Ben Roberts-Smith Versus The Freak Show

Ben Roberts-Smith Versus The Freak Show. By David Archibald.

Mr Roberts-Smith is being persecuted because he is the antithesis of the freak show that is currently running the Department of Defence since at least 2005.

Dresses:

The sort of person they prefer to associate with is another Army captain, Captain Jesse Noble, the Darwin-based subject of the title of this article:

From that article, this is a photograph of Captain Noble wearing his dress, lippy and painted fingernails to work:

 

 

This is the sort of man that the Army’s high command would prefer to have defending Australia, not the fearless Corporal Roberts-Smith. Senior officers backed a bid by Captain Noble that he be allowed to wear a dress to work. That means that those same senior officers are social engineers, who would rather remake society in their own image than be combat-effective. A captain runs a company of about 100 soldiers. In the life and death business of soldiering, soldiers put their trust in their officers to do the best by them, or not if the officer is a bloke in a dress. None could take him seriously. The high command would also be suppressing normal people and promoting their own kind instead.

The importance of trust in having an effective army is mentioned by long time defence analyst Paul Dibb:

The dearth of professional non-commissioned officers means that totalitarian armies are unable to fight effectively because NCOs provide the vital link between officers and soldiers about battlefield decision-making. Military command and control culture boils down to trust, including at the operational level.

You may think that just because a bloke wants to wear a dress to work doesn’t necessarily mean that he thinks he is woman trapped in a man’s body. Which, if that were the case, would be a bad thing because it would mean he has gender dysphoria. This is the worst mental illness to have, because it has the highest suicide rate – 50%. He may look pretty in his dress, and he may feel pretty, but looks can be deceiving. So, if he doesn’t have gender dysphoria, what particular condition might it be? A possibility is transvestic fetishism as described by the American Psychological Association:

Transvestic fetishism is a psychiatric diagnosis applied to men who are thought to have an excessive sexual or erotic interest in cross-dressing; this interest is often expressed in autoerotic behaviour. It differs from cross-dressing for entertainment or other purposes that do not involve sexual arousal. Under the name transvestic disorder, it is categorised as a paraphilia.

Whatever it is, expecting normal people to put up with it is poking them in the eye with a burnt stick. The high command of the Australian Defence Force would have been squealing with glee in forcing a cross-dresser on the lower ranks.

If it makes you feel any better, it is not just the Australian Defence Force that was afflicted. Until recently, West Point, where the cream of the U.S. Army officer corps start their careers, had a course entitled “Uniformed Perspectives: The Evolution of Cross-Dressing in the Military and Gender Norms”.

Proscriptions against cross-dressing in public are sensible. Because of my attendance at Bible Study, I am aware that this offence against society was mentioned 3,400 years ago in Deuteronomy 22:5:

A woman shall not wear a man’s apparel, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment; for whoever does such things is abhorrent. …

Cookbooks but no drones:

Australia has made no effort towards using drones in warfare, or defending against them, even though drones are causing over 90% of the casualties in the Ukraine War. We will be wiped out by any aggressor using them, as was shown by a recent NATO exercise in which 10 Ukrainian drone operators destroyed two battalions’ worth of armour in a day. We have made baby steps towards the prior overarching technology by assembling missiles in Australia.

The bloke put in charge of this missile project is Air Marshall Leon Phillips. The first thing he did, before any missile was assembled, was to produce a ‘harmony’ cookbook:

 

Phillips in his cosplay as a military officer, the cookbook paid for by taxpayers, and being transfixed by an attachment to his blender.

 

Screwdriver assembly of missiles in Australia is useless because production stops when the supply of the parts stops. We are going to make missiles for the HIMARS launchers in Australia, but all the parts will come from Lockheed in the U.S. If Australia is going the wrong way about it, what is the right way to make missiles? The Russians make a lot of missiles and this is how they go about it at the Krasnoyarsk machine building plant that makes intercontinental ballistic missiles … Some 40% of the effort involved is machining of castings in CNC lathes and another 23% is assembly. The only real specialist knowledge is in designing the castings. Assembly is so simple that Russia imported Ugandan females to do that (the average IQ in Uganda is 76).

Recruitment: would you want to join an army with dresses but no drones?

That fact reminds us of another consequence of Captain Noble’s dress, fingernail polish and lippy. People have resigned from the Australian Army because, in their words, they ‘didn’t join the army to salute a bloke in a dress’. For that same reason, parents are discouraging their children from joining the army.

Our armed forces aren’t meeting their recruiting numbers. Our high command interprets this as being due to Australians not wanting to defend the country anymore. So, they concocted a scheme in which soldiers from Papua New Guinea could transfer to the Australian Army and be rewarded with citizenship. One problem with that is that, like Uganda, Papua New Guinea has an average IQ of 76. The US Army found out back in WW2 that there was no role in the army for anyone with an IQ less than 83. In Papua New Guinea, only 32% of the males would have an IQ of 83 and higher. There is another problem with mercenaries that Machievelli pointed out more than five hundred years ago:

Now, mercenary and auxiliary forces are useless and dangerous; and any ruler who keeps his state dependent upon mercenaries will never have real peace and security, for they are disorganised, undisciplined, ambitious, and faithless.

The U.S. Department of Defense solved its recruitment problem by firing all its kooks and tranny-lovers. Their recruitment numbers then went through the roof. Ours will too once we do the same.

Batteries will save us:

Next up in the freak show is the bloke in charge of the Army, Lieutenant General Simon Stuart. In the Army he is considered to be an intellectual because he wrecked a Bushmaster truck by replacing the diesel engine with batteries. General Stuart must live in a world of magic in which you can wish things into existence. Because there is no way of recharging electric trucks on the battlefield. The Army is now considering towing a generator behind it. (Humans normally blink every five seconds or so. This is a video of the general reading from an autocue. This takes so much brain power that his autonomic processes shut down to cope and he doesn’t blink for minutes on end.)

