The Coalition’s new immigration ­policy targets migrants who quietly hate our freedoms

The Coalition’s new immigration ­policy targets migrants who quietly hate our freedoms. By Geoff Chambers in The Australian.

On Tuesday the Opposition Leader will unveil the first phase of the Coalition’s immigration ­policy and declare that those who migrate from liberal ­democracies have a “greater likelihood of ­subscribing to Australian values compared to those ­migrating from places ruled by fundament­alists, extremists and dictators”.

The Coalition’s hardline immigration crackdown, which outlines sweeping visa and rule changes to defend Australian values and slash record migration levels under the Albanese government, would ­deport overstayers abusing the legal system, restore ­temporary protection visas and weed out ­foreign agents pretending to be students and migrant workers.

Mr Taylor will lament that Australia has accepted migrants who don’t believe in equal rights for men and women, don’t believe in the rule of law and want to establish parallel legal systems, and “don’t believe in freedom of speech, association and religion”.

Speaking at the Menzies Research Centre in Sydney, the Liberal leader will warn that “our door has also been opened to people who, while rejecting hate and ­violence, nevertheless still reject our core values”.

“For too long, we’ve turned a blind eye to a reality of immigration and integration: Those who migrate from liberal democracies have a greater likelihood of subscribing to Australian values compared to those migrating from places ruled by fundamentalists, extremists, and dictators,” Mr Taylor will say.

“In that vein, the cohort of ­Gazans let into Australia following the October 7 attacks present a clear risk to our country. They come to our country from a society run by the barbaric Islamist terrorist organisation of Hamas. That cohort must be reassessed entirely with far greater scrutiny.” …

“Not everyone wanting to ­migrate to Australia has a noble ­intent,” he will says. “Not everyone wanting to migrate to Australia will be a net benefit to Australia; indeed, many will be a net drain. Not everyone wanting to migrate to Australia will integrate or assimilate.

Just as energy policy under Labor is dominated by the ­ideology of net zero, immigration policy under Labor is dominated by the ideology of cultural relativism. For Labor, all immigration is good immigration.

“But that’s simply not true. It’s not what Australians are seeing with their own eyes. And Australians are fed up with politically correct preaching on immigration.”

Anyone can crack that code. This policy spells out the objections to Muslims who have no intention of assimilating or adopting our values. If carried through, it will stop the Islamic colonization of Australia. No more Bondis, Lindt Cafes, etc..

But of course it must be more than another checkbox on an immigration form. That’s where’s where the rubber meets the road, where the necessary discrimination occurs, in deciding who to invite into our society.

The policy spells out immigration criteria using principles, keeping it at the level of individuals rather than group identity. The right way to do it, but relatively difficult — discriminating on the basis of group membership is so much easier.

Let’s have an immigration target too. Maybe < 50,000 for the next three years? To make up for the 2 million under Albanese.

UPDATE:

Protecting Australian jobs from cheap labour

Protecting Australian jobs from cheap labour. By B.W. Jackson in The Spectator.

We are often told that Australia needs foreign workers because there are many ‘jobs that Australians won’t do’. …

South Australia Premier Peter Malinauskas argued that we need migrants to ‘wipe the bums’ of the elderly in aged care. During the pandemic, Adam Marshall, then New South Wales Agriculture Minister, said many Australians were too ‘soft and lazy’ to work on farms. …

Instead of allowing wages to rise or fixing the way our welfare system impacts the incentives to work, many important people tend to favour another solution – importing foreign workers.

Alexandra Marshall sums up the main point nicely:

In the 1840s, when farmers wanted to bring in a huge cheap Indian labour force to do the jobs ‘free settlers and convicts wouldn’t do’ – the government said NO.

They argued it would threaten social coherency and undercut the job market for the whole population in a fragile nation.

Did the nation collapse without cheap labour?

No.

Australia innovated wire fences and led an technological revolution in agriculture having been denied cheap labour which continued to hold back other markets.

And what are the modern parties of Labor and the LNP doing?

Leaning into ‘cheap labour’ to ‘save the economy’ while condemning Australia’s job market and killing off our ingenuity while our cultural and social cohesion is destroyed.

Australians will do all those jobs, if the difference between their wages and welfare is made large enough. Duh.

The current ruling class is wrecking our country so they can get rich on cheap labor. They get voted into control of government money by buying the votes of those on welfare, and bringing in third world immigrants.

Viktor Orban bows out after 16 years

Viktor Orban bows out after 16 years. By John Hinderaker at Powerline.

Viktor Orbán was defeated in his bid for a sixth term as Prime Minister of Hungary, to the delight of liberals everywhere. As a populist and “right wing extremist,” Orban was detested by the Left. He did Hungary a great deal of good, if only by resisting the suicidal immigration policies that so many European countries have followed.

But what is the significance of his defeat? Not much, in this sense: after 16 years as Prime Minister — and that is on top of the term he served from 1998-2002 — it would be surprising if he had not worn out his welcome. That is an extraordinarily long time in office in any democracy.

Moreover, Orban didn’t lose to a liberal. Péter Magyar is a former member of Orban’s party, and his views on immigration are no more liberal than Orban’s. In some ways, he is more like an American conservative than Orban has been.

Orban eventually had to bow out gracefully because he was too socialist. He engaged in “state-directed investment strategy,” which inevitably allocates capital poorly and engenders corruption. This was the major factor in his undoing. Stephen Moore explains:

The defeat of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban was NOT a repudiation of free-market economics.

The Heritage Foundation ranked Hungary’s economy as only the 79th freest in the world, 39th out of 44 countries in the Europe region.

