Election fraud evidence significant, cases dismissed only on legal process grounds. By David Clements, law professor at New Mexico State University, interviewed by Patrick Delaney.

A business law professor at New Mexico State University (NMSU), [David Clements], said that anyone who proposes there “is no evidence” for massive election fraud in November’s presidential election doesn’t know what they are talking about. …

For those who believe “there is no evidence, you don’t know what you are talking about,” he said. “I’ve reviewed hours upon hours of public hearings. I have read almost all of the lawsuits that are out there. Most of them were dismissed on legal process grounds.”

These suits, he said, were dismissed due to a legal lack of standing. “The general argument” that was presented in these cases, he said, “was that because this was a general harm,” then “you have no standing because your harm has to be particular. It’s not because there isn’t evidence. There is evidence,” the professor emphasized.

“In fact, I’m in possession of 574 pages of sworn affidavits, forensic reports, all of which would make its way in a court of law under the rules of evidence in a federal or state court. The fact that the evidence has not been heard here by these courts” should not be conflated into “this idea that there is no evidence,” Clements argued.

“The courts have done what they always do,” Clements explained. “When you have political matters, they want them to be decided politically, not in a court room, but through the elections, through the state legislatures.”

However, he observed, the main problem was that “we have a bunch of cowards. We have judges who are cowards, we have politicians that are cowards, and that’s the reality.”

Clements … encouraged all “to look at the evidence, [including] sworn affidavits where people face 10 to 15 years of prison time if they commit perjury, and statistical analysis that just flies in the face of this idea that there was no fraud in this election.”

There are two new foundational lies of the left: that Biden won the 2020 presidential election, and that Trump incited the Capitol Riot. No disagreement will be allowed. The media and political correctness will enforce these two lies so strictly that after a few years you will have forgotten that they are lies. Disagreement will dissolve away, because it can never be repeated in public. Thus lies will become “facts” that “everyone knows”.