Democrats steal another election: LA

Democrats steal another election: LA.

The LA mayor’s race was a three way race, with the top two qualifying for the runoff election. Incumbent Mayor Karen Bass and City Council member Nithya Raman are projected to advance to the November 2026 runoff election for Los Angeles mayor, defeating reality TV star Spencer Pratt in the primary.

 

Mail-ins arriving before Election Day:
🔵 Bass: 38.1%
đź”´ Pratt: 27.9%
🔵 Raman: 20%

Mail-ins arriving after Election Day:
🔵 Raman: 37% (+17% surge)
🔵 Bass: 34.9% (-3% drop)
đź”´ Pratt: 19% (-9% drop)

 

3rd place jumps to 1st in *every* ballot drop *after* Election Day

ChatGPT can’t find a single example of a 3rd place candidate surging, days AFTER Election Day, to overtake 2nd place.

Florida counts 90% of ballots in 1 hour. California is at 72% after 5 DAYS.

“Late votes are disproportionately for Democrats” struck me as believable. “Late votes are disproportionately for whichever Democrat needs to come in 2nd to keep a Republican out of a two-man runoff” is not.

Trump responded to the impossible results coming in after election day, writing, “No way this could have happened. Rigged Election!”

How fringe is Raman? She campaigned with the Jew hating, Al-Qaida-loving, leftist podcaster Hasan Piker, who said the U.S. deserved 9/11.

34 of 47 European counties completely forbid the practice of mail in voting … They’re way to the political left of the US.

So yeah, there probably was a lot of fraud. Any time you mail out 23 million ballots, you can expect a considerable number of them to be filled out and returned by someone other than an intended registered voter. I understand that the U.S. Attorney’s office in Los Angeles is trying to look into the situation, but the same shoddy practices that make fraud easy also make it hard to prove.

California’s voting system is designed for cheating. By Bill Essayli, First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California:

California allows first-time voters to register using forms of ID that most Americans would find surprising, including:

-Gym membership card
-Employer ID card
-Credit or debit card
-Prescription drug label
-Insurance card (California provides free health coverage to undocumented immigrants) …

We also have serious concerns about how California maintains its voter rolls. There are open questions about whether the state is promptly removing deceased voters, people who have moved, and individuals convicted of disqualifying felonies.

On top of that, California allows third parties to collect and turn in ballots on voters’ behalf (a practice known as ballot harvesting) with few restrictions. This makes it difficult to track who actually received, completed, and submitted each ballot. …

California is blocking a federal audit of its voter rolls. …

For over a year, the Department of Justice has been trying to audit California’s voter rolls. Federal law gives the Attorney General the authority to review state voter files and confirm that only eligible U.S. citizens are voting in federal elections.

@AAGDhillon [Federal AG] sent California a letter explaining our legal authority. California refused to comply, claiming state privacy laws block the review, an argument that does not hold up because those laws don’t apply to the federal government in this context. We’ve sued California in federal court, and the case is before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

If California genuinely wants voters to trust its elections, it should open its records, not fight to keep them closed.

What are they afraid of?

How long has this been going on? Well:

NOVEMBER 30, 2010: Four weeks after losing the election as AG of CA, Kamala Harris wins due to mail-in surge from LA. Harris won by less than 1%.

Election stealing by the spooks, by BDW:

Fmr CIA officer here. Let me share how elections get stolen — and the role of intel agencies.

We all know that the CIA and NSA create and execute clandestine operations that are designed to go undetected. That ranges from recruiting human spies, tapping phone systems, and altering devices of all kinds. Yes, that necessarily includes voting machines.

The CIA and NSA have teams to execute all of these operations and missions at the direction of a President, even those ops that are deemed impossible… like machines locked in rooms that are inside secure facilities, unhooked from the internet or whatever device that could tether them to the outside world.

Those tough intel operations require extensive planning, exquisite trade craft, supporting operations (HUMINT, SIGINT, MASINT), and a degree of luck.

For many years, everything that I’m saying was understood by both Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill.

