Islamists Get Kids-Glove Treatment

Islamists Get Kids-Glove Treatment. By Chris Kenny.

AFL footballer Jeremy Finlayson has been publicly shamed and will not play for Port Adelaide over the next three rounds because he slurred an opponent as a “f****t” last week.

Without excusing the homophobic language, it is worth pointing out that Finlayson apologised promptly, privately and publicly, and that the word was so recently mainstream that it was sung in a worldwide No.1 pop song in the mid-1980s.

Meanwhile other Australians have chanted “Gas the Jews” or “Where’s the Jews?” and celebrated the October 7 atrocities, as did Sheik Ibrahim Dadoun, as a “day of courage, a day of pride, a day of victory” and “the day we’ve been waiting for”, while other Muslim preachers have denounced Jews as “descendants of pigs and monkeys”. Yet the hate merchants face no sanction.

The contrast in our national response speaks volumes about our warped priorities and the cowardice of our leadership. The politically easy, convenient or fashionable causes are tackled with an iron fist, but Islamist extremism gets the kid-gloves treatment. …

Look at the way Victorian police used rubber bullets, riot gear and pepper spray against vaccine-mandate protesters during the pandemic, and NSW police cracked down hard and broke up lockdown protests. Yet anti-Israel and pro-Hamas protesters are ushered along, including on Sydney streets when they were intent on defiling a public memorial to slain Jews that was to be projected on the Opera House sails.

As a country we do the easy bits with gusto — welcoming migrants and championing our multicultural harmony — but we fail when it comes to the hard challenges like calling out those who undermine our values or intimidate their fellow citizens. It is now more than two decades since 9/11 and we have weathered Bali, London, the Lindt Cafe siege and a dozen other domestic terror attacks taking more than a dozen lives, yet we still have leaders who try to pretend this away with woolly words. …

We need a new ruling class:

We need leaders who will draw red lines and promise action when they are crossed. Threatening Jewish communities or celebrating their massacre is crossing a line, as is preaching hatred or making excuses for armed jihad.

Meanwhile an Islamists knifes a Christian preacher in Sydney and the ABC cannot bring itself to mention that the assailant is a Muslim saying “Allahu Akbar”. The police arrest two Christians who said they would like to kill the assailant. But the hate preachers? Oh give them a government grant.

Britain is further advanced:

Why don’t the police enforce the law and protect British citizens by arresting those who assault them? Oh, Islam. Read the sorry saga here.

Trump made us realize that the US stopped being a democracy decades ago

Trump made us realize that the US stopped being a democracy decades ago. By Bruce Bawer.

During those nine years [since Donald Trump announced his candidacy for US President], his name and image have dominated not just American political discourse but the entirety of American culture, and even world culture, in a way that may well be without precedent in the entire history of the Republic. …

Trump didn’t become iconic by presiding over an economic crisis or prosecuting a major war; he became iconic by doing something that no president before him had ever done: he took on the establishments of both major political parties, told some harsh truths about the ways in which those establishments had betrayed the American people and their Constitution, and rooted his presidential campaigns, and his entire term in office, in a determination to restore to the people the kind of government that the Founders had intended.

In doing so, he also became an emblematic figure for people around the world whose own governments were betraying the freedoms on which they had been founded. …

Let’s take up the story in 1990, when the great re-alignment of political parties started:

Why was our government spending blood and treasure to fight Islamic enemies in the Middle East even as unpleasant but strategically relevant facts about Islam were being systematically scrubbed from military and intelligence training manuals, insufficiently vetted Muslim immigrants were being welcomed to America in huge numbers, and politicians of both parties (with the unwavering aid of the legacy media) were constantly reassuring us that Islam was a religion of peace?

Meanwhile, what had once been the Steel Belt – a region of cities that, thanks to their booming manufacturing sectors, had previously been populated by some of the most affluent factory workers on the planet – was gradually being transformed into the Rust Belt, as jobs were exported en masse to China, Mexico, and elsewhere. Politically, these blue-collar workers were left high and dry.