Of course the Australian Defence Force has a Net Zero strategy. It is a completely stupid, useless thing to do. The Bushmaster was born diesel but identified as electric. Lieutenant General Stuart sensed this need to transition. …

Woke witch doctors pay for “evidence”:

The next piece of evidence that the higher ranks of our Australian Defence Force is unfit for command is the fantasy fiction of a Canberra sociologist, a Dr Crompvoets. It’s a small literary niche–the high command’s need for lurid stories about how unspeakably beastly Australian special forces are. But it pays well.

According to the previous defence minister Dutton, Dr Crompvoets was paid $6 million over a few years. It started in 2016 when General Angus Campbell commissioned a secret report on SAS culture.

Members of the SAS, past and present, were encouraged to contact Dr Crompvoets anonymously and tell tales of what went on in the regiment. Some of the lurid tales were included in her report as fact. For example:

‘The inquiry has found that there is credible information that junior soldiers were required by the patrol commanders to shoot a prisoner, in order to achieve that soldier’s first kill, in a practice that was known as ‘blooding’. ‘Throwdowns would be placed with the body, and a ‘cover story’ was created for the purposes of operational reporting and to deflect scrutiny. This was reinforced with a code of silence.’

As several thousand Australian troops have rotated through Afghanistan, you would expect at least several hundred of those to have undergone the ‘blooding’ initiation. But none were named in the subsequent Brereton Report, which repeated some of Dr Crompvoets’ other fantasy fiction. Take this example from page 120 of the Brereton report:

Clearance Operations. Dr Crompvoets was told that, after squirters were ‘dealt’ with, Special Forces would then cordon off a whole village, taking men and boys to guesthouses, which are typically on the edge of a village. There they would be tied up and tortured by Special Forces, sometimes for days. When the Special Forces left, the men and boys would be found dead: shot in the head or blindfolded and with throats slit.

The implication was that there are a lot of villages in Afghanistan with only women and girls left because Australian soldiers killed all the males. But no such village was named in the report. And none have been found since. Yet the high command of the Australian Defence Force believed these fairy tales. Nobody even raised the possibility that these stories could be fabrications. They read what they wanted to believe, that ordinary Australian soldiers are sadistic murderers.

The fact that the Department’s senior management believed the Brereton Report means that they have no understanding of the troops they are commanding, and precious little grip on reality otherwise. And most likely loathe the troops under their command.

Brereton couldn’t get the stories on atrocities that he wanted until he started paying Afghans to tell them. Basically, Brereton had insufficient mental acuity to understand that if he wasn’t getting stories of the atrocities he wanted, perhaps there hadn’t been any atrocities. Eventually the Afghans twigged to what Brereton was about and made up stories in order to be paid for the effort.

That is the context of the persecution of Ben Roberts-Smith. Others have also seen the darkness in the Australian Defence Force. Defence journalist Kym Bergman wrote last year,

Defence culture has changed into something secretive, suspicious of the outside world and thoroughly unpleasant.

We are protected by the US Navy, but Albanese has annoyed Trump by not being sufficiently enthusiastic about defanging the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Scientists with access to game-changing space, nuclear, and advanced energy secrets are dying at an alarming rate

Scientists with access to game-changing space, nuclear, and advanced energy secrets are dying at an alarming rate. By Steve Watson at modernity.

[Joe] Rogan encourages listeners to confront a pattern the establishment would rather bury: scientists with access to game-changing space, nuclear, and advanced energy secrets are dying or vanishing at an alarming rate.

“People have to understand this missing scientist thing. It sounds a little conspiratorial. It sounds a little silly, a little tinfoil hatty,” Rogan explained, clarifying “Until you start thinking about the amount of money that would be lost if a breakthrough tech came around that revolutionized the way they distribute energy.” …

“Breakthrough zero point energy breakthrough whatever that is that these people are working on. Plasma technology, whatever the fuck that is. You would lose if you’re in whatever business that would be competing with them. You’re going to lose so much fucking money. You’re probably going to go under. If you’re in the energy business, you’re going to… or he goes away, right?” …

The human cost:

“Mystery around dead or missing scientists privy to space and nuclear secrets grows. Imagine being a scientist, you work so hard to figure out some amazing stuff that’s going to transform the human experience and then people kill you. Literally kill you like in a parking lot, one of those silenced guns.” …

The comments land just as fresh scrutiny hit the ninth case in the growing list. Michael David Hicks, a longtime research scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory … died at age 59. No cause of death was ever released publicly, and no autopsy record has surfaced. NASA and JPL have remained silent.

Others who have gone missing or died include astrophysicist Carl Grillmair, shot dead on his front porch in February 2026; NASA JPL senior scientist Frank Maiwald, who died in 2024 with no cause disclosed; aerospace engineer Monica Reza, who vanished while hiking in June 2025; retired Air Force Gen. William Neil McCasland, who disappeared in February 2026 after overseeing billions in classified space programs; and others tied to Los Alamos National Laboratory and MIT plasma fusion research.

The pattern:

As laid out in the reporting on the exploding pattern of deaths among experts guarding America’s most guarded programs, these individuals held knowledge that sits at the intersection of civilian space exploration and military applications — from hypersonic tracking to propulsion systems that could slash reliance on foreign energy and materials.