Inflation in Hungary since late 2019 has been twice the U.S. level, and last year its real economic growth rate of a paltry 0.3% lagged behind all of its neighbors.

 

No joy for the left:

Voters became exasperated with the inevitable corruption of Orban’s 16 year state-directed investment strategy. (We hope the Natcons here in America are paying attention.) His successor, Peter Magyar, is a former member of Orban’s party who managed to unite the nation’s smaller center-right parties.

Frank Furedi at spiked focuses on the culture war:

More than any other individual, the now former Hungarian prime minister personified the national-sovereigntist, anti-globalist outlook that has made so much headway over the past decade. …

Other analysts have blamed Orbán’s loss on Hungary’s economic slowdown and the cost-of-living crisis now faced by millions of citizens. Yet accusations that Fidesz has been lining the pockets of a few, while others endure a decline in living standards, are also not sufficient to explain what happened this weekend. After all, talk of Fidesz’s supposed corruption is far from new.  …

Fidesz has seemed at a loss as to how to engage with the younger generation. Indeed, by 2024, it appeared that it had more or less given up on young people, fatalistically accepting it had lost their support. It was content to view itself as a party of the older generations. …

The main driver of this generational disaffection was the powerful influence exerted on them by Western identity politics and, underpinning it, therapy culture, with its emphasis on victimhood and vulnerability. The influence of therapy culture and the increasing focus on individual psychology and identity have tended to detach young people from the traditional, conservative values of Fidesz. In effect, many young Hungarians hold attitudes closer to those of their Western peers than the older members of their own society.

When I drew attention to the corrosive influence of therapy culture and identity politics on Hungarian society, many in Fidesz assured me that I was exaggerating the problem. They imagined that these phenomena were confined to the West and somehow miraculously stopped at the border of Hungary. Yet a therapeutic, identitarian sensibility increasingly prevails throughout Hungary’s cultural and educational institutions. Invariably, those influenced by it are likely to be drawn to Western anti-traditionalist and anti-nationalist ideals. Supporters of the government appeared to be oblivious to the fact that they not only were facing a culture war – they were losing it, too. …

But:

Europe’s centrist elites may hope that the defeat of Orbán represents a defeat for the populist movement in Europe. But crucially, none of the values that Fidesz stands for, from national sovereignty and strong borders to the importance of tradition, has been explicitly challenged, let alone defeated by Tisza.

That is why I am confident that the populist surge will continue to transform the political landscape in Western societies.

UPDATE: Joey Mannarino compares Orban with Keir Starmer, the Labor leader of the UK:

Viktor Orban didn’t cancel any elections and never arrested people for social media posts. He also stepped down after his election loss and is partaking in a peaceful transfer of power.

But, don’t forget, he was a dictator.

Keir Starmer attempted to cancel about 1,000 local council elections next month and arrests about 12,000 people a year for social media posts. He also refused to let a rival run for a seat in a by-election because he was worried it would be a threat to his leadership.

But, don’t forget, he’s a democratic leader.

Mass “illiteracy” returns to the West’s ruling class

Mass “illiteracy” returns to the West’s ruling class. By Brandon Zicha.

A student today at my elite university admitted to me today that she took a class so she could work on reading for more than 20 minutes at a time. She can’t read. She mainly skims and summarizes, she says and still gets A’s.

This student is, by professional standards, illiterate. Gonna have high GPA when she graduates. …

The student is literate [but] not at professional university level. …

This conversation was had after 6 of 22 students dropped my course because the maximum reading per week in one week was over 100 pages.

What people aren’t grasping is that this is literally *dangerous*. These people are going to be come doctors, engineers, etc. They are — by any metric — vastly less capable than prior generations. These effects are cumulative over a lifetime.

This grade inflation is part of the problem, but not even close to the entirety. And the problem obviously starts in K-12.

Students don’t know history because, you can’t actually become historically literate on the advice of ‘never assign more than 30 pages a week’. You can’t develop any of the skills that came with literacy. This is, quite honestly, a civilizational catastrophe. …

I was feeling crazy about student complaints about 7 years back. Went back to old syllabi from the late 1990s. I was not crazy. They had a fraction of the load.

Elaborates:

I coteach a class with a colleague … for the past 15 years. … We have reduced the difficulty and load every 3 years or so since the beginning, and we probably have to stop. … That is an objective decline in ability.

I routinely hear professors complaining about students who:

  1. Can’t or won’t read at levels we have never seen.
  2. When they do, their ability to connect between texts and evaluate is poor. Indeed, grasping the text is not great. It’s increasingly the norm, and it used to be the opposite.
  3. They struggle to reason, honestly.
  4. Most weirdly, we struggle to talk about ‘reflecting on one’s ideas’. They often struggle to understand *what that means*.
  5. They have declining writing skills.
  6. They have lower interest in ideas
  7. They are less sophisticated in their ability to manipulate ideas
  8. They are much worse on many of the metrics associated with high level reading ability.

At the same time

  1. Study times have declined.
  2. Assigned workloads have declined a great deal
  3. Hiring employer complaints about graduate quality has declined continually.
  4. Grades have remained the same or gone up.

Causes? Phones, DEI (affecting admissions to elite universities), lack of motivation or fear to spur effort, and of course the general IQ decline of ~1 point per decade since 1880 due to smarter women having fewer kids and today’s lack of selection pressure. The ability to reason probably isn’t helped by wokeism, which requires people to arrive at nonsensical conclusions for political reasons.

World’s tanker fleet heading to the US to fill up

World’s tanker fleet heading to the US to fill up. By Jesús Enrique Rosas.

