The blob mops up after the murder of Henry Nowak

The blob mops up after the murder of Henry Nowak. By John Carter.

After the trial Nowak’s father gave a press conference. He acknowledged the dichotomy between his son’s rough handling by the police, and the kid gloves with which Digwa was treated: not only did the police default to believing the brown man’s complaint of racism over the white kid’s insistence that he’d been stabbed, but when they finally arrested Digwa, they didn’t even cuff him.

But then???

After this, however, Mr. Nowak emphasized that his son was a kind, tolerant man who would never want his death to be used to stoke hatred and division, and that the public’s focus should be on the government’s efforts to combat “knife crime”, which is a nice vague racially ambiguous term from which any indication of agency has been safely removed. Sure enough, regimoids from Prime Minister Starmer on down immediately picked up on the motif of knife crime, while throwing Mr. Nowak’s admonitions against divisive rhetoric in the faces of “far-right agitators” such as Nigel Farage, Tommy Robinson, or Rupert Lowe in an attempt to shame their opponents into silence.

 

 

The statement prepared by Nowak’s father didn’t sound like the words of a man whose heart had been split asunder with grief by the murder of his boy, but then, such statements never do. You would expect such fathers to get in front of the cameras with righteous fury burning in their eyes, calling for bloody retribution. Yet they are always calm and collected, at most a bit morose, perhaps they wipe away a tear, and they always, always take care to stress that their child’s death should not be the occasion for revenge. Don’t look back in anger, we must come together to heal, thoughts and prayers, please respect the wishes of our family in this time of grief, and so on.

The script is familiar because it is, in fact, a script. The first tell is that it sounds like something written by ChatGPT, which is to say like a bland communique from the androids at head office. In this case, the other tell is that Mr. Nowak even took the time to thank the police force’s Family Liaison Officer for her support.

In the US, a shadowy organization known as the Community Relations Service has operated since the Civil Rights Act was signed into law1. This organization is essentially an X-Files for black crime, with secrecy privileges rivalling those of the FBI.

Its agents, known as facilitators, show up on the doorsteps of white families whose children were murdered by Protected Americans, and works to ensure that their grief does not inflame ‘community tensions’. Exactly how they do this is unknown. My suspicion is that they start by appealing to the high-minded civic feeling of the family, under the assumption that they are good liberals who want to do ‘the right thing’. If they need some more cajoling, doubtless there are implied threats of prosecution for jury tampering, hate speech, disturbing the public order, and so on. Whatever it is that they do, they seem to be very good at their jobs. It would be shocking if the the United Kingdom did not have a functional equivalent: probably the Family Liaison Officers embedded within local police forces, probably backed up by nudge units at the national level. …

The lefty paid-protestors moved in:

Before the verdict came in, there was a vigil for Henry Nowak. Supporters came to lay wreathes, say a few words, and hold a minute of silence.

Counter-protesters from “Stand Up To Racism” showed up to screech at them, ‘drowning out’ the minute of silence with the kind of gracious civility that only spiteful mutants can demonstrate. Their mass-produced signage is a good indication that their presence was anything but organic. Someone paid for them. Probably someone in Whitehall.

 

 

The silent treatment (which is failing this time):

The inverted parallels with Fentanyl Floyd are obvious, and have been made by many, but I’m going to harp on them anyhow.

Floyd was a career felon and drug addict who died because he swallowed a fistful of street drugs to avoid getting caught with them after police arrived to arrest him for trying to buy a banana with a counterfeit bill; he resisted arrest, and was put in a standard restraint, which involved the officer kneeling on his neck, a perfectly safe manoeuvre that could not actually have cut off his blood supply. His last words were “I can’t breathe”, because he was OD’ing on fentanyl. This led to the largest hysterical outburst of deranged paramoralistic virtue-signalling in history, as a result of which officer Derek Chauvin was subjected to a kangaroo court as the international scapegoat for the sins of the white race, and imprisoned for life, because he’d had the bad luck to be in the vicinity of the violent pavement ape’s drug OD.

Henry Nowak was a sweet-natured young white kid who died because he was stabbed in the chest by a brown-skinned psycho, and because the literal systemic racism written into explicit police policy resulted in delayed medical treatment along with degrading treatment in his final moments of life. The establishment’s response to this outrage was to ignore it. …

 

Lying by omission

 

And the lies:

 

It’s really a war between whites:

One of the striking aspects of the footage out of Southampton is that almost all of the people involved – the Digwas aside – are white. The protesters: white! The police: white! The politicians: white!

Racial minorities are present in this discourse more as a theoretical concept than as an active agent. …  Racial strife in Southampton, as almost everywhere else in the Western world, is not really a matter of discord between racial others and white people, although of course this is always a factor to a certain degree.