Rep. Tim Burchett has linked several cases directly to UFO-related knowledge and warned that the deaths send a clear message: people don’t want to talk about unidentified flying objects anymore because they are afraid. …

The timing is impossible to ignore. These conversations explode publicly right as President Trump continues demanding the full release of UFO and UAP files long buried by layers of bureaucracy. The very experts who could illuminate breakthrough propulsion, gravity manipulation, or zero-point energy technologies are being removed from the board—whether through outright hits or convenient “disappearances.” …

Investigation?

Congress is already probing the string of incidents involving scientists working on space, gravity, and advanced energy tech. National security voices warn of foreign adversaries targeting American talent at facilities like JPL and Los Alamos. Yet the official response remains the same: silence, no comments, no transparency. …

Taxpayer-funded programs at NASA, JPL, and Los Alamos produced these breakthroughs. The public funded the research. Now the public watches the researchers vanish while the same gatekeepers who buried the files refuse to explain why.

 

 

The left has fallen in love with Islam

The left has fallen in love with Islam. By Brendan O’Neill in The Spectator.

Imagine there was a virulently Francophobic militia on the doorstep of the French Republic. Imagine it had fired nearly a hundred thousand missiles into France these past three years. Imagine if the France-loathing maniacs had caused the deaths of hundreds of French people and forced almost half a million to flee their towns in terror. France would respond, right? It would take action, no? …

Why, then, does President Macron not extend the same right to fight to his supposed ally of Israel? Hezbollah has inflicted every one of those bloody horrors on Israel since 7 October 2023. I’ve scaled up the numbers to account for France’s population of 70 million, compared to Israel’s ten million. Yet this is what the tiny Jewish state has experienced at the hands of that self-styled Party of God — ceaseless, indiscriminate violence.

Reality:

In solidarity with Hamas’s Nazi-like pogrom of 7 October, Hezbollah started raining projectiles on Israel the very next day. It has fired around 12,000 missiles, rockets and drones at its neighbour. Scores have been slain, including 12 Druze children playing a game of football. Tens of thousands in Northern Israel have been forced into internal exile, leaving ghost towns behind them. Jew-free swathes of territory – just as the anti-Semites of Hezbollah like it.

There is not one country on earth that would tolerate such apocalyptic goading.

And yet Macron this week rebuked Israel for striking back against Hezbollah. We condemn Israel’s ‘indiscriminate strikes’ in ‘the strongest possible terms’, he said, to the glee of every twit in a keffiyeh.

How do we know it’s love?

He’s being gushed over, naturally. The fastest route into the affections of the bourgeois left is to take a swipe at Israel.

Yet to those of us whose moral compasses have not been shattered on that wheel of hysterical hatred for the world’s only Jewish nation, Macron’s comments are mad. Immoral, even. Reprimanding a democratic state for pushing back against the racist militia that has subjected it to such savage fire? Who does he think he is? …

Peruse social media, mingle with anti-war types, switch on the BBC, and you could be forgiven for thinking Israel is bombing Lebanon for sport. It’s that ‘genocidal bloodlust’ again, say the Israelophobes of the left, blind to how unhinged and pre-modern such libels against the Jewish state sound to the rest of us. These are lies of omission. To obsess over what Israel is currently doing to Hezbollah without mentioning what Hezbollah has already done to Israel is to engage in flagrant acts of deceit. …

Hezbollah is an army of bigots. It dreams of annihilating the ‘cancerous’ Jewish state. Its goal is a pogrom that would put into the shade those of the 1930s — it has promised to keep waging holy war against the Jews of the Holy Land, and those who survive ‘can go back to Germany, or wherever they came from’. …

Any coverage of the Lebanon crisis that leaves out these facts is not worth the paper it’s written on. Macron, Keir Starmer and every genuine progressive should be making one demand and one demand only: for the full surrender of Hezbollah and the liberation of both Lebanon and Israel from its hateful, violent ideology.

For example (by Catherine Salgado in PJ Media):

After Iranian terror proxy Hezbollah marked the ceasefire by immediately bombarding Israeli civilians, the IDF, of course, struck back. And completely contrary to all the propaganda that has been circulating nonstop from Jew-haters and Islamic terrorists online, Israel is not targeting Lebanese civilians; it is targeting Hezbollah operatives. The only reason Israel has to conduct some operations in “civilian” areas is that Hezbollah, like Hamas, uses civilians and their infrastructure as human shields.

Many of the northern Israeli towns under Hezbollah attack are still reeling from the Oct. 7 war. During that conflict, it was typical for Hezbollah to fire missiles at civilians in northern Israel on a weekly and sometimes a daily basis. Some towns saw a majority of their buildings damaged or destroyed in the Hezbollah bombardments. You can read about the harrowing story of an Israeli reservist crippled in a Hezbollah attack, whose town of Metula was largely reduced to rubble by Hezbollah. And while the jihad-loving Gazans can always be sure of billions of dollars from America and the West to rebuild, the bereft Israeli civilians receive no such aid.

It’s a religious war, and the western left supports the opposition — because it needs to see itself as more virtuous than its own population (who voted for Trump, etc.).

Australia has no oil production because of climate theory

Australia has no oil production because of climate theory. By Eric Johnston in The Australian.

There’s no one better placed to talk about how Australia left itself so exposed on fuel than Adrian Cook. After all, listed explorer Carnarvon Energy, which he ran for more than a decade, discovered the nation’s biggest offshore oilfields of this century. … The field is better known as Dorado, and it’s an underwater energy goldmine.

But like its name suggests, it is frustratingly out of reach. The project has sat idle for years due to a lack of support. When it comes to producing homegrown oil, Australia simply doesn’t have any stomach for it. …

[Cook] describes an entire “ecosystem” that choked off Australia’s once booming oil industry — whereby oil didn’t fail due to a lack of resources but because overlapping political, financial and social pressures slowly created an environment in which development became impossible.

