How media attacks and establishment sneering are fuelling One Nation’s resurgence

How media attacks and establishment sneering are fuelling One Nation’s resurgence. By Chris Mitchell in The Australian.

This column reckons much of the activist media class misunderstands One Nation supporters.

People moving to One Nation know exactly what they do and don’t want.

Like populist movements in the US and the UK, they are part of a backlash against the censorious sneering of the political establishment, freed by Donald Trump’s rejection of woke pieties on immigration, gender and climate.

In Australia, they may not approve of Trump’s handling of world affairs, but they feel they can now speak openly against foolish ideology in favour of common sense.

Journalists Sarah Ferguson on the ABC’s 7.30 on Wednesday and Sally Sara on Radio National breakfast on Thursday railed against Hanson’s words on radical Islam, multiculturalism, speaking English at home, criticism of late-term abortion and support for biological truth over gender ideology.

The pair is only helping One Nation — just as surely as GetUp!’s stunt of unfurling an anti-Hanson poster in the middle of her speech at the National Press Club in Canberra helped her. …

Hanson admitted her party would need to face media scrutiny as its support grew. But scrutiny is not the same as adversarial political activism by reporters. …

The left cannot talk about it:

Despite all the cogent economic analysis from pollsters and political editors about the effects of the cost-of-living crisis on working class Australians, it’s clear the real spurt to Hanson’s political fortunes was the murder of 15 people at Bondi Beach in December during a celebration of Hanukkah.

Whose fault, politically?

The massacre makes up the entire first part of the new One Nation ad, and it’s powerful. The implication is clear — this attack is the fruit of multiculturalism and high migration.

 

 

Australians, Hanson said, should be able to discuss radical Islamism. Yet such discussions are seldom had openly, even though they have been in Europe for more than a decade.

The instructions to the left:

ABC global affairs editor Laura Tingle on December 16 told her colleague Patricia Karvelas on the Politics Now podcast that the actions of the Bondi gunmen had “nothing to do with religion”. …

Reality:

Months earlier ASIO boss Mike Burgess had warned that the war in Gaza was firing up Muslim anger online, especially among young males.

Many journalists have tried to deny the link between high immigration, high house prices and housing shortages. Common sense tells voters the link is obvious. …

Scrutiny is fair. Finger-pointing accusations of racism not so much.

Alexandra Marshall isn’t debating anymore.

UPDATE: Radical Islam imported into Australia all in the name of votes:

Who is responsible?

Rod Lampard:

Being able to buy Chinese for dinner or a kebab for lunch isn’t multiculturalism.

The denial of the right to criticise any culture other than White, Anglo/Celtic European Western civ is.

Forced speech that demands we cower in fear of being called a racist if we point out that “all cultures are NOT equal” is.

Caldron Pool:

What are they here for?

Our culture? Our religion? Our laws? Our customs? Our way of life?

Check out all the Australian flags.

hat-tip Stephen Neil

‘Citizen Vigilante’ Review

‘Citizen Vigilante’ Review. By John Nolte at Breitbart.

The left has their pro-terrorist One Battle After Another, an overlong, mediocre, $100 million studio movie told by a major director (Paul Thomas Anderson) using one of the world’s biggest movie stars (Leonardo DiCaprio). The result? It flopped at the box office and was still predictably showered with unearned critical praise and major Oscar wins.

Basically, One Battle After Another is angry that America enforces the law by deporting illegal immigrants and demands violence against the government to make it stop.

Today we have a rebuttal, and a pretty effective one… Best of all, it’s deliciously subversive.

Citizen Vigilante is a briskly-paced (at 89 minutes) low-budget exploitation movie told by a director who was long ago written off as a joke (Uwe Boll), using an unjustly disgraced star (Armie Hammer). The result? Despite the best efforts of left-wing censors, a brilliant guerrilla campaign has already driven it into the national conversation. Elon Musk then did what he does best: overturned the whole enchilada by releasing it to everyone for free on X.

Basically, Citizen Vigilante is angry that European governments agree with One Battle After Another in that they refuse to enforce the law against the millions of unvetted migrants they imported who have brought their appalling and dangerous Third World values with them.

Let me tell you: Boll isn’t screwing around. His righteous fury against what the government has done to Europe, and especially its women and girls, flames across every scene. That’s one reason the movie works. Another reason it works is that Boll is telling the truth. The primary reason it works is that Boll is the only one telling the truth. …

The flaws? There’s no real story. Armie Hammer’s Michael Sanders is a one-note, robotic justice machine. There are a few eye-rolling contrivances. Considering all the security cameras and Sanders’ refusal to protect his identity 90 percent of the time, it seems impossible he wasn’t caught in the first five minutes. …

He’s also delivering a sweet reckoning to the predominantly white “woke left.” You know the type… The type of judge who releases seven savages guilty of gang-raping an innocent teenage girl because this judge believes those seven savages are victims of a society that didn’t do enough to integrate them. …

Above all, I loved watching The Truth.

Finally… The Truth.

Any of you watch that piece of shit Adolescence, where the British stabbing crisis was laid at the hands of a little white boy poisoned by the manosphere? That dumb series isn’t shit just because it’s a blatant lie, it’s also a creative piece of shit that’s three episodes too long and bursting with pretension, especially the single-shot conceit that drains all the tension out of everything.

Boll tells the actual Truth and does so using the most effective method… Exploitation. …

Citizen Vigilante is not racist. The truth is not racist. Besides, plenty of white people get what they’ve got coming. …

Finally, if anything, Citizen Vigilante downplays its outrages. In real life, it wasn’t seven savages who raped that teenage girl, it was nine. Eight received no prison time.

