Young white men were the swing demographic, switching back to Democrats because Trump did little to ease their persecution

Young white men were the swing demographic, switching back to Democrats because Trump did little to ease their persecution. By John Carter.

The usual uniparty cycle:

The new party assumes office, commences gorging on the corruption machine, fritters away its time and political capital on trivial nonsense, and steadfastly refuses to take action on even the most popular 80/20 issues.

The outgoing Republican House and Senate are a case in point. They outright refused to pass the overwhelmingly popular SAVE Act [which would require voting in person with ID, eliminating most online and mail-in voter registration], for instance. I don’t think they passed any meaningful legislation at all over the last two years. They were very enthusiastic about bombing Iran, however.

What achievements?

Have Trump or the GOP made much difference in daily life? Trump’s done some good things over the last two years. Gutting USAID, clearing out hundreds of thousands of federal bureaucrats, closing the border, deporting a million or so illegals and motivating the self-deportation of a couple million more. There’s been a chilling effect on DEI, the so-called ‘vibe shift’, which in practice has mostly meant that large institutions are pretending not to do DEI anymore. All of that’s been great, but it’s been like one percent of what’s actually required.

Deporting a few million people is a drop in the bucket compared to the many tens of millions in the country illegally. Getting woketards to turn down the volume on woke was a nice reprieve, but they remain in control of every institution that isn’t the executive branch of the US government, and they’ve carried right on refusing to hire young white men. …

Never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity:

When Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a trantifa terrorist, a wave of rage washed through the country, not only at his death but in revulsion at the glee with which the left greeted it. Trump’s administration had every excuse it needed to bring down the hammer. It started well enough, with Antifa being declared an international terrorist group. And then, nothing. …

There was every excuse to go after the NGOs and foundations that fund Antifa and Antifa-adjacent groups, bring the hammer down on universities that provide them with a safe place to operate, and put serious pressure on foreign governments (Canada, for instance) which provide funding for Antifa-adjacent left-wing ‘research organizations’. Instead we got Candace Owens wittering on about how it was really all a Mossad plot or something. The result of all this lack of serious action was that the left felt quite comfortable celebrating the Kirkaversary.

One young Brazilian woman went so far as to recite a vicious little death threat in the form of ‘Night Before Kirksmas’ doggerel to a Turning Point USA representative, who for some unfathomable reason was on campus still doing the Debate Me Bro routine a year after the Debate Bro got shot in the neck for debating. There’s some talk that she and her family might get deported, but, call me cynical, I wouldn’t count on that.

Young white men got more of the same:

Friends have been sounding the alarm for several months now over Trump’s refusal to do anything to ameliorate the plight of young white men in America. They’ve languished under woke for a decade, now. It has absolutely hammered them economically. Six years of that decade have been under Trump, by the way. He didn’t do anything about it during his first term, and during his second what little he did do was mostly performative, things like castigating the universities for not following meritocratic admissions policies and allowing anti-semitism on campus.

He tried to freeze research funding to Harvard and a few other universities, sure, but that got blocked in the courts. They got their money and ignored the Supreme Court’s ruling against affirmative action, carrying right on with discriminatory admissions as though nothing had happened.

In the private sector the toxic confluence of HR girlbossery and AI filtering at the recruitment level, along with an entrenched preference for H1B over American labour within the tech sector, has made it basically impossible for anyone to get a job, but particularly impossible for young white men. There was a study recently which found that something like 98% of new jobs had gone to women, or maybe women and foreigners; either way, young white men have been left out in the cold.

Young white men were Trump’s strongest soldiers:

This matters, because the young white men were Trump’s strongest soldiers. In the last election they swung harder for Trump than any other demographic.

Much more importantly, they’re the political radicals who push the envelope, make the memes, record the podcasts, write the blogs, and conspire together in secret group chats.

They went to war for him in three elections in a row … Many of them sacrificed careers to do that. The social and therefore professional consequences of being a MAGAt, a Trumptard, a member of the Trump Jugend, can be crippling. Nevertheless they were the ones pushing the envelope, hammering away at the Overton window to widen the permissible boundaries of discourse. And they succeeded. You can say things in public now that would have been absolutely verboten just a few years ago. …

No thanks, no relief, no help:

What is of course genuinely, deeply, epochally, unfathomably retarded is that the reward bestowed upon young white men for their successful decade of service has been … nothing.

Nothing at all. No patronage jobs. No grants. No lawfare against the universities refusing to let them in the door, no sanctions against the corporations using H1Bs to replace American tech workers, no ICE raids against blue collar employers undercutting American citizens with illegals, no serious effort to reduce the cost of housing …

So, say goodbye to the Republicans:

So, this election, apparently, the young white men swung by 40 points, from something like +30 for Trump to +10 for the Democrats. …

The young men are embittered and furious. I don’t know how much of that swing is in actual political alignment and how much of it was just the zoomerwaffen saying nah, fuck it, Imma stay home and play Age of Empires tonight, but there’s more than a whiff of what happened with the Bernie Bros in 2016. The Dem establishment shat on them, so they defected to Trump, bringing all of that energy to MAGA….