It was this ecosystem that fed on itself around the climate change thematic,” Cook tells The Australian. …

Banks and government actively discouraged oil exploration and production in Australia because they believed carbon emissions were over heating the planet (but “forgot” to do due diligence on the climate models):

Cook says the shift became noticeable from mid last decade when it began getting more difficult to get funding and even regulatory support was slowing for Carnarvon’s efforts….

“Governments became nervous about approving activities, granting retention licences, production licences; lenders — particularly the Aussie four banks — became nervous, stopped lending to the sector. Investors were sensing things were not happening in this sector versus other sectors and started moving capital elsewhere,” he says. …

Australia has oil but the wrong ruling class:

Cook is emphatic that commercial quantities of oil exist in Australia, saying “it is literally there” and describes it as “a frustration for all Australians” that it is undeveloped.

But the capital needed to first find it and then extract it is simply heading to other countries.

He points to specific proven reserves including Dorado in the under-explored Bedout Basin, the broader Canning Basin and particularly the nearby Browse Basin, which he believes “could be one of the biggest things in this country”. …

Cook says the rhetoric of Australia moving to net zero has “run ahead of reality.… If the farmer can’t have the diesel or the fertiliser to basically bring us food, we suffer as a nation very quickly.”

The modern world preys on white males, who are outside the victim hierarchy

The modern world preys on white males, who are outside the victim hierarchy. By Peter Rudgeair at The WSJ. An example:

The problem, wrote [Bill Ackman, billionaire US fund manager], was a former lawyer in his family office, whom he called by the pseudonym Ronda. She had rejected three months of severance and instead demanded two years’ pay — about $2 million — citing an unsafe workplace.

How does Ronda deserve US$2million from Bill?

The firm that manages Ackman’s personal fortune … has had high turnover and growing expenses. So Ackman installed his nephew, whom he’d previously stationed at a British watchmaker he controls, to investigate.

The nephew made a comment at a lunch about a woman looking young for her age, Ackman wrote. This and other comments were noted by the in-house attorney, who Ackman gave the pseudonym Ronda. When Ronda was later laid off with others at TABLE, she said the nephew’s comments demonstrated an unsafe work environment, and asked for the bigger severance package, he wrote.

In Ackman’s telling, Ronda is in the wrong, since she handled human resources at the time of the incident and she reported to a woman herself. Ronda might think she could demand $2 million when she had worked at the company for just 2½ years because he has been tending to one of his three adult daughters who is recovering from a brain hemorrhage, he said.

“Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a ‘hostile and unsafe work environment’ are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media,” Ackman wrote, a reference to his plan to take public his firm, Pershing Square, in the coming months….

“It strikes a chord with people,” said [west coast anti-DEI activist Robby Starbuck] in an interview discussing his own response. The founder of a company had directly sent him the post, he said. “There is a system that preys more on white males, because it’s like they are outside the victim hierarchy.” …

He clearly touched a nerve among the capitalist class. Elon Musk responded with encouragement 62 minutes later. …

“Destroy them!” Joe Lonsdale, a founder of Palantir, responded to Ackman’s story.

“Agreed,” wrote Donald Trump Jr., with three “100” emojis. “This nonsense has to stop.”

Most of us have to work for our money, but inquiring minds want to know: why only $2 million? Why not $10 million? Obviously Ronda deserves never having to work another day in her life, poor thing.

US has let in 4,499 refugees since October – all but three were South African

US has let in 4,499 refugees since October – all but three were South African. By Mayeni Jones at the BBC.

Since October 2025, 4,499 refugees were resettled in the US, according to the Refugee Processing Center. All, except three from Afghanistan, were South African.

In the last full fiscal year of the Biden administration, which started in October 2023, 125,000 people were accepted from 85 countries.

Last year, Trump halted all refugee admissions, including for applicants from warzones, but allowed Afrikaners, a white minority group he said was persecuted, to seek resettlement. South Africa objected to his characterisation.

In announcing the change, Trump said it would help strengthen national security and public safety. …

Just over a year ago, South Africa’s ambassador in the US, Ebrahim Rasool, was expelled after accusing Trump of “mobilising a supremacism” and trying to “project white victimhood as a dog whistle”.

Then, in the Oval Office in May, Trump confronted his South African counterpart, Cyril Ramaphosa, where he claimed that white farmers in South Africa were targets of persecution and “genocide”.

 

South African farmers burying their dead

Trump’s Strategy for Fortress America

Trump’s Strategy for Fortress America. By Alex Armstrong at GB News, with notes by M.A. Rothman.

GB News’ Alex Armstrong laid out the geopolitical map that American media refuses to draw: this war isn’t about toppling Iran. It’s about 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐥𝐨𝐛𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 — and America is winning on every front.

 

 

Start with oil. The Strait of Hormuz carries 𝟒𝟓% 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐚’𝐬 𝐨𝐢𝐥 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐲. Trump effectively captured Venezuela’s oil supply in January. … China is in the middle of a tariff negotiation with Trump — and suddenly its entire energy supply depends on American goodwill.

Then Europe. With Russian energy off the table and domestic energy hollowed out by the “𝘭𝘦𝘧𝘵𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘣𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘯𝘦𝘵 𝘻𝘦𝘳𝘰,” Europe is becoming 𝐰𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐢𝐥 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐠𝐚𝐬. Armstrong: “𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘺 𝘢𝘴 𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦, 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘰𝘰.”

Armstrong connected the dots to what the Pentagon calls 𝐆𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐍𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚 — Greenland through the Panama Canal, the entire Western Hemisphere secured as a self-sufficient American economic and security zone. “𝘕𝘰 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘯𝘰 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴, 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘦𝘥, 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘦-𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘯. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢.”