Elizabeth Nickson at Absurdistan:

Citizen Vigilante is a crude but compelling fictional film about an American with investments in Europe — the specific country is unclear — who has decided to rectify Muslims raping and murdering young girls. …

I began to realize while watching it, I am profoundly, angry at what our governments have done to our culture, which our ancestors built brick by furiously difficult brick. My rage matched the revenge I was watching, a fury I hadn’t yet plumbed. I may be an educated middle class white woman living in the safest place on earth, but those are my people, those were my girls. And yours.

It won’t be playing at the local movie house.

Young White Men Will Save Western Civilization. Why?

Young White Men Will Save Western Civilization. Why? By Elizabeth Nickson at Absurdistan.

When I used Chat GPT to search Britain and the U.S. for mainstream reporting on grooming gangs in Britain, it refused my request, several times. Grok did not.

Despite extensive reporting by every legacy outfit, nothing has been done by any globalist government anywhere, but the U.S.. …

The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan has repeatedly said that there are no grooming gangs in London. In fact, wherever Muslims have achieved public office, all reports from those districts are quashed.

Young men:

The take-over of our institutions by closeted Marxists, climate change nuts and Islamists is almost complete. Older generations are passive and despairing. They look at this, and think, “thank God I am old and I saw Paris before we destroyed it”. Our mainstream media is passive in its faith, somehow trusting that “democracy” will solve this issue. Governments are fearful both of the people they admitted, and the citizens of the countries they destroyed. They put up smokescreens to hide their crimes. The left cries racism, and persists in its belief that white Christian culture must be destroyed, and they have the people who are going to destroy it in hand. They do not….

But the demand for mass deportation will overtake discussion and will be driven by young men …

Policy people can debate all they like, but the power is not with them anymore. Across the west, Europe and the New World, young men are demanding their culture back. If it means deporting every last non-European, so it shall be.

The tide has changed:

Across Europe, including Scandi, the tides are turning big time. Remigration, which was only whispered about six months ago – Absurdistan’s was the first mention of it last year. When I starting writing about remigration, this time last year, I was nervous. The word was not in use, at all. Today, remigration is formally discussed and is in planning and execution, in every western democracy.

 

 

Remigration is just the beginning. Young white men are leading this fight and they want eradication of separate cultural entities. Multiculturalism is a crime scene across every metric. The U.S. and Canada were founded on Christian principles which created wealth, an explosion of invention and knowledge and peaceful prosperous families and communities.

They do not see why they have to finance this:

 

 

Finland has found that each Somali costs one million euros and contributes nothing.

 

 

This isn’t about remigration anymore. This is about throwing off the entire disgusting mess of licentious, sexually permissive, anti-family, anti-country, anti-Christianity, of the past 75 years. It is about a return to families, with husbands who stay, who claw back authority from the political operatives and sick ideologies who have stolen their futures. Who will take back their towns and counties from the Marxists stealing them blind.

 

 

Australian hospitals have become dangerous for Jews

Australian hospitals have become dangerous for Jews. By Megan Goldin in The Australian.

Weeks before first responders fought valiantly to save lives at Bondi Beach in Sydney in December last year, an international medical conference on the latest battle-tested techniques to treat gunshot wound victims in the critical minutes after injury was to be held in Perth.

Among the speakers was the former head of the Israeli military’s medical corp, Dr Elon Glassberg, who was to share how the Israeli army reduced battlefield mortality rates from gunshot and blast injuries to the lowest in history of any army in the world.

Anti-Israel doctors and nurses groups threatened to picket the conference with large-scale protests if the Glassberg session went ahead. The organisers capitulated and the conference was cancelled.

For protesting healthcare workers, it was a victory to be celebrated. “Thank you to everyone who wrote letters, made phone calls and made their concerns known. Free Palestine,” the Instagram account @hcw4palestinewa said. …

The Australian medical establishment has become actively antisemitic and pro-Hamas:

Many of the more than 30 doctors, nurses, midwives and allied health professionals interviewed for this article cite this incident as one of many examples of how anti-Israel activism by healthcare workers since the October 7, 2023, massacre by Hamas has shaken the 2500-year-old bedrock principle of medicine, dating from Greek physician Hippocrates and his oath, which is that the best interests of patients always comes first.

Using the exalted mantle of their medical professions, activist doctors and nurses routinely are amplifying anti-Jewish blood libels propagated by Hamas as well as adopting dehumanising anti-Jewish hate speech while often expressing support for proscribed terror groups such as Hamas that advocate mass slaughter of Jews.

By doing so, they are turning hospitals and medical clinics into ideological war zones instead of safe spaces where patients can be assured of getting the best possible medical care by empathetic healthcare providers. …

October 8:

Anti-Israel activism began almost immediately after the October 7 massacre when the protests that unfolded in Australian cities spilled into the wards and staffrooms of hospitals in Melbourne, Sydney and other capital cities.

Doctors and nurses wore “From the river to the sea” protest symbols to work and covered hospital toilet stalls and corridors with stickers that included a Star of David with a red line drawn through it.

At The Alfred Hospital in Melbourne, which has received tens of millions of dollars from Jewish philanthropists, such stickers were stuck to the bedside wall of an elderly Jewish patient in the hours before he died.

Meanwhile, a war of words was waged online. Social media posts by pro-Palestine doctors and other healthcare professionals veered into hate speech, antisemitism, Holocaust inversion and support of proscribed terror groups.

“Doctors and nurses were posting Nazi symbols and little caricatures of Jewish people but using the word ‘Zionist’ instead of ‘Jews’,” Jewish pediatric neurologist Dr Carly Debinski says. “They were so virtuous and obsessive about vilifying Jewish people.”

Almost three years later, it’s still going on virtually unabated:

Facebook groups where doctors and nurses had discussed mundane topics such as childcare became venomous in the aftermath of October 7, with Jewish members attacked or booted off if they mentioned the 200-plus Israelis held hostage in Gaza at the time, or the mutilations, rapes and slaughter of 1200 Israelis by Hamas on October 7.

At a major hospital in Melbourne, a Jewish intensive care unit nurse resigned after more than a decade in the job because management refused to tackle “online hate speech” by staff.