The Democrats (once the party of labor, or at least of labor unions) were now more interested in cultivating certain minority groups who were officially considered to be oppressed. As the party moved from traditional liberalism to something that bore an uncomfortable resemblance to Communism, it also increasingly became the political home of corporate bigwigs and other high-income types who’d been brainwashed at elite colleges by far-left professors.

As for the members of the Republican establishment, the large-scale betrayal of decent, hard-working middle Americans mattered less to them than the lower prices of goods that were now being produced by underpaid drudges in China and Mexico.

Meanwhile, both parties were perfectly happy with mass illegal immigration — the Democrats because they wanted the votes, the Republicans because this phenomenon meant the suppression of wages for low-skilled jobs.

Enter Trump:

For blue-collar voters who’d been financially ruined by the drastic decline of American manufacturing, Trump was a godsend — a politician who, unlike the entire Washington establishment, was actually on their side. And for those of us who hadn’t really been paying much attention to the plight of those blue-collar voters, Trump was an eye-opener.

Among other things, he made some of us recognize for the first time the extent to which, in practice, the two parties were, to a remarkable extent, one.

I remember not so many years ago seeing a photograph of George W. Bush in a cozy moment with Hillary Clinton. I can’t stand either of them, but I have to admit, to my great embarrassment, that my reaction to the picture at the time was to admire the ability of political opponents to treat each other not just with respect but with what looked like genuine affection.

 

 

Today, needless to say, I see that picture in an entirely different light. It’s a picture of two people who were and are part of the same exclusive club, who have profited (and whose families have profited) from the same system, and who, while supporting different candidates in elections, were content with the results so long as the winners were reliable insiders who had no intention of trying to change the game.

It was, as I say, Trump who opened the eyes of millions of us to this sordid, cynical reality. Some of us may have been at least somewhat aware of the extent to which America’s government was in the hands of a permanent Deep State, and some of us may even have recognized just how much of a betrayal this was of the Constitution and of the people.

But Trump, with his passionate denunciations of the Swamp, focused our attention on this outrage. He forced us to realize that for a long time it hadn’t really mattered all that much whom we voted into national office, given that a significant amount of the real power in Washington was actually in the hands of the executive departments, the intelligence community, and agencies like the IRS. This was why the issues that really mattered to American voters — such as mass immigration and the mass export of blue-collar jobs — had consistently been ignored by both parties and unmentioned in campaign speeches.

But it wasn’t just Trump who opened our eyes. So did his enemies. The desperate effort by Obama, the Clintons, and their cronies to tie him to Russia — a charge that was ridiculous on the face of it, but that was pushed by the media without surcease — only served, in the end, to show just how much of a threat to their power they recognized him to be.

Ditto the unprecedented attacks on Trump, even while he was in office, by military and intelligence officials who were technically under his command. The two baseless impeachments of Trump, the raid on Mar-a-Lago, the blizzard of ridiculous prosecutions directed at him, and the attempt by New York’s attorney general to seize his properties all underscored both the political establishment’s desperation to remove him from the chessboard and the nakedly undemocratic lengths to which public officials all over the country and at every level are willing to go in order to preserve the Deep State in its current form. …

All of these events showed just how much contempt the Democratic elites have for the white working-class Americans who dare to recognize in Donald Trump a champion of the people and of America’s founding values. And nothing reflected that contempt more powerfully than a single word uttered by Hillary Clinton in 2016: “deplorables.”

Trump and his movement, say his enemies, represent a “threat to our democracy.” The fact is that Trump is the symbol of everything that stands in the way of the efforts by the legacy media and social-media giants (X excepted), as well as by the United Nations, European Union, World Economic Forum, and other international organizations, to undermine democracy — by, among other things, silencing dissent from the progressive agenda and plotting to remove beef from our diets, deny us air travel, and confine us to “fifteen-minute cities.”

In short, the very people who label Trump a “threat to our democracy” are the ones who are intent on dismantling democracy — not just in America but throughout what we used to call the free world. Take Justin Trudeau’s freezing of the bank accounts of truckers who protested the COVID lockdowns. Note how British police give free rein to protestors who call for Jewish genocide but arrest patriots who dare to wave the Union Jack. And witness what happened just the other day in Brussels, where local authorities sent a battalion of police to close down a gathering of top-flight conservative leaders from around Europe, including Nigel Farage, Éric Zemmour, and Viktor Orbán.