Hundreds of supertankers, the kind that carry two million barrels each, are currently racing toward the US Gulf Coast from every direction. …

Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz and everyone panicked. … And then something happened that nobody in media seems interested in reporting, for obvious reasons. The world just… switched suppliers? Like changing your internet provider except the internet provider is the entire effing global energy economy.

Supertankers that were mid-ocean on their way to the Persian Gulf literally turned around and headed to Texas. That’s not a metaphor. Ship tracking data shows them doing U-turns in the Indian Ocean. ..

American oil exports are approaching record levels. Gulf Coast refineries are running at 95% capacity. …

Meanwhile China, which was getting 45% of its oil imports through Hormuz and paying basement prices for sanctioned Iranian crude, is now competing with Japan and Europe for the same expensive American barrels. Chinese manufacturers are already raising prices 20% on goods headed to the US.

So to summarize: Iran played its biggest card and the main result is that the United States became the world’s emergency gas station and China’s cheap energy subsidy evaporated.

MAGA:

This is either the most elaborate coincidence in the history of geopolitics… or someone planned the sequence Venezuela -> Iran -> profits!

Miad Maleki: The U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is going to send Iran broke. Over 90% of Iran’s annual trade transits the Persian Gulf. Another Cuba perhaps, brought to its knees by the US Navy?

A blockade chokes off industrial inputs, machinery, and consumer goods. Food inflation already hit 105% by February 2026. Rice prices are up 7x. This gets dramatically worse under blockade. …

The rial has already cratered from 42,000 to 1.5M per dollar. Banks are limiting withdrawals to $18-30/day. Overall inflation: 47.5%. A blockade eliminating all forex earnings pushes the rial into terminal hyperinflation. The regime issued its largest-ever banknote, 10M rials, worth about $7.

The clock is ticking on the Iranians:

Iran has ~50-55M barrels of total onshore oil storage, roughly 60% full. Spare capacity: ~20M barrels. With 1.5M bbl/day of surplus production that normally exports, storage fills in ~13 DAYS. After that, Iran must shut in wells.

Why is this very important: when mature oil wells shut down, bottom water rushes in, a process called water coning. Oil droplets get permanently trapped in rock pores. This oil can never be recovered. Iran’s fields already decline 5-8% annually. Forced shut-ins could permanently destroy 300,000-500,000 bbl/day of production capacity, that’s $9-15B/year in revenue, gone forever.

US production cannot replace all of the 20% of the world’s oil that used to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, but I’ll bet it can cover a good deal of it.

UPDATE:

 

Iran’s one big card, the only economic leverage it had left, just forced every customer on earth to build a permanent detour around Iran.  …

The regime traded decades of chokepoint relevance for a few weeks of headlines and a negotiating position that got worse every single day. Their oil revenue collapsed. Bypass infrastructure is going up. And the Asian buyers who used to depend on the Strait are locking in American and Russian and African supply chains that will never route back through Hormuz.

Adventures in Migration

Adventures in Migration.

White Papers Policy Institute (UK):

Native Brits are the only people paying more into the Exchequer than they are receiving from it.

Importing a foreign-origin population that now exceeds 14 million is a real fiscal catastrophe.

I’m sure that data comes as a total shock to lefties, but no one else.

 

Basil the Great:

Germany’s AfD adopts ‘Remigration Manifesto’

Manifesto calls for a COMPLETE U-TURN on mass migration. Will put an end to “illegal, culturally alien and anti-native mass migration”. References the mass removal of people from a non-German background

 

End Wokeness:

(It’s in the “Customs and traditions” section. Applicants are expected to know that Eid al-Fitr marks the end of Ramadan, the month of fasting for Muslims, while Eid ul-Adha is associated with the Hajj pilgrimage and the theme of sacrifice.)

 

Emanuel Boder:

Shocking new data from Switzerland🇨🇭 on prison capacities and crime.
🔴 Swiss prisons are bursting at the seams.
🔴 ~70% of inmates are foreigners (do not hold Swiss citizenship).
🔴 ~50% of inmates with Swiss citizenship have a foreign background.
🔴 Overall, ~85% of inmates in Swiss prisons have a migration background! …
🔴 The Swiss mainstream media (including SRF) have lied to Swiss citizens about this data.

 

End Wokeness:

Refugees admitted to US in 2026 [Trump]:

🇿🇦 South Africa: 4,496
🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 3
All others: 0

Refugees admitted to US in 2024 [Biden]:

🇨🇩 Congo (DRC): 19,830
🇦🇫 Afghanistan: 14,680
🇻🇪 Venezuela: 11,350
🇸🇾 Syria: 11,240
🇲🇲 Myanmar: 7,330
🇬🇹 Guatemala: 5,030
🇸🇴 Somalia: 4,790
🇳🇮 Nicaragua: 2,950
🇨🇴 Colombia: 2,520
🇪🇷 Eritrea: 2,400
🇮🇶 Iraq: 2,270
🇸🇩 Sudan: 2,180
🇺🇦 Ukraine: 1,450
🇸🇸 South Sudan: 1,330
🇸🇻 El Salvador: 1,320
+ 16,000 from other countries
(Not including 3 million illegal entries)

South Africa now more racist than ever, but it’s ok because it’s anti-white

South Africa now more racist than ever, but it’s ok because it’s anti-white. By End Wokeness.

South Africa has more race laws than at the height of apartheid.

Elon Musk:

South Africa won’t allow Starlink to be licensed, even though I was BORN THERE, simply because I am not Black!

We were offered many times the opportunity to bribe our way to a license by pretending that a Black guy runs Starlink SA, but I have refused to do so on principle.

Racism should not be rewarded no matter to which race it is applied.