“If these people are willing to share these things on social media, imagine how they treat a (Jewish) patient face-to-face,” she says, requesting that her name be withheld. …

Hostile to Jewish patients:

Hospitals became hostile environments for Jewish patients and employees.

A Jewish health worker at a Melbourne teaching hospital was shirtfronted by a colleague from Ireland, where antisemitic incidents are at record highs, who demanded she apologise for the Gaza war. The same hospital HR department that weeks earlier transferred a staff member in the same unit for mimicking a foreign accent refused to take action when a complaint was lodged.

That pattern was repeated across the country as hospitals and healthcare regulators tolerated conduct against Jews that would have triggered disciplinary action if the conduct had targeted any other minority group, say numerous medical professionals who experienced this double standard. …

“Oops, sorry”:

For Charlotte Frajman, 64, the daughter of an Auschwitz survivor, having her religion listed in her medical records is a litmus test. “If I can’t have my Jewish religion on my medical records then it’s time to leave Australia because we are no longer safe here,” she says.

Frajman worries she was targeted during monthly appointments at a Melbourne hospital day clinic where she receives intravenous post-cancer treatment. During a session last year, a Muslim nurse, with whom she’d previously exchanged smiles, lost his kind demeanour when he saw Frajman’s religion on her hospital records while verifying her details.

When it came to putting in the cannula, he took four attempts. It was incredibly painful,” Frajman recalls. “I was bruised for weeks. You would have thought he was a trainee nurse, not the senior nurse in charge.” When the same nurse again took four attempts to insert cannulas during subsequent visits, Frajman didn’t know what to think. “Then the Bankstown nurses thing came out, and my husband and I looked at each other and we said: ‘Oh my God.’ ”

Israeli-born Orit Brand begged a hijab-wearing radiographer to stop after the eighth failed attempt to insert a cannula into her vein at a radiology clinic at a Melbourne hospital. At her insistence another staff member was called and inserted the cannula at the first attempt “with no pain and no bruising”.

It’s nearly impossible to prove malice when it comes to painful needle insertion. However, in both cases, the hospital protocol of a maximum of two attempts by the same practitioner was breached, according to nurses who work at the hospitals in question.

“The needles, it is a story that keeps repeating,” says Nurit Hadad, a NSW-based mental health nurse counselling victims of antisemitism. “This is the easiest way to hurt people. They say: ‘I’ve done my best but I just couldn’t find a vein.’ ”

Midwife Sharon Stoliar has heard many horror stories since October 7. Among them, a Jewish woman who cried in agony for hours the night after a C-section at a Sydney hospital where she was “left to lie in a pool of blood with no pain relief” while her baby screamed in its cot alongside hers. When the nurse eventually arrived, she treated her roughly and with no compassion. …

While hospitalised in the ICU ward of an Adelaide hospital, Julia, a Jewish patient who asked that her family name be withheld, sobbed after being given a bedside lecture by her nurse denying the events of the Holocaust and the October 7 massacre.

Sounds like 1920s Germany:

Jewish medical students and trainee doctors have been ostracised by fellow students. Some have been verbally attacked by patients and taunted by superiors. They are too afraid to go public because of concerns that it will affect their chances at getting accepted in highly competitive specialist training programs. Indeed, many of those interviewed for this article asked for their names to be fully or partially withheld because of safety or job concerns. …

Slurping up Hamas lies:

It is a testament to the effectiveness of Hamas’s propaganda machine that two days later, hundreds of medical workers dressed in hospital scrubs protested in Sydney and Melbourne chanting “stop hospital bombings”, even though the only Gazan hospital that had been bombed was al-Ahli and it had been hit by a misfired Palestinian rocket.

The same protesters outraged by what they claimed was Israel’s targeting of healthcare workers in Gaza were silent about Hamas firing rocket-propelled grenades at Israeli ambulances on October 7, killing paramedic crews, as well as murdering many Israeli first-aid workers during the massacre including a doctor and paramedic slaughtered as they treated the injured at Kibbutz Be’eri’s clinic.

Mental health crazies:

The medical specialty that seems to be most infested with antisemitism is mental health. Calling on Israelis to commit suicide, a Queensland-based psychotherapist posted on X, “You aren’t fit to live”. An academic working in the psychiatry department of a prominent Australian university put up a Holocaust inversion post on X comparing queues at food distribution centres in Gaza to concentration camp gas chambers during the Holocaust.

Mental health counsellor Hadad had a panic attack in the regional NSW Headspace office where she worked at the time when after October 7 a colleague draped her adjacent desk with a keffiyeh.

If someone is coming with a keffiyeh to a workplace, Australian people who have nothing to do with Middle Eastern culture … it’s a statement of violence,” says Hadad. “It represents the people trying to kill me.”

Her managers refused Hadad’s request to ban protest symbols at work. After months of feeling unsafe at work, Hadad quit her job. …

Antisemitic double standard:

As for the doctor who posted the Hitler quote and a post describing Jews as “loathed slime”, health oversight boards closed the complaint without taking action, as they did for complaints about numerous other doctors who posted antisemitic, terror idealisation and pro-Hamas content online.

“Regulators have shown clear double standards in the handling of complaints,” says Stoliar. She says sometimes the same AHPRA staff have acted against Jewish health practitioners targeted by baseless complaints, while ignoring complaints about blatantly antisemitic and terror idealisation posts by pro-Palestine healthcare workers by claiming these posts were made in personal capacities. …

Some Jewish and pro-Jewish doctors and nurses received letters from AHPRA accusing them of Islamophobia for posting think-tank reports debunking genocide claims or for posts suggesting that the writing had been on the wall for the Bondi attack. …

Honorably setting a good example:

For Melbourne pediatrician Debinski, Australia became so toxic for Jews after October 7 that she is happy she moved to Israel, where she works at Sheba Medical Centre, one of Israel’s largest hospitals near Tel Aviv.

