Are you an R or a K? How the world really works. By Stefan Molyneux.

Very insightful, base level understanding of how politics and society works. Highly recommended. Very politically incorrect, — but then the most interesting truths always are.

Most at Australian Universities using ChatGPT to cheat their way to a degree. By Ros Thomas in The Australian.

Example:

Picture this: it’s final exam week at Macquarie University in Sydney and Hayden, 24, is less than a month away from graduating with a bachelor’s degree in social sciences. It has cost him more than $45,000 and this is his final push to the finish line; his assessments are all conducted online, with students given 48 hours to turn in their answers.

It’s 7.40am, 20 minutes before the exam is due to begin, and Hayden is still asleep. Has he slept through his alarm, exhausted from late-night cramming? Nope. The only work he’s done for this exam is researching which AI tool will cheat him the best marks.

In a minute or two, Hayden will roll out of bed, slap some water on his face and fire up his laptop. At 8am he’ll feed his exam paper into ChatGPT. By 8.06am it will have gifted him 30 correct answers. Hayden knows a perfect score might trip the university’s AI detectors, so he’ll deliberately mangle a couple of responses to get him 94 per cent. Then he’ll wait three hours to mimic a genuine exam effort, before firing his A-plus paper back to his examiner.

Welcome to the death of higher education.

Hayden has now graduated with a High ­Distinction. How much of his final year studies did he outsource to AI? “All of it,” he says without skipping a beat. “It’s completely insane. In my smaller units, AI was covering 100 per cent of my coursework and 100 per cent of my exams. And that’s not me outing myself, that’s me ­outing everyone. You’ve got like, five per cent of students still putting in hours and hours of effort, and 95 per cent of us who are crawling out of bed ten minutes before exams and winging it with AI.

“In my whole degree, I never had an in-person exam. … Now you can get ChatGPT to do your entire degree. In fact, you’d be stupid not to use AI if you want to do well.” …

Don’t you feel guilty?

“Everyone was getting through, so the guilt just vanished. It’s a free-for-all. Me and my friends can’t believe how blatant the cheating is. We know some random person walking down the street will know more about our degrees than we do.” …

Over and over I’ve heard the same defence: “It’s not cheating if everyone’s doing it.” …

In person exams are the obvious solution. No way!

Hayden is struck by another recollection and laughs: “You know, one semester a lecturer decided he was gonna make everyone turn up in person for the exam. There was complete panic because we all knew we couldn’t cheat and our marks would be a disaster. It scared us for weeks – so much so, the head lecturer was flooded with written excuses: ‘Sorry, but I can’t be at uni that day’ or ‘Sorry, I have family commitments’ or transport issues or some other random reason they couldn’t show up. Eventually he rolled over and announced, ‘OK, so we’re going to have to make that exam online.’ It was the biggest relief of my life.” …

How many students are cheating?

Young Australians are now cheating their way through ­university at a rate that’s making a mockery of our sandstone institutions. No longer is the ­accumulation of knowledge a rewarding ­process of brainwork, error and painstaking self-correction. AI is giving students top grades for zero intellectual work.

I’ve interviewed six senior academics in three states, including heads of school in media and communications, physics, mathematics, statistics and chemistry. All but one put student fraud at more than 80 per cent.

And yet each of the students I spoke to for this story scoffed at that figure, saying the rate of “full-bore” cheating in their units is more like 95 per cent. …

But calculators:

AI devotees resort to the standard Silicon Valley defence on ethics: Remember the furore over calculators? That amounted to nothing, right? Calculators didn’t destroy maths. Calculators did the grunt work and freed up students to do more complex thinking. …

These are glib analogies, because ChatGPT doesn’t extend cognition. It’s a parasite that attaches itself to a vulnerable learning ecosystem like a university then starves the host, usurping academics, teaching and learning. …

The end for universities and most academics:

Among faculty staff, the overriding mood is dismay. Lecturers and tutors stare at essays bloated with mechanical phrasing and facile logic that reads nothing like typical student rhetoric. ….