Historic footage from Congressional hearings show both Ds and Rs saying that they were alarmed about voting systems with so-called “unhackable machines.” They knew then — correctly — that such a suggestion or claim was ridiculous. They were briefed by NSA and CIA teams on how they “hack the unhackable” every month without leaving a trace.

This is why Taiwan and others are resolute on conducting elections the old fashioned way: same day voting only, in person, IDs, paper ballots, a counting process that is open to the public to watch and monitor, and results announced that same night.

If Taiwan can do it with ~24M people, any US state can do it. Refusal to do so is an intentional choice to open your electoral systems to vulnerabilities.

That’s what we’re now seeing across the United States, and primarily in Democrat-dominated locales. Including Los Angeles. Those politicians choose broken systems.

California’s ~30 day process to tally votes is obviously and intentionally vulnerable that a reasonable person understands that it allows for manipulation and assured electoral outcome by a dominant power (Democrats, in this case).

And like any good intel op, you do it such that there are no fingerprints left behind — whether that be with machines, mail-in ballots, harvested ballots, etc. If you own the ops environment, anything is possible.

Still, mistakes happen in any op. In the event of disclosure, you do what we often see Democrats and the media do: deny, smear, and make counter-accusations to preserve intentionally broken systems.

Folks, this is not about Spencer Pratt. This is about the future of what’s left of our Republic.

Evil, seditious forces have broken our electoral systems and gained great power using them. Mayor Bass is but one, using the machine that her Democrat Party has built to sustain her and Leftist power. It’s the modern, Golden State version of old Chicago, NJ, or Huey Long corruption.

They will deny it, obviously. Because admission means loss of power, money, and likely prison time. There’s no incentive for them to clean up what’s broken.

Bottom line: Mr. Pratt’s earnest desire to run a righteous race to fix his city faces long odds. He didn’t just run against Karen Bass. He ran against a corrupt machine.

But if nothing else, he has shown his fellow Angelinos and the nation that, once again, we have an existential problem in our electoral system with intentional vulnerabilities and electoral fraud that naturally flows from the brokenness.

Now it’s up to the rest of us to fix it.

There are solutions, none easy or polite. But we must do so — and by whatever means necessary — or the Republic falls to Communists and Cuba-trained agitators like Karen Bass.

UPDATE: Wall Street Journal editorial:

President Trump’s charge that Democrats “rigged” California’s jungle primary has naturally elicited eye-rolls given his habit of crying fraud whenever he loses an election. But he has a point that the state’s Democrats have designed a leaky election system to juice their votes. …

California sends mail-in ballots to all registered voters who have until Election Day to send them back. … The state also lets third parties including unions, campaigns and political parties collect and return an unlimited number of ballots on voters’ behalf—a practice known as ballot harvesting. This can result in large dumps of mail-in ballots that support a particular candidate. …

Democrats legislated election rules to make it exceptionally easy to register and vote with the intent of boosting turnout among young and low-propensity voters who lean left. But these rules also create openings for fraud and improper voting….

Federal prosecutors last month indicted a California woman for paying homeless people on Skid Row to register using her former address, meaning ballots would be sent there. She agreed to plead guilty. …

A woman from Orange County, Calif., was charged last fall with illegally registering her dog to vote and submitting ballots on the canine’s behalf. One ballot was counted, the other was tossed. The fraud was caught because the woman reported herself. …

There’s no evidence so far that fraud has affected the results of the L.A. mayoral race, but the delayed results are a disservice to democracy. The state’s loose voting rules and dilatory counting fuel distrust in elections, and play into the hands of Mr. Trump. You’d think Gov. Gavin Newsom would care about this, but as long as progressives are winning, maybe not.

The latest outrage: immigrant man tries to behead white man in Ireland

The latest outrage: immigrant man tries to behead white man in Ireland.

Tommy Robinson:

Horrific scenes in North Belfast tonight as an invader was caught trying to behead a man in the middle of the street!

Go to the link or here to see the video (too graphic, X won’t embed it).

