If you have a grudge against your country, how can you destroy it?

If you have a grudge against your country, how can you destroy it? By Tony Abbott in Quadrant.

Blackening a country’s history is one of the most effective ways to undermine the morale of its people. …

The most recent academic history of Australia, published last November, opens by declaring that the traditional notion of settlement, as a largely peaceful expansion, is no less than the “founding lie” of modern Australia, masking what the author claims was a brutal conquest. Even though it was always official policy — albeit imperfectly observed — that the Aboriginal peoples of Australia should enjoy all the rights and protections of British subjects. …

What then, might those persuaded that their country’s history is shameful do by way of atonement? Well, in Australia, they could:

  • Seek to amend the constitution to give people with some Aboriginal descent more say than others over the government of the country.
  • Delegitimise the national flag by flying it co-equally with indigenous flags on all government buildings and at all civic occasions.
  • Begin all public speeches by acknowledging the traditional owners of “what always was and always will be” un-ceded land.
  • Change the school curriculum so that every subject, from maths to Latin, is taught from an indigenous perspective.
  • Invoke a climate crisis to close down our main exports and to hobble heavy industry.
  • Defund the armed forces now, while claiming to boost them in the far distant future.
  • Insist that gender is a social construct, rather than a function of biology, to confuse and subvert troubled adolescents.

 

 

The big one:

But for those with a grudge against their own country, it’s sustained mass migration, especially from countries with quite different cultures, that’s the surest and swiftest way to change and punish a place that’s irredeemably tainted by unforgivable sin.

This is done in order to dilute and eventually to extinguish the Anglo-Celtic core culture and the Judaeo-Christian foundational ethos (which is actually what attracts migrants to the Anglosphere) that today’s left-establishment finds so suffocating and judgmental. And it’s to encourage migrants to “other” themselves by funding ethnic activism under Orwellian slogans like “our diversity is our unity” or “our diversity is our strength”.

In this regard, migrants from Islamic countries are especially useful, because belief in a global caliphate, and the conviction that it’s the Koran rather than the legislature that validates law, starts to make pluralist democracy unworkable.

 

To green-left, cultural-Marxist governments, mass migration from the “global south” is not a problem; it’s the plan. It’s the way for supposedly unjustly rich countries to atone for their white privilege and to apologise to poorer ones by becoming more like them.

Pointing this out is not to attack immigrants, nearly all of whom come to countries like Australia to join us, not to change us. But in enough numbers, change us they do, and not always for the better.

It’s Time To Stop Pretending That Migrants Are Entitled To Equal Citizenship

It’s Time To Stop Pretending That Migrants Are Entitled To Equal Citizenship. By Brendon Smith at Alt-Markets.

Yet another civil conflict is brewing this week as the Supreme Court tackles a number of foreign citizenship debates, including Temporary Protection Status (TPS) and Birthright Citizenship. The court has ruled that hundreds of thousands of Haitian and Syrian migrants residing in the US under TPS are no longer safe from mass deportations (a win). But, they have also ruled in favor of migrant anchor babies (a big loss). …

 

 

I find it mind boggling that this debate has been ongoing for so many decades. Frankly, foreigners should not have any citizenship rights under the constitution until they have demonstrated assimilation. Until that time, there should be a separate set of rules handling newcomers (and invaders).

When it comes to TPS and the Haitians, the leftists are raging. Despite this status supposedly being “temporary” (the Obama Administration originally claimed these people would only be in the US for 18 months), many of these foreign transplants have been enjoying the benefits of unearned American citizenship for 16 years or more. Yet, when Haitians protest the TPS decision, what flag do you see them flying? That’s right – They fly the Haitian flag, not the American flag. This tells us everything we need to know.

Moderate left:

The liberal position on this issue is crystal clear: They believe that the constitution protects foreign migrants and their cultures from overt scrutiny. Meaning, foreigners don’t have to prove themselves worthy of citizenship, they get access regardless. Liberals also believe that it should be extremely difficult to remove migrants once they enter the country.

Keep in mind, this is the LIBERAL position. The woke position is far worse.

Woke:

The radical left argues that western borders should not exist at all. For other countries, borders are fine. For the US and Europe, borders must be erased. Furthermore, they assert that the American economy must be treated as an open marketplace rather than a closed system. In other words, foreigners should be allowed to feed on the system whenever they please, transfer that wealth back to their third world hovels, and then come back for more.

Melting pot myth:

The “empathetic” liberal position creates the foundation for the militant woke position. It’s rooted in a propaganda narrative created in the early 20th century: The claim that America’s entire identity is a “melting pot” of cultures and nationalities and that there is no original source identity. This false origin story was produced by New York socialists and it’s been spread by Hollywood for decades. …

The melting pot is not our identity and never was. Historically speaking, America has always had a guarded relationship to immigration and we operated on “origin-based rules”. Meaning, Europeans from the north and west were welcomed, everyone else was limited. There was nothing wrong with this model.

America’s source identity is western civilization and European influence. There is no cultural melting pot.

 

 

The notion that the US is somehow legally required to accept everyone from everywhere regardless of their beliefs or background was not a thing until after the liberal era of the 1960s – 1990s. Until this time period, America had numerous regulations on who was allowed in. After the 1990s, the melting pot ideal became sacrosanct, as if it had always been a part of our constitutional legacy.