Shame on the racist politicians in South Africa. They should be shown no respect whatsoever anywhere in the world and shunned for being unashamedly RACISTS!

 

 

DogeDesinger:

Long ago, South Africa had very unfair laws called apartheid. They treated Black people badly and kept them from good jobs and money. When those bad laws ended, the country made new rules (called B-BBEE) to help Black people get a fair share of business. The idea was good — like a big helping hand. But now? For companies like Starlink to sell fast internet, they MUST give away 30% of their business to Black partners. Just because of skin color.

Elon Musk was born in South Africa. He left as a teen to chase big dreams. Today, his company SpaceX wants to bring Starlink — super fast satellite internet — to South Africa. But the rules say no unless they give up part of the company. Elon said it right: “Starlink is not allowed because I’m not Black.”

SpaceX promised to spend about $30 million (that’s 500 million rand!) to give FREE high-speed internet to 5,000 rural schools. That helps over 2.4 MILLION kids every year learn better, get jobs later, and have a brighter future. Real help for the people who need it most!

Starlink already works in about 24 other African countries. Villages there now have internet for school, doctors, and business. South Africa’s villages are missing out because of these racist rules.

Leftists are outraged by the different treatment of people in South Africa due to their race! Oops, no they’re not (that’s so 1970s) — and in Australia they even tried to inflict The Voice on us.

Military Age German Males Must Ask Permission to Leave Germany

Military Age German Males Must Ask Permission to Leave Germany. By Possum Reviews.

Male citizens aged 17 to 45 no longer allowed to leave Germany without permission under a newly enacted military conscription rule.

An entire generation of men was repeatedly told “gender is a social construct” only for them to have the rug pulled out from under them because of their gender which the law has evidently decided is very much not a social construct.

And then you ask what’s radicalizing them.

 

Commenters:

I mean, surely Germany’s feminists will ask for equal treatment right? …

Make native men 2nd-class citizens
Send them to fight on behalf of a nation that hates them.
Train them to kill things really well.

This surely will have no consequences in the future. …

An entire generation has been told they are worth nothing, that the “Nation” as a concept doesn’t exist, that borders aren’t real, and that they should be replaced by random third-worlders.

And now their government wants them to die, and be happy about it.

What am I even supposed to defend here anymore? By Jörg Friedrich, a young German.

Everywhere I hear the phrase: “We must defend OUR country”
But which country exactly? And is it even “our country” anymore? …

6 million Afghans, Iraqis, Moroccans, Iranians, Tunisians & Co., who have left their homelands – am I supposed to defend them?

Arabs who call me “Kuffar” and call for the destruction of Israel on our streets– and a government & police who celebrate that as “freedom of speech” — am I supposed to defend them?

When I go for a walk with my dog in the morning, I hear Arabic, Ukrainian, Turkish, Farsi — hardly any German anymore. Am I supposed to defend that?

Politicians who call me “rabble,” “Nazi,” or “Dark Germany” — am I supposed to defend them?

Greens who invent genders, welcome people from all over the world with open arms, constantly “change” their gender and now want to be addressed as “they.” Who stoke climate panic and insult me as a “gutter pacifist” — am I supposed to defend them?

An administration that only invents new regulations to justify its own existence — am I supposed to defend that? …

Stoned citizen’s income neighbors who make noise at night and sleep all day, while I head to work at 5:30 a.m. – am I supposed to defend them? …

🎡 Folk festivals canceled out of fear of terror, while women & the elderly feel unsafe on the streets — am I supposed to defend that?

🇩🇪 The country I once loved no longer exists. The black-red-gold flag only reminds me of that now.

Am I supposed to defend those who call me “right-winger,” “Nazi,” “conspiracy nut,” “climate denier,” “shitty German,” or “boomer”?

You know what? Screw that—I don’t have to! This is no longer my country; it’s just the place where I pay taxes so others can live it up.

The Germany of hardworking people is gone. There’s nothing left here worth defending.

 

Walk away

 

“Gender is a social construct” is now officially a lie, as is the gender-is a-choice trans thing, as is the blank slate ideology, as is “we are all the same”, males are toxic, nationalism is bad, diversity is our strength, Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia, …

In 2025, Iran were likely days, not years, from the bomb

In 2025, Iran were likely days, not years, from the bomb. By Nadhim Zahawi, a former Conservative Chancellor of the Exchequer in the UK.

By mid-2025 Iran was assessed to have had nearly a thousand pounds of 60 per cent enriched uranium. This is so close to weapons grade, that American intelligence said that the Iranians could have fuel for a bomb in under a week. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) thought it could make enough for nine weapons. They were likely days, not years, from the bomb.

Now, picture what would have happened if they had actually crossed that line. A nuclear Iran doesn’t just get a weapon. It gets a shield. The IRGC and the Houthis could control the Strait of Hormuz (as well as the less often discussed Bab-el-Mandeb Strait between Yemen and Eritrea, connecting the Red Sea from the Gulf of Aden), and forever dictate terms to ships with infinitely more certainty than their threats today are armed with. Hezbollah operates with nuclear cover.

Worst of all, the conflict we have just seen to defang the regime suddenly becomes impossible. This is exactly why the ayatollahs wanted nuclear weapons in the first place. Then the axis of resistance, led by China and Russia, can hold the region to ransom and make any Western intervention in Ukraine, Taiwan or elsewhere even more difficult. …

Obama — whose side was he on?

The ayatollahs pursued a deliberate multi-track approach: building a regional proxy network of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Iraqi militias, to name but a few, that made the cost of confrontation appear unbearable.

