Iran Strikes: Day 9

Iran Strikes: Day 9. By Lawrence Person, who does a great job explaining why he presents the military news from Iran:

One reason I do these updates is that the vast majority of MSM reporting is of such poor quality. It’s all government talking heads said this or critics of Trump said that. In other words, lazy reporting crap no one cares about.

Back before American journalists became self-licking ice cream cones, war reporting used to include maps, unit movements, logistics, combat reports from journalists embedded with U.S. units, etc. The BBC still seems to do a little of that, but I’m not seeing that from American outlets, maybe because it’s hard work. They don’t even seem to be bothering to tell ChatGPT to do it for them.

Hence these roundups to fill the gap.

Some excepts from today:

 

To many, it seems like an end-of-days scenario: Qatar and Israel on the same team.

Who would have thought? In September, Israel attacked in Qatar, targeting terrorist leaders the Gulf state was housing. But here we are. After five days of war with Iran, the Iranians have succeeded in putting Israel and Qatar on the same team — to say nothing of the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain, and even Saudi Arabia — all countries targeted over the past five days by Iranian missiles and drones.

By some estimates, Iran has fired more missiles and drones at Gulf states combined than at Israel.

What Iran may have done is something Israel has long struggled to achieve diplomatically: place Israel and several Sunni Arab states on the same side of a regional conflict. By striking the Gulf states directly, Tehran has widened the war in a way that forces governments across the region to reconsider where their interests truly lie.

Aircraft carriers:

Having two aircraft carriers launching strikes at Iran evidently wasn’t enough, as the USS George H. W. Bush is now poised to join the party, joining the USS Abraham Lincoln and the USS Gerald R. Ford. Obviously you need ships named after Republican presidents to win wars. If you had the USS Barack Obama, it could only drop pallets of cash, and the USS Bill Clinton could only hit on underage Iranian girls

You did it first:

Since Iran has hit the oil facilities on Persian gulf nations, Israel hits oil storage facilities near Tehran….

Kurds:

For all the talk of Kurdish forces entering Iran, Trump has said he’s told them not to. But we have numerous reports of Israeli jets hitting targets like IRCG posts along the border and police stations in Iranian Kurdistan.

Etc. etc. See the link.

Iranian Imbroglio

Iranian Imbroglio. By John Carter.

Yet again?

Certainly this has happened before. Trump has bombed Iran’s nuclear research facilities a few months ago, and assassinated the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Commander Qasem Soleimani a few years ago.

 

Low level war been going on for 47 years

 

Every time this kind of thing happens there are panicked shouts that thermonuclear Ragnarok is imminent, alongside outraged cries that Zion Don has betrayed MAGA by engaging in precisely the foreign interventionism that he repudiated, that he has been captured by the Neocohens, and that We Will Not Die For Israel.

In each case, nothing much happened. Iran raised the red flag of revenge, or the gold flag of implacable annihilation, or the black flag of this time we really mean it, all of which amounted in practice to a few rockets being fired ineffectually in Israel’s general direction, to be absorbed by an Iron Dome that really seems to work quite well. There was no World War III. There were no boots on the ground.

Israel?

As I saw someone observe recently, We Will Not Die For Israel has become the groyper version of the Handmaid’s Tale: no one is actually asking anyone to die for Israel; there are no imminent plans for mass conscription; therefore protestations that one will resist a non-existent draft amount to the same kind of lurid masturbatory fantasy as declarations that one would never, pant, allow oneself to be confined in a harem, pant pant, and turned into, pant pant pant, breeding stock.

Maybe that will change. Maybe a year from now I’ll be ruefully eating those words, as American boys are being shipped off by their hundreds of thousands to run around blinded by Russian electronic countermeasures in the cold mountain passes of the Zagros, getting picked off by snipers and shredded by Chinese drones.

But I doubt it. …

None of this should be taken to imply that Israel hasn’t played a massive role in orchestrating and precipitating this war. They clearly have. Marco Rubio let this slip when he admitted that part of the reason the US attacked when they did was that Israel had signalled that they were going to attack with or without America’s blessing or assistance. …

Republicans more sensitive to antisemitism than anti-white prejudice:

Republicans who shrug off open anti-white bigotry systematically directed against America’s core population in essentially all of its universities react with fury to campus anti-Semitism, threatening to withhold funding from any institutions that tolerate hurt Jewish feelings….