Antisemitism among young white men is mostly just a character test to make sure you are against the establishment:

Trump took the enormous heap of political capital he’d accumulated and squandered it on another war that no one but Israel and its domestic American Ziocons wanted. You could feel the wind coming out of the sails as the first missiles struck Tehran.

It’s hardly a secret that young right-wing men harbour an intense dislike for the Israel lobby. They’re generally pretty open about that. Cuckservatives like Rod Dreher have been wringing their hands about ‘antisemitism’ amongst the ‘groypers’ for several months now. In their world there is nothing worse than making Jews sad, no, not even losing your country, not even the reduction of your people to servitude, the extinction of your very civilization, and the onset of a long Stygian darkness. …

Performative ‘anti-semitism’ serves the same cultural function as performative racism, performative misogyny, performative homophobia. It’s a shibboleth. Young white men in the Western world have been systematically emotionally abused for their entire lives by a culture that holds white men to be presumptively evil. …

They go looking for frens. Ah, but who is a fren? How do you know who you can trust? Much as you can distinguish a clanker from a real human being by asking it to write a slur, signalling that you can laugh at racism and so on is a way of telling others that you don’t hold those things sacred which your oppressors revere, and in whose name they abuse you. Those who can blaspheme against the civic religion are apostates to the civic religion, and therefore potentially trustworthy. The actual vitriol is quite limited. Half the time the kid making gas chamber jokes is a mischling. …

For Jews, the anti-Israeli turn amongst American youth, and youth across the West, is doubtless nerve-wracking. The young right has become deeply suspicious of and reflexively hostile towards Israeli influence in their domestic politics, again I think primarily out of frustration over foreign influence generally rather than any genuine hatred for Jews specifically….

My sense is that a fair number of young white men, correctly understanding that their boomer elders will never stand up to Israel, have instead made common cause with left-wing anti-Zionists, and for the record I think this is a gigantic mistake. …

Quite different to the Left’s antisemitism:

Leftist youth have turned on Israel ferociously in the aftermath of the 10/7 attacks and, in particular, Israel’s savage response to those attacks. …

The left doesn’t care about foreign influence per se, the left after all essentially is foreign influence, the left’s entire raison d’etre at this point is foreign influence-maxxing to the point that foreign influence is the only influence. It’s just that the left wants foreign influence to be exclusively third world.

For the left, Israel is hateful not because it interferes with America’s domestic politics, but because it is a white settler-colonial state engaged in genocide against an innocent population of brown people, while they see Jews as just a variety of white people who anomalously and very annoyingly retain sufficient privilege to keep them at the top of the progressive stack, where no white person should be.

Attacking Israel is a way of assaulting the last bastion of white privilege. It’s a proxy for attacking Western civilization as a whole, which is why the Palestinian flag has become the battle banner of the third world horde intent on razing the West to the ground. …

The uniparty establishment in the GOP threw the election to wrest back their party from Trump:

It looked like the GOP was angling to intentionally throw the midterms. A resounding defeat could be used to blame MAGA for alienating the voters — too hateful, too aggressive, too ugly …

Armed with that narrative, the old guard of Ziocuck neocons, chamber of commerce grifters, and sanctimoniously longhoused evangelitards could purge the radical youth element and thus shore up their own comfortable positions. Better to rule a defeated party than to be sidelined at the victory party.

Everything that’s happened since has been consistent with that. The Republicans ran a lazy campaign, ground game was weak, and some of their picks were absolutely shocking. What were they thinking putting forth Vivek Ramascammy for Ohio governor? Vivek’s Christmas crashout during the H1B War demonstrated that he had the political instincts of a dodo bird, and a grasp of American cultural norms on the level of a sacred cow’s understanding of multivariable calculus. Surprising absolutely no one, and one of the few silver linings of the midterms, Vivek lost resoundingly to Jane Normalson. Ohio, along with a majority of other states, now has a Democrat governor. …

Texas’s white population share plummeted from 58% to 46% in just a few years, a precipitous demographic decline that puts even Canada’s headlong dive into the abyss to shame. Indians, of course, like every other group of non-whites, vote overwhelmingly for the left. In their eagerness to look ‘not racist’, and their craven appeasement of business interests hungry for cheap labour, Republican traitors have turned Texas into a California with worse weather, uglier cities, and fatter women. But hey you’ve still got the Constitution, right. टेक्सास से पंगा मत लो! …

Now that the Suicide Party have successfully thrown the midterms, the establishment narrative will almost certainly be that this was the fault of Trump and MAGA, and they will use this to attempt to purge Trump’s influence from the Republican mainstream while tacking back towards the Democrat-defined centre. …

Socialism and the polarization caused by mass immigration:

For the Democrats, on the other hand, the DSA will now be able to credibly claim that the midterms demonstrate that the people want full communism. …

America First is immensely polarizing: white men love it, married white women like it, but single white women and non-whites despise it passionately.

