Let’s Talk About Fraud. By Sarah Hoyt. We didn’t want to go there, but this is worth considering.
I think there’s massive fraud because, even when machines aren’t used, it’s insecure by design. …
I also think there’s massive fraud when the right wins. I just think the right beat the fraud in those cases. …
Like most — right? — Americans, and because I grew up reading American fiction, I viewed this as “our little flaw” which mostly happened in Chicago and was funny ah ah. And it might have been, mostly, without the added floodgates of Motor Voter. I mean, we know at least one presidential election was stolen before that: JFK’s. But it was the occasional election, not endemic, right?
I thought that until 2012 when I volunteered to poll watch. 1/3 of the people who came in were told that they had already voted. ONE THIRD. I was told in Denver it was 2/3. At least in some precincts. I don’t know if it’s true. I wasn’t there. And people were sent away happy because they were allowed to “provisionally vote.”
They didn’t know the provisional votes aren’t counted unless the election is close enough for them to matter. And the bad votes CANNOT BE GOTTEN OUT.
Fraud? Dear Lord. In 2012 we were already choking on fraud.
There was hope in this though. With all the fraud, the left BARELY squeaked a victory in Colorado. BARELY. And they knew how much fraud was in it, because then they — AGAINST THE RESULTS OF AN ELECTORAL REFERENDUM — instituted “vote by mail” as the default system. The most easily fraudable system. On the excuse of “saving money” which as we all know is the left’s main worry, isn’t it? Fiscal responsibility. Right.
Then came twenty twenty, aka the hokey stick election. And every election more states go vote by mail, which ends up putting more and more states in the “taken over by the puppet masters” camp.
I’m still surprised we got in 2024 and I THINK the only reason we did is that we’d figured out what the fraud was in 2020 and obviated that. …
Why do you think only the Dems do it? Is it just because they are the only party opposing voter ID, which 80%+ of voters want?
First of all, I don’t. It’s the dems and the controlled opposition. But IF THE RIGHT WERE FRAUDING to any significant amount, the press would be on it like flies on sh*t. You know it, I know it, my cat, Havey knows it, and he was never that smart and is now dead.
So the left is mostly fraud. They know it. As hard as they fight against even minor clean ups of elections. THEY KNOW IT. Without the fraud, they’re done. …
2026 involves some new type of fraud:
2026 is clearly a new animal. So, I’m going to tell you what the reasons I have to suspect the fraud was NEXT LEVEL.
First of all, the numbers. … There is no way in fricking heck the Dems pulled a new 10 million voters out of Marx’s dead ass. That’s fricking impossible. Particularly since there have been a number of self-deportations, etc.
Also if true, there is this: The 15% band. Is it true? I don’t know. but one of my friends on the night said that there appeared to be a 15% swing everywhere he was looking.
Because a lot of you aren’t mathematical, let me explain: for the 15% to be a steady band across the country, it would take a miracle. Like, a pigs are flying overhead to winter in FL type of miracle. It’s not possible. Particularly in elections that are local by nature. It’s never that steady. Some places the swing would be 5% or 10% or 2%.
It is however indicative of a PROGRAMMATICAL fraud. i.e. something programmed in. …the thumbprints of a computer program all over it, and prima-facie evidence of tampering.
“In 15 states, every single county shifted blue: 1,304 of 1,304. What are the odds?”
But wait, there’s more. Two very weird things happened in these elections …
The highly unlikely one: the cities reported first. The big machine cities, where they’re finding votes in car trunks for two weeks after? They reported first. That’s enough to make you go “Uh, I wonder”…. Of course, if the fraud was already baked in, they COULD.
The absolutely utterly impossible: the left outperformed the polls. As skewed to the left as the polls are that’s … unlikely. As incapable of shutting up with their incessant signaling as every leftist everyone knows is, that’s impossible. …
Hmmm:
The dems were stealing signs again. I don’t mean retail stealing opponent signs. I mean stealing signs as a coordinated campaign from above.
This is stupid if you’re doing it to influence people. I don’t think that’s how people decide whom to vote for. HOWEVER it is a masterful way to do battle space preparation for fraud. When your guys wins by ONE BAZILLION VOTES people go “Well, I didn’t see any signs for opponents” and it quiets them down. …
The other thing was the “plans” that DataRepublican revealed for the “color revolution” i.e. to strike back at Trump if he declared the results fraudulent AND the revolts and destruction in Europe. [See The US is facing a color revolution designed to overthrow its government next year.]
Look, I recognize patterns when I see them. In 2020 it was the BLM peaceful yet fiery protests. They were never big enough or widespread enough to threaten the country. BUT THEY WERE ENOUGH TO SCARE JUDGES. So that when the blatant fraud was brought before them, they found reasons to refuse the cases.
In 2026, it was the protests in the rest of the west, the attempted coup in Poland, and the threat of doing the same here. … Which means Trump feels his hands are tied on revealing/persecuting the fraud unless it’s in your face obvious. Which it is, but not in ways that are easy to explain to the man on the street who thought 2020 was too opaque to be obvious fraud. …
Conclusion:
My conclusion is that there was fraud. Massive fraud.
Massive, hard to prove fraud, which members of our government are afraid to contest for fear of a revolution/civil war. …
No, I don’t think we can prove fraud. Or at least not right now in a way that the dear little LIVs [low information voters] will get it through their heads. The normalcy bias holds.
More on the signs of fraud here, here, and here.