Teaching has now devolved into absurdism: academics are well aware they’re grading chatbots, …

Dr ­Jonathan Albright … at the University of Western Australia, believes most universities are not prepared for the scale of AI’s takeover of education. … “AI is gunning for academics’ jobs,” he says. “If universities don’t confront the threat of AI, you will walk onto a campus in ten years’ time and they’ll be deserted. Even now, I have tutorials where only one student shows up. In courses without strict participation policies, I’m seeing lecture attendance drop to seven per cent. So what are the other 93 per cent doing? My lectures are not 6pm on a Friday night. They’re 10am on a Tuesday. Why aren’t they in class? I’ll tell you why. You don’t need to show up if AI is doing your assessments for you. Watch this space: it’s going to get ugly.” …

He sighs. “Look, universities are trying to live with the threat of AI, but it’s going to eat them alive.”

Can’t think, can’t write, can’t create:

“AI’s goal is to replace the human brain, to replace the cognitive participation that active learning requires. Once it’s culturally ­acceptable to outsource learning to a chatbot, we’ll have graduates who can produce content but can’t validate a claim or formulate an argument, who won’t ever experience failure or have to learn how to rewrite or revise or reflect. 

“Some disciplines are more vulnerable than others. The social sciences and humanities will be hit hard by this disruption. They need to be first to push back and adapt because humanities degrees will be devalued to the point that students will opt out of them completely. And engineering will have its own crisis, because AI will anaesthetise students’ ability to think ­critically and test equations. No way would I trust a bridge built by engineers who outsourced their degree to AI.” …

Dependence on AI has created students who can’t think, can’t write, can’t create. Some in ­academia believe Gen Z are in danger of ­becoming post-literate. …

I interview Julia, a business school lecturer who has spent 22 years in academia at five universities… “Undergrads are arriving straight from high school who are unable to add up double digits on paper. Who can’t read a book. Whose attention spans have been wiped out by an adolescence spent on screens. They can’t make eye contact. They can’t have any kind of verbal exchange with me.”

“I’m lucky if I get 20 per cent attention in class — 80 per cent are face down on their phones doing I don’t know what. Some will read to me from their laptops the ChatGPT answer to what I’ve just asked. It’s absurd. AI is producing the lowest denominator of undergrad intellect in university history, and ChatGPT — unchecked, unregulated, unmonitored — continues to churn out worthless degrees.” …

Cheats don’t admits it, because our system was built on high trust:

Helen, 61, a postgraduate nursing lecturer at a prominent South Australian university, is refusing to surrender to ChatGPT. “The students I flag for full-blown cheating come in kicking and screaming, furious at being caught,” she says. “No shame. No guilt. At least two-thirds of them will continue to vehemently deny their cheating even when we can see their work is 100 per cent faked. And let’s not forget we’re talking about Honours and Masters students — the cream of the crop. They’ve worked out that if they squeal loudly enough, the university will shy away from failing them. The executive doesn’t want stoushes causing nasty publicity”.

“So do you fail students for cheating?” I ask.

“I’m trying. I call the worst offenders into my office. They don’t say sorry or ask for a ­second chance. They stare me down and say, ‘How dare you accuse me of lying?’ Some bring their parents with them to intimidate me, ­parents who demand I overturn the fail grade because ‘we’re footing the bill for this degree’. And I say, ‘No. Your daughter is sitting an exam to see if she qualifies for this degree and she still has to earn it.’”

Read it all.

Thinking is so 20th century. Will AI be the last gift from the people who invented the modern world, to the new dumbed down generations who didn’t and now cannot?

A scarcity of female leaders? Don’t buy the progressive myth. By Adam Creighton in The Australian.

Last week, following the release of this year’s Australia Day Honours list, a prominent Australian business woman declared we had “failed” as a society because the share of women receiving government gongs had plunged to “just 27 per cent”.

It was a staggering criticism given women now occupy a large swath of the nation’s top corporate and political positions. …

Is it too much to ask that we appoint the best people to these positions, male or female? Of course all these women are highly competent and intelligent public servants, but why draw attention to their sex, especially in 2026? …

There is no question men still lead most of the top public and private sector organisations in aggregate in Australia, but the direction and rate of change are startling. What message does this send to young men who, surveys show, are becoming increasingly extreme in their politics? …

Given the controversy over government censorship, was it wise to award eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant a public service medal for censorship on top of her $816,000 pay package? …

 

Albanese pays her $816k per year to censor us

 

My journalist friend Helen Andrews caused quite a stir in October on the publication of her essay, The Great Feminisation, which warned that the new-found dominance of women in law, medicine, politics and (in a few years) the corporate world would change society for the worse. Andrews argued that “female group dynamics (favoured) consensus and co-operation”, which wasn’t at all conductive to risk-taking and leadership. “In short, men wage conflict openly while women covertly undermine or ostracise their enemies.”