UPDATE: Here’s a version that will embed:

 

The attack took place in the Kinnaird Avenue area of Belfast at around 10:30pm. The weapon was a small Stanley knife (aka boxcutter). One man arrested at the scene. Unconfirmed reports the guy has sadly passed away — and that he lost both his eyes in the attack.

Attacks are so common now. Elon Musk merely says:

!!

Three bystanders tackled the Somalian knifeman and prevented the attempted beheading from being completed.

The woman recording shouts “There’s a cop there’s a cop back off back off back off”. She knows cops are more likely to arrest the brave men who attempted to stop this dude from murdering the Irishman instead of actually dealing with the criminal

 

Is this news relevant to us? Is there some systematic reason this sort of thing might occur here, to us or our descendants? Is there a long history of this sort of thing happening? Is there an ideology or religion that supports or even encourages this? Is there an obvious way of preventing this happening to us? Will this make it to the mainstream media news? So many questions, to which we all know the answers, but which remain forbidden by our ruling elite.

 

Albanese’s tax changes make the wealthiest tenants better off while making the poorer ones worse off

Albanese’s tax changes make the wealthiest tenants better off while making the poorer ones worse off. By Henry Ergas in The Australian.

Faulty lefty argument:

Saul Eslake’s recent article in The Guardian welcoming Labor’s proposed tax increases … is a textbook example of “progressive” economics.

Like every good progressive, Eslake approaches public policy as a search for victims and oppressors. In his telling, the victims are would-be owner-occupiers; the oppressors are landlords. Those roles assigned, the argument largely writes itself.

He begins with a conceptual confusion. Shelter, he says, is a basic human need. Quite so. But he immediately smuggles in a wholly different proposition: that a right to shelter entails a right to home ownership.

That proposition is absurd. In Switzerland, some 60 per cent of dwellings are rented; the proportions in Germany and Austria are only slightly lower. Yet no one could argue that the Swiss, the Germans and the Austrians are denied the right to shelter. By every measurable standard they are extremely well housed.

Eslake’s error is simple. A right to shelter is a claim about the consumption of housing services; a right to home ownership is a claim about the ownership of assets.

The two are no more identical than a right to nutrition is a right to own a farm. …

Follow the money:

What that means — and what Eslake astonishingly overlooks — is that Labor’s policies do not benefit all, or even a majority, of the ­“oppressed”. They may benefit tenants who move into home ownership; but to the extent the higher costs imposed on landlords are passed through into rents, they make the remaining tenants worse off. …

The new owner-occupiers are likely to be the tenants with the highest incomes: those already on the cusp of buying but not quite there. The policies therefore make the wealthiest tenants better off while making the poorer ones worse off. That is quite an achievement: a policy sold in the name of equity that redistributes from poorer renters to richer ones. …

Winners and losers:

The basic point is straightforward: it is very difficult, if not impossible, for a policy that works by raising the cost of supplying an essential good — in this case shelter — to make the community better off.

It is hard to believe that this one is an exception. It penalises most tenants to benefit a relatively small number of affluent renters, redistributing from the poorest tenants to the richest; it imposes substantial efficiency costs on the Australian economy; and if there are any gains to future buyers, they come entirely by inflicting large losses on existing asset owners, breaking election promises, increasing uncertainty and discouraging investment.

We began with a simple distinction: a right to nutrition is not a right to own a farm, and a right to shelter is not a right to own a house. Labor’s policy forgets it — and in forgetting, contrives to starve the very people it claims to feed.

That such a program should be presented as an obvious social good is remarkable. That it should be applauded as a triumph for the disadvantaged is positively perverse.

Labor has become the party of the wealthy, for the wealthy and by the wealthy. It was inevitable, as big government grew every bigger and their supporters grew wealthier due to government action. Albanese himself is clearly a wealthy man.

50 years of progress and progressivism

50 years of progress and progressivism.

Pepsi commercial from 50 years ago (the past is like a foreign country):

 

This is Pepsi’s modern version of the ad (actually, the present is like a foreign country):

 

Did you vote for this?