 

The most striking part was his warning for Britain: “𝘞𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘺 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘞𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 60% 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘰𝘥. 𝘞𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘺. 𝘖𝘶𝘳 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥.” …

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐰𝐨𝐧’𝐭 𝐚𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐭: 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐩 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐨𝐬. 𝐇𝐞’𝐬 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬.

Islamists gotta propagandize:

Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has claimed Iran as the “definitive victors” in the war against the US and Israel in a statement read on Iranian state TV.

Leftists so want Islam to win against America and Israel. Who better to articulate that longing than better than Michael Moore (by Anna Young at The New York Post):

Liberal filmmaker Michael Moore torched the US as the “bad guys” in the war with Iran — while hailing the Middle Eastern nation as one of the world’s “greatest civilizations” … calling President Trump a “terrorist” for threatening a “holocaust” after the commander in chief warned Iran that its “whole civilization” would be wiped out if the nation failed to cut a ceasefire deal to open the Strait of Hormuz and end the six-week conflict.

“Our leaders and our media are stupid enough to keep asking questions like ‘why do they hate us?’ Hate us?! They don’t hate US! WE HATE THEM!” Moore raged on his Substack. …

Moore then blasted the US as the “only nation sick and violent enough” to use nuclear weapons, while bizarrely praising Tehran for building a diverse global power, advancing human rights, and leading the world on multiple fronts.

“Iran is the cradle of one of the greatest civilizations this planet has ever seen,” the “Fahrenheit 9/11” filmmaker wrote. …

Moore called on the US military to disobey “illegal” and “immoral” orders, urged Congress to impeach War Secretary Pete Hegseth, and demanded the 25th Amendment be invoked to remove Trump from office.

Sure Michael.

There Are No Hills to Head For

There Are No Hills to Head For. By The Kafir. at The Gates of Vienna.

Beginning in 711 AD, Muslims conquered Spain…

One Visigothic nobleman, Pelayo, refused to submit and retreated into Cantabrian mountains and started the Spanish Reconquista. The Reconquista was completed only in 1492, nearly 800 years after the refusal by Pelayo to submit to Islam. In those 800 years, mountains of Spain sheltered the Spanish patriots.

 

Stories of all freedom movements reveal this basic fact: the fighters need a base that cannot be overrun by the enemy. There the fighters arm, rearm, relax, recuperate after battles, store arms, and families remain safe.

Daily I think about Pelayo as the war with Islam comes closer all over the kafir [non-Muslim] world.

Technological advances gave kafirs the past 200 years of military superiority and hence unprecedented prosperity. … But the technology which kafirs have developed and are developing is also reaching Islam in real time. Missiles, drones, radars, and all the means of communication in the Muslim world now match what the technological superpowers, America and Israel, have. …

We can be sure that there is no mountain now where Pelayo can have his base. Reconquista will no longer be possible. …

Islam, on the other hand, goes the full distance in abolishing the abstract rules of conduct. It abolishes in their entirety the moral laws which made civilisation possible. It says that the property of non-Muslims can and must be seized, non-Muslims can and must be killed if they do not convert or pay jizya and non-Muslim women can be seized, raped and sex-enslaved. Every Muslim individual is authorised to do these things to kafirs; he doesn’t have to involve any court or tribunal. A Muslim doesn’t even need to be in a formal war. Any time, in any city or village, when he can, he should kill the kafir, loot his property, and sex-enslave his women. In doing so, he is not only acting in accordance with the moral laws of Islam, he is worshipping Allah. And so Islam produces civilisational deserts. …

Islam has made sure that everything about it — jihad, contradictions in the Qur’an, verses of war in it, its treatment of its own women, etc. — gets discussed but never the only thing that matters: its abolition of the laws of morality, the laws that converted bands of hunter-gatherers into the creators of the great civilisations which we see today. Now it increasingly appears that this discussion perhaps will never happen.

The Western elite has now taken upon itself the duty to ensure that nothing that Muslims do not approve can be spoken, written, broadcast or taught about Islam. They now employ the superlative might of the West to enforce Sharia, the legal code of Islam, that reduces all non-Muslims to the level below the domestic animals of Muslims: mute, without any legal protection of their persons, their women and their property.

And before Islam dehumanises non-Muslims, it kills the humanity in Muslims. The things that the girls in Rupert Lowe’s rape gang inquiry are describing were done to them, no human being, even a rapist, does to another human being. Only soulless zombies are capable of inflicting those horrors on five-year-old girls. And Islam always creates those soulless zombies. …

Civilisation can be destroyed within a decade or two. France was guillotining the Muslim ringleaders of grooming gangs as late as in 1977, but now it denies the US overfly facility when the US is fighting Islam (Iran).

Islam will take over the great surveillance state the Western elite is creating. The AI powered digital ID, the CCTVs, systems to monitor calls and social media. No Pelayo will be possible. Not in cities, not in mountains. Western technology will make sure that the West is no longer capable of organising Reconquista against Islam.

It may seem inconceivable to a sane mind, but the murderers, looters, rapists, enslavers and sex-enslavers will actually inherit the earth. They will not be able to maintain the technology superstate, but they would not even want to. They will just run it like Afghanistan. The only commodity traded will be nine-year-old girls.

But that will come about over centuries. They will not behead or force-convert kafirs immediately. They will keep them enslaved, as payers of jizya and suppliers of five-year-old girls to middle aged Muslim men. George Orwell and Aldous Huxley had very limited imagination as compared to what the world will be under Islam in reality.

It doesn’t have to be this way, but the Western Left supports Islam. “Islamophobe” has overtaken “racist” as the criticism a leftist fears most. It matters not that Islam spread by conquest and is the biggest colonizer on the planet (two billion people and rising), but our left decries “colonists” and supports Islam over native Westerners. History means nothing to today’s ignorant left.

