Global Warming and the Virus

Global Warming and the Virus

by David Archibald

8 October 2020


To recap briefly, the French Government paid for the building of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in an attempt to ingratiate themselves with the Chicom dictatorship. Upon completion, the Chicoms let only one Frenchman into the building. The US, and some other countries, used to do ‘gain of function’ research which is another way of saying they were trying to make deadly viruses yet more deadly. Because of lab mishaps, gain of function research was outlawed in the US.

In 2014 the Obama regime sent US$3.7 million to the Wuhan lab at the direction of Dr Fauci. This is why the US consulate in Wuhan visited the lab a number of times and wrote reports complaining about the poor biosecurity standards there. Why the US would fund such research in China that was too dangerous to conduct in the US has yet to be explained.

An explanation might be found in this co-authored article in Cell, in which Fauci opines “Living in greater harmony with nature will require changes in human behaviour as well as other radical changes that may take decades to achieve”. There are a number of other sentences like it in the Cell article. So Fauci is a deranged, Gaia-worshipping lefty in charge of a US Government agency. As an eco-loon he is in the league of Bill Gates, who wants to use a vaccine to control population.

A lab mishap duly occurred at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Satellite imagery shows road blocks around the lab on 6th to 11 October, 2019. This is supported by US mapping of mobile phone traffic which showed a reduction in traffic from the affected building. The Russians realised that troop movements could be mapped by the US from mobile phone data so Putin banned Russian troops from carrying mobile phones a week later.

The virus spread.

Zinc is known to inhibit viral replication. Doctors in Wuhan remembered a 2014 paper that showed that chloroquine is a zinc ionophore and found that it worked in treating infected patients. On May 22, 2020, medical journal The Lancet joyously published a paper stating that chloroquine doesn’t work. Medical authorities around the world reacted by withdrawing chloroquine from treatment of the Wuhan virus. Death rates spiked up dramatically about two weeks later. This is illustrated by the experience in Switzerland, as shown by the following graphic from France Soir:

The grey-shaded area is the period of increased deaths in Switzerland due to the study in The Lancet. The death rate dropped 13 days after the resumption of dispensing chloroquine. That was just Switzerland. It has been estimated that the fatwa against chloroquine resulted in 80,000 deaths around the world.

Another hit job was attempted on the diabetic drug metformin, which had also been found to be effective against the Wuhan virus. From down in the comments it is noted that “hydroxychloroquine did show excellent results just for prophylaxis of diabetes” in a paper from April, 2019. So it seems that diabetic drugs are effective against the Wuhan virus, perhaps all of them. This is due to reduced conversion of sugars to fat. Chloroquine combines that effect with being a zinc ionophore.

The lesson from all that is that medical researchers are quite happy to cause the deaths of tens of thousands, if you cross their palms with silver. So you can imagine how readily climate scientists can keep up their fraud — nobody dies straight away, and they may not be proved wrong for decades.


[Additional notes on this at the bottom here.]

David Archibald is the author of The Anticancer Garden in Australia.