Australian Government living in a net-zero fantasy

Australian Government living in a net-zero fantasy. By Greg Sheridan in The Australian.

Because the Albanese government now never talks of its “net-zero” energy commitments, the IGR [Intergenerational Report] has been given a free pass for its ludicrous passages on net zero…

The IGR contains plenty of government propaganda that simply contradicts reality, such as: “Australia’s energy transition is well under way, with cleaner, cheaper, renewable energy …”

But the passages on net zero deserve special mention for they perfectly reprise one of the very worst dynamics in contemporary policy. There is a fantasy that much of the world will reach net zero by 2050, and the rest of the world not too long after. …

By pretending that what is at best an impossible aspiration is actually going to happen, the government and its subservient institutions create a toxic feedback loop of bad information that justifies terrible policy today. …

Look at what they believe:

A foundational sentence in the IGR reads: “Progress is expected to continue over the coming decades as the world continues to transition towards net-zero emissions. Around 170 countries accounting for around 80 per cent of global domestic product have adopted net-zero commitments.”

This is one of the worst sentences you could ever read in any Australian government policy document because it does not make any attempt to assess the reality of those commitments. It was never the case that the majority of the world economy was seriously committed to getting to net zero. But even the majority of the small number of countries that were taking some serious action towards that goal have now mostly backed off. …

  • China is notionally committed to net zero by 2060. That is utterly meaningless. Its emissions may have peaked as its population is now in decline and it’s using cleaner coal and some renewables. It’s still commissioning and building new coal-fired power plants and will not seriously reduce emissions for many years, if not decades. It will never go anywhere near net zero. It’s responsible for 30 per cent of global emissions.
  • The second-biggest emitter, the US, has no net-zero commitment at all.
  • Nation number three, India, has a notional commitment to net zero by 2070! Yes, 2070. India, where hundreds of millions of people need electricity, will certainly carbonise long before it thinks about decarbonising.
  • Russia has not the slightest interest in net zero.

That’s way over 50 per cent of global emissions that have no effective net-zero commitment at all — exactly the reverse of what the IGR claims, and bases Australian policy on. …

In 2025, according to the International Energy Agency, global greenhouse emissions rose, as they do every year. That’s not a world moving to net zero. …

The world will pay us? Don’t think so mate:

Aidan Morrison, energy program director at the Centre for Independent Studies, says Treasury falsely [expects] the world will pay whatever it takes to decarbonise, and therefore hugely expensive notional green exports from Australia will become competitive: “In reality, markets for expensive substitutes for carbon-based fuels and materials have not materialised. So we’re living in a fantasy world.”

And let’s not get started on how the Australian Government was hoodwinked by modern bureaucratically funded “science.” The climate models are based on an assumption about how convection and water vapor change when carbon dioxide increases. That assumption was made in 1963 when the modellers and climate scientists had simply no clue, so they made a convenient guess. By the time the empirical evidence was in, around 2005 — showing the assumption to be violently wrong — the “science” was already set in political stone.

AI has deleted the reason for universities to exist

AI has deleted the reason for universities to exist. By Superman on X.

Harvard University ran a controlled experiment pitting a custom AI against their own top-tier classrooms. …

They took 194 undergraduates and split them up.

One group learned physics in one of Harvard’s best hands-on, active-learning physical classrooms. Group work. Instructor support. The premium university experience.

The other group went home and learned the exact same material with an AI tutor.

The AI didn’t just win. It embarrassed the institution. Students using the AI learned more than twice as much as the students in the elite Harvard classroom. They scored 30% higher on the final assessment. And they did it in less time.

Goodbye universities:

Universities have always justified their exorbitant tuition with two things: access to elite knowledge and the physical classroom experience.

This study just proved both of those moats are gone.

When software can teach you complex physics twice as well as a $60,000-a-year institution, the math of higher education breaks permanently.

