Epstein Island for Muslims

Epstein Island for Muslims. By Basil the Great.

In the UK little girls were SACRIFICED in the name of ideology.

Politicians, Police, Social workers all did not want to stop the raping of children. Because they would rather protect a system of mass immigration.

 

 

This is Naz Shah. She’s a Labour MP.

She is infamous for liking and sharing a tweet which said grooming gang victims should shut up for the sake of diversity.

Keir Starmer made her ‘head of community cohesion’.

It’s all just a cruel game to them as they laugh at us.

 

 

Another Afghan national.

Just think how much of a psychopath you have to be to read these headlines every day and keep the borders open. We have the worst kind of people possible running our country.

 

Reminder: “Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser,” by Tom Whitehead in 2009:

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”. …

The number of white, British-born citizens in the UK is at 76% and dropping by about 1% per year. Before 2050 they will make up less than half the population.

The Liberal Party is being seduced by the uniparty — should it say “yes” or “no”?

The Liberal Party is being seduced by the uniparty — should it say “yes” or “no”? By Peta Credlin in The Australian.

Perhaps the real problem for the Liberals all along has been less that they have been insufficiently left wing, or insufficiently right wing, but that they’ve been nothing much at all.

The last time the Coalition won big, in 2013 with a 46 per cent primary vote under Tony Abbott, the LNP was a clear contrast to a Labor government that had lost control of our borders, lost control of the budget, and was climate obsessed. Not only did Abbott, an unapologetic conservative, have a laser focus on the problems that even Labor partisans had to admit were being mishandled, but he had a clear way forward: scrapping the mining and carbon taxes to revitalise the economy; Operation Sovereign Borders to stop the boats; and budget rules such as no new spending without cuts to existing spending to restore fiscal discipline.

The Liberals’ subsequent malaise, under Malcolm Turnbull, was that a centre-right party was being led from the centre-left; and then, under Scott Morrison, that the party of smaller government and greater freedom presided over health authoritarianism and pandemic spending on an unprecedented scale. And Morrison’s embrace of net zero removed another key point of difference.

At last year’s election, despite being well placed six months out, Peter Dutton (and his team) failed to fight for his energy policy, or to campaign against Labor’s unrealised capital gains wealth tax, or even to drive home the collapse in living standards that Labor’s policies had made worse.

For a decade now, the Coalition has consistently let down its voters, who are typically economically liberal and socially conservative, so it’s no wonder they’re angry. And as for this idea that the Liberals have to “return to the centre”, there’s nothing that the Liberals have done over the past decade that’s remotely “right wing”: the AUKUS nuclear submarines decision was promptly me-too-ed by Labor; and even the belated repudiation of net zero reflects a ­general move against energy self-harm even in Europe.

 

The Liberal Party kicked out Pauline Hanson in 1996 because she called for welfare to be handed out on the basis of need rather than race. The rot goes back a long way.

 

Given that 34 per cent of voters currently think that the party best placed to handle immigration is actually One Nation, on this issue, at least, perhaps a tougher Liberal Party is exactly what voters want. …

What they see in Hanson is less about a viable alternative PM than someone who has at least been consistent in her opposition to net zero, mass migration, and the nonsense of three flags and welcoming people to their own country.

Latest polls put One Nation at 26%, Labor at 31%. One Nation never made the mistake of trying to please the ABC.

Randa Abdel-Fattah: The Untouchable Extremist

Randa Abdel-Fattah: The Untouchable Extremist. By Henry Ergas in The Australian.

On October 7, 2023, as the gates of hell opened for some, the gates of fame opened for others. And for no one more so than Randa Abdel-Fattah.

An obscure academic at Macquarie University, whose intellectual output had not even caused a ripple in radical sociology’s crowded waters, she was known, if at all, for her children’s books.

Her activist schtick worked because our media and ruling class lap it up — because they think it increases their status as extra virtuous people:

Turning catastrophe into opportunity, she vaulted into public visibility by adopting a style of political performance in which provocation displaced argument and outrage replaced judgment.

The effect was immediate. What began as a series of shock interventions rapidly coalesced into a recognisable persona, one rewarded by constant amplification. Invitations followed, platforms multiplied, and outrage became not merely a tactic but a credential. In a time that values performative antagonism over measured reflection, she proved an ideal fit: reliably newsworthy, quotable, and always available.