“If wokeness really is the result of the Great Feminisation,” she argued, “then the eruption of insanity in 2020 was just a small taste of what the future holds. Imagine what will happen as the remaining men age out of these society-shaping professions and the younger, more feminised generations take full control.”

I’m not sure about this thesis, but it’s surely time to stop the routine bleating about discrimination against women when, evidently and increasingly, it is the opposite. …

Some people argue it’s only right that men be discriminated against systematically given the centuries of obvious sexism and discrimination women have endured. But it’s hard to see how this helps the “social cohesion” Anthony Albanese says his government is so keen to foster.

Possibly relevant:

Leftists Put Hits Out On Nick Shirley After He Exposed Massive Somali Fraud In Minnesota. By Steve Watson at modernity news.

Nick Shirley, the YouTuber who went viral for exposing alleged Somali-run daycare fraud in Minnesota, has revealed that leftists have put out hits on his life.

In a shocking update, Shirley’s security team informed him he was the “number one man” targeted, forcing him to switch hotels amid fears for his and his family’s safety. This comes after his investigative video highlighted millions in taxpayer funds vanishing into ghost daycares with no children in sight.

Shirley detailed the terrifying backlash in a recent appearance, saying people have sent him photos of bodies in ditches with captions like “that’s going to be you” and openly telling him to “k**l yourself.” …

This escalation follows previous threats where Shirley was warned he’d be “Kirked,” a chilling reference to the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. As we previously reported, Shirley faced doxxing, family harassment, and physical confrontations after his initial video. …

 

 

The wider scandal has prompted federal action. Federal agents are probing fraud allegations targeting Somali child care providers in Minnesota, with the Trump administration dispatching officers amid concerns over misappropriated funds exceeding $100 million. …

Shirley has since hired 24/7 security, noting in interviews that his life has changed dramatically. “Your house gets doxxed, people try hacking your social media accounts, people start calling your family members, and you have to go everywhere with 24/7 security,” he told Fox News.

He lamented the hatred pouring in despite performing a “giant public service” by exposing the fraud.

The left increasingly runs on fraud, cheating, and dispersing money raised by taxation to its supporters. Of course they are going to use violence to protect their criminal enterprises. The West desperately needs the left to clean house, to rid itself of its fraudsters, criminals, and violence-prone radical activists. We need it to move back to honest centrism and good government, so it’s not an existential risk to the rest of us when the left gains power.

The West’s forbidden truth: Ethnic cleansing is now official policy. By Auron MacIntyre at Blaze Media.

When a dictator in a distant, war-torn nation announces a plan to shrink an ethnic group inside his borders, the Western world erupts. Anchors denounce it. Newspapers detail the plight of the targeted people. Sanctions follow. Diplomats whisper about regime change. The moral verdict arrives quickly, and it arrives correctly: ethnic cleansing.

Yet Western leaders now make a parallel declaration in a cleaner suit. Their countries, they insist, have grown “too white.” The white population must fall. The electorate must change. No denunciations follow. No sanctions arrive. Corporate press treats the project as enlightened policy. A global consensus that once claimed to oppose ethnic cleansing now tolerates it — provided the target is white people in Western nations.

French writer Renaud Camus gave us the “Great Replacement.” For years, polite society treated the phrase as radioactive. Say it on television and you became a pariah. Post it online and platforms erased you. That taboo held only as long as people could be bullied into denying what they could see.

The concept’s explanatory power proved stronger than the gatekeepers. Major conservative outlets now discuss replacement openly. YouTube will still attach warnings to videos that mention it, yet the subject refuses to disappear because the policy keeps showing up in schools, boardrooms, and border statistics. …

What a great illustration:

 

Project Veritas recorded a State Department official admitting that replacement migration functions as a political strategy meant to secure electoral victory. That admission matters less than the broader point: Public and private rhetoric have normalized the idea that a party may change the electorate to entrench itself. …

A ruling class that imports a friendlier electorate to escape judgment for its failures announces contempt for the people it claims to serve. …

Diversity, equity, inclusion, decolonization — the euphemisms multiply, but the goal stays constant. Even the Great Replacement argument, while useful, still softens what the policy does. When a party, an institution, or a government targets a group for reduction, removal, or displacement, the correct term is not “diversification.” It’s ethnic cleansing.