Possibly related: (By Anglo Saxon Logic)

Australia was 98% homogeneous white Anglo Celtic up until the 70s. That is who built the country, settled the land, built the infrastructure, federated our nation and introduced all our civic structures, culture and institutions. They are why we enjoy Football, Rugby, Cricket and other Victorian British sports, why we follow English common law, property rights and free speech and open expression. Our people being British Islanders also is the root cause of why the nation was so prosperous, safe, harmonious and positive. For 200 years our people slaved, toiled, and crafted a first world country out of an unsettled wild continent. They also shed their blood defending Australia in two world wars.

The delusional multiculturalism project, driven by boomer liberalism, weaponised empathy and deconstructed identity has given the baby boomers the greatest life imaginable.With monstrous house price growth, huge savings via inflated equities and superannuation and now endless cheap labour for the service economy and big business.

Sadly it is all a ponzi scheme, and this has come at a cost: the Zoomer and Gen alpha generations are now competing with endless foreigners in their homeland, their inheritance squandered by the boomers. Millions of Indians, middle-easterners, Asians, and Africans with antithetical cultures and customs now clog up our cities and towns, meaning our young can no longer afford a home. Their standard of life is suppressed and they now no longer enjoy the high trust homogeneous society of the 1900s-1990s. GDP per capita is in free fall, crime is up, and nobody can afford to live anything resembling a steady life here down under.

Our country is not “a social experiment” … Our nation isn’t a gamble or a venture. It is a shared homeland for the Anglo Celtic people who have a shared ancestry, a shared culture and shared values to bestow to each new generation: not to be given away to third worlders who have no respect for our past or present.

Sadly, many of their generation are so individualistic; selfish and arrogant. Our land isn’t a faceless, cultureless economic zone for all the races of the world to just use as a marketplace of goods, services and property.

Don’t know what you had ’til it’s gone.

The crucial part is assimilation. If immigration is kept slow enough for every immigrant to either assimilate or depart, we keep our unusual high-trust ways and enviable society. High-trust societies are a distinct minority in the world, and are currently being replaced due to mass migration from the third world

Big government scam of “unfixable” problems

Big government scam of “unfixable” problems. By Stephen L. Miller.

The left lets institutions and communities break down to a point of total degradation to prove why more government and non profits are the answer.

The goal is to purposely not solve problems and make life and safety worse. See the entire defund the police movement and homelessness nonprofits in California. Gavin Newson promised to end homelessness and instead it ballooned on purpose.

This is why there was such enormous flip out over Trump renovating the reflecting pool or spencer Pratt’s campaign.

Once people realize that things can be improved a lot of nonprofits and public union/money dries up.

There is a reason why cities like Chicago Los Angeles Portland Seattle and now Denver all look the same because they are all run by the same people running the exact same scam.

Commenter:

The Trump Administration cleaning up Washington DC and crushing the crime rate is a Success for everyone, except . . . . . our corrupt & incompetent Ruling Class.

The mascot group — such as Aboriginals in Australia or the homeless in LA — receive lots more government spending per capita than normal folks, but the money is actually spent employing lefties in big government and the NGO complex. If the problem is fixed, the flow of money to lefties would be reduced.

In many cases it might be better to give the money directly as cash to the disadvantaged people, rather then give it to a bunch of privileged bureaucrats or NGO types — who then pretend to do something.

The catch-22 of big government: it cannot fix a problem, or government would get smaller.

 

Conversation between a Boomer and a Gen Z

Conversation between a Boomer and a Gen Z.

Gen Z to Boomers:

Dear Boomers,

I’m writing this because a lot of us are tired of pretending everything is fine.

We grew up hearing how great things used to be. How one income could buy a house, raise kids, and still have something left over. How you could graduate high school or trade school and walk into a solid job. How communities felt safe and people actually trusted each other.

We don’t have any of that.

Instead we got sky-high housing prices, wages that haven’t kept up for decades, and student debt that follows us for life even if we paid back the original amount. We watch jobs in trades and manufacturing get crushed by cheap foreign labor and illegal immigration while politicians from both parties act like it’s no big deal. We see the Social Security and Medicare systems, the ones you and your parents paid into, getting stretched thinner every year as more people who paid far less into them start drawing out.