Mossad trick or wishful thinking?

There’s an unconfirmed rumour that, as a parting shot, the Mossad wiped the morality police’s databases, so that they no longer had any record of which of their women have a habit of letting their hair down in public. …

How many in Iran hate the Mullahs?

If the reactions of Iranian expatriates living in the West are anything to go by, the Iranian people — particularly the Persians — loathe the mullahs. They’ve been celebrating in the streets, flying the variant of the Iranian flag with the lion instead of the ridiculous Islamic scimitar onion.

But then, is their reaction representative of public opinion in Iran itself? Expats are self-selected to be dissatisfied with their home country; that’s why they’re expats in the first place.

On the other hand, the protests that rocked Tehran in January are certainly indicative of widespread discontent, and one constantly hears that the Iranian people — at least the urban, educated portion — barely tolerate the theocracy. Zoroastrianism is rumoured to be making a comeback amongst Iranian youth, as a repudiation of Islamic mind-control via conscious reconnection with their deep ethnoreligion. …

Iran, like the West, suffers from low fertility, with a Total Fertility Rate of around 1.5. This is probably downstream of Iran’s high rate of female education: well over half of university students are women (peaking at around 70% in the 2010s), and over half of Iranian women enrol in higher education. …

The mullahs are a council of conservative old men holding onto power over a restively bucking youth bulge via the judicious application of welfare with one white-knuckled grip and terror with the other. They are acutely conscious that if their hand grows too heavy they will be overthrown by youngsters who barely tolerate the imposition of religious ideals that they do not share…

Air power alone cannot conquer a country:

So far the war has been entirely an air war, and American air power remains unassailable. On the first day the bombing was conducted with B-2 stealth bombers. Within a few days, Iran’s air defences had been so thoroughly broken that the USAF was able to send in its refurbished WWII-era B-52s, which have giant Las Vegas style neon signs for radar cross sections. Zero American aircraft have been lost. Iran’s skies are American skies, from which America can bomb Iranian facilities at their leisure. The pilots must be enjoying the hell out of themselves. …

Regime change?

The Iranian people may well hate the Iranian regime, but this does not mean that they will rise up against the regime when America and Israel are bombing them. For one thing, the Iranian people already rose up, and were slaughtered. For another, it is one thing to take to the streets during peace time, when one can plausibly claim to be a revolutionary motivated by liberal ideals of humanitarian justice or whatever; it is quite another to take to the streets when the enemy’s munitions are blowing up your country, and the government’s inevitable argument that you are all nothing more than the enemy’s traitorous catspaws will inevitably carry the day. …

So it seems unlikely that the Iranian people will revolt against the Islamic Revolution, at least as long as the bombings continue. The Trump administration seems to tacitly agree: initial declarations that one of the goals was regime change appear to have been quietly dropped, or at least de-emphasized. …

No sign of the much-threatened sleeper agents:

Over the years we’ve heard a lot about Iranian sleeper agents infiltrating the US, ready to sabotage US infrastructure or initiate terrorist attacks. So far none of that has happened …

Oil is already up to $100 a barrel, which is great news for countries whose economies depend on oil exports (such as Canada and Iran, not that it will do Iran much good), but not so great for everyone else. Whether prices rise more and bring on a global recession depends on how long the Straits of Hormuz remain closed. Currently the US Navy is planning to escort tankers through the straits.

UK and Canada out of the loop:

There are rumours that the US is going to try and steal the business of insuring global shipping from the City of London, which has dominated it for centuries. These rumours imply that the one of the advantages enjoyed by Lloyd’s of London was back-channel intelligence connections to the American security state, which have recently been closed.

Certainly America’s erstwhile partners in the United Kingdom appear to have been taken completely by surprise, suggesting that Washington is no longer sharing intelligence with Five Eyes partners it now views as adversarial and compromised by foreign influence. I’m sure that had nothing to do with Westminster inviting the Chinese to build the world’s largest embassy in the heart of their city, or giving away the Chagos Islands and its strategic Indian Ocean airbase to a Chinese client state.