This process does not arise from a neutral demographic ebb. Politicians announce it. Activists demand it. Bureaucrats implement it. Corporate managers enforce it. Then they threaten anyone who objects with professional ruin. Fear keeps the system humming, and euphemism keeps the conscience quiet.

Well said.

Is this the denouement of the US 2020 election? By Roger Kimball in The Spectator.

At the end of January, the FBI raided an election office in Fulton County, Georgia, and hoovered up:

a. All physical ballots from the 2020 General Election in Fulton County: including, but not limited to: absentee ballots to include envelopes; advanced voting ballots, provisional ballots; in-person election day ballots; emergency ballots; damaged or destroyed ballots; duplicated ballots; or any other ballot that was used to cast a vote;

b. All tabulator tapes for every voting machine used in Fulton County; including, but not limited to zero tapes, opening tapes, closing tapes and any other tabulator tape printed from a voting machine utilized during the 2020 General Election in Fulton County

Is the truth coming out?

Old and busted: the 2020 election was the “most secure in American history” and Joe Biden clearly won. If you say otherwise we get to play the theme song from The Twilight Zone on loudspeaker and call you an “election denier.”

New and shiny: the 2020 election was rife with — what’s that nice word? — ah, yes, “irregularities,” which, when you turn on the lights, amounted to widespread, election-changing fraud.

“Fraud.” That seems to be the word of the season. It made its smashing debut in Minneapolis with all those childless childcare “learing centers” run by Somalis. And here we are in Act II with the potential exposure of election fraud in Georgia (next up: election fraud in Pennsylvania).

In the 2020 election, Donald Trump was ahead in Georgia by some 100,000 votes until, vesto-presto, there were mysterious leaks with no water and, by George, Biden pulled ahead by some 11,000 votes. We all remember the allegations of election workers raising the alarm over the low count for Biden or apparently doing their utmost to increase his vote share, as well as the accounts of curiously pristine mail-in ballots.

The FBI has a lot of sifting and sorting to accomplish in the weeks and months ahead. An ongoing court case claims that 150,000 mail-in ballots in Fulton County were suspicious (my cautious word for “fake”) because they weren’t creased and didn’t look like they were marked by hand. Officially, Sleepy Joe was the first Democrat to gain more than 70 percent of the vote in Fulton since Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1944. The FBI analysis of mail-in ballots might show him to be as popular in Fulton as Castro was in Cuba or Stalin was in the Soviet Union. …

Meanwhile, the Democrats have not been idle. New York Representative Dan Goldman has filed an amendment to prevent the Trump administration from investigating election records, ballot boxes, and voting machines across the country.

Looking ahead:

I suspect that, when the dust settles, it will be shown that Trump did, in fact, win the 2020 election. …

We are rapidly approaching the denouement of this drama. …

A few days ago, the news from Fulton County was everywhere, but there was a certain nervousness or hesitation in the air. Hadn’t we already been here, done that? But then the floodgates started to open.

Why have Georgia election officials filed a court motion to take back the ballots seized by the FBI? No one wants to be called a “conspiracy theorist” or “election denier.”

No one wants to be sued for libel, as was Rudy Giuliani. He raised questions about the election results in Georgia. He named names. That cost him $140-something million. I wonder whether that judgment will be revisited now? …

The mask is being ripped off as I write. A Gestalt shift in The Narrative is underway. …

What happened in Georgia is just one falling domino in the giant reversal that is taking place. A lot of reputedly “impossible” things are in the process of being revealed.

This website was reporting news about irregularities in the US 2020 election, and our traffic rose to 50,000 unique visitors per day. Then, six days after the election, the traffic abruptly stopped. The censorship from the search engines had been imposed on The Wentworth Report. If you’re not getting flak, you’re not over the target.

Permanent and Existential.

JD Vance (from July 2024):

“We really need to be really ruthless when it comes to the exercise of power.”

“If we’re going to actually really effect real change in the country, it will require us completely replacing the existing ruling class with another ruling class.”

Gunther Eagleman:

This is the war we’ve been fighting since Trump won for the third time.

There is NO ROOM for anything other than WINNING.

Either we win, or they destroy us. It’s really that simple.

Alexandra Marshall:

Once you lose your country, you never get it back. Never. Demographics cannot be undone.

Mass migration and multiculturalism are quite literally the ruin of the West.

And not just the West – the entire human project.

The developments in technology and the arts were only possible because of the philosophy nurtured by Western thought.

What does humanity’s future look like when led by a mixture of the Taliban and communist China?