When did the US stop being democratic?

For many of us, the chilling abuses of power by left-wingers who are determined to bury the MAGA movement and its international counterparts haven’t just led us to worry about the present and future of American freedom. They’ve caused us to wonder just how free we’ve really been during the last half-century or so.

It was in 1961 that Eisenhower gave his Farewell Address. He was succeeded by John F. Kennedy, who among other things wanted to shutter the CIA, which he recognized as having gotten out of control. He was assassinated in 1963. The Warren Commission, which concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald was the killer of JFK and had acted alone, was the ultimate Deep State entity, consisting of the Chief Justice, the head of the CIA, the former head of the World Bank, two Congressmen, and two veteran Senators. Over the years, Roger Stone and other investigators have not only shown the Warren Commission’s conclusions to be utterly at odds with mountains of evidence but have also provided a great deal of information in support of the hypothesis that the murder was, in fact, the ultimate Deep State crime, involving LBJ, the CIA, and the FBI.

There are those who, reading backwards from the current treatment of Trump by his powerful enemies, now say that the JFK assassination was the moment when the free Republic that Eisenhower spoke of with such reverence and concern in his Farewell Address underwent a dramatic behind-the-scenes transformation. …

Yes, we’ve always known that American history, like all of human history, has been full of corruption: the 1919 World Series was fixed; any number of elections, including, famously, the one that first sent LBJ to Congress, were rigged; everybody knows that JFK won in 1960 because the Mob took care of Illinois and LBJ took care of Texas. But although most of us maintained a healthy American cynicism about professional politicians and big government, we still basically trusted the system and believed that our votes (usually) counted. No, the U.S. government was scarcely perfect. But what human institution is? …

Trump’s role:

But it was the advent of Trump, and the extraordinary scale of the campaign to take him down, that made many of us realize the degree to which our leaders in Washington had rejected the dictates of the Constitution. …

Trump transformed the political scene, and there’s no going back. It’s beyond strange these days to try to read most of the veteran inside-the-Beltway commentators, both Democrat and Republican, because they genuinely seem to believe — or to hope against hope — that somehow the clock can be turned back, the genie put back in the box, and pre-Trump politics as usual restored.

Such thoughts are nothing short of delusional. Tens of millions of decent, patriotic Americans are not magically going to unlearn what they’ve learned in the last nine years. They’re not going to forget the vile lies, poisonous acts, and outright treason of Obama, the Clintons, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, Rachel Maddow, John Brennan, Merrick Garland, Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayoras, and a host of others.

They’re not going to go back to believing in the good faith of the D.C. establishment any more than you and I are going to go back to believing in Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny.

Because Trump did indeed effect nothing less than a revolution — a revolution of the American mind and heart and soul. He woke us up. He educated us, in a way that a teacher with a more sober and restrained classroom manner would never have been able to do. He showed us who our leaders really are and showed us who we, if we dare to take heart and take action, might be. He encouraged us — inspired us — to take our country back, all the while believing in its principles, its history, and (in spite of everything) its enduring promise.

A reader notes:

The great majority still think they’re in western democracies. The forms are maintained, of course: elections, Punch-and-Judy shows in parliaments, MSM talk shows and newspapers and other discussions all frantically taking place within the Overton Window.

Behind it all, behind the curtain, the big money gets what it pays for and the plebs are no more represented than I’m the Flying Dutchman. It’s a complete illusion.

Maybe people will eventually wake up to this, but I don’t think so. Most people don’t want to think. They want to be told what to do.

Once the digital panopticon is in place it’ll be too late, even if they do figure it out.

It’s always darkest before dawn.

The New System of Government

The New System of Government. From an article by Rod Dreher about the recent conservatives conference in Brussels (which is an instructive saga in its own right, at the link):

In his NatCon speech, Tom Vandendriessche, a Flemish MEP, quoted former European Commission head Jean-Claude Juncker, who once told a German journalist how the EU elites work:

“We decide on something, leave it lying around and wait and see what happens. If no one kicks up a fuss, because most people don’t understand what has been decided, we continue step by step until there is no turning back.”