She is part of a team of Jewish, Arab, Muslim, Christian and Druze doctors and nurses, treating children from all communities, including Gazan children brought to Israel for medical treatment.

Israel, she says, could teach Australia lessons about cultivating a culture of collaboration by medical teams from many walks of life whose creed is that patient care is paramount and personal baggage stays at home. For Debinski, the post-October 7 activism in Australian healthcare might have been done “under the guise of humanitarianism but it was really just a poisonous hatred of Jews”.

This is an example of where multiculturalism fails. On many issues, we cannot afford to have multiple cultures. We shouldn’t have to ask whether this a proper Western hospital or a hospital where the culture is to harm people the staff don’t like. We need a monoculture on issues like free speech, good medical care for all, and liberty — which are incompatible with Sharia and antisemitism.

Of course, the advocates of multiculturalism always try to confuse the picture by obsessing on irrelevant trivialities like food and skin color, because it makes them feel so superior and enlightened. (Talk about the Dunning-Kruger effect!)

A reader comments:

The stories about medical staff clearly using needles to torture patients they don’t Iike is very disturbing; it’s almost hard to read.

Wait until whites are more of a minority and all the self-hatred/anti-white hatred taught by the left in schools and universities really starts to take effect.

It won’t just be Jewish patients being treated like this. It’ll be all of us whites.

This is the part the suicidal empaths haven’t realised: instead of “being nice to us” in return for us inviting them in and giving away to them everything we had, they’re going to treat us like second- and third-class citizens once we’re a minority.

That’s the really stupid part of supporting mass immigration from countries with incompatible cultures, predominantly Muslims and Africans.

Whites in W Europe, the UK, Australia etc are going to get trodden on hard, eventually.

Debt Tsunami and a dying paper currency: The Alan Greenspan Legacy

Debt Tsunami and a dying paper currency: The Alan Greenspan Legacy. By Jeffrey Tucker.

Alan Greenspan, Fed chair from 1987 to 2006, embodies a striking ideological shift from gold-standard advocate to architect of the modern easy-money, debt-fueled financial system. He has now died at the age of 100, and this marks a good time to assess his legacy and explain why it matters.

 

In the 1960s, as a young economist influenced by Ayn Rand and Objectivism, Greenspan strongly supported the gold standard. In his 1966 essay “Gold and Economic Freedom,” he argued that gold-backed money was essential for laissez-faire capitalism. It restrained governments from inflating the currency to fund welfare states or deficits, preventing the erosion of savings and the boom-bust cycles caused by fiat money manipulation. He viewed central banking and unbacked currency as tools for hidden wealth confiscation through inflation. …

Once in power, however, Greenspan operated within the fiat system that he once criticized. He became known for discretionary, flexible monetary policy that prioritized short-term economic stability and growth over rigid rules.

Rescued the market every time with fresh paper money (the “Greenspan put”):

Markets came to expect the Fed to cut interest rates and inject liquidity during crises to cushion asset price declines. This started with the 1987 stock market crash (Black Monday [Dow fell 25% in a day]), during which Greenspan quickly affirmed the Fed’s readiness to provide liquidity.

This was the beginning of what later became known as Quantitative Easing, or money printing, as the method to deal with market upheavals. It represented a wholesale repudiation of the policies of Paul Volcker from 1979 to 1982, the last time this country permitted an economic downturn to take its normal course rather than use artificial methods of stimulating demand. It was a test of the theory of the Austrian School, which argued that recessions serve a purpose of cleaning out malinvestments to prepare the ground for new prosperity. …

Sound money:

With sound money and a free market, the interest rate was a reflection of the savings rate. Investors would only borrow what was available, while savers were rewarded for their thrift with high interest rates. The rate of return for financial capital would tend toward an equilibrium identical to industrial output levels. That means that you are always better off saving than taking risks unless you have an eye toward entrepreneurial speculation. That was the balance: save, invest, grow.

Unsound money — the formula for riches since 1982 has been to borrow as much money as possible, buy assets, and wait:

Greenspan’s efforts turned the table over. The Fed embarked on a new experiment that would reward debt more than saving through one simple trick. He would push down rates to the point that saving paid less than investing in stocks, such that anyone could go into serviceable debt and invest and make more money with financial markets. Thus began what is called financialization. It overthrew the traditional workings of capitalism for a new calculation that stopped rewarding thrift and started rewarding leverage above all else.

Quite the achievement for a man who decades earlier had condemned this very system!

This strategy was repeated with responses to the 1998 LTCM/Russia crisis, the dot-com bust (2000–2001), and post-9/11. Investors priced in this implicit downside protection — like a put option — encouraging greater risk-taking, leverage, debt service, and wild speculation. …

The result was moral hazard and a wild culture of risk-taking at the expense of financial prudence. The combination of bailouts for markets (not necessarily individual firms) and low rates fostered the belief that the Fed would always “clean up” after bubbles.

This reduced the perceived downside of speculation, leading to higher leverage in finance, exotic mortgages, and a broader “debt finance” era in which credit expansion outpaced productive growth. Greenspan himself spoke of “irrational exuberance” in 1996 but didn’t act decisively to prick bubbles.

Greenspan’s tenure coincided with (and helped enable) a structural shift toward higher public–private debt levels, financialization of the economy, and repeated asset bubbles. The housing bubble and 2008 crisis are the clearest examples — easy money post-dot-com contributed to over-leveraged households and banks. …

In later years, Greenspan reflected on gold favorably (e.g., calling it the premier global currency and admitting in conversations with Ron Paul that the Fed tried to mimic gold-standard signals). He acknowledged the welfare state’s incompatibility with hard money but pragmatically worked within the system.

Fine talk, but look at how he walked. Greenspan’s successors at the Fed only intensified his apostasy, especially Ben Bernanke, who went one better and slammed rates to zero while protecting against inflationary consequences by filling up bank vaults with fake money. This created innumerable zombie institutions, even as the Fed held the overvalued fake assets on its books. It still does. …

We are still paying a huge price for this mismanagement.