Non-whites genuinely do prefer socialism. The norms of liberty that Americans still delude themselves that their country embodies are simply baffling to brown people. ‘Freedom’ in the way white people understand it is a very culturally specific Anglo thing, all but unique to the ‘WEIRDest people in the world’. …

On the DSA side, full communism is as hateful to white Americans as MAGA is to non-whites. In the afterglow of victory the DSA probably won’t meet much resistance from the Democratic Party, and they and their supporters will therefore feel license to go full blast with Woke 2.0, which will generate enormous societal friction and thus erode their remaining cultural hold over the white populace even more quickly. That would be a very stupid thing for them to do, but they tend to be very stupid people. …

JD Vance tweeted:

Another pollster — one of the smartest people I know in politics — … saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:

  1. End the war
  2. Focus on cost of living/inflation
  3. Put America First
  4. Change our relationship to Israel

Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. …

The reason we lost is the war …

John Carter’s advice for JD Vance:

  • Spend the next two years doing everything in [your] power to materially improve the conditions of young men.
  • Recruit the energetic and talented into patronage positions, into the civil service, into the security services, and make sure this is visible.
  • Raid employers using illegals, in order to put pressure on them to hire young Americans.
  • Deport millions, if not tens of millions of illegals in order to put upwards pressure on wages and downwards pressure on housing prices.
  • Forbid large tech companies from employing H1Bs, and force them to hire American engineers at good salaries.
  • Openly call out the universities not just for vague ‘discrimination’, but specifically for discriminating against white boys, and then force them to stop doing that.
  • Set up training and apprenticeship programs, modelled on the Palantir fellowships, to help talented white youth skip university entirely and go straight from high school into lucrative, high-status careers; work with Elon Musk and Palmer Lucky on that, to implement similar programs at Tesla, SpaceX, and Anduril.

I don’t think promises or intentions or whatever will cut it anymore. There’s been too much betrayal already. They need to see actual results.

Ron DeSantis is Back

Ron DeSantis is Back. By Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis unleashed a blistering attack on Republican leadership following Tuesday’s disastrous midterm elections, accusing GOP lawmakers of squandering their opportunity to deliver sweeping conservative reforms while Republicans controlled the White House and both chambers of Congress.

During an appearance with Fox News host Laura Ingraham, DeSantis ripped into Senate Republicans for failing to pursue an aggressive immigration agenda, codify President Donald Trump’s executive orders, and confront federal courts that have obstructed the administration’s deportation efforts.

His message was unmistakable: Republicans were handed a historic opportunity to reshape the country, and they blew it.

Conservative things:

“If you’re going to do huge conservative things that are going to reorient the country for a generation, fine. But I saw no indication that the current group of Republican senators were interested in doing that type of bold conservative change.” …

DeSantis’s remarks represent a direct challenge to the Republican establishment, particularly Senate leadership under John Thune, which has repeatedly pointed to procedural obstacles and insufficient votes as explanations for its inability to advance major conservative priorities.

The governor was having none of it.

“… You’ve never shown that you’ll do conservative things even with 50 votes. ” …

“A lot of our voters … stayed home because they were frustrated with the lack of productivity from Republicans in the House and Senate.”

ZeroHedge:

Vice President JD Vance’s odds of winning the 2028 Republican nomination tumbled overnight [because he is part of the Trump Administration].

On Polymarket, Vance slid from about 37% to 31.4%, while Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis rocketed from around 3% to 15.5%. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Vance’s closest rival in the polls, barely moved at 19.2%, roughly where he sat before polls closed.

Kalshi shows the same shuffle: Vance at 32% and Rubio at 22%, both down slightly, while DeSantis is up 14 points to 19%.

Rod Dreher:

True, DeSantis is not a riveting speaker, but I think we’ve all had just about enough of entertaining pied pipers who lead the GOP off a cliff.

DeSantis is a Republican who, despite lacking charisma, lives in reality. …

DeSantis is not tainted by the failures of Trumpism.

Not especially smooth or articulate, but Ron got conservative things done in Florida.

Short takes on the US midterms

Short takes on the US midterms.

Mark Steyn:

“So regime change in Texas before Tehran.”

Don’t mess with Texas? The Iranians just did, very artfully.

John Carter:

It’s going to be a vicious narrative war now. The cuckold right is determined to hang the loss on MAGA. They deliberately threw the election precisely for that opportunity. They want to purge the Republican party of radicals…

Gerard Baker:

The confounding aspect of Trump’s calamity is that it was all so avoidable. In less than two years he has blown one of the greatest historic opportunities any American president has earned.

When he was elected … he had a few simple tasks: get prices under control with sensible economic policies; reduce illegal immigration; keep the US out of costly, unnecessary wars; get allies to do more to help defend the West’s security and take a firm line against its enemies. That was more or less it.

But even in the one area where he has had success among those — immigration — he has managed to alienate Americans who, understandably, do not like seeing masked gunmen out of uniform rounding up brown-skinned people on the streets of their cities. All the others have been signal failures.

Rod Dreher:

When most people are struggling in a bad economy, they become enraged when they see politically connected insiders getting rich — and they punish the incumbent.

Exit poll data

I voted straight Republican yesterday, because I fear the Democrats more than I loathe the Trump Republicans (or, to be precise, what they have become, as I too would have voted for Trump in 2024 had I been in the country).