We feel betrayed.

You had the strongest economy in history, affordable homes, stable families, and real opportunity. Then somewhere along the way the doors were thrown open, the factories were shipped overseas, and the rules got changed so the people at the top win no matter what. Now we’re told to “just work harder” in a system that’s rigged against us.

We’re not lazy. We’re not entitled. We’re exhausted from watching the ladder get pulled up after you climbed it.

We want to know: When did you realize it was going this bad? And why didn’t more of you fight harder to stop it?

Sincerely, A frustrated Gen Z

Boomer to Gen Z:

I read your letter. I hear your anger. You feel betrayed, and a lot of you have every right to feel that way. You’re right that it got bad. But let me tell you how it actually happened from our side.

We switched parties more than once trying to get smaller government. We voted for politicians who promised to cut spending, secure the border, and put Americans first. We showed up at the polls. We wrote letters. We trusted the system.

The politicians did what they wanted anyway.

We never voted for open borders. We never voted to ship our factories overseas. We never voted to raid the Social Security lockbox or take the country off the gold standard. Those decisions were made by the generation before us and the permanent ruling class in Washington. They broke the deal no matter which party we sent to power.

We built the interstate system, the power grid, the early internet backbone, the satellite networks, and much of the physical world you live in today. You enjoy the benefits of that infrastructure every single day. We handed it to you in far better shape than we received it.

The suffering you feel, the wage stagnation, the housing crisis, the debt, the broken trust, didn’t fully hit until your generation and the one after. We watched it coming, warned about it, and got called every name in the book for doing so.

We didn’t create this mess. We inherited part of it and then failed to stop it. That’s on us. But pretending we wanted this outcome or voted for it is simply not true. We still believe in hard work, self-reliance, and building something real. We hope you do too.

The country we grew up in had real problems, but it also had real opportunity. You deserve that same chance.

How Did Pakistan Become 96 Percent Muslim?

How Did Pakistan Become 96 Percent Muslim? By Uzay Bulut in PJ Media.

Pakistan was once majority-Hindu. It was part of the Indian civilization with significant religious, ethnic, and cultural diversity.

This is no longer the case. Native Hindu and other non-Muslim cultures were systematically and largely erased by the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Moreover, attempts at reviving the Hindu and other pre-Islamic names of geographical locations are met with backlash from Muslims in the country. …

A little history:

Before the arrival of Islam in the 8th century, the region that is now called Pakistan and the broader Indian subcontinent was exceedingly diverse. Throughout millennia, the region’s religious diversity included a rich mix of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, other local/folk beliefs, and later, Judaism, Zoroastrianism, and Christianity.

Throughout the last 14 centuries, the Islamization of the Indian subcontinent has been shaped by massacres, pogroms, persecutions, and forced conversions. This spans the initial Arab expansions, the Delhi Sultanate, the Mughal Empire, and the partition of India, up to the present. …

One of the largest genocides of Hindus in the post-independence period occurred during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War….

During the nine-month conflict, Pakistani soldiers and their local collaborators systematically targeted Hindus. They engaged in mass killings, rapes, and the destruction of property. It is estimated that 300,000 to 3 million people were killed. …

This systematic persecution led to a drastic decline in the Hindu population in Pakistan, from nearly 15% at the time of Partition to less than 2% today.

It’s happening still:

Pakistan’s current population is approximately 259 million, whereas the Christian population is around 4,785,000. There are approximately 3,479,000 Hindus and 3,522,000 members of other religious minorities in the country. The Islamization of Pakistan has led to extreme and ongoing persecution of these religious minorities.

Hindus and other non-Muslims in Pakistan continue to face religious discrimination, violence, and forced conversions. In recent years, there has been an alarming increase in the abduction and forced conversion of Hindu and Christian girls, often underage, who are forcibly married to Muslim men. Local authorities and religious leaders often turn a blind eye, with judicial systems offering little to no protection to these vulnerable communities.

 

 

Something similar happened to North Africa, which used to be Christian and Jewish. Only Spain evicted Islam, though it took seven centuries.