Stephen Harper:

This tells us that we must protest indefatigably and make life uncomfortable for those who would rule us with woke. Otherwise it is we who will have the increasingly uncomfortable life.

hat-tip Stephen Harper

The CIA gives them “the talk”: Congressional capture

The CIA gives them “the talk”: Congressional capture. By Scott Adams.

If I correctly understand our system of government, when a president or leader in the Congress gets into office, someone in the CIA pulls them aside for “the talk” and completely changes their priorities.

The public is then told the leaders now have secret knowledge the public can never know.

But the leader has no way of knowing the “secret” information is true and in context.

That puts the secret-keepers in firm control of the government’s big decisions. If the secret-keepers agree with a government policy, they stay out of it. If they disagree with a policy, they say the UFOs will attack — or some other unverifiable thing — and by the way, we have recordings of every phone call you ever made, and scare the leaders into compliance.

Right in front of us. None of this is secret.

Revolver:

[US House Speaker Mike Johnson] entered the DC Swamp roaring like a MAGA lion and emerged whispering like an establishment RINO. The transformation is so obvious, it’s impossible to miss. …

So, what exactly is “Congressional capture” that Snowden speaks of, and how does it work? Well, it’s simple in theory but can be quite complex in practice, shaping itself around each politician.

In short, “Congressional capture” is when lawmakers or legislative bodies fall under the heavy influence of outside interests, like big corporations, special interest groups, or US intel. These influences ensure that their agendas take precedence over the public’s needs.

In simple terms, this means certain policies or laws that favor these groups are advanced, while criticism or resistance is quietly suppressed. Suddenly, their most ferocious critics become their biggest cheerleaders.

About Steve Bannon:

Steve Bannon has been sounding the alarm on the Deep State players since day one. Reading his next comments, in regards to Speaker Johnson, it’s hard not to feel that gut punch of disgust and frustration as he lays it out: “America last, American citizens DEAD LAST.” It’s downright maddening to watch these RINOs betray us over and over.

The Secret Retreats That Have CEOs, VIPs and Billionaires Jockeying for Invites

The Secret Retreats That Have CEOs, VIPs and Billionaires Jockeying for Invites. By Sara Ashely O’Brien in the WSJ.

Musk and others attending the Weekend, and gatherings like it, get to exist for a brief time in a buffered safe space where CEOs, celebrities, athletes and political leaders know that no one will tweet a photo of them working out or waiting in line for Champagne.

They are invitation-only, and attendees often arrive via private jet and tinted-out SUVs. The talks are off the record. No one who goes cares what it costs.

 

 

It has been 40-plus years since Allen & Co. put on its first so-called summer camp for the billionaire set in Sun Valley, Idaho, now an executive’s rite of passage, and more and smaller and intimate ultra-VIP conferences are exploding on the scene — from media mogul and venture investor Jeffrey Katzenberg’s in Montecito, Calif., to restaurateur Danny Meyer’s in Tuscany. There are new ones popping up nearly every month. …

Move over, Davos:

The newer events make the World Economic Forum’s Davos — with its pop-up media spaces and Getty photographers scattered about — look like a Vegas trade expo. …

The gatherings have taken place in New York, Japan, Australia, France and the U.K. …

At last year’s Slopes, which attendees call the cool Sun Valley, Margot Robbie swapped her Barbie pink for black to be jointly interviewed with Mattel CEO Ynon Kreiz by LionTree Chairman and CEO Aryeh Bourkoff. Bourkoff has been one of the most prolific dealmakers in media, including as a lead banker in AT&T’s 2022 $85 billion spinoff of Warner Media to Discovery. This year, Lionel Richie performed.

The market is finally beginning to signal the end of the forty-year everything bubble

The market is finally beginning to signal the end of the forty-year everything bubble. By QTR’s Fringe Finance, via ZeroHedge.