But you know what I hope? That the Democrats haul every one of these corrupt bastards before Congress and make them answer for what they’ve done. If the Dems can establish that rich people paid for Trump pardons, then impeach the hell out of Trump. I’m sick of it. We on the Right have nothing to lose now by standing up to Trump over this. …

The old, pre-Trump GOP is never coming back. Good. It’s dead, and deserved to die. But so too is MAGA, dead by suicide….

America will become even more polarized and angry, and open to extremism on both sides. … I don’t know if we are going to get a right-wing Caesar or a left-wing Caesar, but if I were betting, it would be a form of soft Caesarism built on AI surveillance and control. I believe the establishment leftists are best positioned to administer such a system, and ideologically primed to do so. We’ll soon see.

Fox News Poll:

Order security is not an issue any more, because Trump fixed it.

The war was mostly important to Dems –or do they just say that to make Trump unpopular?

Joe Klein:

What voters cared about was Trump. They voted as if he were on the ballot — and they rejected him comprehensively, without a silver lining. They may have finally decided that he is a crook, not very competent, and maybe a little bit senile. He has made two consequential decisions that the public didn’t like: the “Liberation Day” tariffs and the war with Iran. But also, I suspect, they’ve gotten tired of his style.

Rod Dreher again:

Look: Texas is sending a woke Democratic soy boy to the Senate. Texas! That says it all.

hat-tip Stephen Neil

The first big election where AI policy went to a vote — and AI lost big

The first big election where AI policy went to a vote — and AI lost big. By David Evans.

There were 46 AI datacenter moratoria across the country, and AI is losing all of them, 46- 0.

  • 33 moratoria would ban or limit datacenters — all passed.
  • 13 moratoria allowing or permitting AI datacenters — all failed.

It’s about 70% opposing datacenters in every case.

Only SpaceX can put them in space 🙂

Trump single-handedly built a Republican majority then destroyed it

Trump single-handedly built a Republican majority, then destroyed it. By Greg Sheridan in The Australian.

Some Americans liked the weird, vulgar, crass Trump style. Tens of millions of Americans didn’t much like the Trump style but were willing to put up with that in exchange for a presidency that solved the problems.

And Trump has had some significant policy successes in his second term. He closed the US southern border and brought ­illegal immigration under control. That made a significant contribution to another big success, bringing down the crime rate.

Whatever you think of the US military campaign in Iran, it was contrary to every indication Trump had given about no more foreign wars and he made no ­effort at all to prepare the American people for any sacrifice that might be necessary, falsely promising them a short war of four or six weeks.

As a result of the Iran campaign, petrol prices, and especially diesel prices, soared. More than anything, the rise in inflation hurt the Republicans. Inflation tends to count for more in elections than do transgender issues. …

On immigration control, the public supported Trump, but, as with almost everything else, Trump overdid a defensible position and turned it into indefensible excess. Nobody voted to have often innocent people die in mismanaged arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. This contributed to a loss of credibility with Hispanic and independent voters. Hispanics, typically employed on lower than average wages, were also alienated by inflation.

But Trump also became more erratic and, though this hardly seemed possible, even more undisciplined in his speech and behaviour.

The way Trump and his family have enriched themselves out of the presidency has been shameless and off-putting to a lot of working-class folks who initially voted for Trump. Polls disclose that corruption was a big issue for American voters.

Trump thumped

Trump thumped. By John Hinderaker at Powerline.

The night is shaping up as a disaster for the GOP, and a comprehensive repudiation of Donald Trump.

I was wrong: I thought it would be a normal midterm election, but it is shaping up as a wipeout that will approach or even equal the Obama disaster of 2010.

Republicans lost every swing race, and some that were not expected to be in that category. Polling generally overestimated Republican strength.

Texas was the worst disaster. James Talarico won in what looks like a landslide, Governor Greg Abbott lost to someone no one had heard of three months ago, and the Texas legislature has, I understand, flipped blue. No one predicted that.

Apart from his general unpopularity, Trump contributed to the debacle with bad judgment.

  • John Cornyn would have been re-elected easily in Texas, but Trump couldn’t resist endorsing the wildly unpopular Ken Paxton for the Senate seat.
  • In South Carolina, he drew Lindsey Graham’s sister into the race. She had no qualifications, and when asked a question by a reporter — I think it was on foreign policy — she said she didn’t know much about it.
  • Trump went so far as to endorse the pillow guy, Mike Lindell, for Governor of Minnesota, but fortunately Minnesota Republicans weren’t that dumb.

Trump’s wounds are, as usual, largely self-inflicted. …

Post-Trump Republicans?

Trump has been repudiated pretty much universally across the country. What comes next? The GOP will have to figure that out.

Looking ahead to 2028, one wonders whether anyone strongly associated with the Trump administration will have a serious chance at the Republican presidential nomination. I would think that JD Vance is now out of the picture. And, sadly, maybe Marco Rubio, too. Maybe the time will be right for Ron DeSantis. …

Great President, poor politician:

Donald Trump has been, for the most part, a good president. But he is a terrible politician, and that has finally caught up with him. And, unfortunately, with us.

Tomorrow we will enter into a very different political world.

He’s only one man. He needed more support. And he’s pretty old.

Taking Stock of the Trump Administration’s Victories

Taking Stock of the Trump Administration’s Victories. By Inez Feltscher Stepman at National Review.