George Washington instituted the Naturalization Act of 1790 which restricted immigration to people mostly from European nations. John Adams instituted the Alien Friends Act 1798 which allowed the quick deportation of migrants found to be initiating civil disruption and sedition. He also enforced an extended probation period of 14 years before any migrant gained citizenship rights (instead of the original five year period). …

Teddy Roosevelt enforced the Immigrant Act of 1907, which banned the citizenship of any foreigners from cultures that practiced polygamy (which included Muslims) and focused on migration among groups that could easily assimilate into American society. Once again, this is perfectly acceptable and rational. There’s nothing wrong with enforcing logical standards.

Some groups are too dangerous:

Even in a republic, there are certain groups who cannot be allowed to exist because they represent a clear and present danger to the very framework that our country is built on. They are at war with our culture. To give citizenship to the barbarians at the gate is suicide.

By extension, one could argue that Muslim ideology is much like communism in that Muslims have a tendency to seek dominance and authoritarianism rather than integration. Their presence in the US is an obvious threat to the Bill of Rights. Therefore, we may have to make exceptions for them, just as we made exceptions for communism (globalism is also another important target for removal). …

As we’ve witnessed over the past decade, some groups tend to sabotage everything they touch. They don’t view American life as a privilege, they see it as something that can be pillaged, and liberal movements are enabling this behavior. …

If the government isn’t allowed to remove these threats, then make no mistake, the American people will eventually do it themselves. The film “Citizen Vigilante” is not fiction, it’s a warning. It’s wildly popular for a reason.

Every Single Haitian Migrant is Going Back to Haiti Under Trump

Every Single Haitian Migrant is Going Back to Haiti Under Trump. By Steve Watson at modernity.

White House Homeland Security Adviser Stephen Miller delivered a clear and forceful message: every Haitian national on Temporary Protected Status [TPS] will be returned to Haiti under President Trump. …

Miller called the deliberate importation of these migrants into places like Springfield, Ohio, one of the most heinous acts the government has ever committed.

Miller laid it out without hedging:

“There’s an earthquake in Haiti. So she’s (Former DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano) announcing TPS for a few months while they’re recovering from an earthquake. That was in 2010, 15 years ago. Then the Biden administration in its last year extends TPS to every single illegal alien from Haiti while they are flying them en masse into Springfield, Ohio, across the Midwest.”

He continued, “It was a formal policy of replacing the communities that lived in, settled, and sustained these communities for generations. It was one of the most heinous things this government has ever done.

“And yes, under President Trump, let me be very clear, the illegal alien Haitians are going back to Haiti. They can build their country there,” Miller further urged.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on June 25, 2026, that the Trump administration has full authority to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for immigrants from specific countries, effectively allowing the President to undo these protections without judicial oversight.

This directly follows the Trump administration’s earlier termination of TPS protections for 353,000 Haitians, with those designations set to expire. …

Springfield became the most visible example of the fallout. Local residents watched as federal policies funneled large numbers of Haitian migrants into their city, straining housing, schools, and public resources.

Americans reported being priced out of apartments while migrants received housing assistance. Parks saw geese and other wildlife targeted

Haitian immigration was an issue in the 2024 election:

Haitian in Springfield caught town ducks to eat

Cat on the bbq — multicultural cusine!

In 2025, net US immigration was negative for the first time ever.

Putin Seeks Ways To Describe Failure In Ukraine

Putin Seeks Ways To Describe Failure In Ukraine. By StrategyPage.

Russian leader Vladimir Putin is trying to explain to the Russian people that Russia has lost its war against Ukraine. …

Putin’s main aim is to avoid exposing the Russian people to the sudden shock of defeat after more than four years of fighting and all the media coverage that followed. Sudden shocks tend to spark popular revolutions. Putin wants the news of the Russian defeat to arrive slowly and smoothly to avoid any sudden realizations that Putin’s war failed and all the losses were for nothing.

Putin is trying to rewrite history as it is being made. … The current defeat generated articles like Amazing Defeats: When Geopolitical Losses Can Be More Useful than Brilliant Victories. …

Russian government media officials counseled that in Russia defeats are quickly forgotten and are often followed by a period of reforms and revitalization of the economy, government and military. As the old saying goes, what doesn’t kill me makes me stronger. …

Will the Russian make another attempt at conquering Ukraine?

Ukrainians are uneasy about all this because the primary use of a reformed, rebuilt and revitalized Russian military would be the conquest of Ukraine….

Everyone understands that what follows the Russian defeat is a period of rebuilding the military before another attempt to conquer Ukraine. As long as Putin is alive, he will be seeking a military victory, preferably against his arch-nemesis, Ukraine.

Europe chose left bureaucracy, and is now being crushed by the US

Europe chose left bureaucracy, and is now being crushed by the US. By Michael Arouet.

The biggest economic story of the last decade isn’t China.

It’s America decoupling from Europe.

Innovation follows the free market. Talent follows innovation.

Europe will get economically irrelevant, not because the U.S. abandoned it, but because it follows the wrong policies. …

Europe chose regulations, overtaxation, and left redistribution, while the US chose free market, entrepreneurialism, innovation and progress.

With AI the gap will keep growing.

 

And what is the European response to all that? They blame capitalism and scream “tax the rich.”

It will end in disaster for Europe. They will lose the prosperity their fathers and grandparents worked so hard for.

The only people in Europe who want degrowth are those who have never worked in a real job or run a business and assume that “the state” will keep feeding them, not the hard-working taxpayers.