The AI didn’t just give the students answers. It used strict pedagogical guardrails. It guided. It questioned. It forced the students to do the cognitive work. It offered perfect, one-to-one tutoring, personalized to the exact moment a student misunderstood a concept.

That level of attention is mathematically impossible to scale in a physical lecture hall.

For a thousand years, the university was the only place to get a premium education. Now, it’s the bottleneck.

If AI can double your learning speed for a fraction of the cost, what exactly are students taking on decades of debt to pay for?

AI is certainly a heck of a lot cheaper and much quicker, and saves on being physically present. Personally, I found the university environment invaluable for motivating me to learn things I wouldn’t have otherwise thought about.

Anyway, universities have just become finishing schools in elite attitudes, and a dating service.

What have the tech titans ever done for us?

What have the tech titans ever done for us?

Bernie Sanders:

The arrogance of the oligarchs is extraordinary. THEY WANT IT ALL.

In this election, Musk and other billionaires will spend huge amounts of money to make sure that Congress works for them — not working families.

We can beat them.

Educate. Organize. Get your friends to vote.

Robert Sterling:

What Elon Musk has done to make my life better:

– electric cars
– satellite internet
– saved free speech

What Jeff Bezos has done to make my life better:

– nationwide next-day delivery
– architecture that powers the internet

What Larry Page and Sergey Brin have done to make my life better:

– made the internet searchable
– online email and documents platform

What Mark Zuckerberg has done to make my life better:

– social media to keep me connected to friends
– online ads platform

What Larry Ellison has done to make my life better:

– database software for my businesses
– data centers for AI and cloud computing

What Jensen Huang has done to make my life better

– hardware that powers the AI revolution

What Bernie Sanders has done to make my life better:

– Absolutely nothing.

You know the reference:

Actions speak louder than words: Terrorism not so bad, stopping illegals very bad

Actions speak louder than words: Terrorism not so bad, stopping illegals very bad. By Liz Churchill.

1,000+ military-age men broke into Britain last week…

Only one person got arrested…the man who tried to stop it…

Today, the Prime Minister went on TV and called him a racist…

Daniel Thomas (aka Danny Tommo) was arrested and charged with criminal damage for slashing a dinghy in the English Channel. While the vessel was empty of migrants, a French rescue worker was on board when Thomas used a knife to puncture it, which is why the charges included suspicion of endangering life. He pleaded not guilty on September 25, 2026, was denied bail, and is remanded in custody.

And of course, among the 1,200 illegal migrants who invaded in the last two days there have been no arrests. No doubt given somewhere to stay, meals, some spending money, etc.

Commenter from the US:

We are one presidential election away from this. …

Well, one election with unchecked mail-in ballots, anyway.

 

Meanwhile, the five British nationals who were arrested over the bomb plot at RAF Fairford have been released on bail.

Basil the Great:

Anybody who thinks these terrorists are British are part of the problem. …

Nigel, you literally said on camera you believe people with British passports are British

You went on to say you hope it was only a minority of people on the right who believed they weren’t truly British

By your logic these terrorists are as British as we are.

Britain: from affluent and high-trust to broken and low-trust

Britain: from affluent and high-trust to broken and low-trust. By Andrew Fox.

British, because he had a passport. Really?

 

This story has broken me. It has unleashed a rage so strong I can barely express it, but allow me to try.

Above all, I am angry with the decades-long malevolent incompetence of the British state: politicians of all parties, the judiciary, the civil service. Their collective uselessness has shattered the social contract and made us all poorer and less safe. In just 25 years, they have led us from an affluent, high-trust society to a broken, low-trust one.

I am sickened by the growth in sectarian politics. I am appalled by the foreign ghettos in our cities and imported, bent voting practices and resultant corruption in some of our councils. I hate seeing the clothing of female oppression on our streets. I am sickened by the fact our Jewish community lives under siege.

I no longer wish to pay tax to support those who have come here illegally and should be removed immediately. It is to our shame that we have accepted mass immigration without insisting on integration.