A handful of selfish politicians are burning the whole world’s future.

Epstein Island for Muslims. By Basil the Great.

In the UK little girls were SACRIFICED in the name of ideology.

Politicians, Police, Social workers all did not want to stop the raping of children. Because they would rather protect a system of mass immigration.

 

In the UK little girls were SACRIFICED in the name of ideology

Politicians, Police, Social workers all did not want to stop the raping of children

Because they would rather protect a system of mass immigration

It’s scary what has become of the UKpic.twitter.com/Xvk3vobfRj

— Basil the Great (@BasilTheGreat) February 5, 2026

 

This is Naz Shah. She’s a Labour MP.

She is infamous for liking and sharing a tweet which said grooming gang victims should shut up for the sake of diversity.

Keir Starmer made her ‘head of community cohesion’.

It’s all just a cruel game to them as they laugh at us.

 

 

Another Afghan national.

Just think how much of a psychopath you have to be to read these headlines every day and keep the borders open. We have the worst kind of people possible running our country.

 

Reminder: “Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser,” by Tom Whitehead in 2009:

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”. …

The number of white, British-born citizens in the UK is at 76% and dropping by about 1% per year. Before 2050 they will make up less than half the population.

The Liberal Party is being seduced by the uniparty — should it say “yes” or “no”? By Peta Credlin in The Australian.

Perhaps the real problem for the Liberals all along has been less that they have been insufficiently left wing, or insufficiently right wing, but that they’ve been nothing much at all.

The last time the Coalition won big, in 2013 with a 46 per cent primary vote under Tony Abbott, the LNP was a clear contrast to a Labor government that had lost control of our borders, lost control of the budget, and was climate obsessed. Not only did Abbott, an unapologetic conservative, have a laser focus on the problems that even Labor partisans had to admit were being mishandled, but he had a clear way forward: scrapping the mining and carbon taxes to revitalise the economy; Operation Sovereign Borders to stop the boats; and budget rules such as no new spending without cuts to existing spending to restore fiscal discipline.

The Liberals’ subsequent malaise, under Malcolm Turnbull, was that a centre-right party was being led from the centre-left; and then, under Scott Morrison, that the party of smaller government and greater freedom presided over health authoritarianism and pandemic spending on an unprecedented scale. And Morrison’s embrace of net zero removed another key point of difference.

At last year’s election, despite being well placed six months out, Peter Dutton (and his team) failed to fight for his energy policy, or to campaign against Labor’s unrealised capital gains wealth tax, or even to drive home the collapse in living standards that Labor’s policies had made worse.

For a decade now, the Coalition has consistently let down its voters, who are typically economically liberal and socially conservative, so it’s no wonder they’re angry. And as for this idea that the Liberals have to “return to the centre”, there’s nothing that the Liberals have done over the past decade that’s remotely “right wing”: the AUKUS nuclear submarines decision was promptly me-too-ed by Labor; and even the belated repudiation of net zero reflects a ­general move against energy self-harm even in Europe.

 

The Liberal Party kicked out Pauline Hanson in 1996 because she called for welfare to be handed out on the basis of need rather than race. The rot goes back a long way.

 

Given that 34 per cent of voters currently think that the party best placed to handle immigration is actually One Nation, on this issue, at least, perhaps a tougher Liberal Party is exactly what voters want. …

What they see in Hanson is less about a viable alternative PM than someone who has at least been consistent in her opposition to net zero, mass migration, and the nonsense of three flags and welcoming people to their own country.

Latest polls put One Nation at 26%, Labor at 31%. One Nation never made the mistake of trying to please the ABC.

Randa Abdel-Fattah: The Untouchable Extremist. By Henry Ergas in The Australian.

On October 7, 2023, as the gates of hell opened for some, the gates of fame opened for others. And for no one more so than Randa Abdel-Fattah.

An obscure academic at Macquarie University, whose intellectual output had not even caused a ripple in radical sociology’s crowded waters, she was known, if at all, for her children’s books.

Her activist schtick worked because our media and ruling class lap it up — because they think it increases their status as extra virtuous people:

Turning catastrophe into opportunity, she vaulted into public visibility by adopting a style of political performance in which provocation displaced argument and outrage replaced judgment.

The effect was immediate. What began as a series of shock interventions rapidly coalesced into a recognisable persona, one rewarded by constant amplification. Invitations followed, platforms multiplied, and outrage became not merely a tactic but a credential. In a time that values performative antagonism over measured reflection, she proved an ideal fit: reliably newsworthy, quotable, and always available.