Alluha Akbar, comrades! Less carbon dioxide and more 3rd world immigration!

Iran and the Straits of Hormuz — like the Barbary Pirates and the Mediterranean

Iran and the Straits of Hormuz — like the Barbary Pirates and the Mediterranean. By Michael Oren at Fox News.

1776:

Writing to his trusted ally, the Marquis de Lafayette, after the War of Independence, George Washington believed it “the highest disgrace” that Americans were “tributary to such banditti who might for half the sum that is paid them be exterminated from the Earth.”

Those “banditti” were the Barbary pirates of North Africa who preyed on American merchant ships in the Mediterranean, enslaving their crews and endangering the nascent republic’s economy.

But lacking the naval power to protect its foreign trade, the United States paid monetary “tribute” to Barbary, inducing it not to attack. The practice sparked a visceral debate between John Adams, who favored giving in to extortion over using force, and Thomas Jefferson, who preferred to “raise ships and men to fight the pirates into reason [rather] than money to bribe them.” …

2026:

To what degree should Americans defend the freedom of navigation through a vital international waterway? Should they stand up to or pay off a Middle East power threatening it? Instead of the Mediterranean, at stake today is the Strait of Hormuz, and in place of Barbary is the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Muslim attitude:

The ayatollahs’ worldview is almost identical to the pirates’. In a 1786 meeting with Jefferson and Adams in London, Tripoli’s ambassador Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja insisted that Barbary was sovereign in the Mediterranean and that no nation could traverse it without paying a massive toll.

He further explained “that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their [the Muslims’] right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners.” Any Muslim killed in battle, Abd al-Rahman assured the two stunned Americans, “was sure to go to Paradise.”

How did America solve it then?

The encounter convinced Adams that Americans must avoid what they now call endless war with the Barbary states. “We ought not to fight them at all, unless We determine to fight them forever,” he wrote. Such a conflict, moreover, would be “too rugged for our People to bear,” and, given the loss to U.S. shipping, rising insurance rates, and the vast national debt, entirely too costly. America had no choice, Adams counseled, but to continue to pay tribute. Better to send the pirates “one Gift of two hundred Thousand Pounds” than to risk “a Million [in trade] annually.”

Jefferson, though, reached a radically different conclusion. “An angel sent on this business… could have done nothing” to pacify the pirates, he reported, and opposed further efforts to assuage them monetarily. Americans, moreover, with their “erect and independent attitude,” would never succumb to blackmail. Peace with Barbary, Jefferson held, was only attainable “through the medium of war,” a course which would also deter other hostile powers. “It will procure us respect…and respect is a safeguard to interest.”

Jefferson nevertheless realized that all talk of war was frivolous as long as the newly independent America lacked a navy. All negotiations with Barbary should cease, he recommended, until the country adopted “measures… which may correct the idea… of impotency in the federal government.” Needed was a credible military option. …

Under its new Constitution, the United States authorized the construction of six frigates especially designed to fight close to Barbary’s shallow shores. What ensued was America’s first foreign and longest war, lasting until 1815. Only then was Barbary decisively defeated, and American merchantmen guaranteed safe passage through the Mediterranean.

The victory was a source of immense national pride. The country erected its first war monument, to the triumphant Barbary War, on the campus of the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis. No less than 17 American cities were named for the hero of that campaign, Commodore Stephen Decatur. And the Marines still sing of their landing “on the shores of Tripoli.”

Trump?

The Trump administration, by contrast, has pursued both policies, first waging war against Iran and now inducing it with the possible infusion of billions. Still unknown is whether Iran – unlike Barbary – can be trusted to comply with the agreement and whether the peace once won by the United States can be replicated today.

Who were the Barbary Pirates? And why are they always omitted from woke versions of history?

Barbary pirates, more accurately described as state-sanctioned privateers or corsairs, operated from the Barbary Coast of North Africa (modern-day Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya) between the 16th and 19th centuries. These raiders, often under nominal Ottoman suzerainty, terrorized Mediterranean and Atlantic shipping, plundering goods and capturing Europeans for the Barbary slave trade.

Key aspects of their history include:

  • Operations: Based in cities like Algiers, Tripoli, and Tunis, they targeted vessels from Europe and the Americas, extending raids as far north as Iceland and Newfoundland.
  • Slavery and Ransom: They enslaved an estimated 1 to 1.25 million Europeans, forcing many into galley slavery or hard labor, while others were held for lucrative ransoms paid by families or governments.
  • Tribute System: To avoid conflict, many European powers and the early United States paid substantial tributes for safe passage, a practice that fueled U.S. naval expansion.
  • Decline: The pirates’ power waned following the Barbary Wars with the U.S. and British/Dutch naval interventions in the early 19th century, ending with the French conquest of Algiers in 1830.

The French only invaded and occupied Algeria to prevent Muslim raiding. Likewise, the British only conquered and occupied much of Africa in order to close down the slave trade — how else could they stop the black slavers from capturing and selling their fellow blacks?

“The Americans were the fist to seek a solution other than paying protection money” [20:30]. Is history going to repeat in the Straits of Hormuz?

The woke miracle: how basic truths became extremism

The woke miracle: how basic truths became extremism. By Flopping Aces.

America’s ruling class has performed another miracle.

They took the most basic truths in human civilization … crime needs punishment, borders need enforcement, schools should teach, welfare should be temporary, families matter, merit matters, and taxpayers should not be looted by professional parasites … and somehow rebranded all of that as “extremism.”