The domestic policy record of the first two years of his second term should be described, from a conservative perspective, as a major achievement worth celebrating. …

Immigration:

Trump has effectively sealed what was a highly trafficked, lawless border over which both people and drugs flowed with little impediment. …

The controversial H-1B program, for example, which has been criticized by the right for abuse related to undercutting American wages, has gone from approving 130,000 visas annually to about a quarter of its previous size, at 35,000. Asylum claims accepted by the administration have likewise dropped by half, from 60,000 to 30,000. Student visas issued have dropped to 40,000 from a previous high of 155,000.

Legal immigration from Muslim-majority nations, in particular, has taken a whopping 96 percent cut … compared with levels under the previous one. …

All of this taken together has resulted in a nearly 3 million-person decline in the foreign-born population of the United States in less than two years …

Economy:

The Trump economic record for the past two years has shown a lot of green shoots and signs of turnaround.

Overall economic growth has been steady throughout the first two quarters of the year, and Biden-era inflation numbers appear long behind us. …

Real Equality Under the Law, No Woke Exceptions:

Among the greatest victories of the second Trump presidency thus far is the administration’s revolutionary interpretation of the Civil Rights Act (CRA) …

Under the Trump administration, the CRA has been applied not only to protect the left’s favored ethnic groups, but also to protect the disfavored ones: whites, males, Asians, and anyone else deemed too “overrepresented” in American institutions.

The seemingly obvious assertion that the CRA protects white people from racial discrimination, too, has sent shockwaves out in every direction, into institutions that had grown complacent and public in their declared goals to discriminate against white men for admission, hiring, and promotion. …

No more will employers have to categorize their employees by race and sex and fear a government lawsuit if their offices fail to reach tacit racial quotas. …

Higher education:

The Trump administration has successfully sued universities under Title VI (allowing left-wing “protests” to prevent Jewish students’ access to the classroom), under Title IX (requiring female students to share teams and facilities with males as a condition of participating in sports), and under the 2023 Students for Fair Admission decision, for discriminating heavily against white and Asian applicants in the admissions process….

Quietly, some of the most useless and politically provoking ideological departments are going away …

Law and Order:

If the crime rates under President Biden in 2024 had continued through this present day, approximately 5,000 more Americans would have lost their lives to homicide. Along those trend lines, there would have been 8,500 more rapes, 1,000 more carjackings, and 100,000 more burglaries. …

Nationally, though, violent crime is down, and it’s down a lot, and the most likely explanation is that a huge number of people who were in the country to commit these crimes simply aren’t there anymore….

The First Serious Rollback of the Administrative State in a Century:

Federal workers, as a share of the total workforce, are at their lowest point since 1939. …

Powerful positions have been reclassified and made subject to normal, at-will employment rather than a web of boards and protections that made them virtually impossible to fire and therefore not accountable to anyone, least of all the voter. …

That shift alone — restoring control over the executive branch to the elected executive — makes this administration perhaps the most constitutionally restorative term, thus far, in a century. …

DOGE may have been a superficial failure in terms of cutting excess spending, but it was a manifest success in identifying a large number of the absurdly ideological grants functionally funding the institutional left and its army of NGOs. I’ve called this critical overhaul “the Great DEI Defunding,” and it’s putting a huge financial strain on the leftist network that previously felt entitled to enormous taxpayer funding streams. …

Enforcement Actions Against Leftist Fraud and Activism Networks

Nearly every week, the Department of Justice announces another prosecution of the kind of fraud rings that created headlines about “Quality Learing Centers” that didn’t have any children, Medicaid payments going to patients that don’t exist, and other schemes that turn out to be far more common than many of us imagined. …

At last, a real alternative to the uniparty:

This is not the uniparty politics of the ’90s and 2000s that left many Americans feeling that it didn’t much matter which party was in power, but two very distinct visions for the future of the United States.

Four Issues Explain the US Election

Four Issues Explain the US Election. By Mene Ukueberuwa at The Free Press.

We developed surveys designed to uncover respondents’ “private” opinions — the beliefs they consider too sensitive to express openly. …

It all adds up to an electorate that is eager for a change but wary of both parties, though the details behind that mood are often surprising….

Affordablity:

58 percent of Americans publicly say they are having trouble affording daily necessities, but fewer than half say so privately. …

Affordability tops voters’ list of concerns, ahead of every other issue, as the cost of everyday life keeps straining household budgets, and few believe Trump has done much to improve their spending power. Voters appear to be penalizing the entire GOP for these economic conditions, and the best hope for many Republican candidates is the notion that Democrats are equally unpopular. …

Immigration:

49 percent of Hispanics privately support Trump’s immigration agenda, but only 29 percent do publicly. …

Among Asian respondents, 46 percent privately say Trump’s immigration policies have been good for the country, compared with 33 percent publicly. Among Hispanic respondents, the figures are even more divergent: 49 percent privately approve, compared with just 29 percent publicly.

The findings suggest that support for Trump’s immigration policies is more widespread in private than Americans are willing to acknowledge publicly. …

Wokeness:

Only 31 percent of Americans privately believe Democrats are too focused on cultural issues, yet 47 percent say so publicly. …

The significant gap suggests that Democrats may have partly overcome the reputation for being too “woke” that turned some voters off in 2024. …

War:

Both in public and in private, little more than a third of Americans believe it’s worthwhile to start a war to prevent an enemy from gaining nuclear weapons.