Then a stroke of unforgivable Western naïveté — Barack Obama’s 2015 nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). This gave the Islamic Republic both international legitimacy and billions in sanctions relief, while tying Western hands. The JCPOA deliberately excluded both the missile programme and Tehran’s regional behaviour. Many of us warned at the time that Iran would use the breathing space to fund proxy operations and accelerate ballistic missile development. That is exactly what happened.

While the regime was playing a decades-long game of chess, Western capitals were obsessing over the press cycle for the next summit. …

Eurabia:

But with 46 million Muslims across the European continent, governments here that spent years courting those votes suddenly discovered they couldn’t behave robustly on Iran for fear of domestic violence and unrest. There have been at least 20 IRGC-linked plots foiled in Britain alone. German spooks have warned about Iranian attacks on Jewish institutions. French intelligence saw Iranian recruiters infiltrate the criminal underworld. Europe’s insane immigration problems have imported, along with the cultural issues and crime, the Iranian regime’s own enforcement arm.

The [UK] Government still refuses to proscribe the IRGC, hiding behind the legal distinction that it forms part of the Iranian state. Along with the refusal from either party to ban the Muslim Brotherhood, this is terror and cowardice from Britain’s legacy parties.

More evidence on Obama’s affiliation (by Sana Ebrahimi Ledene):

There used to be a rumor floating around among Iranians: that as part of the Nuclear Deal, Obama quietly handed out 3,500 green cards to regime officials and their families.

At the time I thought it sounded crazy.

But now with so many children of top regime figures, professors, researchers, lobbyists, comfortably living in the U.S. on green cards, it doesn’t sound like a rumor anymore. It actually feels real.

I came to America on a student visa. I had to go through an entire month of security clearances, background checks, interviews, the whole process. There’s zero chance these people got here through normal channels. No way.

A nuclear Iran could not be defanged, like North Korea. But Iran could also not be defanged if it had vastly more conventional missiles to rain down across the region. Starting recently, the Chinese were building those missiles, rapidly increasing the rate of Iranian missile production. This is presumably why the US acted now — a point the anti-Trump media has buried and would prefer you didn’t know.

Ben Roberts-Smith Versus The Freak Show

Ben Roberts-Smith Versus The Freak Show. By David Archibald.

Mr Roberts-Smith is being persecuted because he is the antithesis of the freak show that is currently running the Department of Defence since at least 2005.

Dresses:

The sort of person they prefer to associate with is another Army captain, Captain Jesse Noble, the Darwin-based subject of the title of this article:

From that article, this is a photograph of Captain Noble wearing his dress, lippy and painted fingernails to work:

 

 

This is the sort of man that the Army’s high command would prefer to have defending Australia, not the fearless Corporal Roberts-Smith. Senior officers backed a bid by Captain Noble that he be allowed to wear a dress to work. That means that those same senior officers are social engineers, who would rather remake society in their own image than be combat-effective. A captain runs a company of about 100 soldiers. In the life and death business of soldiering, soldiers put their trust in their officers to do the best by them, or not if the officer is a bloke in a dress. None could take him seriously. The high command would also be suppressing normal people and promoting their own kind instead.

The importance of trust in having an effective army is mentioned by long time defence analyst Paul Dibb:

The dearth of professional non-commissioned officers means that totalitarian armies are unable to fight effectively because NCOs provide the vital link between officers and soldiers about battlefield decision-making. Military command and control culture boils down to trust, including at the operational level.

You may think that just because a bloke wants to wear a dress to work doesn’t necessarily mean that he thinks he is woman trapped in a man’s body. Which, if that were the case, would be a bad thing because it would mean he has gender dysphoria. This is the worst mental illness to have, because it has the highest suicide rate – 50%. He may look pretty in his dress, and he may feel pretty, but looks can be deceiving. So, if he doesn’t have gender dysphoria, what particular condition might it be? A possibility is transvestic fetishism as described by the American Psychological Association:

Transvestic fetishism is a psychiatric diagnosis applied to men who are thought to have an excessive sexual or erotic interest in cross-dressing; this interest is often expressed in autoerotic behaviour. It differs from cross-dressing for entertainment or other purposes that do not involve sexual arousal. Under the name transvestic disorder, it is categorised as a paraphilia.

Whatever it is, expecting normal people to put up with it is poking them in the eye with a burnt stick. The high command of the Australian Defence Force would have been squealing with glee in forcing a cross-dresser on the lower ranks.

If it makes you feel any better, it is not just the Australian Defence Force that was afflicted. Until recently, West Point, where the cream of the U.S. Army officer corps start their careers, had a course entitled “Uniformed Perspectives: The Evolution of Cross-Dressing in the Military and Gender Norms”.

Proscriptions against cross-dressing in public are sensible. Because of my attendance at Bible Study, I am aware that this offence against society was mentioned 3,400 years ago in Deuteronomy 22:5:

A woman shall not wear a man’s apparel, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment; for whoever does such things is abhorrent. …

Cookbooks but no drones:

Australia has made no effort towards using drones in warfare, or defending against them, even though drones are causing over 90% of the casualties in the Ukraine War. We will be wiped out by any aggressor using them, as was shown by a recent NATO exercise in which 10 Ukrainian drone operators destroyed two battalions’ worth of armour in a day. We have made baby steps towards the prior overarching technology by assembling missiles in Australia.

The bloke put in charge of this missile project is Air Marshall Leon Phillips. The first thing he did, before any missile was assembled, was to produce a ‘harmony’ cookbook:

 

Phillips in his cosplay as a military officer, the cookbook paid for by taxpayers, and being transfixed by an attachment to his blender.