The more fundamental conflict is intrawhite: between traitor whites of the parasitic shitlib professional-managerial class, and the patriot whites of the productive and more conservative working and entrepreneurial classes.

Follow the money and power:

Traitor whites use foreign imports as a means of tyrannizing, oppressing, and stealing from their opponents. This works in a number of ways….

Immigrants tend to use social welfare systems at higher rates, which provides the traitor whites with the opportunity to profit from administering resource redistribution from the productive whites towards their imported clients.

The same socioeconomic underperformance guaranteed by human biodiversity that leads to higher rates of crime and welfare usage also justifies interventions in the name of fixing racial discrimination, which is the only acceptable explanation for socioeconomic underperformance as traitor white ideology consigns human biodiversity to unforgivable thoughtcrime. These anti-discrimination interventions are a rich source of traitor white employment all on their own, while also providing them with the opportunity to deny education and employment to patriot whites, who are simultaneously ground down by the high taxes necessary to support social welfare programs, the low wages that result from the labour surplus provided by high immigration, and the high cost of housing that results from immigration boosting demand for real estat …

The asset-owning rentier class might not like the high taxes, they love the cheap labour and expensive real estate, which keeps them onside within the parasite coalition.

Best of all, because the civic religion propagated and upheld by traitor whites elevates “racism” to the sin of sins, all they have to do to silence their political opposition is to call them “racists”. They avoid criticism by hiding behind their client groups, insisting that any criticism of the regime’s policies is motivated by the small-minded bigotry of hearts full of hatred for the colour of the skin. That tactic worked very well for a very long time.

Unfortunately for the traitor whites, they’ve yanked on the racism lever so long, so often, and so hard that they have now broken it clean off. The old wordspells stopped working sometime over the last few years. …

Without race politics, the traitor whites have no income and no power:

Race politics are the feeding tube they use to suck their blood-meals out of the body politic.

Quite apart from that, there is simply no way for them to extricate themselves from their moral culpability: they’re all on record, in emails, in memos, in policy documents, in public statements, on their social media accounts, advocating for all of this, insisting on it, demanding it, cheering for it. There’s no way out for them. Keeping this system going is existential.

That’s why their tone is increasingly panicked, desperate, pleading. The choir they preach to is shrinking. The part of the population with acquired immunity is growing, and so is that population’s righteous fury. The political centre is collapsing, and their institutional power continues largely by inertia, even as the institutions themselves crumble. Their supporters consist almost exclusively of the old, of women, and of various grades of low-quality human capital dredged up from the worst parts of the white gene pool and the dregs of the third world. Their opponents are increasingly fearless. The rioters in Southampton didn’t bother wearing masks: no doubt they understand quite well that regime intelligence officers will be poring over video recordings to identify rioters, who will doubtless be charged with public order offences, just as happened during the Southport riots two summers ago, but they don’t seem to care.

And a bleak future:

When this ends, most of the invaders will be remigrated back where they came from, and for the migrants that will be the end of the matter. …

The traitors who facilitated the multicultural experiment, however … who threw open the gates to the invasion … who held the native population’s hands behind their backs so the invaders could prey upon them … who reduced their own people to humiliating servitude … well they can’t be deported, can they?

The Deep Moral Failure of AI

The Deep Moral Failure of AI. By Tyler Austin Harper at The Atlantic.

I don’t know what else to call it when companies market digital girlfriends to the heartsick and young. Or when they hawk robot companions to the lonely and old. Or when a billionaire explains that he intends to sell intelligence — trained on humanity’s stolen intellectual property — back to us as a utility, like electricity or water.

These developments are not just wrong. They feel to me like something deeper and darker. “I met the banker and it felt like sin,” Patterson Hood croons in the great Drive-By Truckers song “Sinkhole.” I’d substitute chatbot for banker.

The acknowledged problems:

Technology journalists, academic experts, and activists typically emphasize the AI industry’s prodigious environmental toll, its reliance on intellectual-property theft, its exacerbation of racialized algorithmic bias, its use in dangerous autonomous weapons systems, its role in warrantless surveillance, its exploitation of cheap foreign-labor markets, its upending of the domestic labor market at home, and the like. …

They are measurable harms that can be quantified, and that regulations and policy can be built around.

The deeper problem:

Even if all of these concrete problems with AI were magically solved …  we would still be left with a technology that radically unsettles many traditional conceptions of human dignity and meaning, and that threatens to outsource the most interesting aspects of our life and labor to machines.

This is what the most thoughtful Christian critics are able to see. [The social critic Ivan Illich] wrote in 1971, when the rise of the computer was the primary technological concern, that man “attempts to create the world in his image, to build a totally man-made environment, and then discovers that he can do so only on the condition of constantly remaking himself to fit it.” He concluded, “We now must face the fact that man himself is at stake.”

Today, AI puts “man” even more at stake, as many of Silicon Valley’s leaders attempt to bring about a digital successor species, based on the belief that humanity’s evolutionary destiny is to usher in a higher form of intelligence.