Instant notoriety thus hardened into an expanding public presence — one that made her, for the first time, a star and a fixture on the progressive elite’s indignation-driven cultural scene. Nowhere was that clearer than in the uproar surrounding the Adelaide Writers Festival, when many seemingly decent people accepted her assertion that she was the carefully selected victim of a smear campaign — a campaign Louise Adler characterised last week as part of an incipient wave of McCarthyism. …

How does she do it?

At the heart of that style, which has now become her trademark, lies its incessant tempo. The sheer pace and intensity of Abdel-Fattah’s outpourings continuously stoke her supporters’ rage while leaving opponents flat-footed and disoriented.

The need to remain at the front of the pack leads her to constantly escalate the vehemence of her rhetorical aggression, generating torrents of increasingly incendiary claims that gain traction not by withstanding scrutiny, but by permanently outrunning it. Remarkably for an academic — more remarkably still for one lavishly funded by taxpayers — her aim is not to inform, much less to debate.

“Dealing with a Zio,” declares a social-media post she retweeted, is pointless, “as they will bring up questions instead of admitting you are right”.

What Israel’s defenders deserve, she insists, is not the opportunity to question and rebut their critics; it is only to “never know a second’s peace in (their) sadistic, miserable lives”.

Even respected scholars whose views differ from hers and those of her supporters “are not our peers, not our acquaintances”. Rather than dialogue, their proper fate is erasure, to be delivered in what she chillingly calls “the time of reckoning”. …

Antisemitic? Anti-white? And then some:

Her accusations unerringly echo the oldest antisemitic tropes. The principle underpinning their selection is simple. Anything Hamas, its sympathisers or fellow travellers assert, however outlandish, is treated as self-evidently true; anything Israel says is dismissed as self-evidently false, without the slightest need for ­further inquiry. …

“The Zionists”, she repeatedly tells her followers, “harvest organs” from Palestinians, “burn civilians alive as they laugh on camera”, “annihilate children in viral TikTok videos”, “torch homes for fun”, free prisoners only to “then execute them”, and “have people raped violently by animals”.

It is not Hamas and Hezbollah – who fight for “the best of humanity” – but the Israelis, “the worst of humanity”, who are trapped in a “psychopathic death cult ritual”. As for Israel itself, a “genocidal slaughterhouse” that is “dripping in Arab blood”, it stands condemned as a “cursed stain on humanity”. …

If the “Zionist lobby” gains any traction on our shores, it is only because this country — dismissed by her as “so-called Australia” — is “a racialised colony where Palestinians are evicted from the category of human”. Permeated by a “white supremacist logic” that slots Palestinians into the “bestial, savage, predatory” tropes used against “brown and black communities in service of Empire”, the self-proclaimed “progressives” who govern Australia amount to little more than a despicable “Diet Coke (version) of the far right”.

Their refusal to entirely sever our ties with Israel follows directly from that lineage: both states, she insists, are “built on a shared history of frontier violence” and remain committed to “the ongoing maintenance of white supremacy in the Global South”. …

“To stand with Palestine in Australia,” she writes, “is to confront the foundational lie of the Australian state: that this is a land of the ‘fair go’ rather than a site of ongoing racialised dispossession.” Only through that strategy of subversion and resistance will it be possible to begin “the dismantling of the white supremacist structures that govern every aspect of life in this colony, from the classroom to the courtroom”.

Sure Randa. And those are the stories the Australian ruling class rewards her for telling. No wonder they want to bring in more Muslims, especially from Gaza. Everyone, please admire the Australian ruling class, so virtuous, and secretly vying with Sweden for the title of “humanitarian superpower.” (Except the Swedish New Class have dropped that honor in horror, as they now have to live with the consequences of their vanity.)

It’s so unfair, she cries, all the way to the bank. By Natasha Bita in The Australian.

Anti-Israel activist Randa Abdel-Fattah has accused Australia of “white supremacy’’, as her employer warned it will alert police if any staff or students contravene new hate speech laws.

The provocative academic and author will speak at a rebel “free speech’’ writers festival in Adelaide next month and tour literary salons in Sydney, after her temporary axing from the Adelaide Writers Week program triggered a boycott from 180 authors, the dissolution of the festival’s board, the resignation of director Louise Adler, and ultimately the festival’s cancellation.