Canada was similarly blindsided, which surely has nothing to do with our parliament being heavily infiltrated by Chinese intelligence, or with our prime minister having announced a ‘strategic partnership’ with the People’s Republic. …

A Eurabian Union will not be a reliable ally, as the sympathies of Muslims will naturally lie in the Dar al-Islam rather than the Dar al-Harb. Already in the Yookay there are mounted Islamic vigilante patrols chasing down Persians protesting in favour of the air strikes. …

Young Americans:

Much of Trump’s base, particularly the younger voters, are furious: they elected him to deport a hundred million people, not to start another pointless desert war for Sheldon Adelson.

Attempts to paint the mullahs as barbaric reprobates for forcing women to wear hijabs, signing off on marriages to 9-year-old girls, or forcing gay men to get sex change operations fall quite flat when young American men are living in the romantic wreckage of MeToo’s male purdah, American schools have been trooning American children for a decade as a matter of government policy, and not a single member of the American elite has been arrested in connection with the Epstein files. Younger voters are in a bad mood in any case due to the economy: however well the stock market is doing, however much manufacturing is reshoring to America, it doesn’t seem to be turning into jobs yet. …

Trump is hogtied at home, but Caesar abroad:

Trump’s mandate was to fix America’s domestic problems, not embark on new foreign adventures. …

Perhaps there’s a domestic upside in this, though. It has not escaped notice that Trump can stride across the globe like Zeus, but is forced into the role of a fiddling Nero when at his burning home, were he’s tied down like Gulliver by a thousand judicial strings, while a recalcitrant GOP sits on his chest, slow-walking his every reform.

Patience with this state of dysfunctional affairs of state has become as thin as the onion-skin paper of an old pocket Bible, and a lot of American voters are carrying that Bible full of enumerated grievances around in their back pockets everywhere they go. If a Caesar is effective abroad, how effective could a Caesar be at home? Many are asking this question. …

Prognosis:

As furious as MAGA is about Iran, it’s worth emphasizing that we’ve been here before. No one wants ‘boots on the ground’, but there’s nothing Americans like more than watching their air force pound the ever-living snot out of someone.

Trump’s style so far has been more gun-boat diplomacy and less hearts-and-minds nation-building. He seems to prefer the punitive expedition to the occupation, and if he holds to that pattern — and, just as importantly, if it does not spin out of control into catastrophe – it’s likely that voters will forget all about it by November, which is forever and a day away in news cycle terms.

It also shouldn’t be forgotten that a huge part of Trump’s base are not angry young radicals who want to burn it all down, but grumpy old boomers with Cold War nostalgia for Top Gun training montages and a chip on their shoulders that’s been itching since 1979. That part of his base is loving the bombardment porn.

Islam conquered Iran (Persia) centuries ago. It would be nice if it were liberated — like Spain in 1490. But that’s very unlikely.

Iran is a religious state, which gives it superpowers?

Iran is a religious state, which gives it superpowers? By Chris Mitchell in The Australian.

Commentators in Australia discuss Iran as a rational state rather than a time capsule of religious ideas. Yet those religious ideas underpin the strategies of the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his predecessor, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini: hatred of Jews, the embrace of martyrdom, and rejection of modernity.

International law:

In Australia, the ABC could not report what was really happening, focused instead on whether various attacks on Iran and its proxies complied with international law.

Why? The national broadcaster appears to abhor Trump and Netanyahu more than it does a state that has financed terror around the world, including antisemitic attacks in Australia last year. …

Resistance:

Key to understanding Iran is the idea of “resistance”, something young Australian students and journalists who think they are speaking truth to power unthinkingly support but only because they have no idea what “resistance” means to an Islamist. …

The Arabic word “muqawama” means resistance. It is both “’the Islamic Republic’s greatest source of resilience — and the engine of its unravelling,” [Times of Israel’s political correspondent Haviv Rettig Gur] argues.

“When used by the leaders of Iran or Hezbollah or Hamas or the Houthis … (it) refers to a sustained, never-ending campaign of violence accompanied by a willingness to absorb catastrophic levels of damage. As the damage sustained to one’s own polity grows, so the sanctity and religious meaning grows with it.”