What is humanity for?

Defending humanity against its digital doppelgänger requires having a positive conception of what humanity is in the first place. As the pope writes in his encyclical, “Technological progress — valuable in itself — requires careful discernment of the anthropological vision that guides it and the ends it pursues.” …

Christianity has a clear “anthropological vision,” asserting that the purpose of the human species is to exist in the image of its creator, to love God and one another, and to spread life on Earth and steward its creatures. …

ChatGPT was not made in the image of God …

If secularists flinch at calling this taking — what Pope Leo calls Big Tech’s “dehumanizing ambition” — a sin, they’ll need to find another word for it.

What is money for?

David Archibald:

The International Space Station didn’t actually do anything.

The F-35 program could be abandoned tomorrow.

The AI thing will lower costs and thus improve our standard of living. Which will offset the reduction coming from a higher cost of energy.

Those without AI, and nuclear to power that AI, will be at a considerable disadvantage which will be measured in a lower standard of living.

hat-tip Stephen Neil

The harm of DEI: a generation of talented men wasted

The harm of DEI: a generation of talented men wasted. By Captive Dreamer.

I don’t think people have fully registered how societally detrimental DEI has been in business, government, and education. Anti-White hiring policies that locked out an entire generational cohort of talented men, replacing them with unqualified leftist political foot soldiers.

John Carter:

On four levels: first, by packing the institutions with talentless mediocrities; second, by depriving institutions of the gifts of the talented; third, by wasting training and education on people who could not benefit from it; fourth, by failing to cultivate those who could take advantage from those opportunities.

Commenters:

I know people who were blocked by the racist ATC screening process. It crushed them. Faith in themselves gone. Multiply that by a hundred million and you get a lost civilization.

Hmmm. And now our institutions are incompetent.

When the Australian Elite Failed

When the Australian Elite Failed. By Nick Cater at Quadrant.

Every prime minister since Howard has struggled to find the middle ground, a position that will satisfy the competing visions within their own parties, let alone the nation as a whole.

It has not helped that the political class’s judgment has been skewed by the environment in which it operates, surrounded by the graduate class that predominates in the bureaucracy and the media.

Their bluff:

The moral force that holds elite arguments in place, sanctioning those who dare to offer discordant evidence, reinforces the hegemony of conventional wisdom backed by experts. The elite’s superior rhetorical skills and its all-access pass to media platforms give it a seemingly unassailable advantage in civic debate.

It is little wonder that the elite’s vision on contentious issues like climate change, the republic and Aboriginal rights is perceived as the majority opinion, the position held by sensible people opposed by an ignorant few.

Bluff called:

Pauline Hanson entered politics with a practical, commonsense outlook, untarnished by higher education. Her principal anger was not towards migrants, as those who were quick to label her as racist supposed. It was towards the enforcers of political correctness. …

Hanson’s maiden speech attained instant notoriety. Her principal complaint was that a self-appointed elite had stolen the agenda, without a legitimate mandate, and had denied middle Australia any say on the disruptive issue of multiculturalism. “For far too long, ordinary Australians have been kept out of any debate by the major parties,” she said. “I and most Australians want our immigration policy radically reviewed and that of multiculturalism abolished.”

Over the years, Hanson’s policy agenda has broadened. Climate change, transgender rights, Aboriginal rights and woke adventurism in all its forms are connected by a common thread. Radical changes to Australian life have been implemented unilaterally by an elite that assumes extra-parliamentary authority to reshape the nation according to its vision.

Covid revealed that our elites had become incompetent (too much DEI?) and untrustworthy:

The Covid epidemic proved a turning point as governments, state and federal, accelerated along the road to tyranny. The declaration of a crisis became the justification for illiberal measures enforced by decree. Dissent was declared dangerous, contrary to expert opinion, an incitement to sceptics to disobey the rules, and a real and present threat to the well-being of the general community.

Like her earlier declarations on multiculturalism, Hanson’s interventions during the pandemic appear uncontroversial today. Yet in August 2021, her claim that the vaccines had “not been properly tested” and the government was using lockdowns to bully people into being jabbed were the subject of outrage in the mainstream press, including The Australian, which headlined its report: “Pauline Hanson argues people should have the right to catch Covid and die”.

The brutal suppression of public protests, a torrent of lies, and the scapegoating of the unvaccinated, endorsed by the political establishment backed by mainstream media, became a breeding ground for dissent. The extent of the erosion of trust in officialdom has been barely recognised by the political establishment, even to this day.