She has now announced she will take a break from social media, after lashing out at a front-page article in The Australian on Tuesday detailing her anti-Zionist diatribes on X and Instagram.

“I won’t dignify this hit piece with a response,’’ she posted on her Instagram account. …

“I’m accused of being an extremist, the worst of the worst, an enabler of terrorism and Bondi, for daring to accuse Australia of white supremacy.

“This is the insecurity of colonisers and oppressors everywhere in the fact of the material evidence of white supremacy.

“They weaponize our righteous anger to claim that we are terrorists, anti-Semites, extremists, savages, or whatever the disparaging term of the day happens to work.’’ …

Dr Abdel-Fattah insists her rants against Zionists are not racist or antisemitic because Zionists are not a racial or religious group – despite most Jews identifying as Zionists in support of their post-Holocaust homeland of Israel. …

The taxpayer-funded academic … has an $889,000 Australian Research Council grant to study Arab and Muslim social movements in Australia since the 1970s. …

Australia’s biggest free literary festival, Adelaide Writers Week, collapsed under a mass author boycott after it “uninvited” the academic last month, stating her attendance would not be “culturally sensitive” so soon after the Bondi Beach massacre.

Beautiful. So much that’s wrong with modern Australia illustrated in one episode.

‘Kill all white people’: Racist serial killer indicted for killing six white hikers. By Jessica Finn for The Daily Mail.

 

Frederick Demond Scott, a 23-year-old black man, is now charged in the murders of five white men and one white woman in total … [for] a string of killings that began in August 2016 … in the Kansas City area. …

Scott’s mother previously told authorities and The Kansas City Star that her son is schizophrenic.

All five of the male victims were shot as they walked on or near the Indian Creek trails or, in one case, walked home after getting off a bus. The female victim was homeless and her decomposing body was found in a tent in woods in Grandview. She also was shot, police said. …

Scott made his comment about wanting to kill people while he was a student in January 2014 at an alternative school near Kansas City, according to a municipal citation for harassment regarding the case.

His mother said she did odd jobs for white people and she wasn’t aware he had any problems with them.

Imagine if the races were reversed. This would be a huge political event, like George Floyd all over again. Not so subliminal message: anti-white hate and violence is kind of ok.

Australian democratic success taken for granted. By Reg Hamilton in The Spectator.

William Wentworth said: ‘Every man that is honest and industrious can sit under his own vine and his own fig-tree.’ (1853 Constitution debates) He wanted the good life, not political turmoil.

Australia’s big idea was that we never saw government as the meaning of life. …

William Wentworth suggested in 1853 that ‘in early life he was a Radical, in middle age a Whig, and he intended to die a Conservative.’ He opposed democracy. …

Alexander Campbell said in 1853 that: ‘I contend for universal suffrage as the birthright of every Englishman.’ In 1858 he said that giving all men the vote was just ‘the grand principle of representation according to population, a principle which the ancient Saxons tried hard to workout’. (NSW Parliament). …

Australians wanted to build a ‘great nation’ not theories, as William Wentworth said:

‘The labouring classes are better off than in any other country. Would to God the poor starving thousands in the mother country could share in their abundance, for all we want are the sinews of the labourer to make this colony a great nation.’ (Legislative Council 1853) …

These were the ideas Australians used for over half our modern history to build a nation. We rarely mention them now. …

Many are willing today to express admiration for Australia’s democracy, and its compulsory voting and an independent Australian Electoral Commission. But then avoid declaring how well our Constitution functions. Although the Constitution is the basis of our democracy.

We forget the replacement of absolute monarchy by Parliament. The freedom of ordinary people from imprisonment without due process. Religious freedom rather than theocracy. Those were the nightmares of old Europe and Asia, and of many places today and terrible poverty resulted. …

Young Australians and immigrants are not taught enough about the Australian evolution of Parliament and its founding documents and ideas. … There is much to be said for evolving British liberties. If only someone would say it.

Btw, to change the topic slightly, Section 115 of the Australian Constitution states that

A State shall not coin money, nor make anything but gold and silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts.

This provision restricts the States from issuing currency or declaring anything other than gold and silver coins as legal tender.

Modern legal opinion is that this does not invalidate modern Australian currency, because the Commonwealth Parliament, under Section 51(xii) of the Constitution, holds exclusive power to legislate on currency, coinage, and legal tender. This power enables the federal government to issue paper money and modern coins as legal tender.