Incredible work, really.

Apparently, a “compassionate” society is one where the violent repeat offender gets another chance, the victim gets a candlelight vigil, the taxpayer gets the bill, the schoolkid gets passed along illiterate, the fraudster gets a grant, the NGO gets another contract, the illegal alien gets services, and the working American gets told to shut up and be more inclusive.

What a beautiful system.

Soft justice did not stay in the courtroom. It metastasized. It became soft borders, soft schools, soft parenting, soft welfare, soft standards, soft men, and soft bureaucrats explaining why every obvious solution is “too harsh.”

  • Lock up predators? Cruel.
  • Deport illegals? Hateful.
  • End generational welfare? Lacking empathy.
  • Punish fraud? Complicated.
  • Restore merit? Problematic.
  • Teach kids to read? Probably colonialism by Tuesday.

A serious country protects the innocent from the guilty. A decaying country protects the guilty from consequences and makes the innocent finance the experiment.

That’s America’s real crisis. Not poverty. Not “root causes.” Not another fake expert panel. Consequences.

Follow the money. So long as those on team big government get lots of taxpayer-funded good jobs, rather than having to provide goods and services for the rest of us at prices we are willing to pay. It’s a moral thing: do you get paid via coercion (government, NGO, or welfare, by and large) or voluntarily (private industry, by and large)?

For the work, a big part of the attraction is replacing merit with “equity,” thereby giving the less able a bigger share, and even running the place.

Commenters:

How did this happen? Politicians decided that staying in power and looting the treasury was their primary purpose. Forget about governing “by and for the people”. It became buying votes to insure they stayed in power and using the tax payers hard earned income to make themselves wealthy. Everything became “it’s government money” as if someone didn’t have to work for that money to be spent.

The amount of fraud that has been uncovered is truly astronomical. It’s so bad that it’s really beyond belief for some. How can those here illegally manage to scam the system for hundreds of millions, for years, without being caught? Think about it. If you have $10 million and you spend $1000 per day, the money won’t run out for 27 years. We are finding out that there are illegal scammers that stole hundreds of millions! HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS! And the politicians that represent these districts are defending the fraudsters! What does that imply? Maybe that they’re in on the scam? And not ONE politician has been arrested. Not one! …

Look at this quote from John Tooby , an evolutionary psychologist. He explains why the “with-it” crowd constantly flips the meaning of truth and beauty, among other things, into distorted — sometimes opposite — versions of their plain meaning.

That soft justice, replacing competition and merit with “equity”, and the developing longhouse generally, all sounds a bit female, doesn’t it?

‘Citizen Vigilante’: The Film About Muslim Atrocites That Is Opening Eyes and Terrifying the Globalists

‘Citizen Vigilante’: The Film About Muslim Atrocites That Is Opening Eyes and Terrifying the Globalists. By Kevin Downey at PJ Media.

As a 37-year comedy veteran, I believe I’m pretty good at “reading the room,” and I believe the room, in this case, Western civilization, has turned a corner: we’ve finally had enough of the Islamic rape and murder epidemics terrorizing mostly white Christian girls and women in the West.

We’ve seen a series of events — and heinous crimes — unfold in the last month that are shaking the world and scaring the globalist, New World Order lizard people to their Godless core.

Here is a timeline of crimes and victories we’ve seen in the past month: …

Let’s skip the recounting of the worst atrocities of the last month. It’s bad. The Internet is now inundated with reporting of atrocities by third world immigrants in the West. The stories used to be once a month or week when we started in blogging 2016, or maybe they weren’t being reported. Now there are many per day being reported. For example, a few from today’s feeds (omitting the worst):

Turkish Muslim Murders Six In Germany. 6 people were shot to death in Stade, Germany today at a youth facility. Authorities have now confirmed the shooter was a Turkish Muslim. Absolutely horrific.

Glasgow is going through a rape epidemic

Someone jokes hat the 5th horseman has arrived in Scotland:

Due to immigration, Girls & Women are now being raped so often in Glasgow, Scotland that the rape crisis centre had to close its waiting list as they can’t keep up.

A 20 year old French man accidentally bumps into a North African man coming around a corner then apologises. The North African chases after him & stabs him in the neck then casually walks away.

 

Back to the article, which moves on to an event that has now reached political significance:

The film Citizen Vigilante, a movie about an American in Europe who goes to war against Muslim savagery and those who allow it, is released in U.S. theaters. …

The movie, written and directed by German filmmaker Uwe Boll, is an inconvenient truth that the globalists don’t want their people to see: an accurate portrayal of Muslim atrocities against white Europeans and, worse (to them), with a hopeful ending.

GRAPHIC WARNING: You can see a clip from the movie here. [Warning, it’s bad.]

There is no greater promotion for art than banning it, and Germany did just that.

Germany refused to grant the movie an age rating, thereby preventing its theatrical release. That’s when Elon Musk stepped in.

Musk, whom some of the 21st century’s most brilliant political pundits believed saved free speech and was instrumental in President Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory, posted the film on Twitter/X for free this past weekend.

Twitter has exploded over Citizen Vigilante. It was viewed at least 15.5 million times in the first 48 hours it was released on Twitter/X. …

Did the film cause the tide to turn, or was it just fortuitous timing?

Two days after Musk releases Citizen Vigilante, 4,000 rape and “grooming” cases are magically “discovered” in London, despite Mayor Sadiq Khan claiming repeatedly they had never occurred. …

June has been an eye-opening month for England and the world. People have finally had enough of the religion of “peace.”