Since 95 per cent of the population had taken the vaccine, the elite arrogantly assumed that discontent was limited to a small bunch of nutters. They did not factor in that many had been vaccinated with extreme reluctance, that jobs had been lost and businesses destroyed and that the lockdowns had placed an intolerable burden on the population, which rose disproportionately the deeper one ventured into the suburbs. …

The Voice revealed who the majority really were:

Albanese’s strategic blunder in holding a referendum on the Voice to Parliament emboldened middle Australia. A progressive pet project had been put to the vote, granting Australians a rare opportunity to express what they really thought without fear of retribution under the cover of the ballot box.

The scale of the referendum defeat — 60 per cent to 40 per cent –pierced the vanity of the elite establishment, who had assumed that their vision was shared by all sensible people. Among the dissenters, however, it was the defeat not just of a narrow constitutional amendment, but of the whole woke shouting match.

It provided comprehensive evidence that they were on the side of the majority, not just a maverick few.

Trump, Farage/Lowe, Hanson. Populism is the response to incompetent rule by the political class. No wonder the political class hates “populism.”

Pro tip: Follow the money, from taxpayer to members of the elite.

Majority Politics and Protecting Minorities

Majority Politics and Protecting Minorities. By Saigou.

Bro, let’s stop pretending.

Muslims make up about 25% of the entire world’s population — over 2 billion people across 50+ countries.

Japanese people? About 1.4% of the world. One single country. Shinto exists only in Japan.

So when people say “Japan should prioritize minorities and be more accommodating to Islam,” who exactly are we talking about?

The global majority is coming to one of the world’s smallest ethnic and religious groups and demanding that Japan change its culture, food, and traditions for them.

That’s not “protecting minorities.” That’s the majority trying to colonize a tiny minority.

Japan has every right to protect its own people and culture first.

If Muslims want to live under Islamic rules, they already have dozens of countries where they can do that. They don’t need to come to Japan and turn it into another one.

Perfectly said. Like haiku!

Pride month? Not in Trump’s USA.

Pride month? Not in Trump’s USA. By The Calvin Coolidge Project.

The Trump Administration has officially declined to issue a proclamation recognizing Pride Month for the second year in a row.

Under Biden, US Embassies around the world flew pride flags:

U.S. Embassy Seoul, 2021

The back-reaction now:

Commenters:

Good. It’s ridiculous to celebrate someone’s sexuality. Especially for a whole month. …

You have to admit, a whole month celebrating a group of people just because of who they’re attracted to sexually seems a bit ridiculous. …

Why do we need to recognize and celebrate, for an entire month, a group whose identification is solely based on who they chose to share a bed with? And to be clear, I have a lot of gay friends who I love dearly. …

There aren’t enough months to designate for everything people do when they pull their pants down. …

I have had Rainbow fatigue for many, many years. …

Well we also don’t have any:

  • White Pride Month
  • American Pride Month
  • Veterans Pride Month
  • Disabled/Handicapped People Month

(Forgive me, Chemo brain has me struggling to remember if any other races besides Black have a Pride Month dedicated to them.)

Etc. etc. All these woke symbols must be wound back some or all. Here in Australia, the welcome-to-country ceremonies need to be wound way back, if only because they are so very boring.

Henry Nowak protests are growing

Henry Nowak protests are growing.

When we started the Wentworth Report in 2016, anti-white violent outrages by immigrants behaving badly (and yes, 90% of terrorism worldwide is by Muslims) were only once a week or so — or at least, as reported on the Web. Few websites reported anything, so as part of our remit to draw attention to things the media choose not to talk about, we ran many of them, or at least the major ones.

But they have become more and more common, overwhelmingly so. Increasingly, many websites or accounts report on them, especially since Elon Musk liberated Twitter/X. There are many per week.

We could fill a much bigger blog reporting solely on such outrages. But there are many other issues that interest us. So, we gradually retreated to just mentioning the very major outrages, then only the more egregious Australian ones. We’ll leave the continuous stream of outrages to other sites.

We haven’t mentioned the Henry Nowak murder in the UK until now, but it has become huge. It’s like George Floyd, only everything is inverted and this time it actually was a murder. A nastier single incident of immigrant and institutional nastiness would be hard to concoct.

 

Murdered on Dec. 3. Kept out of the news until now.

 

It’s all over the web, so look it up if you haven’t seen it. But now it is spilling into the political arena, a turning point that is going to affect policy, so we’ll run some material that we think is interesting.

Protests against the police by white crowds in Southampton are becoming mildly violent after police antagonize the crowd.

 

A crowd is protesting outside the Digwa (the murderer) home:

Protestors demand the police take a knee for Henry Nowak, like they did for George Floyd:

 

Protestors are hunting police and throwing plastic garage bins at them:

 

John Carter on widespread blame:

Every time one of their pets pops off and ends someone, it’s always an “isolated incident”, “mental illness” or “knife crime” or whatever.

Every time one of their pets gets into trouble it’s an indictment of the entire system and justification for the revolution.

If the pet happened to be born locally, he suddenly becomes “one of us”, so it certainly has nothing to do with “immigration”, no.