I am tired of being told that a British passport makes a foreigner as British as me. I assure you that the “British citizen” in this story is not. I am saddened that for so many people, the concept of “British” is essentially meaningless.

I am sick of the obsession with a minor war 2,500 miles away that barely affects us. I despise that £88m of our tax money is going to Hamas (because it will), when the tax burden is a record high, everything is expensive, welfare spending is out of control and we can’t even pay for our own defences when the global risk of conflict is the highest it has been since the end of the Cold War. And in spite of how much of our money the government steals from our pockets, nothing, at all, in this country works. Healthcare, transport, education — all broken.

It is a stain on our national politics that we have five Gaza MPs. It is our national shame that our government is intent on sucking up to the Palestinian entity which contains some of the worst monsters on the face of planet. It is a disgrace that our Foreign Secretary shook the hand of the representative of the Iranian regime that has slaughtered tens of thousands of its own people, and that he doesn’t seem to understand why that photograph will damn him forever. It is embarrassing that we had a Foreign Office minister dancing with and hugging the representative of the Palestinian Authority. The lack of serious statesmanship is mind-boggling and indicative of how far we have fallen.

They say the past is a foreign country, but my goodness, do I miss the country I grew up in. I feel so sorry for the generation that grew up after 2000 and will never know how good it was. It’s not coming back. …

The worst part of it is that there is absolutely nothing any of us can do about it. I just want to live in a happy, stable, prosperous country like we used to be, instead of one that is run by a state apparatus that does nothing but beat us down, obsess over irrelevances, take our money, and leave us poorer and less safe.

Fighting all the institutions

Fighting all the institutions. By Eric Weinstein.

Peter Theil asks:

What is something you feel is good and needs to be done, but on which almost no institution agrees with you and will fight to destroy you with their full force at a deeply personal level?

Eric’s answer:

Undermining faith in Anthony Fauci’s and Francis Collins’ scientific behavior during a pandemic.

Calling attention to the fact that the president of the United States with launch code responsibility was obviously demented during his presidency.

Opposing high levels of immigration for completley non-xenophobic reasons.

Openly discussing asymmetries in patterns of religious martyrdom attacks.

Fighting the loss of the word “Genocide” via coordinated social campaigns.

Pointing out that the history of Peer Review is retconned and fictitious and obviously false.

Fighting irreversible surgeries pushed on children leading to a reproductive holocaust.

Calling for an end to Diverisity-Equity-Inclusion and opposing “Black Lives Matter”, despite their branding genius, even during the Summer of Floyd.

Pointing out that conspiracies are well documented and ubiquitous and fighting for responsible conspiracy theorizing.

Promoting my own technical work and insisting that scientists get paid handsomely.

Truth seekers are rare:

You’re asking the wrong person. It seems I stand up for what I believe is deeply good and what is misperceived as evil all day, every day. This has stupidly become close to my whole life at times. I’m so bored by how silent everyone is. I can’t fathom it. “Managed Reality” has turned evil.

Something is pushing pure evil, disguised as “good” down our throats 24/7 via the institutions. And almost everyone puts up with it. I do not.

Who controls are the institutions? Why do they all move together, like fish in a school? Why are politicians who advocate political positions that were centrist and mainstream from 1990 to 2005 — such as Donald Trump, AfD, Marine Le Pen, Rupert Lowe and Nigel Farage, and Pauline Hanson — damned as “far right” and Nazi adjacent by all the institutions in the 2020s? Who decided to simultaneously weaken all white countries by mass migration from the third world?

We don’t pay no stinkin’ reparations

We don’t pay no stinkin’ reparations. By Daniel Hannan.

I’ve had enough of these grifters. If another government comes whining for slavery reparations from the country [Britain] that distinguished itself by its relentless global abolitionism, we should treat it as a hostile act and respond with economic sanctions.

John Cleese.