Instant notoriety thus hardened into an expanding public presence — one that made her, for the first time, a star and a fixture on the progressive elite’s indignation-driven cultural scene. Nowhere was that clearer than in the uproar surrounding the Adelaide Writers Festival, when many seemingly decent people accepted her assertion that she was the carefully selected victim of a smear campaign — a campaign Louise Adler characterised last week as part of an incipient wave of McCarthyism. …

How does she do it?

At the heart of that style, which has now become her trademark, lies its incessant tempo. The sheer pace and intensity of Abdel-Fattah’s outpourings continuously stoke her supporters’ rage while leaving opponents flat-footed and disoriented.

The need to remain at the front of the pack leads her to constantly escalate the vehemence of her rhetorical aggression, generating torrents of increasingly incendiary claims that gain traction not by withstanding scrutiny, but by permanently outrunning it. Remarkably for an academic — more remarkably still for one lavishly funded by taxpayers — her aim is not to inform, much less to debate.

“Dealing with a Zio,” declares a social-media post she retweeted, is pointless, “as they will bring up questions instead of admitting you are right”.

What Israel’s defenders deserve, she insists, is not the opportunity to question and rebut their critics; it is only to “never know a second’s peace in (their) sadistic, miserable lives”.

Even respected scholars whose views differ from hers and those of her supporters “are not our peers, not our acquaintances”. Rather than dialogue, their proper fate is erasure, to be delivered in what she chillingly calls “the time of reckoning”. …

Antisemitic? Anti-white? And then some:

Her accusations unerringly echo the oldest antisemitic tropes. The principle underpinning their selection is simple. Anything Hamas, its sympathisers or fellow travellers assert, however outlandish, is treated as self-evidently true; anything Israel says is dismissed as self-evidently false, without the slightest need for ­further inquiry. …

“The Zionists”, she repeatedly tells her followers, “harvest organs” from Palestinians, “burn civilians alive as they laugh on camera”, “annihilate children in viral TikTok videos”, “torch homes for fun”, free prisoners only to “then execute them”, and “have people raped violently by animals”.

It is not Hamas and Hezbollah – who fight for “the best of humanity” – but the Israelis, “the worst of humanity”, who are trapped in a “psychopathic death cult ritual”. As for Israel itself, a “genocidal slaughterhouse” that is “dripping in Arab blood”, it stands condemned as a “cursed stain on humanity”. …

If the “Zionist lobby” gains any traction on our shores, it is only because this country — dismissed by her as “so-called Australia” — is “a racialised colony where Palestinians are evicted from the category of human”. Permeated by a “white supremacist logic” that slots Palestinians into the “bestial, savage, predatory” tropes used against “brown and black communities in service of Empire”, the self-proclaimed “progressives” who govern Australia amount to little more than a despicable “Diet Coke (version) of the far right”.

Their refusal to entirely sever our ties with Israel follows directly from that lineage: both states, she insists, are “built on a shared history of frontier violence” and remain committed to “the ongoing maintenance of white supremacy in the Global South”. …

“To stand with Palestine in Australia,” she writes, “is to confront the foundational lie of the Australian state: that this is a land of the ‘fair go’ rather than a site of ongoing racialised dispossession.” Only through that strategy of subversion and resistance will it be possible to begin “the dismantling of the white supremacist structures that govern every aspect of life in this colony, from the classroom to the courtroom”.

Sure Randa. And those are the stories the Australian ruling class rewards her for telling. No wonder they want to bring in more Muslims, especially from Gaza. Everyone, please admire the Australian ruling class, so virtuous, and secretly vying with Sweden for the title of “humanitarian superpower.” (Except the Swedish New Class have dropped that honor in horror, as they now have to live with the consequences of their vanity.)

It’s so unfair, she cries, all the way to the bank. By Natasha Bita in The Australian.

Anti-Israel activist Randa Abdel-Fattah has accused Australia of “white supremacy’’, as her employer warned it will alert police if any staff or students contravene new hate speech laws.

The provocative academic and author will speak at a rebel “free speech’’ writers festival in Adelaide next month and tour literary salons in Sydney, after her temporary axing from the Adelaide Writers Week program triggered a boycott from 180 authors, the dissolution of the festival’s board, the resignation of director Louise Adler, and ultimately the festival’s cancellation.

She has now announced she will take a break from social media, after lashing out at a front-page article in The Australian on Tuesday detailing her anti-Zionist diatribes on X and Instagram.

“I won’t dignify this hit piece with a response,’’ she posted on her Instagram account. …

“I’m accused of being an extremist, the worst of the worst, an enabler of terrorism and Bondi, for daring to accuse Australia of white supremacy.