The truth is Henry Nowak was murdered by a large number of people. Most of them white. Digwa might have wielded the blade, but he had one in the first place because traitor whites in the courts and the legislature gave Sikhs a special carveout when they disarmed everyone else, most especially whites.

Digwa’s family was in the UK because traitor whites in the government let them in.

The traitor whites in the police force defaulted to believing Digwa’s accusation of “racism”, and ignoring Nowak’s plea for help, because they prioritized the ‘race action plan’ above all other considerations, which was implemented and enforced by traitor whites.

The ‘race action plan’ was created because whites had been conditioned to treat racism as worse than absolutely anything, and once again it was traitor whites in journalism, entertainment, academia, and the state who performed this conditioning.

Every single one of them is guilty of Nowak’s death.

That guilt spread out over millions of people doesn’t necessarily come to much individually. But then you add up all of the other whites who have been robbed, raped, beaten, and murdered over the decades, and eventually you come to the conclusion that there is more than enough guilt at the per capita level to justify sending every single one of you to the gallows.

Imagine if a black or Muslim community somewhere in the Western world was rioting at this level. It would be a major scandal. What dastardly white unfairness drove the darlings to protest so?

The major political issue here is that the police took the allegation of racism more seriously than a stabbing, their bullshit diversity training automatically discriminating against the white victim. This two-tier, anti-white policing is the dominant, explosive political issue — again.

The British establishment that wept for Floyd has been conspicuously quiet about Nowak.

 

 

Notice there’s no perfectly manicured signs. No Public sector union banners.

Just unmanufactured genuine outrage at the horrific injustice. The ordinary people have finally had enough.

UPDATE: Here comes the censorship:

 

Nigel Farage (Reform):

I wrote yesterday to the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, requesting a review of the sentence given to the killer, which fell below the recommended minimum for such a sustained, aggressive, murderous assault.

He was jailed for life for a minimum of 21 years. In my view, his crime merits a whole-life tariff.

Above all, however, Britain needs to undergo a broader cultural change.

We must end the anti-white prejudice that has been allowed to fester. We must assert, without apology, that White lives matter too. DEI initiatives and positive discrimination must be scrapped. No ifs, no buts. …

Unfortunately, the Labour Party is simply unable to confront uncomfortable truths about race and diversity. These issues are too deeply ingrained in the party’s institutional culture.

Rupert Lowe (Restore):

We must remove those third world migrants who put their ‘clan’ above all else, including our British rule of law.

If that means entire clans are deported, then that is what must happen. ….

A Labour MP, Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, has attacked Restore Britain in Parliament for our push to get the Kirpan [Sikh traditional knife, which Sikhs are allowed to carry in the UK for religious reasons!] banned in public spaces.

Under a Restore Britain Government, all will be equal.

Un-British religious practices will not be tolerated or accepted. …

Halal slaughter, banned. The kirpan, banned, Kosher slaughter, banned. The burqa, banned. All of it, banned.

This is Britain — we do things our way.

Matt Walsh:

There’s never been anything like the Henry Nowak case where the victim is non-white and the assailant is white, and the police respond the way they did. That whole combination of events could really only happen to a white person. The BLM narrative is the exact opposite of reality.

Matt Goodwin:

Henry Nowak’s tragic murder is downstream of anti-white racism. Extend his sentence. Deport the mother. Have a full police inquiry. Root out all woke “DEI” policies that promote minorities while claiming whites are “racist”.

Storming the West — literally

Storming the West — literally. By Geiger Capital.

Spain’s far-left PM Pedro Sanchez gave amnesty and citizenship to 500,000 illegal immigrants, and now hordes of unvetted African men are storming the border.

It looks like a scene from World War Z.

 

Commenters:

He’s solidifying his power. He’s importing his voters. This is the eventuality if leftist get their way. …

These oligarchical leaders are going to push folks so far until the people start pushing back! We are reaching a boiling point in may places around the world as any sense of normalcy has been thrown out the window! …

China would shoot them and their soldiers would know they would never be punished, they know they would be punished if they failed to do their job and shoot them….

Under the Schengen Treaty, they are free to roam to the nearest EU country that offers the best benefits. …

Can you blame them? This idiot was offering permanent residency with huge benefits. Of course this is what is going to happen!

Why the West Is Replacing Its White Population

Why the West Is Replacing Its White Population. By Ricardo Duchesne at The Unz Review.

The Great Replacement is now almost locked in.

This is not because of a grand conspiracy … Nor is it simply the result of excessive “suicidal empathy” or … elites refusing to accept race realism or the critique of the equality thesis.