Background: The current bubble of rapidly increasing money supply started in 1982, after the inflation of the 1970s was quelled. The private sector created the money through the banking system until it stalled in 2008, creating the global financial crisis (GFC). Then  government largely took over the heavy lifting of rapid monetary growth, so the right people could continue getting rapidly rich. Now that, too, is stalling. Your life is about to change.

Gold is the old money. It is signalling a large problem developing.

The gold mining stocks still have not provided any leverage to the price of gold. In fact, in the first quarter they did not even keep pace with the increase in the price of gold. With gold up 8.1% in the quarter, the gold mining indices were up 2%.

Typically, gold miners provide 2x to 3x leverage in terms of returns; so with gold up 8%, the miners would typically have been up 16% to 24%. This supports our thesis that the miners are still undervalued and are going to mean revert with a vengeance as this bull market in gold continues. The gold mining shares have a long way to go before they reflect fair value. …

Gold, Silver and Bitcoin are reacting to both that recent intervention plus front running the next round of money printing or monetary accommodation that will occur in the coming crisis (and given the debt load, the next crisis could be massive).

This move in sound money assets is different.

This is best demonstrated in the chart below which shows the price of gold compared to the “real yield” on the U.S. 10 Year bond (inverted). Note that the “real yield” is the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond minus the current expectation for average inflation rates over the next 10 years. For example, today the 10 year treasuries are yielding about 4.5%, and 10-year inflation swaps are priced at ~2.5%, reflecting the expectation that inflation will average 2.5% for the next ten years. (we don’t think it will). This leads to a “real yield” of 2% as shown in the chart below.

 

 

One of the long-standing relationships in finance is that when real yields are higher, gold is less attractive. Gold pays no yield, but it protects against debasement. When real yields are positive or trending positive, gold suffers. When real yields are negative or trending negative, gold does well. Note the tight correlation from 2006 to 2020 in the chart below.

Now, the important point is to look at what happened starting in 2022. Due to the Federal Reserve’s rate hiking campaign, real yields have gone up substantially and YET, gold went up!

In our opinion this is a huge clue. Something is different. We believe the gold market is sniffing out the global debt and fiscal problems that are present in the United States and that it is anticipating future monetary debasement. …

Given this dramatic de-coupling of the price of gold from the underlying trend in real yields/interest rates, we cannot help but wonder: have conditions changed such that the Fed is impotent and interest rates no longer have such a strong impact on the price of gold?…

The change in the gold price behavior, when compared to real interest rates, demonstrates the economic conversation is changing. Broadly speaking, the narrative is shifting, and the mainstream financial world and investment markets are waking up …

The entire world is coming to understand that the Fed is trapped and will soon be forced into additional monetary accommodation. The U.S. Government’s Fiscal situation is out of control, and people and investors are losing trust. Many people sense that something is wrong, and they are moving to protect themselves. Remember that the faith in the dollar, as opposed to gold, is based upon trust in the U.S. Government. As the schedule below shows, the government is not doing too well in the trust department.

 

 

We wondered who the 20% were and then we were reminded that the government employs about 20% of the population. …

Perhaps all of the awareness that we described above is because it is very hard to ignore the math and the recent headlines like the one below from March 4, 2024:

 

 

Keep in mind that this is all with a relatively healthy economy and stock market. If the debt were to continue to grow at this rate, it … would imply an annualized growth rate of 10.7% in the total debt burden. Annual debt growth of 10.7% compares very unfavorably to estimated GDP growth of 2.0-2.5%.

GDP funds the interest payments on the debt and this is why the math is unrelenting. Something has to give. …

Tthe Biden Administration just proposed a spending budget of $7.3 Trillion for fiscal 2025 which represents a 13% increase in spending. Keep in mind that tax revenues in fiscal 2023 were only $4.4 Trillion.

Coming soon: naked printing.

The Federal Reserve is clearly trapped. …

We are beginning to think that Fed Policy does NOT matter anymore.

  • If the Fed doesn’t cut rates, something blows up and then we get a massive rate reduction and the big print.
  • If Powell does cut rates, he keeps the game going but at the cost of higher inflation.