 

Screwdriver assembly of missiles in Australia is useless because production stops when the supply of the parts stops. We are going to make missiles for the HIMARS launchers in Australia, but all the parts will come from Lockheed in the U.S. If Australia is going the wrong way about it, what is the right way to make missiles? The Russians make a lot of missiles and this is how they go about it at the Krasnoyarsk machine building plant that makes intercontinental ballistic missiles … Some 40% of the effort involved is machining of castings in CNC lathes and another 23% is assembly. The only real specialist knowledge is in designing the castings. Assembly is so simple that Russia imported Ugandan females to do that (the average IQ in Uganda is 76).

Recruitment: would you want to join an army with dresses but no drones?

That fact reminds us of another consequence of Captain Noble’s dress, fingernail polish and lippy. People have resigned from the Australian Army because, in their words, they ‘didn’t join the army to salute a bloke in a dress’. For that same reason, parents are discouraging their children from joining the army.

Our armed forces aren’t meeting their recruiting numbers. Our high command interprets this as being due to Australians not wanting to defend the country anymore. So, they concocted a scheme in which soldiers from Papua New Guinea could transfer to the Australian Army and be rewarded with citizenship. One problem with that is that, like Uganda, Papua New Guinea has an average IQ of 76. The US Army found out back in WW2 that there was no role in the army for anyone with an IQ less than 83. In Papua New Guinea, only 32% of the males would have an IQ of 83 and higher. There is another problem with mercenaries that Machievelli pointed out more than five hundred years ago:

Now, mercenary and auxiliary forces are useless and dangerous; and any ruler who keeps his state dependent upon mercenaries will never have real peace and security, for they are disorganised, undisciplined, ambitious, and faithless.

The U.S. Department of Defense solved its recruitment problem by firing all its kooks and tranny-lovers. Their recruitment numbers then went through the roof. Ours will too once we do the same.

Batteries will save us:

Next up in the freak show is the bloke in charge of the Army, Lieutenant General Simon Stuart. In the Army he is considered to be an intellectual because he wrecked a Bushmaster truck by replacing the diesel engine with batteries. General Stuart must live in a world of magic in which you can wish things into existence. Because there is no way of recharging electric trucks on the battlefield. The Army is now considering towing a generator behind it. (Humans normally blink every five seconds or so. This is a video of the general reading from an autocue. This takes so much brain power that his autonomic processes shut down to cope and he doesn’t blink for minutes on end.)

Of course the Australian Defence Force has a Net Zero strategy. It is a completely stupid, useless thing to do. The Bushmaster was born diesel but identified as electric. Lieutenant General Stuart sensed this need to transition. …

Woke witch doctors pay for “evidence”:

The next piece of evidence that the higher ranks of our Australian Defence Force is unfit for command is the fantasy fiction of a Canberra sociologist, a Dr Crompvoets. It’s a small literary niche–the high command’s need for lurid stories about how unspeakably beastly Australian special forces are. But it pays well.

According to the previous defence minister Dutton, Dr Crompvoets was paid $6 million over a few years. It started in 2016 when General Angus Campbell commissioned a secret report on SAS culture.

Members of the SAS, past and present, were encouraged to contact Dr Crompvoets anonymously and tell tales of what went on in the regiment. Some of the lurid tales were included in her report as fact. For example:

‘The inquiry has found that there is credible information that junior soldiers were required by the patrol commanders to shoot a prisoner, in order to achieve that soldier’s first kill, in a practice that was known as ‘blooding’. ‘Throwdowns would be placed with the body, and a ‘cover story’ was created for the purposes of operational reporting and to deflect scrutiny. This was reinforced with a code of silence.’

As several thousand Australian troops have rotated through Afghanistan, you would expect at least several hundred of those to have undergone the ‘blooding’ initiation. But none were named in the subsequent Brereton Report, which repeated some of Dr Crompvoets’ other fantasy fiction. Take this example from page 120 of the Brereton report:

Clearance Operations. Dr Crompvoets was told that, after squirters were ‘dealt’ with, Special Forces would then cordon off a whole village, taking men and boys to guesthouses, which are typically on the edge of a village. There they would be tied up and tortured by Special Forces, sometimes for days. When the Special Forces left, the men and boys would be found dead: shot in the head or blindfolded and with throats slit.

The implication was that there are a lot of villages in Afghanistan with only women and girls left because Australian soldiers killed all the males. But no such village was named in the report. And none have been found since. Yet the high command of the Australian Defence Force believed these fairy tales. Nobody even raised the possibility that these stories could be fabrications. They read what they wanted to believe, that ordinary Australian soldiers are sadistic murderers.

The fact that the Department’s senior management believed the Brereton Report means that they have no understanding of the troops they are commanding, and precious little grip on reality otherwise. And most likely loathe the troops under their command.

Brereton couldn’t get the stories on atrocities that he wanted until he started paying Afghans to tell them. Basically, Brereton had insufficient mental acuity to understand that if he wasn’t getting stories of the atrocities he wanted, perhaps there hadn’t been any atrocities. Eventually the Afghans twigged to what Brereton was about and made up stories in order to be paid for the effort.

That is the context of the persecution of Ben Roberts-Smith. Others have also seen the darkness in the Australian Defence Force. Defence journalist Kym Bergman wrote last year,

Defence culture has changed into something secretive, suspicious of the outside world and thoroughly unpleasant.

We are protected by the US Navy, but Albanese has annoyed Trump by not being sufficiently enthusiastic about defanging the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Scientists with access to game-changing space, nuclear, and advanced energy secrets are dying at an alarming rate

Scientists with access to game-changing space, nuclear, and advanced energy secrets are dying at an alarming rate. By Steve Watson at modernity.