Republicans seem to have been lulled into inaction because they assumed the polls were just wrong. Not so, it seems. The Democrat victories are mostly large enough that cheating isn’t significant.

Major leftist podcaster stops just short of calling for Elon Musk’s execution as a traitor

Major leftist podcaster stops just short of calling for Elon Musk’s execution as a traitor. By ZeroHedge.

Scott Galloway holds massive significance in podcasting, generating approximately $15–20 million annually from his media empire, which reaches millions globally.

What began as a familiar critique of Silicon Valley’s billionaire class quickly took a darker turn.

Galloway compared Musk to aviation pioneer Charles Lindbergh, whose sympathies toward Nazi Germany before America’s entry into World War II remain a controversial chapter in U.S. history.

Galloway then invoked Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, the American couple executed in 1953 after being convicted of conspiracy to commit espionage for the Soviet Union.

“We lined up the Rosenbergs against a wall,” Galloway said, before insisting Musk should be held to the same standards as other traitors.

Galloway stopped short of explicitly calling for Musk’s execution, but bringing up two spies who were put to death while calling him a traitor was a striking comparison.

Billionaires and nine figure types have more money than they can possibly spend on themselves. Is it fair that they have more than others? Perhaps not, but that’s not what matters to me.

People who have accumulated large amounts of money are responsible for allocating capital. They are stewards of vast amounts of what is really collective wealth a society has generated.

The great part of this is that more effective stewards — like Elon Musk — accumulate the most capital. That means that society maximizes the benefits from capital. I’d rather Elon Musk in charge of $1 trillion than, say, a bunch of bureaucrats.

Alternative to capitalism: Imagine if the dumbest, most ideological, or most corrupt people were in charge of allocating the world’s capital. Oh, I see, that’s the way modern Western government is going, and third world government has always been.

Half of Nvidia’s employees are worth over $25 million

Half of Nvidia’s employees are worth over $25 million. By Marko Nguyen at Meme Burn.

An internal survey of roughly 3,000 Nvidia employees in June 2025 found that 76% to 78% are millionaires, with approximately 50% reporting a net worth above $25 million.

 

The wealth comes almost entirely from company stock, not salaries. Nvidia runs an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) that lets employees buy shares at a 15% discount to the lowest price over a two-year lookback window.

Nvidia’s stock has returned roughly 22,687% over the past decade on a split-adjusted basis … The company’s market cap now sits around $4.8 trillion.

All that success in delivering what others voluntarily pay for … breeds so much envy and resentment among a certain type of political person, who wants “equity”, brother. So gimme dat!

The dumbing down of Australian politics

The dumbing down of Australian politics. By Damien Costas in The Spectator.

Older, bolder, richer Australia:

Bob Hawke, Paul Keating, John Howard, and John Hewson … could be arrogant, evasive, and unbearable. But they were serious people making serious arguments. They understood policy and defended positions under pressure. …

There was a minimum intellectual standard.

Rhodes scholar

The same was expected of political journalists. Government is complicated. Tax, trade, defence, and industrial relations can’t always be explained between mattress advertisements. It requires people who can read a brief, recognise what matters and translate it for the public. …

Journalists like [Laurie Oakes] could dissect budgets, expose contradictions, and leave ministers wishing they’d developed a sudden diplomatic commitment in Paraguay.

That entire ecosystem has deteriorated.

Australia today:

The intelligence, command of detail, and capacity for argument among our politicians appear to have halved. Too many speak in slogans because that’s all they possess. Ask a second question and the machinery begins to smoke. …

Midwit

Independence is dangerous. Intellectual confidence is troublesome. Far safer to promote the factionally obedient, the ideologically house-trained, and those who control the numbers in a suburban branch.

The result is a Parliament populated by people who have spent their adult lives preparing to enter it without developing a reason why they should.

The education system can’t escape responsibility. … Students learn the vocabulary of certainty before acquiring the knowledge to justify it. They emerge with opinions on everything, expertise in very little and a touching faith that the former compensates for the latter.

Then came the collapse of journalism. …

The old political journalist wanted to catch ministers lying. The new model wants to catch the audience thinking incorrectly.

That failure gave independent media an opening. The internet broke the monopoly of complacent, ideological and distrusted institutions. …

Across the political spectrum, commentary comes in angry, expletive-ridden monologues from people with about as much class as a baboon in a ball gown. Every thumbnail announces that somebody has been destroyed, exposed, or humiliated, usually by a man alone in a spare bedroom. …

Yes, some are courageous. Many are passionate. Several have identified genuine failures that established journalism ignored. That is precisely why independent media matters. I don’t want fewer dissenting voices. I want better ones.

They should research carefully, speak precisely, and understand that profanity isn’t punctuation. Anger can alert people to a problem, but it can’t substitute for knowing what caused it or what should be done. A country can’t meme its way to competent government.