Sacrifice is the ultimate weapon the weak can use against the powerful. Rettig Gur outlines the role of a Syrian preacher, Izzedine al-Qassam, who died in 1935 as a martyr outside Jenin in the north of the West Bank shouting: “This is Jihad, victory or martyrdom.”

His death sparked the 1935-38 Arab revolt against British rule and is emblematic for Hamas which named its key combat force the Al-Qassam Brigades and its most common rocket the Qassam.

Into this legend 1960s Palestinian intellectuals added Mao’s theory of guerilla warfare: “A militarily inferior force embedded in a sympathetic population could exhaust a technologically superior enemy simply by refusing to be eliminated.” Sound like Hamas in tunnels? …

Rettig Gur argues Hamas and Iran’s Ayatollahs believe: “You do not need to win … You need to make the cost of occupying you unbearable in moral, political and economic terms.” …

But is religious-level resistance ultimately self-defeating?

Like Russian communism, the system contains the seeds of its own destruction.

The educated young of Iran see their rulers enriching themselves while Iran pays for weapons for Iran’s terror proxies.

Iran, with 93 million people, an educated population and enormous natural resources, has a smaller GDP than tiny Israel which has a population of only nine million and few natural resources. This is why Hamas’s October 7 pogrom was timed to disrupt the Abraham Accords negotiation process.

Normalisation of relations between Israel and the Gulf States would be a disaster for the Mullahs: Iran’s domestic protest movement is more interested in a better life than a better martyrdom.

Students chanting “Neither Gaza nor Lebanon – my life for Iran”, and “They take our bread to buy rockets for Lebanon”, know a lot more about real resistance than the keffiyeh-wearing pro-Palestine mobs here each weekend.

Funny how the media never point how how flagrantly the West’s opponents violate “international law.” Somehow “international law” only ever impedes or constrains the West, never it enemies.

NDIS Ghost Towns in Lakemba, Sydney

NDIS Ghost Towns in Lakemba, Sydney. By Pete Z.

1,300 NDIS providers in Lakemba. That’s 1 in every 13 people.

So @DrewPavlou and I went there to see it for ourselves to both Lakemba and Bankstown. The supposed hub of NDIS providers.

Yet when we showed up… almost every single one was a ghost town.

 

 

Curious. This is presumably the video we mentioned earlier here:

Pete visited the infamous NDIS provider with a $250,000 GTR parked out the front and they chased him down the street.

 

Backgrounder on Lakemba:

Religion: Islam is the predominant religion, practiced by 68.3% of the population …

The top ancestries in Lakemba (2021) are Bengali/Bangladeshi (18.7%), Indian (10.7%), and Australian (8.2%), with notable overrepresentation of South Asian and Middle Eastern groups compared to regional averages.

Tony Burke’s electorate.

Backgrounder on the NDIS:

The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is a government-funded program in Australia that provides individualised support to people with permanent and significant disability, enabling them to live more independently and participate in the community.

Fraud in the NDIS is a serious and growing concern, with estimates suggesting up to $6 billion annually may be misused, including by organised crime. Fraud involves intentional deception to gain financial benefit, such as claiming for services not provided, overcharging, using fake identities, or creating “ghost” participants.

Commenters:

Check out Mirrabooka in WA. 1 in 9 NDIS, It’s our Lakemba. Not an Aussie in sight. …

Looks like Middle Eastern Muslim population has the highest disabled people in Australia….

Can you ask them to relocate some to more rural/regions? We can’t get enough funding to cover my transport costs. 100kms of driving.

If this is like the Somali day care ripoffs in Minnesota, the center-left party might be getting donations from the recipients of NDIS money. Just a possibility, but will our media properly investigate? Of course not, they are also of the left.

hat-tip Peter S.

Flying a Union Jack flag branded a ‘tool of hate’, in new document from Keir Starmer’s government

Flying a Union Jack flag branded a ‘tool of hate’, in new document from Keir Starmer’s government. By Robert Folker in The Daily Mail.

Flying English, Scottish and Union Jack flags has been branded ‘tools of hate’ in a leaked draft of the Government’s new social cohesion strategy.

