Unhinged on Ivermectin
by David Archibald
29 August 2021
I have a friend on the east coast who has been successful in business and life, but now ivermectin has sent him off the deep end. He has the quaint, old-fashioned view that health authorities in Australia and globally have our best interests at heart. So if our health authorities are pushing leaky vaccines with all their might, then we should be grateful for them. A week ago he sent me this article on the FDA, saying “You are not a cow”. The FDA doesn’t like people circumventing their leaky vaccines by repurposing cheap drugs from agriculture.
So I replied with an email noting that the FDA had previously said “You are not a horse,” which contained an image of someone dressed as a doctor fondling a horse as part of their anti-ivermectin disinformation campaign:
Powerful anti-ivermectin image from the FDA
Also, in an attempt to show him another point of view, I included the latest missive from Professor Robert Clancy who is Australia’s most distinguished clinical immunologist. Professor Clancy is very much in favour of using ivermectin against the virus.
So my friend came back with an article by the government propaganda unit, saying that the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) “has detected increased importation and prescribing of Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19”. The TGA maintains that ivermectin has
No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease and a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
With respect to the first claim, as the Bible says “There are none so blind as those who will not see.” Or hear — the TGA could pick up the phone and have a conversation with Professor Clancy, if they were interested. But they are willfully blind to evidence and Australians suffer as a result.
With respect to the TGA’s second claim that ivermectin is unsafe — well that is just an outright lie. India got its last covid wave under control using ivermectin tablets of 12 mg each. The biggest doses delivered to human individuals have been 2,000 mg at a time — with no ill effect apart from the clearance of all the dead parasites from their bodies. That dose is 166 times greater than the standard dose rate for the virus. In medical terms, ivermectin has a therapeutic window so wide you could drive a truck through it. There is no potential penalty for the TGA for misleading the Australian people.
So my reply to that was, “You know what you have set yourself up for? A continuous stream of ivermectin news. Things like this.” In that video, the Chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association says:
In Africa if we compare countries distributing ivermectin once a year with countries which do not distribute ivermectin, I mean they don’t give ivermectin to prevent Covid but to prevent parasitic diseases, but anyway if we look at Covid numbers in countries that give ivermectin, the number of cases is 134.4 per 100,000 and the number of deaths is 2.2 per 100,000.
Now Africa countries which do not distribute ivermectin have 950.6 cases per 100,000 and 29.3 deaths per 100,000. I believe the difference is clear. Of course, one cannot conclude that ivermectin is effective only on the basis of these figures but when we have all these elements, we cannot say that ivermectin is absolutely not effective, at least not me. We can do other studies to confirm its efficacy, but we are in a crisis situation. With regard to the use of ivermectin, it is obviously necessary to obtain the informed consent of the patients and I think we’re in a situation where we can afford to give them this treatment.
Evidence-based medicine was too much for my friend and so he sent me this missive today:
Sadly whether you are a crack pot anti vaxer or not, you are helping them spread their anti-science misinformation and so you count in my mind as an anti vaxer.
Your friends are now committing the equivalent of treason in Melbourne. En masse they are now making vaccination appointments for late in the day and then not turning up. Their perverted anti science hope is that because it is late in the day, that the vaccines will have to be thrown out.
To me that should be a treasonable offence. A firing squad would be too good for them.
They are putting my grandchildrens’ lives at risk, hoping to delay the time by which vaccination can be offered to children.
Your friends, the groups to whom you are inadvertently lending support with your anti science retoric, are becoming truly evil.
In short, he has become completely unhinged. Ivermectin has challenged his world view and caused great discordance.
But let’s stick with the theme of people who are truly evil. That would include the nasty psychopath known as Bill Gates. Bill Gates used to hang around with the pedophile and blackmailer Jeffrey Epstein, but that is only one facet of this dark-hearted creature.
Bill Gates believes in global warming and that is enough excuse for him to indulge in fantasies of eradicating his fellow humans. Observe this short TED talk from 2010. At the 2.00 minute mark he started talking about using a vaccine to control the world’s population. That is followed at the 3.20 minute mark by talking about his one wish, which turns out to be a vaccine — which he describes as “something I love.”
It appears from the video that the vaccine he speaks of is one intended to cause infertility. How people will be encouraged to take such a vaccine was not explained. And that begs the question of how Bill Gates thought he was going to get people to take something that obviously wasn’t good for them.
In October 2019, Bill Gates’ foundation was behind ‘Event 201’ which was about managing the media around a viral pandemic. The pandemic started the following month. This in turn brought attention to Mr Gates’ misanthropic wish. This has been explained away as meaning that healthier, vaccinated children will mean that parents will breed fewer of them. But if we go back further in time we find this: The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation.
This is the meaning of the word ‘vaccine’ as per Bill Gates’ usage — something that would cause permanent infertility. Has his wish been granted with the current crop of Covid vaccines? Take this statement in a document by Michael Yeadon, distinguished ex-Pfizer researcher:
Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Synctin-1 which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses. There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.
So the question is: Do antibodies produced by the vaccines block Synctin-1? Pfizer et al. may or may not know. Either way, they are not telling us. Why would you trust vaccines from people who hate humanity anyway? Like Mr Gates, the father of the virus, Fauci, is also an eco-loon. In a September 2020 paper he said “COVID-19 … should force us to begin to think in earnest and collectively about living in more thoughtful and creative harmony with nature.’
Is the rush to vaccinate people as fast as possible designed to do as much damage as possible, before the side effects become widely known? My friend in the east should not be in a rush to have his grandchildren vaccinated. He may not get to have great-grandchildren.
David Archibald is the author of The Anticancer Garden in Australia