Sadly, Australia’s small market makes it difficult. Only a fraction of our population follows politics seriously, so few capable people can earn a living from independent commentary. Doing it properly is full-time work, requiring research, preparation, judgement, and expertise. In America or Britain, a specialist can find an audience that makes the work pay. Here, the intelligent lawyer continues practising law, the economist remains in finance, and the microphone is left to whoever wants it most.

On top of that, that average IQ continues to drop at one or two points per decade, having peaked in the late 1800s (the genetic component that is, so no, the Flynn effect does not mitigate this steady erosion). No wonder our politics increasingly resembles that of 1600s or 1700s England. Perhaps modernity and the standards of the last century are simply unsustainable already.

Another billion dollar industry arrives to feed off “The Climate Crisis” and make us poorer

Another billion dollar industry arrives to feed off “The Climate Crisis” and make us poorer. By Joanne Nova.

Australian companies will pay $1+ billion in climate accounting fees, including reporting CO2 produced in other countries.

One thousand million dollars a year, soon to be more, is being sucked out of the Australian economy to pointlessly track carbon emissions. And companies will pay even more than that to hire consultants to calculate the emissions in the first place so the accountants (the ones earning a billion dollars) can check them.

It creates a new vested interest who will lobby for more of this red tape.

ASIC chair Joe Longo said it would be ‘the biggest change to company reporting in a generation’ .

All over the country fully functional people with 15 years of education (at least) are busy researching and calculating numbers that serve no useful purpose. Even if we pretend carbon dioxide was worth limiting (bear with me), what point is there is tracking emissions produced in China, say, from burning our coal? So we can flagellate ourselves at UN cocktail parties? So we can tell off President Xi?

Australian companies are being required to account for emissions they don’t produce, from facilities they don’t own, in countries where Australian law has no jurisdiction. Penalties are in the order of $18 million or 10% of annual turnover. What are we thinking?

This a billion dollars that isn’t making better widgets, growing food, or curing cancer. Customers will have to pay more for the exact same product. Shareholders get nothing but a smaller dividend. Australia becomes just a bit less competitive. But some bureaucrat will have some great stats to share on a slideshow at the next UN convention.

The Labor Party has brought in laws saying all Australian companies with more than 100 employees have to calculate their carbon emissions in detail, including not just the emissions they control (Scope 1) but the emissions produced by their suppliers of electricity, heating and cooling (Scope 2) and even by their customers (Scope 3).

ClimateZero has helpfully laid out the full bureaucratic nightmare that poor CEO’s must employ lawyers and accountants to wade through. This onerous task is being phased in, starting with largest companies last year, and bringing in the smaller $50 million operations* mid next year. “Scope 3” emissions get added to the burden a year after the Scope 1 and 2 emissions.

The awful truth is that big companies are doing all this work, and then paying around $85,000 just for accounting firms to check and approve their numbers. Mid sized companies are slugged for about $61,000 for the same process. This is really going to hurt smaller businesses. …

Two years ago two Coalition Senators estimated that climate reporting will cost business $2.3 billion. They estimated 1,800 entities would be captured. It’s just a paper pushing farce, tracking a gas that feeds plants and trees. The Labor Party is creating jobs burying bottles of cash and paying people to dig them up again.

Like net zero itself, this destroys productivity, so we all get poorer. Australian productivity figures have slumped, and there is a widespread feeling of life becoming tougher economically — which, surprise surprise, coincides with our push for net zero. If our ruling class had just done some due diligence on the carbon dioxide theory of global warming instead of jumping on Al Gore’s bandwagon they would have found it was exaggerated nonsense. But they didn’t. So stupid.

Created a divided society by putting multiculturalism ahead of assimilation

Created a divided society by putting multiculturalism ahead of assimilation.

Commentary Australian Greens:

This isn’t Iraq. It’s a school in Australia.

This is a parallel society forming in real time. It’s not racist to have a problem with this.

Either we all start voting like we want Australia to stay Australia, or our kids inherit the consequences.

And:

We used to have a shared sense of purpose, strong national identity, collective responsibility, social trust, pride in contributing to our nation, intergenerational thinking, a sense of belonging to something greater than oneself.

What happened? Where did we lose this? 🙁

And:

Mehreen Faruqi’s entire political brand is a single, well-worn tactic: pick a fight, inject race into it, demonise anyone … who disagrees, then collapse into the role of aggrieved victim the moment the pushback arrives.

The script never changes. It’s not sophisticated or brave. It’s actually the cheapest form of political performance available and she has made a very lucrative career out of it.

People aren’t sick of her because of her race. We’re sick of the relentless, bad-faith race-baiting, the reflexive accusation of bigotry against anyone who won’t applaud, the constant insistence that disagreement is violence and criticism is hate. That is a choice she keeps making and it comes at a huge social cost to our country.

Dearborn, Michigan:

This is the early voting line in Dearborn, MI. Like it or not, demographics are destiny.


Victoria:

Last year Labor passed a treaty in Victoria and created this “First Peoples Assembly” which is basically a symbolic parliament but with power to formally challenge legislation. No one in Victoria voted for it but Labor passed it anyway.

The clown you’re watching makes over $250k a year for this.