Oli London:

The 47 page document has said the British, English and Scottish flags can be used as ‘hate’ symbols.

The document says the ‘extreme right has tried to turn symbols of pride into tools of hate’ and the flags have been used by the ‘extreme right’ to ‘exclude or intimidate.’

John Cleese:

I would like to point out that Starmer has now managed to alienate the extreme centre.

His plans for the evisceration of English culture will be outlined in a new Labour publication called ‘Der Starmer’

Winston Churchill:

Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. …

When Muslims are in the minority they are very concerned with minority rights, when they are in the majority there are no minority rights.

 

Keir Starmer:

“Muslims are the face of modern Britain”

 

Progress! More progress to come!

Maoris say “No!” to Islamic immigration

Maoris say “No!” to Islamic immigration. By Wolf.

In New Zealand, native Māoris protest against Islamic immigration and destroy the jihadist flag while performing the traditional Haka.

“New Zealand is Christian. Muslims are not welcome here!”

 

 

Amazingly enough, this wasn’t reported in the legacy media (except the India Herald), despite being both surprising and illustrated by great video.

Hastie the first to confess the uniparty erred on immigration and monetary expansion

Hastie the first to confess the uniparty erred on immigration and monetary expansion. By Robert Gottliebsen in The Australian.

Andrew Hastie has become the first among the Liberal and ALP ranks to confess that two fundamental mistakes made by both parties triggered the rapid rise in support for One Nation.

Hastie correctly confesses that both parties set immigration numbers that were too high and also allowed migrant standards to be too low.

And two decades of expansionary monetary policy and cheap debt had boosted housing prices and encouraged huge public sector spending over successive terms of government. He says that people now believe the system is broken and are blaming the major parties.

Two more mistakes, as yet only highlighted by One Nation:

But in my view, the major parties are still making two other fundamental mistakes. Firstly, the parties dismantled our refining and fuel storage systems because they could save money by relying too much on Singapore, which in turn ties Australia to the Strait of Hormuz which the US has yet to reopen. Our past major party political foolishness makes us very vulnerable to what is happening in the Middle East.

Secondly, no senior ALP or Liberal Party Canberra politician has called out what is arguably the biggest infrastructure construction disaster in our history, the $40bn Snowy 2.0 project. Snowy 2.0 has the potential to lock Australia into high-cost electricity systems for decades ahead and destroy huge areas of prime agriculture.

And at this point, dangerously for the major parties, only One Nation has isolated the Snowy 2.0 mistake and is putting forward serious answers.

As I pointed out last month, the Liberals thought up the Snowy 2.0 project but the ALP implemented it in the knowledge of its cost and horrific impact on our agriculture. The project involves around 2000 towers often 60 to 70 metres high on prime agricultural land. One Nation declares that we must stop putting towers on agricultural land and those erecting towers must set aside money for their demolition. In the Farrer by-election, with a farmer as a candidate, she will no doubt campaign on the disaster which is set to have a severe impact on farmers in the Riverina section of the Farrer electorate. One Nation also plans more irrigation water for farmers. …

Like Trump, because the same reasons apply in Australia:

Hanson may have policies and they are controversial and many of the cost savings are similar to those of Donald Trump. But they are on the table.

Hastie, of course, wants the Liberal Party to leave the Uniparty and go back to its role as a true center-right party, championing the constrained or tragic view.

Goodbye, Unconventional Pronouns

Goodbye, Unconventional Pronouns. By Christian Toto in Hollywood in Toto.

The cultural winds are shifting in Tinsel Town. Turns out a movie or TV show set is no place for a prima donna or someone who demands special treatment — think unconventional pronouns.

“Anybody who creates any of that kind of energy, it becomes problematic,” [comedian Bryan Callen from MADtv] explained. “When Hollywood hired all those DEI officers, movies started losing money.”

And, as a result, many were “quietly fired,” he said. That was then, albeit a few short years ago. The professional climate today is different, he explained.

“Now, the minute you apply for a job in Hollywood … if you wanna work on the set, if you put your pronouns down [on your resume], you ain’t getting the job.

Nobody wants to deal with that maintenance,” he said. “I’ve been in those rooms [where decisions are made]. ‘Nope, I don’t wanna do any of that pronoun stuff.’”