Gold is the only financial asset that has no counterparty risk and does not rely on a third party’s promise to pay. Hence, it is a good basis for money.

1 in 3 French are foreign origin. You racists have lost.

1 in 3 French are foreign origin. You racists have lost. By Angelo Plume.

In France, you can just stand in the parliament and celebrate the genocide of your own people while your fellow party members applaud your moral superiority.

“1 in 3 French are foreign origin. You racists have lost.”

 

Raw Egg Nationalist:

The French left are openly appropriating “the Great Replacement” — indeed, actually using that term — to describe demographic change in the country. Mask off.

Commenters:

The evolution was simple and rapid: when the term “Great Replacement” first came up, they screamed that it didn’t exist and that talking about it was racist. Then, it became: “Well, okay, it does exist, but it’s actually great! and if you’re against it, you’re racist.”

I’m scared: 14 yo British schoolgirl

I’m scared: 14 yo British schoolgirl. By Wall Street Apes.

14 year old school girl in the UK says every day her and her friends live in fear from the Muslim migrant rape gangs

“I’m scared that whenever I come out of school, they’re going to be across the road watching everyone come out — I feel like one day me or other people my age are just going to be watched by these men and that feeling gives you a sense of insecurity”

Reporter “And you’re at the age where you want that bit of freedom to go out and enjoy yourself. You can’t do that”

“No, I can’t. I have to walk It’s a longer way to school now. I can’t walk into the town much anymore by myself. I have to really go with friends or parents, and I can’t even really go to the park unless there’s my friend’s parents there”

What if she wears a burka?

Commenters:

These people [young white girls] should be able to come to America as refugees. This is the definition of the legit scenario for America accepting people from other countries! They are not safe in their country anymore! …

You realize that when you’ve hired a horde of barbarian mercenaries you’ve got to provide them with not just money, food, clothing, weapons, and housing, but you also have to provide them with whomever will satisfy their sexual appetite The government’s in the UK are complicit in this. …

British pop star Duffy recently opened up about being drugged at her birthday dinner and taken out of the country for a month by a group of migrants that repeatedly raped her [in 2010]. If this kind of thing is happening to celebrities, how on earth are we going to protect ordinary girls? [Duffy has been snapped out in public for the first time in over 15 years …The 41-year-old singer was spotted visiting a cafe in North Wales]

A society that cannot or will not protect its young women is not long for this world.

How did we fall so far behind the Americans?

How did we fall so far behind the Americans? By Stephen Green at PJ Media.

All that is my long-winded way of getting to our delight these last few weeks with FIFA tourists like Freddy the German — a common European fellow learning the common joys of American life far from the usual tourist destinations.

You know, like our gas stations.

Freddy loved Buc-ee’s, by the way.

And Another Thing: Not quite germane, but there’s also video of Australian tourists visiting Buc-ee’s, one of whom says, “Only America can make a gas station an attraction that everyone wants to come and see.” We build it, they come.

Then there was the whole Ranch dressing craze, which admittedly got an unfair start because a chesty Swedish OnlyFans star named Elsa decided she loved it. … Kraft responded by almost instantaneously ramping up production of TSA-sized bottles of Ranch, something only possible because the company didn’t have to first get permission from the E.U.’s Directorate-General for Condiment Packaging. Besides, the Permanent Undersecretary for Three-to-Seven Ounce Containers is on holiday this month. …

Seriously:

As awesome as Freddy is, and as weirdly attractive as Ranch dressing suddenly became, behind their touristy delights lies an uncomfortable question that our cousins will take back with them to the Old Country, provided they have the guts to ask it.

“How did we fall so far behind the Americans?”

The difference isn’t scale. The EU has 449 million people living in a single market, compared to 342 million Americans.

The difference is the explosion of wealth, abundance, and experiences that come from a regulatory climate where innovation is still (mostly) prized.

Hardly anything happens in Europe without getting permission first. That’s why Europe can’t build a social media platform like X, but Brussels can slap a record-setting $140 million fine on the firm for ignoring Europe’s censorship mandates.

Brussels and the whole “European project” smothered innovation almost out of existence in the name of unity, safety, and homogeneity — and the scale of Europe’s failure shocked even me.

Instead of teasing this out, let me show you right now the single chart that blew me away.

 

 

So a “from scratch” company is a startup, not the result of a merger, acquisition, or spinoff. Think of Apple, with Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs hiring a few friends to build computers in a garage. …

What you see on the left side of that chart is an explosion of creativity and wealth perhaps unparalleled in human history, all since 1976. What you see on the right is an entire continent just limping along — a continent that used to be the wealthiest and most sophisticated on Earth, but is now blown away by our easy access to Ranch dressing. …

And I singled out tech because tech is innovation.

Want to know why Freddy can buy 57 varieties of jerky at a truck stop chain the likes of which Europe doesn’t even have a single location? That’s why, right there.

Back in April, you and I looked at Britain’s sad decline vis-à-vis the U.S. “30 years ago, Britain would have ranked fifth among U.S. states, just behind Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey,” I wrote then, but today Britain would rank 51st behind Mississippi.

But here’s the thing. When polled on where their island nation ranks among U.S. states, Britons guessed “seventh” on average. Europoors don’t know they’re poor until they’ve stepped inside an air-conditioned Costco on a steamy afternoon in Nowhere, Texas.

Europeans ought to ask themselves, “Where is our Costco? Where is our Buc-ee’s? Why does America have more and better stadiums than we do, even when they barely play Fußball? How come they have SpaceX, Apple, Facebook, and Nvidia, and we don’t?”

Simple. Europe collectivized decision-making and handed it to unelected bureaucrats. We have that problem, too, but we’re still decades behind Europe in that regard.