“This is the insecurity of colonisers and oppressors everywhere in the fact of the material evidence of white supremacy.

“They weaponize our righteous anger to claim that we are terrorists, anti-Semites, extremists, savages, or whatever the disparaging term of the day happens to work.’’ …

Dr Abdel-Fattah insists her rants against Zionists are not racist or antisemitic because Zionists are not a racial or religious group – despite most Jews identifying as Zionists in support of their post-Holocaust homeland of Israel. …

The taxpayer-funded academic … has an $889,000 Australian Research Council grant to study Arab and Muslim social movements in Australia since the 1970s. …

Australia’s biggest free literary festival, Adelaide Writers Week, collapsed under a mass author boycott after it “uninvited” the academic last month, stating her attendance would not be “culturally sensitive” so soon after the Bondi Beach massacre.

Beautiful. So much that’s wrong with modern Australia illustrated in one episode.

‘Kill all white people’: Racist serial killer indicted for killing six white hikers

‘Kill all white people’: Racist serial killer indicted for killing six white hikers. By Jessica Finn for The Daily Mail.

 

Frederick Demond Scott, a 23-year-old black man, is now charged in the murders of five white men and one white woman in total … [for] a string of killings that began in August 2016 … in the Kansas City area. …

Scott’s mother previously told authorities and The Kansas City Star that her son is schizophrenic.

All five of the male victims were shot as they walked on or near the Indian Creek trails or, in one case, walked home after getting off a bus. The female victim was homeless and her decomposing body was found in a tent in woods in Grandview. She also was shot, police said. …

Scott made his comment about wanting to kill people while he was a student in January 2014 at an alternative school near Kansas City, according to a municipal citation for harassment regarding the case.

His mother said she did odd jobs for white people and she wasn’t aware he had any problems with them.

Imagine if the races were reversed. This would be a huge political event, like George Floyd all over again. Not so subliminal message: anti-white hate and violence is kind of ok.

Australian democratic success taken for granted

Australian democratic success taken for granted. By Reg Hamilton in The Spectator.

William Wentworth said: ‘Every man that is honest and industrious can sit under his own vine and his own fig-tree.’ (1853 Constitution debates) He wanted the good life, not political turmoil.

Australia’s big idea was that we never saw government as the meaning of life. …

William Wentworth suggested in 1853 that ‘in early life he was a Radical, in middle age a Whig, and he intended to die a Conservative.’ He opposed democracy. …

Alexander Campbell said in 1853 that: ‘I contend for universal suffrage as the birthright of every Englishman.’ In 1858 he said that giving all men the vote was just ‘the grand principle of representation according to population, a principle which the ancient Saxons tried hard to workout’. (NSW Parliament). …

Australians wanted to build a ‘great nation’ not theories, as William Wentworth said:

‘The labouring classes are better off than in any other country. Would to God the poor starving thousands in the mother country could share in their abundance, for all we want are the sinews of the labourer to make this colony a great nation.’ (Legislative Council 1853) …

These were the ideas Australians used for over half our modern history to build a nation. We rarely mention them now. …

Many are willing today to express admiration for Australia’s democracy, and its compulsory voting and an independent Australian Electoral Commission. But then avoid declaring how well our Constitution functions. Although the Constitution is the basis of our democracy.

We forget the replacement of absolute monarchy by Parliament. The freedom of ordinary people from imprisonment without due process. Religious freedom rather than theocracy. Those were the nightmares of old Europe and Asia, and of many places today and terrible poverty resulted. …

Young Australians and immigrants are not taught enough about the Australian evolution of Parliament and its founding documents and ideas. … There is much to be said for evolving British liberties. If only someone would say it.

Btw, to change the topic slightly, Section 115 of the Australian Constitution states that

A State shall not coin money, nor make anything but gold and silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts.

This provision restricts the States from issuing currency or declaring anything other than gold and silver coins as legal tender.

Modern legal opinion is that this does not invalidate modern Australian currency, because the Commonwealth Parliament, under Section 51(xii) of the Constitution, holds exclusive power to legislate on currency, coinage, and legal tender. This power enables the federal government to issue paper money and modern coins as legal tender.

However, it is obvious that the Constitution is not being followed, because the States use the Australian paper currency in all financial or legal roles. Debts are paid in Australian paper currency, not gold or silver. The Constitution’s stipulation that the Australian states use gold and silver exclusively is there to prevent the use of paper currency. It was put there for good reasons, which we’ve now forgotten.