Possibly related:

Muslim rape gangs: : ‘Get over it’ says the he Alwaleed bin Talal Chair of Islamic Civilization at Georgetown University.

Muslim rape gangs: : ‘Get over it’ says the he Alwaleed bin Talal Chair of Islamic Civilization at Georgetown University. By The Daily Caller.

Professor Jonathan A. C. Brown, chair of Islamic Civilization at Georgetown, posted the dismissive remark twice on X in response to users discussing a link between Islam and an escalating crisis of rape gangs in the United Kingdom, archived versions of the now-deleted posts show.

One post by Independent Member of Parliament Rupert Lowe reads: “There is a link between the rape gangs and one particular religion — we have seen it again and again and again at our inquiry. That religion is Islam. As a country, we must have the courage to face up to that fact.” Brown responded to Lowe’s post with “get over it.” …

Brown’s justification of rape and other horrific events in the name of Islam date back even further. In 2017, the Daily Caller reported on Brown openly supporting Islamic supremacism and defending slavery and rape.

Commenters:

There is something absurdly evil about saying “get over it” in context with gang rape, torture and murder for religious reasons. Something like this would never be said about any other group for lesser crimes.

Colonialism, straight up.

The Australian public was duped when told that our renewables scheme would provide cheap power

The Australian public was duped when told that our renewables scheme would provide cheap power. By Robert Gottliebsen in The Australian.

Back in 2020, the AEMO [Australian Energy Market Operator] cost estimate for most of the transmission line projects was just $8.5bn. Renewables looked to be low-cost and very profitable. Now the transmission lines will cost at least $120bn but, as explained below, are more likely to explode beyond $200bn.

Add another $160bn for the wind and solar generators and we have a $350bn-plus project that is being financed with high-cost loans, which could boost the total 35-year outlay above $1 trillion. Australia’s current debt is around $940bn. …

Snowy 2.0 is coming in at 20 times the original cost estimate and the wider project is similar….

Disaster:

The government could argue that the funding for renewables is not really borrowings because it will be met by the consumers of power over 35 years.

But that would send power costs through the roof and make Australia an uneconomic destination for most activities.

Those currently bemoaning the cost of living are now set for a continuation of the disaster for at least three decades.

The designers of the chaos appear to delight in running their thousands of kilometres of cables and thousands of towers — that are about the height of Sydney Harbour Bridge pylons — through our best agricultural land. …

Political parties changing positions:

Earlier this week the ALP moved to remove its emissions target from its national policy — the first sign that some in the ALP have woken up to the fact that Energy Minister Chris Bowen has created a financial nightmare.

To their great credit, the Liberals, Nationals and One Nation are all now opposed to putting towers on agricultural land.

One Nation goes one step further and states that where towers are being put on agricultural land, developers must put the required money aside to pull the towers down.

All that because our ruling class refuses to do any due diligence on the climate models, and only hires scientists who agree with the carbon dioxide theory. Well yes, but look how money some people made in the renewables rollout! And how it enhanced the political power of the globalists! Too bad about the trash littering the Australian landscape and the high energy prices — a small price to pay for what is really important.

Birds: the crazy double standard of Australia’s ruling class

Birds: the crazy double standard of Australia’s ruling class. By Brad Thompson in The Australian.

Andrew Forrest’s high-flying gold play, Greatland Resources, has had its wings clipped by the mysterious and elusive night parrot.

The environmental watchdog in Western Australia has recommended strict conditions to protect the endangered parrot as Greatland seeks to build the Havieron underground gold and copper mine to complement its existing Telfer operations.

The conditions are based on three audio recordings of what might be the night parrot over what has been a five-year approval process. No one has seen a night parrot anywhere near the site, including environmental scientists hired by Greatland. …

It is now Australia’s third biggest gold miner with a market capitalisation around $10.2bn, behind Northern Star and Evolution Mining. …

In the case of the Telfer-Havieron envelope, EPA recommendations released on Wednesday include a ban on night-time haulage and other conditions to protect the parrot, including speed limits and “fauna spotters”.

Greatland may also have to re-route its haul road to avoid areas considered potential parrot habitat.

The EPA also recommends 300m buffer zones around anything that could be a night parrot roosting site, and similar measures to protect greater bilby burrows. …

An EPA report on Telfer-Havieron said the species was recorded on three occasions with “two confirmed calls at one location, and one unconfirmed call at a different location” based on information from consultants hired by Greatland. …

Gold, currently fourth, is on track to overtake LNG and coal to become Australia’s second most valuable export after iron ore.

Rio Tinto too:

Rio slashed its planned footprint for Winu – dubbed the “copper whopper” when discovered in 2017 – last year after shock evidence that one of the world’s rarest birds might reside in the area.

Audio monitoring carried out on behalf of Rio detected the call of what experts later identified as that of a lone night parrot in mid-2024. No one in the monitoring team saw the night parrot and no calls were picked up in the previous 2500 nights of monitoring.

So, our ruling class is happy to degrade Australia’s exports for a bird that may or may not exist, but it is completely different when it comes to their renewables and their mythological role in changing future weather. (Follow the money?)

 

Iran is waging the forever war

Iran is waging the forever war. By Tim Black at spiked.

The obstacles to a lasting peace go far deeper than arguments over the terms of the ceasefire and Tehran’s ridiculous wishlist.

Their roots lie in the continued existence of the Islamic Republic itself, which is constitutionally committed to ‘ensuring the continuation of the [Islamic] revolution at home and abroad’. For it is this Islamist mission that has led the Iranian regime to wage a bloody, decades-long shadow war on Israel, using proxy armies and terror groups across the Middle East and beyond.