My thesis is that the large-scale demographic replacement of White European populations is the logical and nearly inevitable outcome of the fusion between

(i) liberal universalism, which delegitimizes ethnic particularism and prohibits state preference for one culture in favor of diversity and value pluralism

(ii) post-Fordist capitalist optimization [Fordism is the old 20th-century industrial system associated with Henry Ford], which demands flexible, low-cost, compliant non-Western labor, expanding global markets, and short-to-medium-term gains.

Together, these two self-reinforcing logics have created a dynamic, high-level equilibrium and path-dependent civilizational trap that is quite effective at delivering GDP growth, opportunities for elite status, rewards for loyalty, and moral validation, yet systematically undermines the long-term demographic and cultural foundations of European societies.

This system exploits the historically peculiar “WEIRD” psychology of Whites (low ethnocentrism, impersonal trust, impartiality) while empowering groups operating on kin-selection and ethnic nepotism …

The West is both a capitalist and a liberal civilization. This economic system and this ideology developed together and are now fused into a single, self-reinforcing system.

In the Fordist phase (roughly 1945–1975), this fusion largely benefited native White populations, delivering broad-based affluence, rising real wages, high homeownership, and stable family-oriented communities within relatively homogeneous nations still anchored by pre-liberal norms.

However, the crisis of Fordism in the 1970s activated a transition to a post-Fordist multicultural and limbic capitalist regime. [Limbic capitalism refers to industries that profit by targeting the brain’s reward, pleasure, craving, and habit systems — the “limbic” parts of the brain — which encourage excessive consumption or addiction: processed food, gambling, alcohol, drugs, pornography, social media, gaming, advertising, etc.]

In this new order, liberalism’s universalistic drive and capitalism’s optimizing logic reinforce each other: the former delegitimizes ethnic particularism and cultural continuity, while the latter demands flexible, low-cost non-Western labor to deal with structural shortages. The system thus favors both diversity as a moral good and certain immigrant personality traits that optimize post-Fordist production.

Yet this regime harbors a deep structural contradiction: it rests upon the historically peculiar “weird” psychology of European peoples, including low ethnocentrism, high impersonal trust, and impartiality, while empowering non-Western groups that operate according to particularistic kin-selection and ethnic nepotism.

The result is a system that is biologically and culturally incompatible with the long-term survival and civilizational creativity of European peoples in their homelands. …

Why Asian labor is preferred:

Capitalism will strive to optimize in whatever political setting it is allowed to operate. This may lead some to assume that it has no inherent ethnic preference. There is no question, however, that in the post-Fordist era, liberal capitalism has shown a clear preference both for diversity and for certain cognitive and personality traits that are statistically more common among East Asians (particularly ethnic Chinese) and Indians.

I am not thinking only of its obvious preference for the cheaper labor found in the non-Western world. In so-called large settler nations, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and America, it has also shown a preference for high-tech workers who are “more goal-oriented” in their motives; more focused on pure careerism, repetitive technical tasks, strong compliance, and relatively low political inclinations or intellectual and cultural interests beyond one’s specialization and work requirements.

It views East Asians as exceptionally efficient (“low-friction inputs”) for post-Fordist technical tasks such as coding, algorithm design, lab work, and incremental optimization.

White populations tend to be viewed as less efficient in this narrow respect because they exhibit greater personality differentiation, broader interests, higher openness to experience, and a stronger tendency toward political, philosophical, and societal engagement. While these White traits were historically crucial in driving revolutionary scientific breakthroughs, major innovations, and grand societal projects, they are less optimal for the narrow, high-volume, high-conformity demands of today’s hyperspecialized post-Fordist AI economy.

Liberal capitalism is currently selecting for traits that optimize short-to-medium-term economic returns at the cost of the long-term civilizational creativity of the West and its cultural survival. …

Indian migrants are particularly attractive because they are more compliant and geographically mobile than native Whites with comparable education. Lacking deep community roots or established family ties in the West, they accept irregular and intense schedules more readily. There are no entrenched mortgages, local schools, or unions associated with the importation of fresh Indian migrants. This entails less political or social pushback when companies adjust to new market signals or replace workers with AI.

The cost savings are substantial: firms can hire a senior Indian developer in the US or Canada on work visas for $30,000–$50,000 per year, in contrast to $150,000–$200,000 for a similarly qualified American worker. Their narrow education, total focus on STEM degrees, compliance, and one-dimensional desire for money have made Indians quite useful as employees in limbic capitalist sectors such as social media, e-commerce, gaming, streaming, and AI-driven engagement.

To fix a problem, first understand it and describe it accurately.

Our new aristocracy

Our new aristocracy. By Damien Coates in The Spectator.

Did you know?

A few weeks ago, Senator Dave Sharma used Senate Estimates to question why a government-appointed fuel security coordinator was being paid the equivalent of almost $1 million a year.

Most Australians had probably never heard of the role. Many would struggle to explain what a fuel security coordinator actually does. Yet instinctively, they understood something else: whatever this is, it isn’t ordinary life.