This seems like an arcane objection that can be easily overlooked, at least while the Federal paper currency works well. But now that the debasement of paper currencies throughout the West is emerging as an obvious danger, it is perhaps worth pointing out that the upcoming problems would have been avoided if the Constitution had been obeyed to the letter.

Governments and banks cannot print gold or silver. They can quite properly issue credit — and note that the stuff in your bank account (really just a number on a computer) is technically credit. But it is improper for them to conjure the underlying base currency out of thin air. It always, eventually, leads to major problems. Our Constitutional founders knew that.

 

A socialist/color revolution is happening in the US

A socialist/color revolution is happening in the US. By Julio Rosas.

Everyone’s debating what happened in Minnesota. Few are talking about the real problem: what these “protests” are really like. …

Lost in the back-and-forth is a more basic question that almost no one is asking: What is actually going on at these protests?

The left has its answer ready. New York magazine put a masked protester on its cover under the headline “Your Friendly Neighborhood Resistance.” The image is striking, the title heroic. …

 

 

It’s a compelling piece of mythmaking. The truth is something much less glamorous.

I’ve spent years covering left-wing protests and riots across America, from 2020 through the present. What I’ve witnessed on the ground looks nothing like the noble resistance portrayed in legacy media.

The reality: Chaos. Violence. Dishonesty. Truly, the street activists are among the most dishonest people I’ve encountered.

If you rely solely on their videos (the ones that feed the outrage machine on social media) you will be systematically and intentionally misinformed. Whether through misleading captions or selectively edited footage, left-wing activists are masters at manipulating sympathetic national media. This, in turn, feeds mainstream outlets more than happy to take their material and craft their preferred narratives.

The recent unrest in Minneapolis is a textbook example. Claims of “legal observers” being “brutalized” by federal agents are routinely disproven when other video evidence from the same scenes emerges. But by then, the narrative has already been set. …

The debate America needs to have:

We’re arguing over whether two deaths were justified — poring over body camera footage like sports referees watching the instant replay, assigning blame, sorting ourselves into teams. That argument will never be resolved. It’s not meant to be. It’s meant to be a distraction. The real question isn’t whether federal agents were justified in Minneapolis.

The real question is what kind of organized resistance has taken root in American cities and what it will take to uproot it.

These aren’t protesters. They’re not even rioters, not in the traditional sense. What I’ve witnessed over the past five years is the emergence of something else entirely: networked, coordinated, ideologically committed groups that operate more like cells than citizens. They have communication infrastructure, reconnaissance capabilities, and target lists. They can mobilize in hours and coordinate across state lines.

The New York cover wants you to see a friendly neighbor in a gas mask. What I see is something the country isn’t ready to confront.

The justified-or-not debate is comfortable. It lets us stay in familiar left versus right, cops versus protesters territory, the same worn-out arguments we’ve been having for decades.

But that debate is a luxury we may not be able to afford much longer. What’s building in Minneapolis, in Portland, Austin, Chicago, in cities across the country, isn’t going away after the news cycle moves on.

The only question is whether we’re willing to see it clearly.

A socialist/color revolution is happening in the US. Can it defeat a functioning democracy? Who is organizing and funding it?

Amelia and the Lefties

Amelia and the Lefties. By Amelia.

 

 

 

 

Censorship in the EU: X is the only hero

Censorship in the EU: X is the only hero. By Eva Vlaardingerbroek.

Thanks to the [House Committee on the Judiciary, Republicans], we now have proof that the EU has been actively censoring legal content that goes against their agenda — and that they interfered in at least 8 European elections … by meeting with social media platforms to pressure them to censor political speech in the days before the vote. …

What kind of political speech did they want to censor, you ask?

– “Populist rhetoric”
– “Anti-government/anti-EU content”
– “Anti-elite” content
– “Political satire”
– “Anti-migrant and Islamophobic content”
– “Anti-refugee content/anti-immigrant sentiment”
– “Anti-LGBTQI content”
– “Meme subculture”

In other words, anything that goes against their agenda, anything remotely right-wing or conservative, and anything pertaining to the disastrous migrant situation we have here in Europe.

And guess what the only platform was that did not cooperate? X, of course. The same platform that the EU is fining for 120 million euros under the DSA and the same platform that is currently having its offices raided in France.

This is the type of stuff over which governments should resign and institutions like the EU should fall. Democracy is dead.

David Archibald:

Do we have to wait for Van der Leyen to die before we see the end of her?