The markets have taken away the car keys from the reckless teenager: The Fed. …

Our conclusion: the Fed and its banks, sooner or later, will provide more monetary accommodation or the entire debt structure will collapse. That is just math. Now, they will do everything they can to mask it, deny it, or create programs that they claim are not “money printing” … But, they will have to print money or else the system will collapse. The gold and bitcoin prices demonstrate that the markets know this.

This might seem arcane and far away now, but soon it will be much closer. The resulting financial upheaval will blow away most other news into irrelevance.

Trump Legal Team Skeptical About Impartiality Of Juror Number Six

Trump Legal Team Skeptical About Impartiality Of Juror Number Six. By the Babylon Bee.

Matt Margolis at PJ Media:

Do you remember when Sunny Hostin of “The View” said she was worried about Trump supporters who may “sneak onto the jury” by claiming they hate Trump but insisting they can be impartial Apparently, the real problem is the opposite.

On Wednesday evening, Fox News’ Jesse Watters was discussing the criminal case against Trump over his non-disclosure agreement with Stormy Daniels and how the process has been rigged against him, and he brought up how liberal activists are trying to sneak onto the jury. …

They are catching undercover liberal activists lying to the judge. They’re saying, ‘Oh, have you ever said anything on social media about Donald Trump?’ ‘No, I can’t remember.’ ‘Well, what about this post where you said he should be in prison?’ ‘Oh yeah, that one.’ ‘Strike!’ and they keep throwing these undercovers at him.”

“And thank God they’re doing the research on these people so far,” he added.

Naturally the media is instead dwelling on Trump’s complaint that lying leftist activists tried to get onto his jury. Trump thereby supposedly broke a gag order imposed on him — so fair!

 

The Robin Hood Effect

The Robin Hood Effect. By J.B. Shurk at American Thinker.

Citizens are increasingly seeing through the lies Western governments regularly tell their populations in order to buttress their authority and maintain effective social control.

As awful as COVID’s lockdowns and other rank authoritarian mandates were, they proved salubrious in educating the public as to how government institutions (including health agencies) fabricate scientific evidence and betray basic medical ethics in pursuit of broader totalitarian agendas.

Part of the heightened pushback to expensive “green energy” directives and farming regulations stems from enhanced public awareness that Western governments flood the information space with fake news meant to justify more expansive and intrusive government control. …

The Robin Hood effect:

If governments enforce reasonable laws in an impartial way, conscientious citizens will dutifully comply. The criminal code becomes an integral part of the social mores that guide an individual’s behavior and expectation of behavior from others.

When law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and courts are instead seen as applying criminal statutes in an unequal, discriminatory, and malicious fashion, then the legal system is understood as nothing more than a partisan political weapon. Once such legitimacy is lost, it is not easily restored. In fact, corrupt legal systems tend to produce a “Robin Hood” effect, in which the moral stigma of being an outlaw disappears.

The U.S. and other Western governments have so eroded the public’s trust in their respective criminal justice systems that they risk mobilizing “Robin Hood” resistance forces on a national scale.

 

 

Immigration:

Throughout the West, significant budget expenditures are utilized to aid and abet illegal immigration. Government offices assist foreign nationals in skirting existing work rules, identification requirements, and other domestic laws. Meanwhile, when law-abiding citizens object to such flagrant criminality, police officers and prosecutors in too many jurisdictions direct their resources toward punishing the locals for violating some vague prohibition against “hate speech.” Dissent is criminalized so that officers of the law can participate in ongoing criminal conspiracies without the burden of exerting any effort to conceal their culpability. …

A dispassionate observer might conclude that State agents are involved in a criminal conspiracy meant to keep blue-collar wages low, while sustaining hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballot recipients who may influence public policy by voting illegally. Democrat politicians in Denver parrot the same Orwellian language used in other crime-sponsoring jurisdictions by insisting that illegal aliens be called “newcomers.” When government agents employ euphemisms to hide their own criminal activities, honest citizens take note. …

Fraudulent elections:

The fact that public officials break the law so shamelessly adds to the widespread perception in the United States that elections are rigged. For decades, American citizens have called for secure elections that ensure that only legally permitted voters cast ballots. Instead, politicians and election officials in too many states have worked to limit photo identification and signature verification requirements.