Islam is different — supremacist and intolerant:

Meanwhile, India is home to the third-largest Muslim population in the world and the largest global Muslim-minority population. India’s Muslim population is estimated to be approximately 200 to 213 million people, accounting for roughly 14.2% to 15% of the country’s total population. While Pakistan has persecuted and largely exterminated its Hindu communities, Muslims have thrived in India as equal citizens of the country.

Out to conquer the world:

The ultimate outcome of Islam’s desire to dominate the world is the creation of nations such as Pakistan, where indigenous non-Muslim cultures and peoples are eliminated, and the surviving, tiny non-Muslim communities perpetually live under tyranny. Non-Muslim countries of the world must immediately start learning lessons from Pakistan’s history of Islamization and take precautions so they will not experience a similar fate.

Sure it can’t happen here? Dr Maalouf:

Islamic preacher: “When Muslims become the majority in the West in the next 40 years, non‑Muslims will have to convert, pay the jizya, or be killed, because Sharia will rule.”

Is the message clear, or do they need to spell it out?

“Islam” means “submission.”

Complaining about racism in Australia

Complaining about racism in Australia. By Katherine Deves,

Pakistani-born and bred Mehreen Faruqi, Senator for Palestine, is complaining about racism in Australia for the eleventy billionth time

Who else is bored?

 

 

Restore Australia:

There is something so awful about a constantly aggrieved first generation migrant. It is the ultimate display of arrogance, entitlement and disrespect.

Instead of thanking the Australian people for welcoming her in, for their kindness, their tolerance and their open mindedness, especially as we have a society that is so tolerant (or foolish) that she can become a serving politician, despite being a foreign born Pakistani woman, she does exactly the opposite.

She displays her ethnic hatred of white Europeans, her tribalistic loyalties and her selfish goals and aims: every single time she speaks, it is in a negative manner to the host population and is demanding our erasure and or displacement. …

Why do we allow millions to migrate here with antithetical views and beliefs, who fundamentally hate our people and history?

 

Albanese Government’s Marxist Economic Agenda

Albanese Government’s Marxist Economic Agenda. By the Editors of The Australian.

It was American civil rights activist Maya Angelou who said when someone tells you who they are, believe them the first time. Jim Chalmers told everyone who he was in a sweeping Monthly essay in January 2023 in which he railed against the market economy and failings of capitalism.

Dr Chalmers has praised socialist economist Mariana Mazzucato — who was an adviser to hard-left British Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn — as an inspiration. And here we are today. The Albanese government has adopted Professor Mazzucato’s agenda to increase taxes on capital and embrace a pre-distribution focus to target accumulated wealth.

Dr Chalmers promised to renovate our key institutions, and has made changes to Treasury, the Productivity Commission and the head of the Reserve Bank of Australia, as well as how interest rates are set. The head of the Productivity Commission, Danielle Wood, has confirmed the federal government’s plan to redistribute national housing as productivity falls into negative territory. …

What’s next?

The next steps in Professor Mazzucato’s playbook include taxes on financial transactions, an end to fossil fuel rebates, and support for a wealth and inheritance tax to fund a minimum universal inheritance scheme.

Following Angelou’s advice, when Anthony Albanese and Dr Chalmers say they want to change the social and economic fabric, we know to believe them. Because when they promise at election time not to make changes that lift taxes, upend retirement plans and sap incentives to work and save, they can always change their mind.

Forewarned. Australia is heading for a typical socialist economic downturn, which might last decades. On top of the demographic changes, Australia is being radically transformed. Time to leave?

Chaser:

A country becomes prosperous when its brightest people build companies, create jobs, and take risks.

When they shift from entrepreneurship to a government desk, prosperity slowly stops being created.

Some public servants in Canberra get paid almost $1m per year, then retire on a pension of 38% for life.

US Vice President blames the left for Henry Nowak’s death

US Vice President blames the left for Henry Nowak’s death. By J.D. Vance.

Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit.

His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.

Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response — the only response — is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.

It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children.