Basil the Great: Starmer hates the only platform that refuses to censor, so the BBC links him to Epstein:

Elon Musk is the one guy we know for an absolute fact DID NOT join Epstein’s club

So why is the BBC using his picture to suggest he was

Because they are shameless propagandists who are part of a co-ordinated attack to convince people that the Government should ban X

Speaking of the lying BBC:

The BBC are determined to re-write history by showing Victorian Britain as a mulitcultural diverse society

But of course the pickpocket was white and the Policeman was black

The BBC truly despise us.

 

hat-tip Stephen Neil, David Archibald

Inquiry: 250k victims of rape gangs in UK, some raped 600 times

Inquiry: 250k victims of rape gangs in UK, some raped 600 times.

Rupert Lowe MP:

Thousands and thousands and thousands of white girls were allowed to be gang-raped by Muslim men EXACTLY because these men were Muslim.

We are seeing it over and over in our inquiry hearings.

Police even deliberately left these girls with their abusers against the desperate pleading from parents.

They did not want to be called racist. They did not want to upset community relations.

It was EVERYWHERE.

Don Keith:

250,000 British girls raped in the last 25 years by predominantly Muslim men.

Sammy Wodehouse:

A remarkable woman has just shared her testimony with us at the Rape Gang Inquiry hearings. It was the first time she has ever spoken out about what happened to her. She was raped as a child by over 600 men and was made pregnant four times by her rapists.

Rupert Lowe MP:

In many cases, the police were complicit in these rapes. I do not say that lightly.

The lack of any desire to investigate these men is criminal. It happened again and again and again.

And yes. It’s mainly because the rapists were Muslims.

Parents pleaded and begged. The police all too often did nothing. Staggeringly, they even suggested the parents work with the rapists, as we heard today. This went on for years, years and years and years. We will be releasing further evidence on this over the coming days.

These children were torn away from their families, through alcohol, drugs, fear or blackmail. They were then raped and abused, on an industrial scale. These rapists knew exactly what they were doing. It’s evil. Pure evil. Turning these children against their families. It is psychological torture.

Honestly I feel sick going over it.

To have that happen to your child must be the most unimaginable pain.

To those parents who have been campaigned so that others don’t go through that same pain? They have my greatest respect.

This was an important topic to start our hearings with, because it’s not just the survivors who have their lives ruined.

It’s entire families. The impact is more brutal than most of us could ever imagine.

We had three parents tell us their unique stories – there are thousands and thousands and thousands of others. It is almost endless, and it absolutely does continue today.

 

How indeed:

hat-tip Stephen Neil

Jeffrey Epstein’s corrupt overclass: How do you purge a ruling elite?

Jeffrey Epstein’s corrupt overclass: How do you purge a ruling elite? By Mary Harrington at UnHerd.

The Epstein horror show has [much] in common with Britain’s rape gang scandal … Both involved the grooming and trafficking of vulnerable girls. Both convened a close-knit network of depraved insiders, some bonded by sexual degeneracy and linked through a host of further personal and economic ties. Both have a way of bubbling to the surface at intervals, triggering horror and disgust, then disappearing off the front pages again.

Both scandals also implicate the entire political regime in which they occurred. By rights, both Rotherham and Epstein ought to be extinction-level events for these respective (in fact, interlocking) regimes. But somehow, public life staggers on. After all, how would we go about purging an entire national ruling class, let alone a transnational billionaire one with a combined net worth greater than many nation states? …

If you booted everyone touched by this corruption from public life, would there even be anyone left? The list of luminaries connected to Epstein reads like a Who’s Who of the overclass….

How deep does the depravity go?

In the public reaction, it’s generally been the sexual depravity that has elicited the most visceral disgust. This is understandable, especially when this comes with a backbeat of still-darker rumours, that shade from sex trafficking into Gothic horror.

Buried amid the files, for example, is one in which a man alleges he was raped by “George Bush 1” and that he witnessed babies dismembered and faeces eaten. Another alleges that Donald Trump witnessed the killing of her newborn baby, whom she birthed aged just 13. Then there’s the video footage of a hysterical Mexican model in Monterrey in 2009, screaming in the street after attending an “elite” party about how “they ate a person”, only to vanish off the face of the Earth that very night. No one knows much about the context, or if it’s even related to Epstein, but especially in the light of the latest revelations it’s doing the conspiracy rounds again.

The Epstein files contain many documents that are unverified, and could be hearsay or libel. High-profile abuse cases sometimes attract fantasists. It is eminently possible that many of the more baroque papers in these millions of documents may be untrue. …

Our ruling globalists:

But what is harder to parse, and yet is arguably more consequential, is the social picture that emerges from these files. Epstein’s emails convey the sense of a world that operates on terms completely alien to those by which normal people live. …

As Epstein’s power increased, he’s revealed as bartering favours, introductions, and insider access in every direction, majordomo for an intricate interpersonal economy of perks and privileges.