They have transformed Election Day into Election Season — providing political operatives the time to collect ballots for weeks both before and after important contests. And they have taken advantage of COVID hysteria to normalize the use of mail-in ballots. With many states running elections as nothing more than ballot-gathering operations in which political partisans print and mail millions of untracked ballots for their political allies to fill out and return, elections have never been more vulnerable to fraud. Unlike elections outside the United States, American elections are not transparent, timely, or reproducible.

When hundreds of thousands of concerned citizens showed up in D.C. to protest for free and fair elections on January 6, 2021, however, the same criminal officials who condone fraudulent elections abused their powers to torment and imprison conscientious Americans. As writer Dave King recently noted, “if you peacefully enter the Capitol Building, you go to jail,” but if you are a Muslim immigrant shouting, “Death to America” in Michigan, President Biden and Democrats will join your side and celebrate the terrorists in Hamas….

At some point, there is little to lose:

As the stigma of being branded an “insurrectionist,” “extremist,” or “domestic terrorist” disappears, more and more “Robin Hoods” will openly defy the State. …

The corrupt FBI and DOJ have taken unprecedented steps to imprison President Trump for the rest of his life. These Gestapo forces have persecuted Trump’s allies, ordinary conservative voters, Christians, pro-life advocates, and parents attending school board meetings. Instead of effectively demonizing or intimidating their targets, however, the goose-stepping thugs providing muscle for the federal government’s criminal empire have only emboldened Americans to support the “villains” more vigorously. When “outlaws” have more honor than governments, paradigms come crashing down, and widespread prison breaks begin.

Will there be a revolution of the right? It’s not unknown.

Educational nosedive parallels fall in average IQs and the rise in “equity”. but we all pretend it isn’t happening

Educational nosedive parallels fall in average IQs and the rise in “equity”. but we all pretend it isn’t happening. By Alan Lee in Quadrant.

Not long ago I was asked to take a relief lesson with Year 9 students and prepare them for their no-calculator NAPLAN numeracy test the next day. To test their mental arithmetic, I asked, “What are seven sixes?” I looked encouragingly from one blank face to another until a girl at the back triumphantly called out, “Forty-two!” This performance was immediately unmasked by a boy at the front: “Aw Sir! She just looked up at the times tables on the back wall.” …

For [William Stanley Jevons in 1877], preparation for exams was central to education: “All life is a long series of competitive examinations. The barrister before the jury; the preacher in his pulpit; the merchant on the Exchange flags; the member in the House.”

We live in an era of leftist ideology and declining average IQs (about 0.5 to 1 point per decade, starting around 1880, after the test-taking artifact of the Flynn effect is removed). To hide the decline, external exams were jettisoned and grade promotion became automatic — which torpedoed motivations. End result: educational standards fell dramatically.

The consensus that directed education policy [after the 1943 report by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER)]: raising the age of compulsory education, eliminating public exams, and progress from primary to secondary school “based on age only and not on educational achievement”. …

Schools streamed students so that teachers could address classes of comparable ability ranked from A to D based on tests conducted in the first week of school. Progress to the next level each year and mobility between streams depended on performance in assessments. Fear of being held back motivated students to improve. Streaming was justified by the “doctrine of double effect”; the need for efficiency in state-funded schools made the policy necessary; the motivating effect was beneficial but incidental. …

Students lacking academic ability either worked, became apprentices, or undertook vocational education. …

Now:

In a modern system, teachers motivate students by making lessons interesting and enjoyable. This is not always easy. Rote learning of the multiplication table is unpopular with children. Adolescents do not spontaneously enjoy learning to solve simultaneous equations, factorise quadratic expressions, or set out a formal proof in geometry. …

Students who stay on now choose subjects they enjoy since they entail no consequential commitment. Vocational subjects involve little more than a pretence of doing work. The very students with limited capacity for academic abstraction are expected to study practical disciplines abstracted from the real world: child studies without children; tourism without tourists; food and hospitality without customers. …

