Queensland: Vaccine mandates for police and ambulance drivers ruled a breach of human rights

Queensland: Vaccine mandates for police and ambulance drivers ruled a breach of human rights. By Joanne Nova.

Two years after police and ambulance drivers were forced to get Covid injections, the Queensland Supreme Court has ruled that the vaccine mandates were unlawful. …

This follows on from a South Australian decision a few weeks ago where the Employment Tribunal found that an employer (the state government) was liable for any injuries caused to staff by mandatory injections required in the workplace.

First excess death inquiry in the world … maybe:

And possibly related to all this, in 2022 10,000 Australians died above and beyond the normal rate and no one (officially) knows why. The Australian Senate has decided (on the fourth try, and only by one vote) they can say for sure someone should definitely look into this. This banal, but good outcome was possibly a parliamentary world first — which says a lot about the state of democracies around the world because the same odd patterns of deaths is occurring in pretty much every democracy.

The Labor Party and Greens voted against it, presumably being worried about industrial relations but fine with dead bodies. …

Justice delayed is justice denied:

Some 200 police in the state were suspended due to non-compliance. The decision to force medical experiments on employees was made in January 2022. So here we are living in a legal swamp where it’s taken two long years to find out what is “lawful”. … And the government may yet appeal, which means, in the fullness of millions of dollars perhaps the unlawful will become lawful again. …

Some people were put through hell for believing (correctly) that they had the legal right to choose what they inject. They lost their jobs and went through two years of stress, fear and lost income. A few others who took the vaccine may have had their own kind of hell, depending on whether they had side effects. …

Priorities revealed:

In the world we thought we lived in, if a major new experimental drug was rolled out in an emergency, in a nation with 22 million mobile phones, satellites and 100,000 bureaucrats, you’d think batches would have been tracked, results collected and within a few months our Minister of Health would be able to release safety data for all of us to see. Instead, we got nothing.

Remember the big Queensland vaccine trail that was supposed to follow 10,000 people for five years? The QoVax trial gave the illusion the government cared, but mysteriously ran out of funding after just one year.

Somehow, the Australian government was happy to spend $17 billion on Australia’s vaccine and treatment of Covid 19, yet wouldn’t spend 0.5% of that checking whether the vaccines were safe.

In war and pandemics, the rulers — often with the assumed consent of most of the governed — simply ignore the written law. Worry about it later. The law scarcely applies in a perceived emergency.