“You can’t afford to have somebody sue or make a scene,” he added. “You’re dealing with too much money. You got 23 days to shoot this thing … nobody wants that [drama].”

Another virtue signaling fad has done its job of making the special people seem morally superior, but it’s past time to retire it now — it’s not special anymore, now that too many people are doing it.

The special people have are now waving Iranian flags and mourning Iran’s mullahs, because supporting your country’s opponents always sets you apart as special.

Why Nobody Was Fat in 1970s America

Why Nobody Was Fat in 1970s America.

Ditto Australia. Though our enameled stoves and fridges were always white (“whitegoods”), not olive green or whatever.

UPDATE:

 

Andrew Hastie’s recipe for beating One Nation

Andrew Hastie’s recipe for beating One Nation. By Tom Rabe in The Financial Review.

Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Perth on Friday, the opposition industry spokesman lamented that the “emotional vibe” of Australians was being shaped by anxiety, stress and loneliness as online networks disrupt local institutions.

Their anger is smouldering when you talk to them in person, but it’s breaking out like wildfire online when people have the freedom to post what’s really on their mind. The system is not working for Australians, and they are blaming the uni-party: the Liberals and Labor,” Hastie said, in notes of the speech provided to AFR Weekend.

“That’s why One Nation, the teals and the Greens have risen in prominence: have acknowledged that the system is broken … I think it’s time that we did the same thing. That we acknowledged that we got it wrong, that the system needs a massive overhaul.”

The former Special Air Services captain said immigration levels were too high, placing unnecessary strain on Australian infrastructure and essential services, fuelling inflation and pushing up housing prices.

It’s true: immigration numbers are too high, while the standards are too low … That’s why people are angry,” he said. …

Hastie said almost two decades of expansionary monetary policy and cheap debt had not only helped propel the housing market skyward, it had encouraged huge public sector spending over successive terms of government.

“Here’s the hard truth: when you spike the punch, you wake up with a bad hangover, and the Australian people are now bearing the cost of loose monetary policy, as inflation under the Albanese government punishes their living standards,” he said. …

He said centralised control had outsourced decision-making to unelected officials responsible for much of Australia’s fiscal policy.

Hastie also called out the grassroots of the centre-right, people he believes have adopted the cancel culture of the left.

 

(Facebook videos don’t come size-adjustable. Ugh.)

Right v. Left: the Constrained Vision versus the Unconstrained Vision

Right v. Left: the Constrained Vision versus the Unconstrained Vision. By Emile Phaneuf.

Why do beliefs cluster the way they do?

If someone believes that only police and military should have guns, why is that person also likely to support socialized healthcare and a government-imposed minimum wage, and be unsupportive of school vouchers? In his 1987 book A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles, economist Thomas Sowell put forth two conflicting visions of man that he believes explain many of the underlying reasons for the clustering of beliefs.

In what he terms the “constrained vision,” man is by nature flawed, selfish, and limited.  Under the constrained vision, man seeks to deal with his flaws and excesses by establishing institutions of restraint: the separation of powers, constitutions, etc. Those who employ the constrained vision see abuses of power by leaders like Napoleon Bonaparte as inevitable. For this reason, limitations must be placed on power and on the institutions themselves so that it is more difficult for any individual to abuse them. The idea is to decentralize power so that man’s flaws are not catastrophic.

The “unconstrained vision,” by contrast, sees abuses of power as being caused by not having chosen the right leaders or established the right kinds of institutions. “Implicit,” writes Sowell, “is the notion that the potential is very different from the actual, and that means exist to improve human nature toward its potential, or that such means can be evolved or discovered, so that man will do the right thing for the right reason rather than for ulterior psychic or economic rewards.” And central to the unconstrained vision is the notion that human beings are highly malleable; they can be trained in the service of some ideal.