Everyone is now trying to make the revelations a scandal for their enemies in particular. But it’s clear that at the level on which Epstein operated, political “sides” are not real….

Money, though, was real, in Epstein’s network; money and influence. In Mandelson’s case, for instance, emails between him and Epstein show him putting pressure on the British government to water down proposed curbs on bankers’ bonuses, in the wake of the financial crash.

Geopolitics is real, but can be transcended if you know how: Sergey Belyakov, a Russian FSB officer, wanted Epstein’s advice on evading sanctions.

Clout is real too: for Wexner, Epstein provided glittery guests. Karp wanted an exclusive golf-club membership. Elon Musk wanted “the wildest party”. Richard Branson wanted the “harem”. Sarah Ferguson wanted a lifestyle she couldn’t afford. The mind recoils from what Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor wanted.

For everyone, their heart’s desire; the thing they will do almost anything to get. Identifying and trading in such desires seems to have been Epstein’s superpower.

But surely this miasma of upscale corruption didn’t touch everyone, or did not taint everyone to the same degree? The insurance mogul Robert Meister, who introduced Epstein to his first billionaire client, told Vanity Fair that the last straw in his mounting dislike of the financier came when Epstein turned up at his house with a bevy of young models, apparently for his sexual entertainment. Meister was, he said, not tempted: he told Epstein to leave and never come back. …

The girls were just an amusing diversion — power was the real game:

For some in this group, raping trafficked children may have been a fun diversion. But the real frisson — and Epstein’s real work — lay in the subtler and more varied trade, in things that money can’t buy.

The nihilistic overclass of transnational kleptocrats and their hangers-on Epstein catered to in this occult marketplace operated, and still operates, at a level where political principle simply does not feature, let alone the moral or spiritual kind. There’s only whatever you want, and whatever strings you are willing or able to pull for someone else, in exchange for it. This was the real feast; those poor violated girls were just the amuse-bouche.

 

 

UPDATE: Stefan Molyneux:

The Epstein files reveal to all but the most ignorant and ideological why governments don’t listen to voters.

They can’t.

They’re mostly held hostage by blackmail….

And:

All the powerful people who enforce morality partied and happily hung with a convicted child sex trafficker … We are ruled over by evil.

And:

The Epstein file release teaches us for the ten millionth time that power not only corrupts, but attracts the most corrupt.

US Civil War 2.0 Has Already Started

US Civil War 2.0 Has Already Started. By Brandon Smith.

Activists are funded by a massive shell game of NGOs hidden behind other NGOs. They are coordinated by hidden online discord servers. They receive their orders and share information in the field through encrypted Signal chats. They are trained in agitation and disruption by anonymous online meet-ups run by covert activist coordinators. They have engaged in violent attacks on ICE agents on hundreds if not thousands of occasions and few of them are ever prosecuted. This is not the behavior of a grassroots protest movement, this is the behavior of an army of covert operatives with special protections.

It’s important to understand that the “protests” are actually a highly coordinated guerrilla campaign. These are not sincere citizens exercising their civil rights. For now their stated motivation is to stop deportations of illegal migrants, but this is just an excuse for their insurgency.

If ICE stopped operations tomorrow, the paid activists would simply fabricate another rationale for tearing the country apart. Placating them will accomplish nothing.

 

 

They are hostile combatants trying to assert dominance and grow their numbers through posturing. Their goal is the destruction of the western world. …

The clear solution would be for the government to shut down hostile NGOs, however, these institutions are protected by corporate personhood and have the same constitutional rights as individual citizens. The process of investigating them and prosecuting them takes time — time we don’t have.

Even if Trump utilized the Insurrection Act and deployed the military, there are not enough troops to lock down more than a handful of US cities. Those people hoping that martial law will resolve the issue are kidding themselves. By extension, leftists stand to gain greater support: Martial law would represent proof to the rest of the world that the administration is indeed “fascist.”

The course of the war will not depend on government intervention, so don’t hold your breath waiting for effective enforcement. The reality is, most activist arrests end with them right back out on the street anyway. Their support apparatus has to be permanently removed, or THEY have to be permanently removed from the equation.

Everything will be decided by regular conservatives. If they organize in large numbers, if they create a funding apparatus to move people and supplies around the country quickly, and if they form proper leadership and training guidelines, then there might be a chance for peace simply by presenting a formidable deterrent. If not, at least the means to put down the insurgency will be available.