 

 

After all, this current war didn’t really begin on 28 February this year. It started in earnest on 7 October 2023, when Hamas — an Islamic Republic proxy — invaded what it calls the ‘Zionist entity’ and slaughtered and raped hundreds of Israeli Jews. The joint US-Israeli war in Iran is merely the latest and most explosive phase of a conflict that erupted two-and-a-half years ago. In fact, you could argue that the seeds of this conflict were sown with the 1979 Iranian Revolution and the birth of the Islamic Republic itself. For as long as the Islamic Republic persists, at least in its current form, achieving a lasting resolution to this conflict looks unlikely.

Iran’s leaders may claim to have inflicted an ‘undeniable, historical and crushing defeat’ on the US and Israel – a claim echoed by the West’s anti-Trump media and degenerate bourgeois left. …

 

 

As it stands, survival is enough for this wretched, parasitic regime. The supreme leader and his Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps remain in power, and their vicious proxy armies, from Hamas and Hezbollah to the Houthis and various Iraqi Shia militias, are still active. For as long as this remains the case, then the Iranian threat to the Middle East’s security persists. The war may be paused, but the Islamist regime that’s driving it is still holding on.

This is one of the grim ironies of the US-Israeli military operation. When it was launched, Trump talked grandly of Iranians’ ‘hour of freedom being at hand’. Yet far from heralding the Iranian people’s liberation, the war has likely supercharged their repression. Reports suggest that the Iranian government has been busily using the cover of war to execute protesters and opponents.

The only hope for a more peaceful future lies with the Iranian people. For all the military power of America and Israel, only the Iranians themselves can take their country back from the Islamist thugs squatting over them.

The war will only end when Iran is liberated from Islam, or Islam conquers the US. Until then, there are only ceasefires.

Anti-white: the emerging pattern in all white countries

Anti-white: the emerging pattern in all white countries. By Moongazer.

Yes every white country at the same time exponentially increased how many violent third worlders they let in.

And yes these countries all at once started teaching children their ancestors were uniquely evil while portraying every nonwhite group as eternal victims who only ever contributed positively.

And yes they all simultaneously pushed the idea that any expression of white in-group preference or pride was inherently supremacist and dangerous.

And yes they all celebrated and funded every other ethnic group’s identity organizations and pride events.

And yes every major political party in these unrelated countries openly endorsed or quietly facilitated more nonwhite immigration.

And yes they all said it was out of moral progress or economic necessity or demographic inevitability.

And yes they all at the same time began labeling any politician or party that tried to slow or reverse the flow as far right or extremist or threat to democracy even when those parties were polling 40% among native voters.

And yes the intelligence agencies in these countries all started treating native critics of mass migration as bigger domestic terrorism threats than the actual imported gangs and jihadist networks.

And yes the banking system and payment processors all at the same time began deplatforming and financially crippling anyone who spoke too plainly about the pattern.

And yes legacy media coordinated identical smear campaigns against anyone who noticed.

And yes all at the same time fertility among the native white populations collapsed.

And yes this was encouraged through cultural messaging and economic pressure and delayed family formation and pharmaceutical and surgical interventions representing liberation while all the same countries imported replacement-level amounts of third worlders with higher birth rates.

And yes they were immediately fast tracked to citizenship.

And yes in all these countries at the same time welfare systems were reoriented to subsidize the invaders more generously than struggling native families which created observably tiered outcomes that were blamed on systemic racism when white people noticed.

And yes all of these countries at the same time experienced violent crime spikes and sexual predation scandals and fraud and welfare strain and cultural erosion.

And yes when that became impossible to hide every single one of these countries responded with more censorship and more gaslighting and more “diversity is our strength” slogans and more blaming the native population for not embracing the transformation fast enough and more acceleration of the policies that caused the problems.

And yes all these countries at the same time made it functionally illegal to dissent to this.

And yes they all deployed the same hate speech laws and online content bans and deplatforming pressure and extremism watchlists to silence natives who objected.

And yes in every country the native population was told to adapt and lower their standards and to accept erosion of their safety and traditions and future under the banner of tolerance and inclusion that always didn’t extend to their own group interests.

No:

But NO: despite this precisely repeating across every white country at the same time with no exceptions and no natural divergence you must accept this is all just a spontaneous and completely unrelated convergence of policy and culture across dozens of sovereign nations with no central directive or shared blueprint or common architects.

And NO it’s certainly nothing that can’t be reversed through ordinary electoral politics within the same system that enforced this entire transformation at every step.

There is no reason to ask who or why. It’s all a coincidence. We can vote our way out of this.

Cernovich:

When I was growing up, they told us diversity in our strength. Now they tell us diversity is their revenge.

Basil the Great:

An advert in Denmark shows a White Danish couple hugging on the sofa

An “expert” shows up out of nowhere and tells them not to date each other because it’s basically “inbreeding” for whites to have babies with other whites

He says they should have kids with non-Whites instead

 

okoy:

So a group of zero white people held a press conference to tell you that white people will be systemically discriminated against.

War crimes, or Marxist humiliation ceremony?

War crimes, or Marxist humiliation ceremony?

Reuters:

Ben Roberts-Smith, Australia’s most decorated living soldier, was arrested at Sydney Airport and charged with five counts of war-crime murder over the killing of unarmed Afghan civilians while deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.

 

Other than to create a public spectacle for the media, why was Ben Roberts Smith arrested at the airport after getting off a domestic flight?

 

John Konrad:

He won a Victoria Cross, the equivalent of a Medal of Honor, for killing Taliban. Now, two decades later, he’s arrested for killing Taliban. …

Something is really bothering me about the Ben Roberts-Smith case. …

On one hand, this prosecution stinks of liberal bias.