Steven Pinker’s 2002 book The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature builds on much of Sowell’s work. He refers to Sowell’s constrained and unconstrained visions as the “tragic” and “utopian visions,” respectively. Pinker argues that much of the Unconstrained Vision is rooted in the false belief that individuals are born with no pre-programmed software (or innate human nature). This blank slate (or tabula rasa) belief, Pinker claims, was often based on good intentions; after all, if we are born equal in every way, this could also eradicate social and economic concepts of inequality, but the problem is that human behavioral sciences have already demonstrated that the human mind does, in fact, come with certain innate biological programming, which is unique for every individual. …

None of this is to say that a given person cannot hold political beliefs characterized by both visions, as is often the case.

Obviously the unconstrained vision is leftist idealism (really fantasies the left use to manipulate their way to power), while those on the right believe the more realistic constrained vision.

The uniparty buys into the unconstrained vision, and in recent decades here in Australia we have seen the center right party, the Liberals, adopt much of the unconstrained vision.

Last night at the Perth CPAC I heard Andrew Hastie argue that the Liberal Party should abandon the unconstrained vision, and move back to being the champion of the constrained vision. Very impressive! He was light years ahead of the primitive exhortations of the other two Liberal politicians who spoke.

 

Surprisingly thoughtful, delivered a meaty speech that proposed a successful path forward for the Liberal Party

 

A bit more on the two visions:

Constrained Vision

A worldview rooted in the belief that human nature is inherently flawed, self-interested, and limited in wisdom and virtue. This vision, also referred to as the “tragic vision,” holds that these limitations are unchangeable and thus must be managed through institutional structures rather than attempted moral or social transformation.

Key characteristics of the constrained vision include:

  • Human Nature: People are naturally self-interested and prone to error; moral improvement is not easily achievable through societal design.
  • Institutions Over Individuals: Trust is placed in time-tested systems like the rule of law, tradition, markets, and constitutional constraints to manage human flaws.
  • Procedural Justice: Emphasis is on fair processes and equal opportunity, not guaranteed equal outcomes.
  • Spontaneous Order: Belief that complex social systems—like markets—evolve organically and are more effective than top-down planning.
  • Skepticism of Power: Deep caution toward concentrated authority; checks and balances are essential to prevent abuse by leaders or elites.
  • Trade-Offs Over Solutions: Acceptance that all policies involve trade-offs; the goal is to minimize harm and maximize stability rather than achieve perfection.

Prominent thinkers associated with this vision include Adam Smith, Edmund Burke, Alexander Hamilton, Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman, and Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. The constrained vision underpins much of classical liberal and conservative political thought, emphasizing empirical evidence, decentralization, and incremental change over radical reform.

Unconstrained Vision

A worldview that sees human nature as malleable and perfectible, believing that people can be guided toward moral and intellectual excellence through education, reason, and enlightened leadership. This vision, also referred to as the “utopian vision,” holds that societal problems stem not from inherent human flaws, but from flawed institutions, unjust systems, or inadequate policies. Advocates of the unconstrained vision trust in expert-driven, top-down solutions and believe that complex social issues — like poverty, inequality, or war — can be eradicated through rational planning and deliberate reform.

Key characteristics include:

  • Belief in the potential for human improvement and the idea that people are fundamentally good.
  • Disbelief in the inevitability of conflict, trade-offs, or systemic limitations.
  • Preference for centralized decision-making by knowledgeable elites or experts.
  • Emphasis on equal outcomes rather than equal rules.
  • Faith in articulated rationality and abstract moral ideals over tradition or spontaneous order.
  • View of institutions as problems to be redesigned, not as evolved systems of wisdom.

Sowell associates this vision with utopian ideals, often linked to progressive or left-leaning ideologies. He critiques it for dismissing the complexity of social systems and underestimating unintended consequences.

Sowell refers to those who embody the unconstrained vision as the “self-anointed” — individuals who believe they possess superior insight and moral authority to shape society. This vision often underpins calls for radical social change, social justice as a moral imperative, and policies that seek to eliminate disparities through redistribution or regulation.

Iran’s Surging Missile ‘Shield’: The Cause for the Hurry

Iran’s Surging Missile ‘Shield’: The Cause for the Hurry. By Fred Fleitz in American Greatness.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said during a March 2 press conference that Iran was producing over 100 missiles per month.

Rubio also told reporters that Iran was building up its arsenal of drones and missiles to create a missile “shield” that, within 12 to 18 months, would put Iran “in a place of immunity where the damage they can inflict on the region would be so high that no one can do anything about their nuclear program or their nuclear ambitions.