Get more of what you subsidize, less of what you tax. Obviously, the uniparty did this to us intentionally. It’s as if our enemies/rivals (the old Soviet Union? China? Tehran? Mecca?) somehow influenced our societies to do this to themselves. Hmm, how much money would that take? Point enough virtue signalers in the desired direction, and let competition and mob dynamics do the rest.

Sovereignty or Submission? Poland’s Battle Against the Eurocrats is Everyone’s Battle

Sovereignty or Submission? Poland’s Battle Against the Eurocrats is Everyone’s Battle. By Roger Kimball at American Greatness.

[Following] the attempted coup d’état in Poland Friday night, … who governs? The people or the unelected bureaucrats? It is one of the central political questions of our times, as applicable to Europe, Australia, Canada, and South America as it is to the United States.

Increasingly, it seems, the answer is “the bureaucrats.” Just a week ago, Brazil went through an extremely dodgy election in which a last-minute, illegal extension of voting yielded the Communist Lula da Silva a victory over Flávio Bolsonaro. The EU was pleased by, and perhaps contributed to, the outcome. Or consider what happened in Hungary. In May, Péter Magyar defeated Viktor Orbán. Magyar moved quickly to ban his opponents from ever running again and even started legal proceedings against some. In Germany, the AfD is wildly popular with the people, but not with the ruling party or the commissars in the EU. Hence, it is subject to unending harassment and may be banned altogether. In France, Marine Le Pen was put under house arrest and required to wear an electronic ankle monitor. In Romania, when the “wrong” candidate ran, the election was cancelled, and the winner was banned from running. This is what Ursula von der Leyen, president of the EU, means by “democracy”: submission to the diktats of the European Union.

In Poland, the usual mold may be being broken. As I write, we are still in a fog-of-war situation. Many things have been tossed up into the air. It is not entirely clear where they all will land. …

What happened:

The prime minister since 2023 has been Donald Tusk, an EU poodle and liberal authoritarian. The president since 2025 is Karol Nawrocki, an anti-EU, Poland-first populist who wants Poland to keep its own currency, have control of its borders, and sharply limit immigration.

Here’s what happened. On Friday night, Nawrocki departed on an official trip to Senegal. His plane was over Spain when he received word that Tusk had unilaterally suspended some duly appointed judges and other officials, elevated a judge loyal to him to the chief spot, and called in riot police to surround Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal. …

Dominik Tarczyński:

What is happening right now with the Constitutional Tribunal is that [Tusk and the globalists] want to take it over and fill it with their own people.

Why? Because they want to get rid of the Polish currency, bring us into the eurozone, and eliminate our secure borders. They are being pushed by the Germans, who want to spread the burden of illegal migration and send migrants to Poland.

First of all, the Polish złoty is our constitutionally protected currency. They have to change the Constitution to replace it, and without the Constitutional Tribunal, they cannot do that.

So, number one, they want to get rid of our currency and force us to adopt the euro and join the eurozone. Then they want to take our gold reserves, the largest in the European Union, to Frankfurt, to the European Central Bank, which is a German-based institution.

They also want to open our borders. And they want to make sure that when they lose the next elections, which are coming next year, the Constitutional Tribunal will be unable to do anything to stop their actions or reverse what they have done.

Why now? Brivael Le Pogam:

Because the globalist project is losing its grip.

They lost the media war: people get their information elsewhere, compare, verify, and no longer trust the official line. They lost the trust of the people. And the countries that are bouncing back, the ones finding their energy, their birth rates, their pride again, are precisely the ones that understood that the Brussels machine, as it runs today, is not the cure but the disease. Poles elected Nawrocki against the system’s candidate. The message was clear.

When a system loses trust, it has two options: reform or harden. They chose. All-in. …

The official story is “we are restoring the rule of law.” It’s always the official story. Nobody has ever dismantled a democracy while announcing they were dismantling a democracy.

In Poland it’s about Polish sovereignty and Polish submission to the globalist agenda of the EU. But the same battle is being played out everywhere:

The countries already taken back:

🇺🇸 United States: Trump
🇦🇷 Argentina: Milei
🇸🇻 El Salvador: Bukele
🇨🇴 Colombia: Abelardo de la Espriella, elected in June
🇨🇱 Chile: Kast, in power since March
🇵🇪 Peru: Keiko Fujimori, elected in June
🇪🇨 Ecuador: Noboa
🇧🇴 Bolivia: Rodrigo Paz, after nearly 20 years of MAS
🇭🇳 Honduras: Asfura
🇵🇾 Paraguay: Peña
🇮🇹 Italy: Meloni
🇨🇿 Czech Republic: Babiš
🇸🇰 Slovakia: Fico
🇵🇱 Poland: Nawrocki in the presidency

The countries in the midst of flipping:

🇫🇷 France: RN is polling between 31 and 37% in the first round.

🇩🇪 Germany: AfD scored 43.8% in Saxony-Anhalt in September, against 17.2% for the CDU.

Let’s be clear-eyed: they’re still winning some battles. Orbán fell in Hungary in April. Lula took back Brazil a week ago. The system knows how to defend itself. But we need to look at the underlying trend, not the latest match.

Politics has gone fully international. There are the same two sides everywhere now, and everyone knows it. Globalists versus nationalists. Post-modern left and Islam versus everyone else.