Out of thousands of potential war crimes cases the social justice warrior police chief could have pursued, she picked THE most decorated soldier on the entire continent. That isn’t justice. That’s a public humiliation ritual.

On the other hand, I do believe actual war criminals should stand trial regardless of rank or honors. And I know what’s coming: “John, Roberts-Smith already lost the 2023 defamation case. Justice Besanko found he committed the murders.”

Yes. On the balance of probabilities. 51 percent. That’s the civil standard. Criminal conviction requires 99 percent.

The same fragile evidence that barely cleared a coin flip is now supposed to send a man to prison for life. …

The Roberts-Smith allegations are 20 years old. And here’s what the Brereton Inquiry, for all its 510 witnesses and four years of work, could never get:

  • No crime scene access. The Taliban didn’t let investigators into Uruzgan.
  • No Afghan witnesses interviewed.
  • No secured scene.
  • No blood-spatter analysis.
  • No DNA
  • No autopsies.
  • No recovered bodies.
  • No weapons tied to victims.

The investigators themselves admitted they “lacked access to Afghan crime scenes and were missing the physical evidence that would normally anchor a murder prosecution.”

So what’s left? Memory. Twenty-year-old memory from men in the fog of war.

The science is unambiguous. Countless research studies confirms memory is reconstructive: later suggestion, media exposure, and repeated questioning distort it. This is the textbook misinformation effect.

Confidence and accuracy decouple within months, let alone decades. Studies on soldiers who suffer PTSD show the gaps get even larger.

I admittedly don’t know 🇦🇺 law but US courts admit decades-old testimony but warn juries it is inherently fragile, not scientific proof. Australia is treating it as load-bearing concrete.

The media says “20 former soldiers testified against him.” Fine. Was all their testimony actually against him? How clear was it? Did 20 people watch him murder a civilian in broad daylight? And even if they did, you still have to prove the dead man wasn’t Taliban. In Uruzgan. In 2009. Without a body. …

And here’s the question nobody in Canberra wants asked: Why is the trigger-puller in the dock while the officers who wrote the rules of engagement, approved the missions, and signed the after-action reports keep their pensions?

The Victoria Cross winner hangs. The chain of command walks. Past “War crime” cases with more hard evidence remain “unsolved”.

That isn’t accountability. That’s a scapegoat ritual.

You do not get a Victoria Cross just for killing. You get it for extraordinary gallantry, valour, self-sacrifice & devotion to duty in the presence of the enemy.

And here is what Australia just told every soldier watching: the reward for a VC is fame which will make you a target for future show trials built on 20-year-old memories, prosecuted by a police chief with no combat but more ribbons on her uniform than you.

If murder can be proven without hard evidence decades later, that isn’t justice even if he is guilty. Proof of guilt matters.

That’s a Marxist humiliation ceremony leading to national strategic disarmament by lawfare.

Much hinges on the “definition” of civilian, and who gets to do the defining.

cdrslamandar:

I’m old enough to remember how Morant and Handcock became folk heroes in Australia.

This time though, it isn’t the British who are going after Diggers, it is their own government.

Also of note, the incident involving Morant et al took place in 1901. The trial took place just a few months later in 1902. During the trial, Boer forces attacked Pietersburg where the trial took place. Morant and the others were released, issued arms, and helped defend the town against the attack. There were denied a plea of condonation and were returned to confinement. The trail was finished in Feb. 1902, with Morant and Handcock were executed 18 hours later.

What is this generation doing?

It is 2026. The accused, who happens to be the most decorated Australian living veteran, was arrested for accusations dating back 16 and more years ago.

This isn’t justice in any way shape or form. This is something else altogether.

If he were to be charged, it should have been a decade and a half ago, at the latest.

They’ve already bankrupted him last year with legal fees in a defamation trial where he has been asked to pay $30 million dollars (Australian) in legal fees.

Craig Kelly:

Any decent Australian can only regard the arrest of a Victoria Cross recipient as a sad day for Australia on so many levels.

Yet somehow it brings a smirk to the faces of the worst of humanity — the most pathetic, contemptible, grossly snivelling leftists in our society. …

The bottom line is they’ve been brainwashed to hate Australia and hate our military — yet the very freedoms and prosperity they enjoy wouldn’t exist if it weren’t those things.

 

 

Stephen Neil:

Ben Roberts Smith represents the Ancien Regime. As a straight white Christian Anglo Australian war hero, he epitomises the oppressor class and is by definition a counter revolutionary and an ‘enemy of the people’ etc.

Peter Van Onselen in The Daily Mail:

The arrest of Ben Roberts-Smith has already become much more than a criminal proceeding.

It’s a political, cultural and institutional test, and the speed with which public figures rushed into their preferred camps highlights this. …

Much of the country has already split behind two rival instincts that are now hardening almost beyond persuasion. Even Elon Musk weighed in on social media overnight. …

[Pauline Hanson] casts Roberts-Smith not as a defendant facing grave charges, but as a symbol of a broader betrayal — a decorated soldier cast aside by timid elites and agenda driven journalists. Even abandoned by the state itself and its institutions, once they took from him what they wanted. …

Greens senator David Shoebridge posted a screenshot of an article about the arrests, simply writing ‘Good’ alongside it.

$300 million was spent on the investigation of Roberts-Smith.

Color me skeptical. I’ve no doubt that Ben Roberts-Smith was sometimes uncouth and certainly not woke, and a rough man when required. But he was a very effective soldier — just the sort of man the woke lefties hate.

Look at the photos above. Who would you want on your team — him or her?

hat-tip Stephen Neil, David Archibald