The priority of preparing students for exams protected teachers from the political objectives education departments might impose, and students and parents regarded teachers as allies. Teachers today likely lament a 1960s-and-today cartoon in which a parent, a student and a teacher confer over an assignment with a fail grade. In the 1960s, the teacher and parent glare at the embarrassed student; today the parent and student glare at the embarrassed teacher. …

In 1992, of 115 government schools [in South Australia], ninety-five offered Chemistry, ninety-two Physics, 101 English Studies and eighty-two Mathematics 2. Two decades later, with 125 government secondary schools, only sixty-two offered Chemistry, sixty Physics, forty-four English Studies and twenty-seven Specialist Mathematics.

Schools built for baby boomers were equipped with labs to accommodate Year 12 Chemistry, but the flight from STEM subjects has made maintenance uneconomic.

 

 

The subjects students take instead of STEM are generally justified by their vocational orientation but enrolments are not constrained by career opportunities. In 2014 there were seven times as many students studying Health and Physical Education as the “double maths” that a STEM career requires, and Year 12 enrolments showed only 10 per cent of students studying Physics, 12 per cent Chemistry, 5 per cent Specialist Maths and 7 per cent Modern History. In 1964, 52 per cent of Year 12 students studied Physics, 50 per cent Chemistry, 60 per cent Maths I, 50 per cent Maths II and 23 per cent Modern History. …

Students avoid subjects that require an exam, notably Chemistry, Physics, Biology, English Studies and Maths. …In 2014, only 6 per cent of Year 12 students failed, and 22 per cent were awarded an A-plus, A, or A-minus. In 1964, the Leaving Honours examiners failed 34 per cent of candidates and awarded credit grades to 7 per cent. …

Dumb internationally:

The performance of Australian students in the OECD’s Program for International Student Assessment relative to other countries has markedly declined. In their analysis of Australia’s PISA results from 2000 to 2015, one group of researchers called Australia’s steady decline an “unsolved mystery”. Not only are the declines large but they are greatest for the economically disadvantaged …

In South Australia, the decline is consistent with the flight from academic studies, especially STEM. In the 1960s about half of all students in senior years studied STEM subjects, today it is about one in ten. …

Road to stupidity:

The Norwegian social philosopher Jon Elster discusses Hans Christian Andersen’s tale of the farmer who goes to market to trade a horse and comes home with a sack of rotten apples: “The farmer’s road to ruin is paved with stepwise improvements. Each time the farmer believes himself to be better off by the exchange, but the net result of all the exchanges is disastrous.”

Authorities view the elimination of streaming, grade retention and external exams, and increasing the school leaving age from fourteen to seventeen, as stepwise improvements, but what are the benefits?

In 1944, the Adelaide Exercises in Arithmetic asked commencing Year 7 students to: “Find one-seventeenth of 10 days 19 hours 43 minutes 54 seconds … Divide 765,487 by 326 … Reduce 737,058 square inches to square yards.” In 2016, students taking the Year 9 NAPLAN test were asked: “A shop sells balloons in bags of five. For a party, 20 balloons are needed. How many bags of balloons are needed?”; for a parallelogram with sides marked 110cm and 90cm they are to find the perimeter; and for “a tablecloth of 3 square metres” they must find “the area of the tablecloth in square centimetres”. The thirty-two questions in the NAPLAN test do not range much above these examples in difficulty.

In the 1960s Year 12 Physics students could be questioned on anything arising from Martin and Connor’s Basic Physics, a three-volume 1500-page textbook. Today, Physics students study a ninety-page SASTA Physics Study Guide that gives worked examples of questions that will comprise their exam, guaranteeing pass grades for all but the hopelessly incapable. …

The decline in average IQ since 1880 has been around 15 points, which is the difference between doctors and old fashioned teachers. But new teachers, on average?

A 2021 Department of Education study found that high-achieving school leavers were not inclined to teach because it falls short in intellectual challenge and pay compared with the careers they chose. In 2019, only 4 per cent of graduating students with an ATAR over 80 chose teaching, a decline of nearly a third compared with 2006.

Most political debate today is so far from the issues that matter.