The thing about collectivism — or its pan-European equivalent, multinationalism — is that the collectivists always want you to believe that it’s inescapable. Here in the U.S. more than a century ago, our homegrown collectivists took old-school European collectivism and renamed it “Progressivism,” to signal that moving backwards from our founding principles was somehow progress.

Australia is more like the US, but our ruling class and our current government admire the Europeans and want to be like them — with them in charge.

On the big government versus liberty spectrum, Australia used to be up the liberty end — but now we are plummeting towards the big government end. By weird coincidence, we also have mass immigration and many new voters from the third world. Hmmm. No wonder immigration is the one special issue that the left will absolutely not discuss rationally or consider compromising on.

“The dancing days of the dirtbag left” in NY

“The dancing days of the dirtbag left” in NY. By Chris Nesi at The New York Post.

Democrats were shocked when a trio of anti-Israel, socialist candidates backed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani swept Tuesday’s New York House primary races, warning that their ascendance represents a changing of the guard for the party as voters embrace the far left.

“The roof is collapsing on the Democratic Party establishment tonight,” progressive political activist and CNN commentator Van Jones told Kaitlan Collins as election results rolled in. …

US Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), whose independent streak has rankled his own party since his own surprise victory in 2022, didn’t hold back in voicing his consternation about Tuesday’s results when speaking to Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

This has become the dancing days of the dirtbag left,” he said. “Some of these candidates are outrageous. You have candidates, they [want to] abolish ICE, abolish police, abolish the border.”

Monica Showalter in American Thinker:

Democrat voters chose extremists of the most repulsive sort over establishment-endorsed candidates, to win three New York primaries, driving their party to the farthest left it’s ever been. …

It’s so bad the winners are from the kind of left that makes Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez look like a moderate.

They’re calling for the death of Western Civilization:

[Newly elected condidate] Darializa Avila Chevalier says she converted to Islam because of the “grace and love and passion” that her Muslim friends had for “social justice” …

Darializa Avila Chevalier says she’s hoping to reflect Islam in the halls of Congress. The quiet part out loud. She just won the Democratic primary for NY-13. They’re conquering us before our eyes.

Bill Melugin:

Their positions are some of the most extreme and far left Dems have seen:

Darializa Avila Chevalier (NY-13): Abolish prisons, abolish ICE, abolish borders, defund the police, and “all deportations are wrong”, including for violent criminals. She has called the U.S. an “effing disgrace”, and said in a prior social media post “I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me.”

Claire Valdez (NY-7): Grant citizenship and voting rights to illegal aliens, use taxpayer funds for all transgender treatments, and eliminate private health insurance.

Brad Lander (NY-10): Abolish ICE, forgive all student loans (almost $2 trillion worth), expand the Supreme Court.

Mamdani gets a clean sweep, a bad night for Hakeem Jeffries, and big questions for where the Democratic Party is heading.

Just Loki:

Normie libs were so obsessed with “getting” Trump that they let their party get taken over by Islamic communists.

Logan Hall:

We imported a ton of third world foreign communists and allowed them to participate in our elections and run for office and then they all vote for third world foreign communism. Doesn’t take a genius to realize this was never going to be anything other than a recipe for disaster.

Jon Levine — overproduction of would-be elites:

NYC election results reflect highly educated yet downwardly mobile white people who are angry that their expensive degrees are worthless and people in jobs they find demeaning (electricians, plumbers) are making more than them.

The Undercurrent:

This is the DSA [Democratic Socialists of America] co-chair. Let me summarize what he says in this video:

“We’re using the Democratic Party as a ballot-access vehicle, not because we share its goals. We build our own organization, get elected under the Democratic label, caucus with Democrats when it’s useful, and push our own agenda from the inside. We see the Democratic establishment as an obstacle, not a home.”

 

Auron MacIntyre:

You need to understand that democracy in the US is over.

Handing power to the left even one time means the end of the country as tens of millions pour in and permanently change the electorate forever.

We have to be perfect, they need just one win.

John Carter:

Their presence is not legitimate, because they were brought in under false pretenses, and naturalized by hostile subversives looking to pack the electorate.

Yet still the western ruling class is just focused on their good government jobs, on their status and money. They refuse to see what is happening around them, possibly because they are responsible and it is just too stupid and awful to contemplate.

How Israel Became the Biggest Litmus Test in American Politics

How Israel Became the Biggest Litmus Test in American Politics. By Mark Halerpin at The Free Press.

A political earthquake shook New York City on Tuesday night, and it is about to reverberate throughout the entire Democratic Party.

Democratic Socialist candidates won a trio of House primaries, each backed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Senator Bernie Sanders. More than any other issue, these upstarts are united by their opposition to Israel and to U.S. support for the Jewish state. …

How did opposition to Israel become the toxic litmus test in Democratic Party politics — so rapidly, so emotionally, and so completely? …

For most of the postwar era, support for Israel was one of the least controversial positions in Democratic politics. Israel was welcomed as a true ally of America and the West: modern, tolerant, open-minded, generous, and stalwart. Israelis — the government and the people — were considered evolved, formidable, and brave.

That consensus has not merely weakened; it has collapsed. Key elements of the Democratic coalition — young voters, female voters, black voters, urban voters — have all undergone this total shift in attitude. …

Ethnic hatred and communism rear their ugly heads in NY:

The visceral explanations are harder to measure and more piercing to contemplate. They mirror centuries — and even millennia — of instinctive antisemitism, a raw dislike and distrust of Jewish people.

The left media:

In our 21st-century incarnation, traditional media has played a role. Not by inventing Palestinian suffering, which is real, or by making criticism of Israel illegitimate, which it is not. But by creating a daily rhythm of coverage in which Israel is almost always framed as the active agent and Palestinians almost always as the passive victims. The New York Times and its imitators waited only a beat or two after October 7 before returning to their familiar posture: Israel is the problem to be interrogated, the actor to be doubted, and guilty until proven innocent.