But the UK PM blames Elon Musk and the US Vice President:

Keir Starmer has now blamed JD Vance and Elon Musk for dividing the UK instead of Henry Nowak’s murderer, the family who tried to cover it up and the appalling response from the police.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has accused Elon Musk and US Vice President JD Vance of interfering in British democracy and seeking to stir up division over the murder of student Henry Nowak

Imagine:

Henry Nowak death: The left is to blame

Henry Nowak death: The left is to blame. By Greg Sheridan in The Australian.

The death of 18-year-old university student Henry Nowak is as terrible as anything you’ll ever see. …

Nowak is not even given the dignity of being hated or abused. There is just utter indifference to him, the cold, bureaucratic hand of identity politics, which has delivered us not into a land of racial justice, but into Dante’s Inferno, the fourth circle of hell. …

An accusation of racism was more important than murder, and the desperate need for first aid. …

Britain’s Opposition Leader, Kemi Badenoch, says Nowak’s killing is a seminal moment that will change Britain profoundly.

Nowak had been stabbed five times by Vickram Digwa, 23, a cold blooded murderer who contrived to tell the police many lies. …

Anti-white ideologues rule:

Starmer denies two-tier policing exists but his denial seems absurd. In Australia, too, there are obvious double standards, but nothing on the scale of the Nowak incident.

From the first, there was something wrong with Black Lives Matter. Hillary Clinton and one or two innocent celebrities said: yes, black lives matter, all lives matter. The BLM movement viciously chastised them: you must only say black lives matter. …

Identity politics, like all contemporary left-wing ideology, is simplistic and filled with hatred. It is a bastard child of Marxism which substitutes for capital and labour, and the paint-by-numbers analysis of their power relationship, a new class of oppressor and oppressed. White people are oppressors and can never, by definition, be victims of racism. Non-white people are victims of oppression, and can never be guilty of racism. 

Critical Race Theory is its expression in ethnic politics. It reverses the liberal ideal of Martin Luther King who wanted a society in which people were judged by the “content of their character, not the colour of their skin”. CRT means character counts not at all, skin colour is everything. …

It’s rising to existential danger:

How did we get to the point where the police are so afraid of being accused of racism that they handcuff a dying man, while consoling his murderer, simply because a charge of racism has been levelled? Here’s the ineradicable, undeniable truth of human morality which identity politics can never acknowledge, admit or accommodate. You can’t cure racism with more racism, defeat discrimination with more discrimination, beat prejudice with more prejudice. …

The British police believe justice should not be colour blind, people should not be treated equally. This is sad and mad and bad. The very depiction of Lady Justice, in a thousand courts and judge’s chambers, is of a woman, blindfolded, holding the scales of justice. She weighs the evidence, blind to the background, race, power or wealth of the people involved. She is meant to be colour blind.

UK Police training: chanted “Islam is a religion of peace” and discussed white privilege

UK Police training: chanted “Islam is a religion of peace” and discussed white privilege. By Gordon Rayner in The Telegraph.

Luke Salmons lost his job as a police community support officer (PCSO) with the North Yorkshire force and was barred from policing after a conversation about Gaza with a Muslim officer.

He later won an appeal but has never received an apology from the force where he said a “culture of fear” existed among officers who were terrified of being fired for saying the wrong thing.

Mr Salmons, 46, told The Telegraph that a training day on race, religion and culture turned into an “indoctrination” session as trainers chanted “Islam is a religion of peace” and discussed white privilege.

Having been encouraged to ask questions in what staff were told was a safe space, he asked a Muslim officer about his views on terrorist attacks by Islamist groups including Hamas. The officer happily discussed the issue with him and invited him to chat further over coffee after the session.

But within two days he had been suspended for gross misconduct by an inspector who told him: “I don’t like your beliefs.”

Career ending:

Mr Salmons told The Telegraph: “I loved my job and I was good at it. I was well respected as a PCSO and my colleagues said they loved working with me and couldn’t understand what was happening.

“But an overzealous inspector took against me and that was the end of my career, even though I had done nothing wrong.”

Would Henry Nowak have survived if the police had been less anti-white and less pro-Islam, and called an ambulance or begun medical treatment right away? Some say yes.