When did normal become ‘far-right’? By Daryl Maher in The Spectator.
Today, far-right is apparently anybody who disagrees with the Prime Minister. Raise concerns about migration, ethnicity, or religion and you risk being treated not as someone to be answered, but as someone on a conveyor belt to extremism. …
Rape has become third-world-migrant-coded, so now it’s outside the Overton window:
When I investigated the issue, many Western countries where the ruling elites have indulged in mass migration have seen a massive increase in rape, yet the entire topic is taboo. I wouldn’t even know had I not investigated for myself.
Rape statistics are one of the few statistical areas that comes with an army of apologists trying to say that it’s really not as bad as it looks. Spoilers: it is. Even counting the #MeToo effect, higher recording, and even changes in the law. …
Discussing this isn’t far-right, it’s a reasonable concern of normal people. If my Indian Grandmother was aware of this situation, she would be asking questions too. But somewhere along the line, we stopped caring about rape. It is one of the most astounding developments in modernity.
Antisemitism has become left-coded, so we can talk about that). But of course concern about Islam and third world immigration has become right-coded, so it’s outside the Overton window:
Concerns over the rise in antisemitism is also, apparently, something that the ‘far-right’ are concerned by. Even after a terrorist attack, our own Prime Minister was often reluctant to use the term Islamic Terrorism. …
Again, it is not an extremist position to ask why the Albanese regime continues to bring in high numbers of migrants from countries where antisemitic sentiment is not only rife, it is commonplace.
Asking why this has happened isn’t far-right, it’s a reasonable concern of normal people. …
Warning system:
We know where this is headed. Thanks to Google’s YouTube and Elon Musk’s X we can all see what is happening in the UK. For now, anyway. …
Asking why the media isn’t sounding the alarm isn’t ‘far-right’, at this stage, it’s a survival impulse. In fact, the deeper question is why the media seems to be silent about the proven impacts of importing cultures that are historically and provably hostile to our own.
And just in case there was anybody left who still thought we lived in a democracy, ask yourself how a party with a primary vote of 32.58 per cent could drag us to the brink of being permanently divided by race.
Permanent division by race? I think the author is referring to migration, ethnicity, or religion, not The Voice. Though he might be.