Social media and YouTube have done the rest, faster and with even fewer restraints. A generation of influencers, streamers, podcasters, and algorithmically rewarded stars has discovered that anti-Israel certainty performs beautifully. Complexity does not go viral. Layered ambiguity does not build a following. A tragic conflict between two peoples becomes, in the hands of the platforms, a simple morality play: oppressor and oppressed, colonizer and colonized, villain and victim.

Muslim and Chinese money:

Then there’s the foreign money and foreign influence. Qatar has spent years investing in American institutions, from universities to media to political networks, shaping the atmosphere in which elite opinion is formed. China’s role is different but no less consequential. Beijing does not need to care deeply about the Middle East to understand that TikTok and related information flows can amplify narratives that divide Americans, weaken confidence in Western institutions, and turn young Americans against their own country’s allies.

Qatar and China did not create every sentiment now coursing through Democratic politics. We don’t know exactly how much they have done to sow anti-Israel feeling on the left. But we can be confident that, with remarkable dexterity and efficacy, they have created some of the content and helped build and fuel the pipes through which those sentiments travel. …

The toxic result:

There has developed around Israel a kind of Pavlovian disgust association that now seems wired into many otherwise thoughtful people.

Jew. Jew. Jew. Jew. AIPAC. Dead children. Netanyahu. USS Liberty. Epstein. Weinstein. Occupation. Apartheid. Christ killers. NYPD trainers.

On and on and on.

Some of those associations involve serious subjects. Some are distortions. Some are outright nonsense. But the human mind is not a courtroom. It is an associative machine.

The mind can take only so much repetition before it is affected by it. And once the psychological ground has been softened, permeability to newer facts, factoids, allegations, images, and narratives rises dramatically. Almost everything flows in one direction.

The result is not necessarily hatred. It is something in some ways more powerful: a presumption.

A presumption that Israel is wrong. A presumption that Israel is lying. A presumption that Israel is acting in bad faith.

Leftist’s lack of principle makes them more vulnerable:

Years ago, I worried that parts of the progressive movement were dismantling some of the intellectual guardrails against bigotry. The principle used to be simple: Judging people based on immutable characteristics is wrong.

Increasingly, the argument became that some groups deserved less protection than others because of their perceived power. That shift has consequences. …

The evidence suggests that the anti-Israel litmus test inside Democratic politics is not weakening. It is growing stronger. And at the moment, no outside force capable of reversing, or even slowing that movement, is anywhere in sight.

Perhaps third world immigration has brought old ethnic hatreds into the West. Once in power, the haters will act on them.

According to Solzhenitsyn, something similar happened after the Russian revolution. Foreigners (in this case Jews, Georgians, etc.) who hated the Russian people seized control using the sweet promises of communism — and then proceeded to slaughter Russians:

The Voice will be back

The Voice will be back. By Noah Yim in The Australian.

Trade unions have broken with Anthony Albanese’s decree that the Labor movement move on from the failed Indigenous voice, declaring a legislated or constitutional Aboriginal decision-­making body is vital to ending racism in Australia.

The ACTU is the umbrella ­organisation for unions in the country and often front-runs policy that ends up on the Labor Party’s national platform. The most recent suite of industrial relations reform, Mr Albanese’s recognition of Palestine, and key elements of the government’s latest controversial tax package were all strongly advocated for by the ACTU.

By breaking with Mr Albanese’s policy of listening to voters and never again pushing for an ­Indigenous voice, the ACTU is the first major public institution to re-embrace the Uluru Statement on a national level. The move could ­ignite Indigenous leaders and ­activists who still believe an ­Aboriginal-only decision making body is necessary.

Another referendum perhaps? The ruling class is delusional if they think they will succeed in their second attempt to install a racist governance structure in Australia’s constitution. Unless, perhaps, they first change the electorate.

Leftist activists push Channel 9 into sacking Karl Stefanovich because he interviewed Pauline Hanson and Tommy Robinson

Leftist activists push Channel 9 into sacking Karl Stefanovich because he interviewed Pauline Hanson and Tommy Robinson. By Savanna Young in The Daily Mail.

Karl Stefanovic is reportedly set to resign from Nine following late-night talks amid the fallout from his controversial interview with Tommy Robinson.

The Today show star uploaded a controversial chat with the British far-right activist to his YouTube channel podcast, The Karl Stefanovic Show, on Tuesday, only to delete it hours later after facing widespread backlash [from his political opponents].

On Wednesday evening, The Sydney Morning Herald confirmed Stefanovic’s departure from Nine, indicating the decision was made in part to ‘defuse a major advertiser boycott.’ …

Meanwhile, activist group Mad F**king Witches (MFW) announced that it had launched a campaign against Stefanovic over the podcast with Robinson.

The grassroots organisation is known for launching advertising boycotts against media figures, having previously targeted Kyle Sandilands [who has just come out as a One Nation supporter]. …

The left don’t want us talking about certain topics:

Stefanovic — who has been branded ‘Joe Bogan’ thanks to his attempt at replicating the success of Joe Rogan’s podcast – sparked controversy when he published the interview with Robinson which discussed Islam, immigration and Australian politics.

By Wednesday morning, the interview had vanished from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and The Karl Stefanovic Show YouTube channel.

Marta Jay at The Daily Mail:

Pauline Hanson has assured Karl Stefanovic that he has a job with One Nation should he want it, after the Today host was dropped by Channel Nine on Wednesday. …

Hanson slammed Nine, saying the network would be ‘bloody stupid’ to sack Stefanovic.

‘They’ve gone so far to the left, Channel Nine, they’re making a big mistake,’ the senator said. …

Hanson had earlier backed her ‘good friend’ Karl by uploading his pulled interview with Robinson to her own YouTube channel.

Pauline Hanson put up one minute from the Tommy Robinson interview on her X account:

And put the full interview on her YouTube channel:

Karl has been cancelled by Australia’s ruling class. Welcome to the outsiders, Karl.