If conservatives stay at home and refuse to protect any piece of territory beyond their front gate, they will lose everything. It’s inevitable. The side that wants to win will always have an edge over the side that “just wants to be left alone.”

Protests will continue to spread to other cities using the same model we have seen recently in Minneapolis. NGOs will try to provoke more activist deaths at the hands of federal agents. The more the activists go unchecked by the general public the more emboldened they will become and the more their numbers will grow in the assumption that they are the majority.

In the event that the protests are stalled but the organizations are not crushed, activists will revert to assassinations and Weather Underground-style terror attacks until they demoralize the populace and gather strength again. The bottom line? If the political left is not made to truly FEAR consequences, they will not stop until they get their own Red Terror purge.

The end result is not going to be “balkanization.” That idea might have worked during the pandemic, but at this stage it’s far too late for a national divorce. The leftists will never allow conservatives to live in peace in red states. Letting blue cities rule over entire states of mostly red counties would only legitimize progressive extremists and hurt the conservative cause. This fight is for the entire country, not pieces of it.

It’s also not going to be a war of “factions”. This is prepper SHTF theory nonsense. The lines could not be more defined. The “false left/right paradigm” is a dead remnant of the Ron Paul era. It no longer exists, at least not where the bottom of the pyramid is concerned. The vast majority of progressives and Democrats are onboard with woke extremism. They’re onboard with the purge. They are loyal soldiers of globalism. Unity with them means enslavement.

Leftists, globalists and their allies are not going to discern between MAGA, libertarians and centrists. They will ultimately treat everyone as an enemy worthy of elimination. …

In the end, the fate of the US and western civilization stands on the precarious shoulders of a conservative movement that has the means to fight, but not necessarily the will. They are forever waiting for the perfect Hollywood scenario in which they can defend themselves in good conscience in a fair fight where they are the clear and undeniable “good guy.” They are forever waiting for the perfect moment to rise up — a moment that will never come.

The left are fairly inept at real physical stuff so could be expected to lose a civil war among whites fairly easily. But, for decades the left has been disarming the right (gun bans) and importing an army (third world immigrants).

Thousands and thousands of them. All marching into Spain from Africa. And the Spanish Government is now giving them the right to stay.

 

Play Civil War Games, Win Civil War Prizes

Play Civil War Games, Win Civil War Prizes. By Robert Spencer in PJ Media.

President Donald Trump has just made it clear that he is not going to tolerate any more of this low-grade but escalating insurrection.

“I have instructed Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem,” Trump wrote on Saturday afternoon, “that under no circumstances are we going to participate in various poorly run Democrat Cities with regard to their Protests and/or Riots unless, and until, they ask us for help.”

This apparently means that Trump intends to deny the Democrats what they want most: Trump sending the National Guard to restore order in cities where leftist leaders are using the lack of order as a political weapon, and are salivating at the chance of being able to claim that they’re holding the line for “our democracy” against the fascist Trump and his jackbooted thugs.

That doesn’t mean, however, that Trump is going to leave those cities to drown in the mayhem that leftist leaders are encouraging in order to protect the Democrats’ voter base. He continued: “We will, however, guard, and very powerfully so, any and all Federal Buildings that are being attacked by these highly paid Lunatics, Agitators, and Insurrectionists.”

Yes, that’s right: leftists are in favor of insurrectionists now, because the present insurrection, as opposed to the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection theatre, is real, and being ginned up on their side.

Trump added a pointed warning for future Renee Goods and Alex Prettis: “Please be aware that I have instructed ICE and/or Border Patrol to be very forceful in this protection of Federal Government Property. There will be no spitting in the faces of our Officers, there will be no punching or kicking the headlights of our cars, and there will be no rock or brick throwing at our vehicles, or at our Patriot Warriors. If there is, those people will suffer an equal, or more, consequence.”

It’s likely that if he follows through on that, he would find that doing so was wildly popular. The American people have had quite enough of these rabid ideologues interfering with law enforcement operations on behalf of criminals.

At the same time, the president reminded insurrectionist city leaders of the responsibilities they swore to uphold: “In the meantime, by copy of this Statement, I am informing Local Governments, as I did in Los Angeles when they were rioting at the end of the Biden Term, that you must protect your own State and Local Property. In addition, it is your obligation to also protect our Federal Property, Buildings, Parks, and everything else. We are there to protect Federal Property, only as a back up, in that it is Local and State Responsibility to do so.”