This is where the Arabs were ahead of us

By castrating all their slaves, they made sure that there were no descendants who could claim reparations

John Carter:

The lesson of the long twentieth century is that mercy gets you nowhere. You will pay for it forever. No one gives the Arabs a hard time about the slave trade, because the Arabs made sure there were no descendants of slaves. No one gives the Argentines a hard time about stolen land, because the indigenous peoples of Argentina were systematically eliminated. No one gives the Japanese a hard time about the Ainu, because there are no Ainu.

Video on western civilization

Video on western civilization. By the Claude AI. Pure eye-candy, but fun.

 

Now watch tv nowadays:

What is to be built for the Australian Navy?

What is to be built for the Australian Navy? By David Archibald.

The premise of the book Building Australia’s Defence is that while the situation is dire and the hour is late, it is still recoverable. …

China:

China has taken upon itself to be the main vector of death and destruction during this century. Thirty years ago they realised that their peak relative strength would be in the 2020s. That window of opportunity is running out. Their problem is that the advances in electronics over the last 25 years have favoured the defence.

Another problem is that their ancestors have already conquered the easy stuff, going out from the original Han heartland in Shaanxi Province. There is frozen wasteland to the north, deserts to the west and mountain ranges to the south. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was easy by comparison, with thousands of kilometres of flat land to drive across in armoured formations. To go anywhere, China has to put its troops in metal containers — ships and aircraft — which are easily detected and tracked on the modern battlefield.

It has been said that the cost in ordnance of sinking a ship, with cruise and ballistic missiles, is about five percent of the cost of building it. It doesn’t matter that China now has the world’s largest navy by hull count, because the cost of sinking them is a small fraction of the cost of building them. Ukraine is inspirational in this regard for, even without a navy, it has driven the Russian Navy to the eastern end of the Black Sea. A recent campaign saw Ukraine destroy over 300 Russian commercial vessels using drones. …

And Australia?

The most cost-effective way to sink warships now is with air-launched ballistic missiles. Radar systems on ships have a blind spot vertically above them in a cone about six degrees wide. That is the weak spot to be exploited. The US developed the PrSM missile, with a range of 500 km, to be the successor to the ATACMS missile. It weighs one tonne, and has a 90 kg warhead. Air-launching a missile doubles its range. Another rule of thumb is that with a warhead that is 10% to 20% of the missile weight, you will get a range of one kilometre per kilo of mass. Increment two of the PrSM missile was developed to enable the US Army to sink ships at sea. It has passive guidance with an infrared, image-matching seeker, combined with radio frequency detection (the target ship’s radar is effectively a location beacon). …

Unfortunately Australia doesn’t have any aircraft that can launch a two-tonne missile. The psychotic people running the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) buried the ones that could, our F-111s, in a pit.

But civilian aircraft could be converted to that purpose and would not come in harm’s way, given the stand-off range of the missile. For sinking ships, air-launched ballistic missiles are far more cost-effective than submarines. While a submarine might take weeks to complete a mission, an aircraft could service targets in the Indian Ocean one day and targets in the Pacific the next. Every Chinese ship in the Pacific and Indian Oceans needs to be sunk, including their fishing fleet. To sink a 500 tonne fishing vessel takes a 50 kg warhead.

The countries around the South China Sea will help. The Philippines and Indonesia have acquired the Brahmos supersonic, antiship missile from India, and Malaysia is evaluating it. Indonesia is particularly important, given that it is a belt 5,200 km long across the path between China and Australia. If Indonesia doesn’t want a Chinese armada to pass, then the Chinese armada will be heavily chewed up in attempting to do so. Fortunately China and Indonesia have recently had a falling out, with China dismantling US$14 billion worth of nickel production lines in Indonesia in response to an Indonesian hike in its take. …

The Virginia class submarines are a positive development. However, the Australian Government didn’t increase the defence budget to pay for them. Instead, it took funds from some 500 other projects, in effect hollowing out the ADF and making it more fragile. For example, Australia recently acquired 75 Abrams tanks that are fitted for, but not with, the Trophy system. So they are naked against ATGMs. On the other hand they don’t have protection against drones either, so they are useless anyway.

