The End of Ideology and the Rise of Ethnic Voting in Britain.
On Thursday, the UK held a by-election in near Manchester in an electorate named Gorton and Denton.
The Green Party’s win was their first-ever in in a Westminster by-election.
Greens, Reform, Labour, Tories, Lib Dems
But it wasn’t really the Greens who won. It was an election fought along ethnic lines, and the Muslims all voted Green (note, not Labour). The Labour Party had held the seat since 1931.
It may not sound like much, but it’s a huge shift in percentage terms with tremendous implications for the British political system.
Notice how the remnants of the British two-party system won less than 28 percent of the vote combined. Labor and the Conservative Party are still ideological parties.
Also note that the Muslim population is 42 percent and the Green Party’s vote, which was projected to be 27 percent just yesterday, turned out to be 40.7 percent. This means that the Green Party is the chosen vehicle of the foreigners in the UK and will rapidly be taken over by them. …
Reform, whether Nigel Farage wants to admit it or not, is the larval form of the White British Party that will either a) accept its destiny to restore an invaded nation [maybe not Reform — the Restore Party may take that role] or b) go the way of the Conservative Party, depending upon whether it embraces the interests of the white British nation or not.
The Conservatives are totally hopeless and worse than useless.
Both the Left and Right are failing to understand that their differences about ideas are no longer relevant. The foreign immigrants in Gorton and Denton don’t care about the ideas of the Green Party anymore than Somali immigrants in Minnesota care about the ideas of the Democratic Party. It’s just a vehicle for them to utilize their numbers and pursue their material interests.
The Age of Ideology is over. This is the Age of Identity, and those who claim not to have one, or not to see them, are irrelevant.
Daniel Hannan in the Daily Mail (a Tory MP):
This is how democracies unravel. …
We are Balkanising our country, moving beyond citizenship as our primary political identifier and instead relating to one another as members of antagonistic tribes whose territories happen to overlap.
The Green Party’s behaviour in the run-up to yesterday’s by-election should place that party beyond the parameters of democratic decency. Divisive, sectarian and ready to stoke Muslim grievances against Israel and India, the former eco-activists have dropped any pretence of appealing to voters as British citizens. … The Greens campaigned largely on two issues: lifting immigration controls and hostility to Israel. …
Does this really need spelling out? No democracy can flourish if its people lack common identity and shared allegiance.
There have been multi-national regimes down the years — the Habsburgs, the Ottomans, the Soviets — but they survived only for as long as they remained autocratic.
The moment their peoples were given the right to choose, they fractured into their component ethnicities.
What is happening here is vastly more toxic. We have moved from being a cohesive nation, in which almost everyone accepted certain norms –- equality before the courts, parliamentary democracy, religious pluralism, free speech –- to one in which we ourselves are teaching groups of our own citizens to be separate and resentful. …
We taught their children that Britain was rapacious, reprehensible and racist. No wonder some of them turned against the country of their birth.
And the Greens? In bed with Islam, but soon to go extinct:
We’ve tried to appeal to people from all kinds of backgrounds,’ said the Greens’ deputy leader, Mothin Ali, when asked about the Urdu video. ‘That’s about inclusivity.’ …
Ali came to national attention when he marked his victory in the 2024 local elections in Leeds by shouting, ‘We will raise the voice of Gaza! We will raise the voice of Palestine! Allahu Akbar!’
On the day of the October 7 abomination, he recorded a clip in which he argued ‘Palestinians have the right to resist occupying forces’ and that everyone should ‘support the right of indigenous people to fight back’. Does he realise, as a second-generation Brit, how dangerous it is to encourage ‘indigenous people to fight back’? …
Why are Leftists playing this game? Do Greens think that their new voters will buy into the rest of their policies? Do they imagine that Manchester Muslims are clamouring for puberty blockers, ‘gender-affirming care’ and the legalisation of all drugs? …
All that unites the eco-loons with the Islamists is a dislike of the West in general and Israel in particular.
Every such alliance has resulted in the first lot, the white Lefties, being swallowed up by the second.
A truism of political science that, as the renowned sociologist Donald L. Horowitz remarked, in a society divided along ethnic lines “the election is a census, and the census is an election”. …
Ethnic pandering is only acceptable to the ruling class when the left do it:
As a national spectacle rather than a local campaign, specific political goals took a backseat to “keeping out Reform”, a party whose perception as one focused on narrow ethnic British interests is the unspoken context of all the Labour and Green rhetoric of “hope against hate” and “unity against division”. This is simply ethnic politics for a political system unwilling to name what it has become. …
The pivot of the election was better understood by Jeremy Corbyn, announcing the need to vote Green to “defeat Reform, defeat the fascists and the racists”, which, translated out of Leftspeak, means parties addressing ethnic British voters and their collective interests as openly as the Greens so effectively did for their own new voters.
In this, given the legal restrictions and political taboos against overt ethnic mobilisation of the British electoral majority, progressives currently possess the upper hand, permitted to engage in open ethnic pandering while condemning the same approach for their Right-wing rivals.
Open borders versus closed borders:
The reshaping of Westminster politics into a battleground between the party of limitless open borders on the one hand, and of mass deportations on the other, will make overt what British political taboos still barely manage to keep implicit. …
Rather than civil war, as darkly hinted at by Danny Kruger should Reform fail to win office, the more likely outcome is simply the formalisation of voting along ethnic lines in highly segregated communities, and the consequent foregrounding of symbolic politics — of flags and monuments and the jealous rivalry over communal space — in areas where the two politically opposing voting blocs about each other.
Britain is leaving the modern world it invented, and regressing back to the Dark Ages. All it took was feminism, lefty virtue signaling, and mass immigration from the third world.