The movie is harsh but accurate. I do not in any way support or condone “vigilantism,” but this movie kept me cheering. I won’t give away much other than to say I watched it three times in one day. The movie left me angry and yet optimistic. The left will call you a “racist” for watching a feel-good movie that stands up to true Muslim aggression, rather than bending a knee to it. …

I hate when people give away too much information about a movie I haven’t seen, so I will end with this: watch this movie before it disappears or, worse, before it’s too late.

Pauline Hanson vs Paul Hogan

Pauline Hanson vs Paul Hogan. By Alexandra Marshall.

 

When was the last time Paul Hogan caught public transport in Sydney or Melbourne?

When did he last stand in line with 60+ people for a rental and realise he’s the only English-speaker in the queue?

When did he take his knife to a Melbourne machete fight at a shopping centre?

When did he go for a job only to find it outsourced to cash in hand workers?

When did foreign gangs try breaking into his home, like they do in Queensland?

One day the Marxists will delete his films and call them racist colonial propaganda and his legacy will be destroyed as well.

And on that day, he will realise Pauline Hanson was right.

Because the Australia Paul enjoyed in his youth has been taken from the Australian children of today.

And another thing:

Every time an aging Australian cultural icon comes out from their mansion or private jet to tell the plebs that they’re ‘wrong’ about culture — the disconnect becomes more obvious.

EXTREMELY RICH ‘stars’ living in another country praising an Australia they remember rather than experience does nothing but enrage the poor.

And yes, every day more Australians become poor.

The middle class is slipping to the working class and the working class is slipping to the welfare class.

Now look, we all expect the ‘stars’ to be idiots. They haven’t lived in the real world since the 70s.

But they represent a more extreme version of our political class — who enjoy huge salaries, security, Commonwealth cars, taxpayer-funded travel, and a life-long pension.

They don’t live on the ground with us either.

And it shows.

Instead of telling voters to ‘touch grass’ — politicians should spend a week in the suburbs with the highest levels of migration — catch public transport at night – and see what it’s really like.

Commenters:

The ideological and institutional capture of celebrities, news outlets, and politicians is Orwellian.

How media attacks and establishment sneering are fuelling One Nation’s resurgence

How media attacks and establishment sneering are fuelling One Nation’s resurgence. By Chris Mitchell in The Australian.

This column reckons much of the activist media class misunderstands One Nation supporters.

People moving to One Nation know exactly what they do and don’t want.

Like populist movements in the US and the UK, they are part of a backlash against the censorious sneering of the political establishment, freed by Donald Trump’s rejection of woke pieties on immigration, gender and climate.

In Australia, they may not approve of Trump’s handling of world affairs, but they feel they can now speak openly against foolish ideology in favour of common sense.

Journalists Sarah Ferguson on the ABC’s 7.30 on Wednesday and Sally Sara on Radio National breakfast on Thursday railed against Hanson’s words on radical Islam, multiculturalism, speaking English at home, criticism of late-term abortion and support for biological truth over gender ideology.

The pair is only helping One Nation — just as surely as GetUp!’s stunt of unfurling an anti-Hanson poster in the middle of her speech at the National Press Club in Canberra helped her. …

Hanson admitted her party would need to face media scrutiny as its support grew. But scrutiny is not the same as adversarial political activism by reporters. …

The left cannot talk about it:

Despite all the cogent economic analysis from pollsters and political editors about the effects of the cost-of-living crisis on working class Australians, it’s clear the real spurt to Hanson’s political fortunes was the murder of 15 people at Bondi Beach in December during a celebration of Hanukkah.

Whose fault, politically?

The massacre makes up the entire first part of the new One Nation ad, and it’s powerful. The implication is clear — this attack is the fruit of multiculturalism and high migration.

 

 

Australians, Hanson said, should be able to discuss radical Islamism. Yet such discussions are seldom had openly, even though they have been in Europe for more than a decade.

The instructions to the left:

ABC global affairs editor Laura Tingle on December 16 told her colleague Patricia Karvelas on the Politics Now podcast that the actions of the Bondi gunmen had “nothing to do with religion”. …

Reality:

Months earlier ASIO boss Mike Burgess had warned that the war in Gaza was firing up Muslim anger online, especially among young males.

Many journalists have tried to deny the link between high immigration, high house prices and housing shortages. Common sense tells voters the link is obvious. …

Scrutiny is fair. Finger-pointing accusations of racism not so much.

Alexandra Marshall isn’t debating anymore.

UPDATE: Radical Islam imported into Australia all in the name of votes:

Who is responsible?

Rod Lampard:

Being able to buy Chinese for dinner or a kebab for lunch isn’t multiculturalism.

The denial of the right to criticise any culture other than White, Anglo/Celtic European Western civ is.

Forced speech that demands we cower in fear of being called a racist if we point out that “all cultures are NOT equal” is.

Caldron Pool:

What are they here for?

Our culture? Our religion? Our laws? Our customs? Our way of life?

Check out all the Australian flags.

hat-tip Stephen Neil

‘Citizen Vigilante’ Review

‘Citizen Vigilante’ Review. By John Nolte at Breitbart.

The left has their pro-terrorist One Battle After Another, an overlong, mediocre, $100 million studio movie told by a major director (Paul Thomas Anderson) using one of the world’s biggest movie stars (Leonardo DiCaprio). The result? It flopped at the box office and was still predictably showered with unearned critical praise and major Oscar wins.