That reaction says something important about modern Australia.

An aristocracy?

For most of history, societies had aristocracies. Kings, nobles and landed elites occupied a world far removed from the people they governed. They enjoyed privileges unavailable to ordinary citizens and exercised influence over institutions that shaped national life.

We like to think we abolished all that. In reality, we may have simply reinvented it.

The old aristocracy wore crowns, inherited titles, and lived in palaces.

The new aristocracy wears lanyards, holds postgraduate qualifications, and works from government departments, regulatory agencies, universities, publicly funded organisations and sprawling bureaucracies. …

Trust is fraying:

What Australians have always distrusted is privilege. Particularly privilege that pretends not to be privilege.

The owner of a successful construction company who earns a fortune rarely attracts much resentment. He built something. He employed people. He took risks. Australians understand that bargain.

But a growing number of people look at modern institutions and see something very different. They see departmental secretaries earning salaries most taxpayers can scarcely imagine. They see agency heads, regulators, university executives, consultants, and publicly funded administrators occupying positions of extraordinary comfort while presiding over outcomes that appear to be getting worse rather than better. [They took no risks.]

  • Housing is less affordable.
  • Infrastructure is under strain.
  • Energy costs are rising.
  • Government is larger than ever.

Yet the managerial class continues to expand.

In Australia, almost one in five workers is now employed directly by government. Around that sits an even larger ecosystem of consultants, regulators, policy advisers, university administrators, NGO executives, and publicly funded professionals. Together, they constitute a class that exercises enormous influence over public life while often remaining insulated from the consequences of the decisions they make. …

 

 

Above it all, insulated by oodles of low-risk taxpayer money:

The people deciding housing policy generally own homes.

The people advocating population growth rarely compete for rental properties in outer suburbs.

The people designing energy policy seldom worry about whether they can afford next month’s power bill.

The people making decisions increasingly inhabit a different Australia from the people living with those decisions. And ordinary Australians know it.

That is why comparisons with the monarchy are more instructive than many realise.

For example, PM Anthony Albanese, who only ever worked for the Labor Party, has had multiple properties:

 

The pretending is particularly irritating:

The British monarchy never pretended to be ordinary. Its legitimacy was built upon distance. Kings did not claim to understand the daily struggles of farmers and labourers. Aristocrats did not pretend they were simply average citizens temporarily entrusted with power.

The divide was obvious.

Modern elites often ask for something far more ambitious. They seek the authority that comes from expertise while simultaneously demanding the trust that comes from relatability.

Increasingly, they enjoy neither.

Politicians tell voters they understand housing stress while owning multiple properties. Bureaucrats explain the necessity of policies whose consequences they rarely experience firsthand. Institutional leaders speak constantly about community while living lives increasingly disconnected from the communities they govern.

The problem is not that elites exist. Every successful society has elites. The problem is that modern elites frequently deny they are elites at all.

They speak the language of equality while occupying positions of extraordinary privilege. They present themselves as representatives of ordinary Australians while inhabiting professional and economic worlds that bear little resemblance to ordinary life. …

Populism is the tell that the elites are failing:

The rise of populist movements, the collapse of confidence in institutions and the growing hostility toward experts are not random developments. They are symptoms of a widening gap between those who exercise authority and those expected to accept it.

Democracies ultimately depend upon legitimacy. Legitimacy depends upon trust. And trust becomes difficult to sustain when large numbers of people conclude that those making decisions no longer understand the country they are governing.

And the recent tax changes didn’t help. The elite keeps swelling, so they need ever more tax income:

We deserve to feel safe in our own country

We deserve to feel safe in our own country. By Bec Freedom.

Last Monday, on the 18th of May, at around 6am, one of our own became a victim of the very thing we are trying to raise awareness about.

She was violently carjacked by machete-wielding African youth in Victoria. @soundstarter had stopped at the laundromat in Keysborough to dry her work jacket on the way to work. She was waiting out the front in her car when she was confronted by an aggressive African man who opened her car door and aggressively attempted to drag her out.

She fought back and tried to push and kick him away while he threw several punches at her face and body. Another African man then approached the altercation armed with a machete. Although she put up a fight, they managed to violently drag her out and took off in her car, which contained all of her belongings-her phone, credit cards, identification, and keys to her home.

Thankfully, onlookers heard the noise and ran over to help her. There were no serious injuries, but due to their aggressive and violent nature, she is quite badly bruised and scratched up.

She has had to change the locks on her house and, thankfully, already had a security and camera system installed. She is understandably still shaken up but wanted her story shared to help raise awareness.

Police reports were filed and her car has now been located. The car wasn’t smashed or set on fire-it was just dumped after they’d had their fun. Her phone and credit cards were also located and had been thrown away, which goes to show these weren’t poor struggling immigrants who attacked for monetary gain.