Hold a globe so that you are looking directly at Australia, and you’ll see Australia and ocean, and not much else. Australia is the nearest significant nation to about a quarter of the world’s oceans. Yet our navy is minuscule and outdated.

As of late 2025 and 2026, Australia’s merchant fleet has shrunk to only 20 Australian-flagged ships, most of them coastal traders, a dramatic decline from over 100 ships three decades ago. There are only four ocean-going, Australian-flagged ships actually engaged substantially in international trade. The decline is attributed to the high costs — due to union rules — of operating Australian-flagged and crewed ships compared to foreign-flagged alternatives, which carry the vast majority (99%) of Australia’s seaborne trade.

We have no Australian-controlled tanker fleet capable of sustaining energy imports, no fleet of bulk carriers able to guarantee critical commodity flows and almost no Australian-flagged vessels trading internationally that could be directed toward national priorities in a crisis

Read all of David’s article, covering land and air forces, here.

Matriarchies fail: How building women’s  self esteem is killing us

Matriarchies fail: How building women’s  self esteem is killing us. By Devon Eriksen.

The worst and most prolonged psychological torture you can inflict on a woman is to convince her she’s as good as any man.

This torture is lifelong, unendurable, and once you set up the initial conditions, the pain becomes self-inflicted.

You see, women are genetically programmed for two things. First, to raise children. Second, to select a man who is superior to her to bear those children for.

Not equal. Certainly not lesser. Superior.

There is no point in arguing about this. It is obviously true to anyone who looks around himself without blinders made of wishful thinking.

There is no point in becoming angry at me or anyone else about this. It is true whether I wish it to be or not, and whether you wish it to be or not.

There is no point in trying to talk women out of this. It is not a part of their culture or education. It is not an individual character flaw in them. It is part of their genetic recipe.

Therefore, if you convince a woman she is equal to most men, she will only be willing to bear children to a small percentage of exceptional men.

If you convince her that she is the equal of any man, she will be unwilling to start a family with anyone.

And she will remain genetically programmed to do so.

Biasing schools and work to favor women raised their self esteem, but made courtship and babies impossible for many:

When I was a child, and again when I was a young man, in high school and college, I noticed that the older adults who staffed the education system seemed to think “girls’ self-esteem” was our most precious resource …

Perhaps they thought half of humanity’s potential Newtons, Einsteins, and Da Vincis were hidden among the ranks of the fair sex, waiting to be unlocked by “Project Self Esteem”, and no, I did not make that name up. …

Self-esteem is not being happy. Self-esteem is not even feeling good. Self-esteem is how awesome you think you are.

And if you think you’re awesome, when you’re mediocre, then you’re miserable, because everyone around you treats you a whole lot worse than you think you deserve.

High self-esteem is great for young men. It makes them take risks. And to thrive men need to take risks, and achieve things, for many reasons, one of which is that women only mate up.

High self-esteem is not so good for young women. It doesn’t get them anything they wouldn’t have already had. It just makes them less happy with it.

Sure, there’s such a thing as self-esteem too low, but if a woman can look you in the eye, instead of in the shoes, when she talks to you, she’s pretty much good to go.

Anything more than that is superfluous at best, and at worst… well, eyeball the video for a moment and you’ll see what I mean.

 

 

But the misery isn’t just personal.

This is the fertility crisis in a nutshell. We, Western civilization, have spent the past five or six decades telling little boys that they are worthless sacks of protoplasm, and telling little girls that the sun shines out of their collective girl parts.

And look what’s happened.

The fertility crisis is stupidly simple. When you elevate the status of women by giving them a greater share of respect, and of society’s wealth, which is created by men, they refuse to have children.

You can reverse this by allowing men to keep the wealth they create, instead of giving it to women.