Basically, One Battle After Another is angry that America enforces the law by deporting illegal immigrants and demands violence against the government to make it stop.

Today we have a rebuttal, and a pretty effective one… Best of all, it’s deliciously subversive.

Citizen Vigilante is a briskly-paced (at 89 minutes) low-budget exploitation movie told by a director who was long ago written off as a joke (Uwe Boll), using an unjustly disgraced star (Armie Hammer). The result? Despite the best efforts of left-wing censors, a brilliant guerrilla campaign has already driven it into the national conversation. Elon Musk then did what he does best: overturned the whole enchilada by releasing it to everyone for free on X.

Basically, Citizen Vigilante is angry that European governments agree with One Battle After Another in that they refuse to enforce the law against the millions of unvetted migrants they imported who have brought their appalling and dangerous Third World values with them.

Let me tell you: Boll isn’t screwing around. His righteous fury against what the government has done to Europe, and especially its women and girls, flames across every scene. That’s one reason the movie works. Another reason it works is that Boll is telling the truth. The primary reason it works is that Boll is the only one telling the truth. …

The flaws? There’s no real story. Armie Hammer’s Michael Sanders is a one-note, robotic justice machine. There are a few eye-rolling contrivances. Considering all the security cameras and Sanders’ refusal to protect his identity 90 percent of the time, it seems impossible he wasn’t caught in the first five minutes. …

He’s also delivering a sweet reckoning to the predominantly white “woke left.” You know the type… The type of judge who releases seven savages guilty of gang-raping an innocent teenage girl because this judge believes those seven savages are victims of a society that didn’t do enough to integrate them. …

Above all, I loved watching The Truth.

Finally… The Truth.

Any of you watch that piece of shit Adolescence, where the British stabbing crisis was laid at the hands of a little white boy poisoned by the manosphere? That dumb series isn’t shit just because it’s a blatant lie, it’s also a creative piece of shit that’s three episodes too long and bursting with pretension, especially the single-shot conceit that drains all the tension out of everything.

Boll tells the actual Truth and does so using the most effective method… Exploitation. …

Citizen Vigilante is not racist. The truth is not racist. Besides, plenty of white people get what they’ve got coming. …

Finally, if anything, Citizen Vigilante downplays its outrages. In real life, it wasn’t seven savages who raped that teenage girl, it was nine. Eight received no prison time.

Elizabeth Nickson at Absurdistan:

Citizen Vigilante is a crude but compelling fictional film about an American with investments in Europe — the specific country is unclear — who has decided to rectify Muslims raping and murdering young girls. …

I began to realize while watching it, I am profoundly, angry at what our governments have done to our culture, which our ancestors built brick by furiously difficult brick. My rage matched the revenge I was watching, a fury I hadn’t yet plumbed. I may be an educated middle class white woman living in the safest place on earth, but those are my people, those were my girls. And yours.

It won’t be playing at the local movie house.

UPDATE:

 

 

Young White Men Will Save Western Civilization. Why?

Young White Men Will Save Western Civilization. Why? By Elizabeth Nickson at Absurdistan.

When I used Chat GPT to search Britain and the U.S. for mainstream reporting on grooming gangs in Britain, it refused my request, several times. Grok did not.

Despite extensive reporting by every legacy outfit, nothing has been done by any globalist government anywhere, but the U.S.. …

The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan has repeatedly said that there are no grooming gangs in London. In fact, wherever Muslims have achieved public office, all reports from those districts are quashed.

Young men:

The take-over of our institutions by closeted Marxists, climate change nuts and Islamists is almost complete. Older generations are passive and despairing. They look at this, and think, “thank God I am old and I saw Paris before we destroyed it”. Our mainstream media is passive in its faith, somehow trusting that “democracy” will solve this issue. Governments are fearful both of the people they admitted, and the citizens of the countries they destroyed. They put up smokescreens to hide their crimes. The left cries racism, and persists in its belief that white Christian culture must be destroyed, and they have the people who are going to destroy it in hand. They do not….

But the demand for mass deportation will overtake discussion and will be driven by young men …

Policy people can debate all they like, but the power is not with them anymore. Across the west, Europe and the New World, young men are demanding their culture back. If it means deporting every last non-European, so it shall be.

The tide has changed:

Across Europe, including Scandi, the tides are turning big time. Remigration, which was only whispered about six months ago – Absurdistan’s was the first mention of it last year. When I starting writing about remigration, this time last year, I was nervous. The word was not in use, at all. Today, remigration is formally discussed and is in planning and execution, in every western democracy.

 

 

Remigration is just the beginning. Young white men are leading this fight and they want eradication of separate cultural entities. Multiculturalism is a crime scene across every metric. The U.S. and Canada were founded on Christian principles which created wealth, an explosion of invention and knowledge and peaceful prosperous families and communities.

They do not see why they have to finance this:

 

 

Finland has found that each Somali costs one million euros and contributes nothing.

 

 

This isn’t about remigration anymore. This is about throwing off the entire disgusting mess of licentious, sexually permissive, anti-family, anti-country, anti-Christianity, of the past 75 years. It is about a return to families, with husbands who stay, who claw back authority from the political operatives and sick ideologies who have stolen their futures. Who will take back their towns and counties from the Marxists stealing them blind.