UPDATE: The Confidential Daily:

Karl Stefanovic interviewed the wrong bloke, on the wrong subjects, in the wrong tone, and Nine decided he had crossed the line.

Not a legal line. Not even a journalistic line, really. A cultural one.

Karl Stefanovic committed wrongthink.

Stefanovic’s great sin was not simply interviewing Tommy Robinson. Journalists have interviewed all sorts of people over the years. Dictators, terrorists, murderers, fraudsters, extremists, fanatics and every variety of political nutter have been given airtime when it suited a newsroom’s purpose.

No, Karl did something much worse. He treated Robinson like a guest. …

The interview covered immigration, Islam, multiculturalism, free speech and the media. In other words, the list of topics ordinary Australians are allowed to talk about at the kitchen table, in the ute, at work, or over a beer, but only in the correct way in public.

The approved script (as if you didn’t know): …

Mass immigration must always be a blessing. Multiculturalism must always be a triumph. Free speech must always be defended in theory and restricted in practice. Islam can be discussed only with trembling caution. And the media, naturally, must never be accused of being part of the problem.

Karl didn’t follow the approved script:

He didn’t scowl on cue. He didn’t perform the required denunciation before allowing his guest to speak. He didn’t treat Robinson like a radioactive parcel left on the studio floor.

Worse still, he apparently praised his “tenacity” and “courage”. Promotional footage showed the two men looking friendly in London.

That was the real outrage.

Not that the interview existed. Not really. The outrage was the tone. Karl was supposed to cross-examine, condemn, interrupt and posture. Instead, from what we’re told, he had a conversation. …

Cancelled, a high flier’s career up in smoke, and let that be a lesson to everyone else in the Australian media:

Nine did not have to endorse Robinson. Karl did not ask Nine to endorse Robinson. By Nine’s own account, this was an independent podcast. Yet once the right people were offended, independence suddenly counted for nothing.

This is how cancellation works now. It rarely comes with an official stamp. Nobody walks in wearing a black hood. There’s no formal announcement saying, “This man has been punished for unacceptable views.” …

Only Pauline Hanson called them out (i.e. showed leadership):

Pauline Hanson said plainly what plenty of others would only mutter once the door was shut. She accused Nine of trying to sack Stefanovic, called its management weak, and reposted the deleted interview herself.

That, naturally, annoyed the media class even more. The deleted thing was not supposed to reappear. The whole point of pulling it down was to make it disappear into the digital memory hole, where awkward material goes when powerful people decide the public cannot be trusted to watch and make up its own mind.

That is the trick now. They don’t ban interviews. They just pressure people until interviews vanish.

They don’t censor conversations. They just make sure anyone who has the wrong conversation pays a price.

Chalmers’ war on capitalists: Investors are abandoning Australia

Chalmers’ war on capitalists: Investors are abandoning Australia. By Dimitri Burshtein and Peter Swan.

How many Australian businesses must fail before another generation of politicians learns one of the oldest lessons in economics? State-directed planning and political capital allocation is a path to poverty not prosperity.

Capital is one of the most misunderstood things in our public debates. Politicians treat it as a fixed pile in a vault, waiting to be redistributed by the clever and the caring. It is nothing of the sort. Capital is patient money placed at risk on a promise about the future; a bet that the rules will still be the rules in ten years, that a contract signed today will be honoured tomorrow, that the government will not move the goalposts the moment an investment begins to pay off. Remove that confidence and the capital does not get redistributed. It just does not show up.

This is why sovereign risk matters, and it is the quiet catastrophe unfolding in Australia. Not a crash, just a slow bleeding away of the willingness of investors to commit their money.

The Albanese government’s record follows a clear pattern. The superannuation system: Division 296, arriving 1 July, levies an extra impost on larger balances. A tax the government was forced to redesign after first proposing to tax unrealised gains. Negative gearing and capital gains: perennially placed on the table, lifted off, modelled, leaked, denied, now hanging over every investment decision in the country. Each intervention is sold as fairness. Together they deliver one message to anyone with capital: whatever you build here, the government reserves the right to return for a larger slice once you have finished building it.

Then there is gas. Investors sank tens of billions into Australian projects on the understanding that they could sell what they produced at the price the market set. The government changed the terms after the fact with price caps, a mandatory code, rewriting the economics of projects already in the ground. You can argue the politics. What you cannot argue away is the signal. In Australia, the deal you struck is provisional.

Say goodbye to investment and the capital for productivity improvements — because of sovereign risk caused by left wing government:

Foreign investors do not read Hansard. They do not follow which faction won which preselection. They run a screen across forty countries and flag Australia as elevated risk.

They remember that Australia keeps changing its rules: that signed contracts get reopened, that tax treatment shifts, that the government reserved the right to impose domestic reservation and price caps on gas projects already operational. So they file Australia alongside the economies where political caprice outranks the rule of law.

There will be no single moment of reckoning and no headline that captures it, and that is precisely the danger. A government can preside over the slow flight of capital and never see its own fingerprints on the wreckage, because the damage takes the form of things that simply never happen. The factory not built. The founder who took the idea to Singapore. The pension fund in Toronto that quietly trimmed its Australian weighting and moved on without a word.None of it bleeds in the quarterly figures. None of it can be undone by the next ministerial press release.

Confidence, once a country starts spending it, turns out to be the one form of capital no treasurer can borrow back. Somewhere on a screen in Tokyo or Seoul, Australia has already moved a few places down the list. No announcement. No media conference. Just a lower number beside a country that should know better.

Australia is going to get relatively poorer for several years ahead, because the big government team is ascendant — high taxes to pay for all those jobs and welfare for its supporters.

The current government makes the Hawke and Howard years look brilliant in comparison. We’re back at Whitlam-level craziness. Like many third word rulers, the Whitlam Government apparently didn’t understand sovereign risk.