Then they will give it to women themselves, but the women will look up to them, and there will be children again.

Concrete problems:

During the Trump administration so far, 94% of new jobs went to women. This is not natural or organic. This doesn’t happen on its own. This is not happening because women are “crushing it”.

Women are the same women they have always been, risk averse, clustered around average intelligence, prone to wait for others to lead.

This is not an accident. This is spin on the ball. Women vote. And pandering is an easy way to get those votes.

But give a moderately pretty one a single email job at a Silicon Valley startup, and pretty soon she thinks that the father of her children should be a “post-economic” jet-setter with the body of a professional athlete who ticks all the boxes her therapist thinks are important.

And she thinks she can pick him off a shelf at age 35.

This is a vote, conscious or not, willing or not, for the extinction of humanity.

 

There are now more women than men working in the U.S. Over the past year, working-age men have LOST jobs, while women have captured virtually 100% of the net new jobs:

 

 

A fact that everyone should know, but sadly do not:

Throughout the genetic history of humanity, approximately 80% of women had children, as opposed to 37% of men. Those numbers don’t lie. Most men either weren’t exceptional enough to breed, or died trying to become exceptional enough to breed.

Women just had to not be in the bottom quintile. Not to be horrible, or horribly unlucky.

Which societies succeed?

And this is why Western civilization told women they were the weaker sex, the dumber sex, the more fragile sex. Why Eve was said to made to serve Adam.

Because this preserved civilization and the species.

Women were actually happier that way, because women don’t want to win. They want a winner.

But even if it didn’t, what choice would we have?

The only nations and tribes in the world which are still breeding are the ones where women are still of low status. And if you try to replace Westerners with them, try to make them into Westerners, not only will you fail, but even if you succeed, they’ll stop breeding, too.

And we know now why there are no matriarchies. Its not because men have superior strength, and enslaved women with violence. It’s because matriarchies don’t breed.

Humans are an animal, like any other animal. Every animal has mating rituals, and if those rituals can’t be conducted, there will be no next generation. This is why some animals can be bred in zoos, and others cannot.

We know what’s wrong. We just lack the political will to fix it. Because it’s “not fair”.

Well, of course it’s not fair. But look around you. Look at the universe. Look at history. Whatever made you expect that things would be fair?

Reality isn’t woke.

UPDATE: A reader writes:

The Devon Erikson flame war is not the usual WR standard. I feel compelled to write. …

In the end some women have to be smart enough to tell the 160 IQ guys from the 140 ones, or what is the point of all that sexual selection? Men wouldn’t be writing sonnets to impress the girls if the women didn’t have some choice, and if they weren’t smart enough to pick the better sonnet. …

The “only 37% of men have children line” is a junk statistic.

ChatGPT:

Perhaps one-third or so of all males ever born became fathers. That isn’t necessarily because vast numbers of adult men were excluded from reproduction. A huge fraction of historical male births died before reproductive age.  …

For all human history:

  • Adult females becoming mothers: ~88%
  • Adult males becoming fathers: perhaps ~70–80%

So the sex difference is real, but probably nowhere near the often-repeated idea that only a small minority of prehistoric men reproduced.

The author treats all women as the same, not acknowledging the many exceptions, and far from sympathetic. So jarring! Where as men are frequently treated this way by the current culture — as toxic and dumb — and we are so used to it.

Standing up to the people who want a unicultural society dominated by themselves

Standing up to the people who want a unicultural society dominated by themselves. By John Cleese.

In response to this from Paul,

John Cleese writes:

In other words, the people who like the idea of a multicultural society must stand up to the people who want a unicultural society dominated by themselves.

The opposite of multiculturalism:

The lies about productivity, regulation, multiculturalism, debt, and carbon dioxide are coming home to roost. in Australia

The lies about productivity, regulation, multiculturalism, debt, and carbon dioxide are coming home to roost in Australia. By Paul Kelly in The Australian.