 

 

Australian hospitals have become dangerous for Jews

Australian hospitals have become dangerous for Jews. By Megan Goldin in The Australian.

Weeks before first responders fought valiantly to save lives at Bondi Beach in Sydney in December last year, an international medical conference on the latest battle-tested techniques to treat gunshot wound victims in the critical minutes after injury was to be held in Perth.

Among the speakers was the former head of the Israeli military’s medical corp, Dr Elon Glassberg, who was to share how the Israeli army reduced battlefield mortality rates from gunshot and blast injuries to the lowest in history of any army in the world.

Anti-Israel doctors and nurses groups threatened to picket the conference with large-scale protests if the Glassberg session went ahead. The organisers capitulated and the conference was cancelled.

For protesting healthcare workers, it was a victory to be celebrated. “Thank you to everyone who wrote letters, made phone calls and made their concerns known. Free Palestine,” the Instagram account @hcw4palestinewa said. …

The Australian medical establishment has become actively antisemitic and pro-Hamas:

Many of the more than 30 doctors, nurses, midwives and allied health professionals interviewed for this article cite this incident as one of many examples of how anti-Israel activism by healthcare workers since the October 7, 2023, massacre by Hamas has shaken the 2500-year-old bedrock principle of medicine, dating from Greek physician Hippocrates and his oath, which is that the best interests of patients always comes first.

Using the exalted mantle of their medical professions, activist doctors and nurses routinely are amplifying anti-Jewish blood libels propagated by Hamas as well as adopting dehumanising anti-Jewish hate speech while often expressing support for proscribed terror groups such as Hamas that advocate mass slaughter of Jews.

By doing so, they are turning hospitals and medical clinics into ideological war zones instead of safe spaces where patients can be assured of getting the best possible medical care by empathetic healthcare providers. …

October 8:

Anti-Israel activism began almost immediately after the October 7 massacre when the protests that unfolded in Australian cities spilled into the wards and staffrooms of hospitals in Melbourne, Sydney and other capital cities.

Doctors and nurses wore “From the river to the sea” protest symbols to work and covered hospital toilet stalls and corridors with stickers that included a Star of David with a red line drawn through it.

At The Alfred Hospital in Melbourne, which has received tens of millions of dollars from Jewish philanthropists, such stickers were stuck to the bedside wall of an elderly Jewish patient in the hours before he died.

Meanwhile, a war of words was waged online. Social media posts by pro-Palestine doctors and other healthcare professionals veered into hate speech, antisemitism, Holocaust inversion and support of proscribed terror groups.

“Doctors and nurses were posting Nazi symbols and little caricatures of Jewish people but using the word ‘Zionist’ instead of ‘Jews’,” Jewish pediatric neurologist Dr Carly Debinski says. “They were so virtuous and obsessive about vilifying Jewish people.”

Almost three years later, it’s still going on virtually unabated:

Facebook groups where doctors and nurses had discussed mundane topics such as childcare became venomous in the aftermath of October 7, with Jewish members attacked or booted off if they mentioned the 200-plus Israelis held hostage in Gaza at the time, or the mutilations, rapes and slaughter of 1200 Israelis by Hamas on October 7.

At a major hospital in Melbourne, a Jewish intensive care unit nurse resigned after more than a decade in the job because management refused to tackle “online hate speech” by staff.

“If these people are willing to share these things on social media, imagine how they treat a (Jewish) patient face-to-face,” she says, requesting that her name be withheld. …

Hostile to Jewish patients:

Hospitals became hostile environments for Jewish patients and employees.

A Jewish health worker at a Melbourne teaching hospital was shirtfronted by a colleague from Ireland, where antisemitic incidents are at record highs, who demanded she apologise for the Gaza war. The same hospital HR department that weeks earlier transferred a staff member in the same unit for mimicking a foreign accent refused to take action when a complaint was lodged.

That pattern was repeated across the country as hospitals and healthcare regulators tolerated conduct against Jews that would have triggered disciplinary action if the conduct had targeted any other minority group, say numerous medical professionals who experienced this double standard. …

“Oops, sorry”:

For Charlotte Frajman, 64, the daughter of an Auschwitz survivor, having her religion listed in her medical records is a litmus test. “If I can’t have my Jewish religion on my medical records then it’s time to leave Australia because we are no longer safe here,” she says.

Frajman worries she was targeted during monthly appointments at a Melbourne hospital day clinic where she receives intravenous post-cancer treatment. During a session last year, a Muslim nurse, with whom she’d previously exchanged smiles, lost his kind demeanour when he saw Frajman’s religion on her hospital records while verifying her details.

When it came to putting in the cannula, he took four attempts. It was incredibly painful,” Frajman recalls. “I was bruised for weeks. You would have thought he was a trainee nurse, not the senior nurse in charge.” When the same nurse again took four attempts to insert cannulas during subsequent visits, Frajman didn’t know what to think. “Then the Bankstown nurses thing came out, and my husband and I looked at each other and we said: ‘Oh my God.’ ”

Israeli-born Orit Brand begged a hijab-wearing radiographer to stop after the eighth failed attempt to insert a cannula into her vein at a radiology clinic at a Melbourne hospital. At her insistence another staff member was called and inserted the cannula at the first attempt “with no pain and no bruising”.

It’s nearly impossible to prove malice when it comes to painful needle insertion. However, in both cases, the hospital protocol of a maximum of two attempts by the same practitioner was breached, according to nurses who work at the hospitals in question.