[Joe] Rogan encourages listeners to confront a pattern the establishment would rather bury: scientists with access to game-changing space, nuclear, and advanced energy secrets are dying or vanishing at an alarming rate.

“People have to understand this missing scientist thing. It sounds a little conspiratorial. It sounds a little silly, a little tinfoil hatty,” Rogan explained, clarifying “Until you start thinking about the amount of money that would be lost if a breakthrough tech came around that revolutionized the way they distribute energy.” …

“Breakthrough zero point energy breakthrough whatever that is that these people are working on. Plasma technology, whatever the fuck that is. You would lose if you’re in whatever business that would be competing with them. You’re going to lose so much fucking money. You’re probably going to go under. If you’re in the energy business, you’re going to… or he goes away, right?” …

The human cost:

“Mystery around dead or missing scientists privy to space and nuclear secrets grows. Imagine being a scientist, you work so hard to figure out some amazing stuff that’s going to transform the human experience and then people kill you. Literally kill you like in a parking lot, one of those silenced guns.” …

The comments land just as fresh scrutiny hit the ninth case in the growing list. Michael David Hicks, a longtime research scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory … died at age 59. No cause of death was ever released publicly, and no autopsy record has surfaced. NASA and JPL have remained silent.

Others who have gone missing or died include astrophysicist Carl Grillmair, shot dead on his front porch in February 2026; NASA JPL senior scientist Frank Maiwald, who died in 2024 with no cause disclosed; aerospace engineer Monica Reza, who vanished while hiking in June 2025; retired Air Force Gen. William Neil McCasland, who disappeared in February 2026 after overseeing billions in classified space programs; and others tied to Los Alamos National Laboratory and MIT plasma fusion research.

The pattern:

As laid out in the reporting on the exploding pattern of deaths among experts guarding America’s most guarded programs, these individuals held knowledge that sits at the intersection of civilian space exploration and military applications — from hypersonic tracking to propulsion systems that could slash reliance on foreign energy and materials.

Rep. Tim Burchett has linked several cases directly to UFO-related knowledge and warned that the deaths send a clear message: people don’t want to talk about unidentified flying objects anymore because they are afraid. …

The timing is impossible to ignore. These conversations explode publicly right as President Trump continues demanding the full release of UFO and UAP files long buried by layers of bureaucracy. The very experts who could illuminate breakthrough propulsion, gravity manipulation, or zero-point energy technologies are being removed from the board—whether through outright hits or convenient “disappearances.” …

Investigation?

Congress is already probing the string of incidents involving scientists working on space, gravity, and advanced energy tech. National security voices warn of foreign adversaries targeting American talent at facilities like JPL and Los Alamos. Yet the official response remains the same: silence, no comments, no transparency. …

Taxpayer-funded programs at NASA, JPL, and Los Alamos produced these breakthroughs. The public funded the research. Now the public watches the researchers vanish while the same gatekeepers who buried the files refuse to explain why.

 

 

The left has fallen in love with Islam

The left has fallen in love with Islam. By Brendan O’Neill in The Spectator.

Imagine there was a virulently Francophobic militia on the doorstep of the French Republic. Imagine it had fired nearly a hundred thousand missiles into France these past three years. Imagine if the France-loathing maniacs had caused the deaths of hundreds of French people and forced almost half a million to flee their towns in terror. France would respond, right? It would take action, no? …

Why, then, does President Macron not extend the same right to fight to his supposed ally of Israel? Hezbollah has inflicted every one of those bloody horrors on Israel since 7 October 2023. I’ve scaled up the numbers to account for France’s population of 70 million, compared to Israel’s ten million. Yet this is what the tiny Jewish state has experienced at the hands of that self-styled Party of God — ceaseless, indiscriminate violence.

Reality:

In solidarity with Hamas’s Nazi-like pogrom of 7 October, Hezbollah started raining projectiles on Israel the very next day. It has fired around 12,000 missiles, rockets and drones at its neighbour. Scores have been slain, including 12 Druze children playing a game of football. Tens of thousands in Northern Israel have been forced into internal exile, leaving ghost towns behind them. Jew-free swathes of territory – just as the anti-Semites of Hezbollah like it.

There is not one country on earth that would tolerate such apocalyptic goading.

And yet Macron this week rebuked Israel for striking back against Hezbollah. We condemn Israel’s ‘indiscriminate strikes’ in ‘the strongest possible terms’, he said, to the glee of every twit in a keffiyeh.

How do we know it’s love?

He’s being gushed over, naturally. The fastest route into the affections of the bourgeois left is to take a swipe at Israel.

Yet to those of us whose moral compasses have not been shattered on that wheel of hysterical hatred for the world’s only Jewish nation, Macron’s comments are mad. Immoral, even. Reprimanding a democratic state for pushing back against the racist militia that has subjected it to such savage fire? Who does he think he is? …

Peruse social media, mingle with anti-war types, switch on the BBC, and you could be forgiven for thinking Israel is bombing Lebanon for sport. It’s that ‘genocidal bloodlust’ again, say the Israelophobes of the left, blind to how unhinged and pre-modern such libels against the Jewish state sound to the rest of us. These are lies of omission. To obsess over what Israel is currently doing to Hezbollah without mentioning what Hezbollah has already done to Israel is to engage in flagrant acts of deceit. …

Hezbollah is an army of bigots. It dreams of annihilating the ‘cancerous’ Jewish state. Its goal is a pogrom that would put into the shade those of the 1930s — it has promised to keep waging holy war against the Jews of the Holy Land, and those who survive ‘can go back to Germany, or wherever they came from’. …

Any coverage of the Lebanon crisis that leaves out these facts is not worth the paper it’s written on. Macron, Keir Starmer and every genuine progressive should be making one demand and one demand only: for the full surrender of Hezbollah and the liberation of both Lebanon and Israel from its hateful, violent ideology.