Hudson Institute Research Fellow Zineb Riboua expressed the same assessment this week in an excellent Substack article in which she said Iran was on track to double its missile inventory from 2,000 to 4,000 missiles by 2027 and increase it to 10,000 by 2030. Riboua believes the increase in Iran’s missile and drone arsenal was due to stepped-up massive support from China of advanced missile electronic components and rocket fuel chemicals since the 12-Day War. …

Iran’s marked shift in recent years toward the offensive use of its missile arsenal — moving well beyond any plausible defensive posture — combined with its unprecedented direct strikes on Israel in 2024 and its large-scale attacks throughout the Middle East and beyond, constitutes a powerful justification for President Trump’s decision to launch Operation Epic Fury. At the same time, Iran’s aggressive buildup of missile and drone forces to create an impenetrable “missile shield” around its advancing nuclear weapons program underscores how narrowly timed the U.S. action was — and how President Trump’s decision may ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon.

Violent Migrants and Equal Rights

Violent Migrants and Equal Rights. By Alexandra Marshall.

If government officials are afraid that standing up for Western values will incite migrants to violence — then those migrants need to be deported.

Anyone who thinks violence is a suitable response to criticism of their religion and culture is not compatible with Western society.

I’ve had enough of politicians pandering to fear of the violent, un-Australian mob instead of making that mob afraid of arrest.

And:

Australians want equal rights. Multiculturalism and identity politics has taken away these rights.

We now live in a hierarchy of identity and victimhood where the descendants of the people who built this country have the least rights, pay the most taxes, and are censored the hardest.

This cannot continue. Our politicians sold our rights out for electoral advantage.

Commenters:

Ayaan Hirsi Ali told us years ago that, if people come to your country and don’t appreciate and assimilate to the hosts culture, you must ask those people to leave , if they refuse, you must make them leave. …

Fear of confrontation with Islam just makes the inevitable conflict bigger. …

Our career politicians, copying the UK, are harvesting Muslim votes without caring that these people are committed to undermining the democratic principles that grant our politicians trust, influence, authority. The current AU gov. are destroying themselves and us. …

The mass unvetted migration of people who hate Westerners, our culture, and our religions is madness. Many are radicalized and dangerous. They want you to change your culture, laws, and religions, and they will use force. …

It’s ironic, with all the talk recently about ‘social cohesion’ – identity/group-based politics has the opposite effect. It highlights differences and turns society into tribal hunger games.

 

Ayaan Hirsi Ali grew up in Somalia, where she embraced Islam and strove to live as a devout Muslim. But in 1992 Ayaan fled to the Netherlands to escape a forced marriage.

 

Apologists say the Quran verse (9:5) that instructs Muslims to kill non-Muslims is a misinterpretation, taken out of context. Apparently many Muslims also take it out of context:

Nearly 50,000 attacks since 911, in which at least one non-Muslim died in an attack carried out in the name of Islam. All documented here. Attacks by all the other religions put together? Maybe a dozen.

Hizb ut-Tahrir’s reign of hate ends under hate group laws

Hizb ut-Tahrir’s reign of hate ends under hate group laws. By Sarah Ison in The Australian.

Radical Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir has been banned under Australia’s new hate group laws.

Labor confirmed late on Thursday evening that it had officially listed Hizb ut-Tahrir as a prohibited hate group, which threatens those who continue to be involved in the organisation with up to 15 years in jail. …

Several other countries have banned the organisation, including the UK, with Australia following suite after Sydney-based Hizb ut-Tahrir figures dramatically ramped up their messaging following the attacks of October 7, 2023, in describing Jews as the “hidden evil” and calling for a “jihad against the Jews”….

 

 

What do Hizb ut-Tahrir say?

Hizb ut-Tahrir, which intelligence and security officials have feared for years was engaging in active radicalisation of Australian youth, has frequently threatened legal action over any crackdown on their organisation.

Its spokesmen have likened banning Hizb ut-Tahrir to banning Islam, arguing the group was “neither hateful nor violent”.

If they are only preaching what’s in the Koran, then yes they are right — banning them is like banning Islam.