“The needles, it is a story that keeps repeating,” says Nurit Hadad, a NSW-based mental health nurse counselling victims of antisemitism. “This is the easiest way to hurt people. They say: ‘I’ve done my best but I just couldn’t find a vein.’ ”

Midwife Sharon Stoliar has heard many horror stories since October 7. Among them, a Jewish woman who cried in agony for hours the night after a C-section at a Sydney hospital where she was “left to lie in a pool of blood with no pain relief” while her baby screamed in its cot alongside hers. When the nurse eventually arrived, she treated her roughly and with no compassion. …

While hospitalised in the ICU ward of an Adelaide hospital, Julia, a Jewish patient who asked that her family name be withheld, sobbed after being given a bedside lecture by her nurse denying the events of the Holocaust and the October 7 massacre.

Sounds like 1920s Germany:

Jewish medical students and trainee doctors have been ostracised by fellow students. Some have been verbally attacked by patients and taunted by superiors. They are too afraid to go public because of concerns that it will affect their chances at getting accepted in highly competitive specialist training programs. Indeed, many of those interviewed for this article asked for their names to be fully or partially withheld because of safety or job concerns. …

Slurping up Hamas lies:

It is a testament to the effectiveness of Hamas’s propaganda machine that two days later, hundreds of medical workers dressed in hospital scrubs protested in Sydney and Melbourne chanting “stop hospital bombings”, even though the only Gazan hospital that had been bombed was al-Ahli and it had been hit by a misfired Palestinian rocket.

The same protesters outraged by what they claimed was Israel’s targeting of healthcare workers in Gaza were silent about Hamas firing rocket-propelled grenades at Israeli ambulances on October 7, killing paramedic crews, as well as murdering many Israeli first-aid workers during the massacre including a doctor and paramedic slaughtered as they treated the injured at Kibbutz Be’eri’s clinic.

Mental health crazies:

The medical specialty that seems to be most infested with antisemitism is mental health. Calling on Israelis to commit suicide, a Queensland-based psychotherapist posted on X, “You aren’t fit to live”. An academic working in the psychiatry department of a prominent Australian university put up a Holocaust inversion post on X comparing queues at food distribution centres in Gaza to concentration camp gas chambers during the Holocaust.

Mental health counsellor Hadad had a panic attack in the regional NSW Headspace office where she worked at the time when after October 7 a colleague draped her adjacent desk with a keffiyeh.

If someone is coming with a keffiyeh to a workplace, Australian people who have nothing to do with Middle Eastern culture … it’s a statement of violence,” says Hadad. “It represents the people trying to kill me.”

Her managers refused Hadad’s request to ban protest symbols at work. After months of feeling unsafe at work, Hadad quit her job. …

Antisemitic double standard:

As for the doctor who posted the Hitler quote and a post describing Jews as “loathed slime”, health oversight boards closed the complaint without taking action, as they did for complaints about numerous other doctors who posted antisemitic, terror idealisation and pro-Hamas content online.

“Regulators have shown clear double standards in the handling of complaints,” says Stoliar. She says sometimes the same AHPRA staff have acted against Jewish health practitioners targeted by baseless complaints, while ignoring complaints about blatantly antisemitic and terror idealisation posts by pro-Palestine healthcare workers by claiming these posts were made in personal capacities. …

Some Jewish and pro-Jewish doctors and nurses received letters from AHPRA accusing them of Islamophobia for posting think-tank reports debunking genocide claims or for posts suggesting that the writing had been on the wall for the Bondi attack. …

Honorably setting a good example:

For Melbourne pediatrician Debinski, Australia became so toxic for Jews after October 7 that she is happy she moved to Israel, where she works at Sheba Medical Centre, one of Israel’s largest hospitals near Tel Aviv.

She is part of a team of Jewish, Arab, Muslim, Christian and Druze doctors and nurses, treating children from all communities, including Gazan children brought to Israel for medical treatment.

Israel, she says, could teach Australia lessons about cultivating a culture of collaboration by medical teams from many walks of life whose creed is that patient care is paramount and personal baggage stays at home. For Debinski, the post-October 7 activism in Australian healthcare might have been done “under the guise of humanitarianism but it was really just a poisonous hatred of Jews”.

This is an example of where multiculturalism fails. On many issues, we cannot afford to have multiple cultures. We shouldn’t have to ask whether this a proper Western hospital or a hospital where the culture is to harm people the staff don’t like. We need a monoculture on issues like free speech, good medical care for all, and liberty — which are incompatible with Sharia and antisemitism.

Of course, the advocates of multiculturalism always try to confuse the picture by obsessing on irrelevant trivialities like food and skin color, because it makes them feel so superior and enlightened. (Talk about the Dunning-Kruger effect!)

A reader comments:

The stories about medical staff clearly using needles to torture patients they don’t Iike is very disturbing; it’s almost hard to read.

Wait until whites are more of a minority and all the self-hatred/anti-white hatred taught by the left in schools and universities really starts to take effect.

It won’t just be Jewish patients being treated like this. It’ll be all of us whites.

This is the part the suicidal empaths haven’t realised: instead of “being nice to us” in return for us inviting them in and giving away to them everything we had, they’re going to treat us like second- and third-class citizens once we’re a minority.

That’s the really stupid part of supporting mass immigration from countries with incompatible cultures, predominantly Muslims and Africans.

Whites in W Europe, the UK, Australia etc are going to get trodden on hard, eventually.