This was African machete violence and theft committed by two men aged between 16 and 20. Why? Because they can and they know they get away with it due to a weak court system.

This was an opportunistic, violent, and aggressive crime committed by foreigners who prove time and time again that they do not belong here, nor do they deserve a chance at a better life in our country.

We have become so desensitised to these attacks constantly happening, especially in Victoria. We speak about them in our spaces, make posts about them, and see them on the news.

But when it happens to you or someone you know, it’s a scary reminder of just how real this problem actually is. We need to get louder. We need to make more noise, because the reality is that any one of us could be next.

The only thing that will fix this is removing those who do not belong. We need instant deportations of criminal immigrants and the remigration of foreigners.

 

 

It’s happening here too — there is now an Australian Restore movement:

 

Get involved — real life activism

Get involved — real life activism. By Cameron at the National Workers Alliance.

I would like real life activism.

To the influencers who are rage-posting daily, who are monetizing their content while people get angry and frustrated, I know that education and awareness is important …

So stop watching the doom posters and put some time and energy into activism …

Under the current system there is no political solution. …

Every major city has ethnic enclaves, there is sectarian violence, and as social cohesion continues to break down, the separation will continue. White flight is happening.

Here they are protesting against Victorian Premier’s thousand-dollars-a-head event hosted by two MPs representing immigrant-dominated electorates. The Premier slips in a side door and will not answer questions.

Founder and leader of NWA Matt Trihey and a handful of other activists held photos of victims of immigrant crime, including teenager Declan Cutler and doctor Ash Gordon, both killed by African gang members, at the main entrance. …

This private function was $1000 a ticket and was attended by majority foreigners

Jacinta Allen will proudly sell out to foreign investors while ignoring the rising crime

 

It’s not an “insurrection” when the left do it

It’s not an “insurrection” when the left do it.

Major clashes occurred on the weekend between New Jersey police and anti-ICE rioters in Newark. Super physical fights against the police and authorities, by lefties who cannot get their way at the ballot box.

Leftist rioters are attacking the NJ police with rocks, and antifa is throwing flashbangs back at them.

 


Ari Fleischer:

The Democrats do a January 6th every day, every week. Their target is ICE.

J6 was a riot. THIS is in insurrection.

Glenn Reynolds:

This is much more violent than January 6. January 6 was American citizens acting like Americans. This is enemies of America acting like enemies.

Commenters:

I’m looking at hundreds of people that should be in jail for assaulting police. …

How can you throw freaking flashbangs and rocks at police and just walk away with ZERO consequences? …

Why aren’t they being arrested? Trump designated Antifa as a terrorist organization…don’t terrorists usually get arrested? …

How can this happen? It’s New Jersey, that’s how. You arrest them and they’ll be out in 4 hours, no bail and then they’ll take the train back to NYC.

I’ll bet there aren’t undercover FBI agents among the protestors, spurring them on, like on J6.

UPDATE: Antifa Thugs in Portland and Newark, Laying Siege to ICE detention facilities are PAID. By Bitchuneedsoap.

I messaged a group admin asking how my family in NJ could help the Delaney Hall protesters. Within minutes she sent me a supply list and a Venmo donation link.

The supply list wasn’t water bottles. It was P100 respirators (tear gas grade), military-spec impact goggles, welding gloves for picking up hot tear gas canisters, helmets, body armor, and Sudecon chemical decontamination wipes. That’s a military/law enforcement product most people have never heard of.

The Venmo link: @cosechanj. That account belongs to Jenny Garcia. She’s the main organizer of the Delaney Hall protests.

Quoted in the American Prospect, Newsweek, and TIME. Listed as the official press contact.

She is not a volunteer. She is a professional organizer.

Venmo feeds are public. I pulled hers.

Payments labeled “Commissary” (money for detained immigrants to buy food inside the facility). “Commissary / phone accounts fund” (keeping detainees’ phones active). “DSA meeting” (Democratic Socialists of America). “Mutual aid.” “F ICE.” …

So who pays Jenny Garcia? She holds three titles at three organizations.

  1. Detention Watch Network. DC-based. $7.2 million in assets. Ford Foundation funded.
  2. AFSC. Classified as a church. No public donors. Tides Foundation gave them $221K.
  3. Cosecha NJ. The @cosechanj Venmo name. Files two 990s. Reports $0 in salaries. Every year. Every officer. Nobody gets paid.

Foundation money pays Garcia through DWN and AFSC. She organizes under Cosecha’s name. Cosecha claims to pay nobody.

Nick Sortor:

The area around ICE Newark is DEAD SILENT after NJSP FORCED rioters out of the area

Tens of THOUSANDS of dollars worth of supplies are just abandoned outside the facility. It is genuinely mindblowing how much money is poured into riot supplies.

These are not grassroots demonstrators, but bought and paid for by left wing foundations.