This could be the most important part of Trump’s statement, for it is going out to numerous local officials who have not only been ignoring that responsibility, but actively contravening it for their own short-sighted political ends. In reminding them of which side they are supposed to be on, Trump is once again raising the specter of consequences. Play civil war games, win civil war prizes. …

Think it will have much effect? Nah:

The Democrats will stop at nothing to preserve their illegal voter base.

The left need their army of third worlders to win the upcoming civil war.

To join the upper echelons of the global political class, they must have kompromat on you

To join the upper echelons of the global political class, they must have kompromat on you. By Mark Steyn.

It was my former colleague James Delingpole who first told me that the people who really run the world possessed kompromat on everybody else, and you weren’t allowed to advance into the upper echelons of the global political class unless they had something on you. …

That seems to be as good an explanation as any as to how we wound up with the likes of Biden, Macron, Trudeau, Johnson, etc.

One notes, inter alia, that, with respect to the current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, last week was also the week that the fifth twink dropped. Why every Ukrainian “male model” on the books of Mayfair agencies wants to incinerate Keir Starmer is an interesting question, although evidently not to Fleet Street’s investigative reporters.

Still, Sir Keir’s appetite for Slav lovelies is far from an outlier. Apparently, being the bloke who gave the world Windows 98 doesn’t pull the birds like it used to, so even Bill Gates required assistance from Mr Epstein. We learn from the emails that Bill picked up an “STD” from one of his “Russian girls” and so was anxious to acquire discreetly some antibiotics he could surreptitiously adminster to his wife Melinda just in case she came down with a dose of something. … One begins to understand why the self-appointed Chief Medical Officer to every government on the planet is so anxious to vaccinate the entire globe – a necessary precaution if one is partial to widely travelled “Russian girls”. …

 

 

Among the documents are reports of “an orgy with Tony Blair” — not a phrase I would have thought the English language would ever have need for.

But, if you’re wondering why the British political class are so indifferent to the gang-raped working-class girls of every town up and down England, well, it’s clear from a cursory glance at the Epstein files that our rulers are relaxed about the way of the world: under the new class system, there are those who are pleasured and those who do the pleasuring. …

Jeffrey Epstein’s principal skill appears to have been an ability to identify those in proximity to power with certain vulnerabilities. That is a spook’s talent. The reason to invite them — presidents and prime ministers, royal dukes and crown princesses, ambassadors and vaccination crusaders — to a private island is because presumably it’s wired up the wazoo. It would seem obvious that his life was one big honey-trap operation for an intelligence service: because of the contemptuous references to “goyim” in his emails, the presumption is that it’s Mossad; but it could just as easily be Putin’s lads. …

So perhaps the most disturbing thing would be if it were not an intelligence operation — that, from the Clintons in Chappaqua to the Glücksburgs in Oslo, from the Gates-funded World Health Organisation to Starmer-funded Ukrainian rent-boys, this is just how a depraved and degenerate fin de civilisation ruling class carries on, and whaddaya gonna do about it? The perverts will only be replaced by other perverts.

 

What do you think of Birmingham Cathedral. It’s sh*t, but it’s a nice place to smoke weed.

What do you think of Birmingham Cathedral. It’s sh*t, but it’s a nice place to smoke weed. By Christian Heiens III.

When I visited Birmingham in December 2023, it was like this everywhere.

Third World migrants loitering around, drinking, smoking, and essentially living in the ruins of a civilization they had no part in building and have no respect for.

They know it too. They know they don’t belong there, but they remain anyway because no one has ever told them to leave.

They’re taking advantage of a liberal worldview espoused by the English people who believe their values are the universal default of humanity.

But the ironic tragedy of English liberalism is that it isn’t humanity’s default at all. It’s a particular expression of a specific group of people.

And you can take one look at Birmingham today, with its 40% English population, and see what happens when you divorce liberalism from its particularist origins.

The people whom the British government has imported by the millions over the last 30 years do not share this worldview. They do not see themselves as English. They have no loyalty to England’s history, culture, traditions, or inheritance. They will desecrate centuries-old monuments and cathedrals because they do not see these things as theirs.

And they never will.

 

 

Commenters:

Same thing at the Sacré Cœur in Paris. All black Africans smoking weed and tossing beer bottles onto the ground as they shatter to hooting and hollering. …

This is who open borders leftists defend worldwide, from Birmingham to Minneapolis. This cancer of an ideology must be ripped from power and destroyed if the West wants to survive.

Btw, in 1997, Britain’s economy was larger than China and India combined