Don’t think the seventh intergenerational report (IGR) released this week by a confident Treasurer, Jim Chalmers, is about dry technical economics. This document is a political time bomb because it reveals the scale of Australia’s long-run redirection under Labor and signals that the 2028 election will be one of the most polarising and ideological contests in our history. …

What is the Labor plan? It is a double-down on the current Albanese government agenda. If you thought our existing tribulations might provoke a Labor rethink, you could not be more misconceived. Labor’s current policies will be entrenched as the Australian model for future decades, adapting them to a changing world.

While most economic indicators are predicted to improve, the big picture is enshrined over the coming 40 years:

  • slower economic growth
  • permanent budget deficits
  • higher government spending
  • higher personal income tax
  • more emphasis on renewables and net zero
  • strong immigration
  • falling fertility rates
  • an industrial base shaped by services, clean energy
  • AI as a revolutionary technology that delivers a dynamic economy and an eruption in productivity that means enhanced living standards.

Labor believes it has correctly diagnosed the times.

What do right wingers say?

Yet the three parties of the right wing — Liberal, National and One Nation — are embracing a radical agenda that at every major decision point rejects the Labor/Treasury/IGR vision and, indeed, views much of the document as an alarming prophecy of national decline and hardship.

Former treasurer Costello told Inquirer: “The IGR was designed to give a measure of how fairly current generations were treating future generations. When you compare the situation today and the situation in 2002, we are in a far worse position. We have had no increase in real wages for about a decade, our living standards are falling, our productivity is zero, we’ve got demand-driven programs that guarantee higher costs in the future, and the Albanese government produces a report to say how well we are doing.

“This is complacency writ large. The whole idea of the IGR was a call to arms, but this is a laying down of arms. Here’s the critical point. Rather than come up with a plan off the back of this IGR to do something about our economic decline, the essence of this IGR is to assume the problem away. …

“To put the future of the Australian economy into the AI basket is like embracing a cargo cult.”

Labor believes all the lies of the left, and will govern as if they are true.

Two tier justice

Two tier justice.

Lozzy B.:

Attacks against Australians = No Consequences

Attacks against any other race/ culture, ideology = JAIL

 

Lozzy B.

A White English man Del Somerville, 42, was given a 2 year sentence after he threw a plastic bottle.

Meanwhile feral leftists assault & smash Police with sticks & throw dangerous objects at them with no consequences or repercussions at all.

 

Paul:

A brown Muslim racist who spits in a white baby’s face in a pram, walks away free.

A white man throws an empty plastic bottle and says a swear word, gets 2 years jail.

 

Related:

Victoria has become the ‘Criminal’s dream state’

Victoria has become the ‘Criminal’s dream state’. By Eli Greenblatt and Ben Wilmot in The Australian.

Shopping centre property developer Chris Garnaut has labelled Victoria a “criminal’s dream state” after it topped national crime statistics with 263 offences every day.

Mr Garnaut — whose Fawkner Property has a $5bn mall network — says the theft rate is running at the highest ever levels at the group’s shopping centres in Victoria.

And it is making the state, which goes to the polls November 28, uninvestable.

“It is 50 per cent higher in Victoria than in all other states,” he said. “Criminals are not being charged or are immediately let off.

“The worst crime rate is in our Coles and Woolworths supermarkets in Victoria. Victoria is a criminal’s dream state; steal, bash security guards, walk off, don’t get charged, and on the rare occasion the criminal is charged they are not convicted, and if they are on bail, the bail is typically extended,” he said.

The commercial property investor and financial adviser is going on an investment strike. …

Billionaire Solomon Lew says retail crime is the worst he has seen in his 60 years of retailing, remarking he was shocked to see expensive steak in a Coles supermarket stapled with a security tag, while the Woolworths’ head of violence prevention argued Victoria’s weakened anti-retail crime legislation left supermarket staff “exposed to ongoing harassment and violence”.