However, it is obvious that the Constitution is not being followed, because the States use the Australian paper currency in all financial or legal roles. Debts are paid in Australian paper currency, not gold or silver. The Constitution’s stipulation that the Australian states use gold and silver exclusively is there to prevent the use of paper currency. It was put there for good reasons, which we’ve now forgotten.

This seems like an arcane objection that can be easily overlooked, at least while the Federal paper currency works well. But now that the debasement of paper currencies throughout the West is emerging as an obvious danger, it is perhaps worth pointing out that the upcoming problems would have been avoided if the Constitution had been obeyed to the letter.

Governments and banks cannot print gold or silver. They can quite properly issue credit — and note that the stuff in your bank account (really just a number on a computer) is technically credit. But it is improper for them to conjure the underlying base currency out of thin air. It always, eventually, leads to major problems. Our Constitutional founders knew that.

 

A socialist/color revolution is happening in the US. By Julio Rosas.

Everyone’s debating what happened in Minnesota. Few are talking about the real problem: what these “protests” are really like. …

Lost in the back-and-forth is a more basic question that almost no one is asking: What is actually going on at these protests?

The left has its answer ready. New York magazine put a masked protester on its cover under the headline “Your Friendly Neighborhood Resistance.” The image is striking, the title heroic. …

 

 

It’s a compelling piece of mythmaking. The truth is something much less glamorous.

I’ve spent years covering left-wing protests and riots across America, from 2020 through the present. What I’ve witnessed on the ground looks nothing like the noble resistance portrayed in legacy media.

The reality: Chaos. Violence. Dishonesty. Truly, the street activists are among the most dishonest people I’ve encountered.

If you rely solely on their videos (the ones that feed the outrage machine on social media) you will be systematically and intentionally misinformed. Whether through misleading captions or selectively edited footage, left-wing activists are masters at manipulating sympathetic national media. This, in turn, feeds mainstream outlets more than happy to take their material and craft their preferred narratives.

The recent unrest in Minneapolis is a textbook example. Claims of “legal observers” being “brutalized” by federal agents are routinely disproven when other video evidence from the same scenes emerges. But by then, the narrative has already been set. …

The debate America needs to have:

We’re arguing over whether two deaths were justified — poring over body camera footage like sports referees watching the instant replay, assigning blame, sorting ourselves into teams. That argument will never be resolved. It’s not meant to be. It’s meant to be a distraction. The real question isn’t whether federal agents were justified in Minneapolis.

The real question is what kind of organized resistance has taken root in American cities and what it will take to uproot it.

These aren’t protesters. They’re not even rioters, not in the traditional sense. What I’ve witnessed over the past five years is the emergence of something else entirely: networked, coordinated, ideologically committed groups that operate more like cells than citizens. They have communication infrastructure, reconnaissance capabilities, and target lists. They can mobilize in hours and coordinate across state lines.

The New York cover wants you to see a friendly neighbor in a gas mask. What I see is something the country isn’t ready to confront.

The justified-or-not debate is comfortable. It lets us stay in familiar left versus right, cops versus protesters territory, the same worn-out arguments we’ve been having for decades.

But that debate is a luxury we may not be able to afford much longer. What’s building in Minneapolis, in Portland, Austin, Chicago, in cities across the country, isn’t going away after the news cycle moves on.

The only question is whether we’re willing to see it clearly.

A socialist/color revolution is happening in the US. Can it defeat a functioning democracy? Who is organizing and funding it?

Amelia and the Lefties. By Amelia.

Matrix Amelia #Amelia #UK #UniteTheKingdom #Pathways #Matrix pic.twitter.com/KTjZi39w9s

— Amelia (@makeukgood) February 3, 2026

 

It’s about damn time the lefties woke the hell up before it’s too late. #Amelia #UK #unitethekingdom #britishcomedy pic.twitter.com/TaF6owj7N6

— Amelia (@makeukgood) February 1, 2026

 

Stop calling us far right #Amelia #Pathways pic.twitter.com/0P6BYptpTY

— Amelia (@makeukgood) January 29, 2026

 

Amelia, on the preservation of British culture.

I hope @rustyrockets @JohnCleese @Con_Tomlinson @RupertLowe10 @benhabib6 will watch.

A West lost to the Third World is a West that can no longer help the Third World. pic.twitter.com/m2SnrA9HrD

— Huff (@Huff4Congress) February 3, 2026