For example (by Catherine Salgado in PJ Media):

After Iranian terror proxy Hezbollah marked the ceasefire by immediately bombarding Israeli civilians, the IDF, of course, struck back. And completely contrary to all the propaganda that has been circulating nonstop from Jew-haters and Islamic terrorists online, Israel is not targeting Lebanese civilians; it is targeting Hezbollah operatives. The only reason Israel has to conduct some operations in “civilian” areas is that Hezbollah, like Hamas, uses civilians and their infrastructure as human shields.

Many of the northern Israeli towns under Hezbollah attack are still reeling from the Oct. 7 war. During that conflict, it was typical for Hezbollah to fire missiles at civilians in northern Israel on a weekly and sometimes a daily basis. Some towns saw a majority of their buildings damaged or destroyed in the Hezbollah bombardments. You can read about the harrowing story of an Israeli reservist crippled in a Hezbollah attack, whose town of Metula was largely reduced to rubble by Hezbollah. And while the jihad-loving Gazans can always be sure of billions of dollars from America and the West to rebuild, the bereft Israeli civilians receive no such aid.

It’s a religious war, and the western left supports the opposition — because it needs to see itself as more virtuous than its own population (who voted for Trump, etc.).

Australia has no oil production because of climate theory

Australia has no oil production because of climate theory. By Eric Johnston in The Australian.

There’s no one better placed to talk about how Australia left itself so exposed on fuel than Adrian Cook. After all, listed explorer Carnarvon Energy, which he ran for more than a decade, discovered the nation’s biggest offshore oilfields of this century. … The field is better known as Dorado, and it’s an underwater energy goldmine.

But like its name suggests, it is frustratingly out of reach. The project has sat idle for years due to a lack of support. When it comes to producing homegrown oil, Australia simply doesn’t have any stomach for it. …

[Cook] describes an entire “ecosystem” that choked off Australia’s once booming oil industry — whereby oil didn’t fail due to a lack of resources but because overlapping political, financial and social pressures slowly created an environment in which development became impossible.

It was this ecosystem that fed on itself around the climate change thematic,” Cook tells The Australian. …

Banks and government actively discouraged oil exploration and production in Australia because they believed carbon emissions were over heating the planet (but “forgot” to do due diligence on the climate models):

Cook says the shift became noticeable from mid last decade when it began getting more difficult to get funding and even regulatory support was slowing for Carnarvon’s efforts….

“Governments became nervous about approving activities, granting retention licences, production licences; lenders — particularly the Aussie four banks — became nervous, stopped lending to the sector. Investors were sensing things were not happening in this sector versus other sectors and started moving capital elsewhere,” he says. …

Australia has oil but the wrong ruling class:

Cook is emphatic that commercial quantities of oil exist in Australia, saying “it is literally there” and describes it as “a frustration for all Australians” that it is undeveloped.

But the capital needed to first find it and then extract it is simply heading to other countries.

He points to specific proven reserves including Dorado in the under-explored Bedout Basin, the broader Canning Basin and particularly the nearby Browse Basin, which he believes “could be one of the biggest things in this country”. …

Cook says the rhetoric of Australia moving to net zero has “run ahead of reality.… If the farmer can’t have the diesel or the fertiliser to basically bring us food, we suffer as a nation very quickly.”

The modern world preys on white males, who are outside the victim hierarchy

The modern world preys on white males, who are outside the victim hierarchy. By Peter Rudgeair at The WSJ. An example:

The problem, wrote [Bill Ackman, billionaire US fund manager], was a former lawyer in his family office, whom he called by the pseudonym Ronda. She had rejected three months of severance and instead demanded two years’ pay — about $2 million — citing an unsafe workplace.

How does Ronda deserve US$2million from Bill?

The firm that manages Ackman’s personal fortune … has had high turnover and growing expenses. So Ackman installed his nephew, whom he’d previously stationed at a British watchmaker he controls, to investigate.

The nephew made a comment at a lunch about a woman looking young for her age, Ackman wrote. This and other comments were noted by the in-house attorney, who Ackman gave the pseudonym Ronda. When Ronda was later laid off with others at TABLE, she said the nephew’s comments demonstrated an unsafe work environment, and asked for the bigger severance package, he wrote.

In Ackman’s telling, Ronda is in the wrong, since she handled human resources at the time of the incident and she reported to a woman herself. Ronda might think she could demand $2 million when she had worked at the company for just 2½ years because he has been tending to one of his three adult daughters who is recovering from a brain hemorrhage, he said.

“Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a ‘hostile and unsafe work environment’ are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media,” Ackman wrote, a reference to his plan to take public his firm, Pershing Square, in the coming months….

“It strikes a chord with people,” said [west coast anti-DEI activist Robby Starbuck] in an interview discussing his own response. The founder of a company had directly sent him the post, he said. “There is a system that preys more on white males, because it’s like they are outside the victim hierarchy.” …

He clearly touched a nerve among the capitalist class. Elon Musk responded with encouragement 62 minutes later. …

“Destroy them!” Joe Lonsdale, a founder of Palantir, responded to Ackman’s story.

“Agreed,” wrote Donald Trump Jr., with three “100” emojis. “This nonsense has to stop.”

Most of us have to work for our money, but inquiring minds want to know: why only $2 million? Why not $10 million? Obviously Ronda deserves never having to work another day in her life, poor thing.