the order of “We’ll pay you not to hurt us.” It was an act of self-abnegation of an inferior toward a superior. The British government is filled top to bottom today with people who have grown up on the idea that the native culture is rotten.

Why shouldn’t they hand over the money British citizens have earned to people who are not tainted with Britishness?

I’ll bet USAID did it bigger and better. Btw, have you noticed that right-wingers are doing better in elections all over the world, especially in South America, ever since USAID funding was cut?