They’re calling you a White Supremacist so they can justify killing you

They’re calling you a White Supremacist so they can justify killing you.

Hasan Kwame Jeffries, brother of U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who is a professor at Ohio State University and who hosts a podcast for the SPLC:

John Brown understood that only way to free America from the scourge of white supremacy was to get rid of white supremacists by any means necessary.

Jeremy Carl:

Remember: They’re not trying to kill you because you’re a “White Supremacist.”

They’re CALLING you a White Supremacist so they can justify killing you.

(Actually, John Brown was white guy who sought to end slavery, not “white supremacy”.)

We’ve entered the pre-violence rhetorical phase of the classic communist cycle. By Brivael Le Pogam.

The script is documented, archived, and it repeats itself identically for a century. Before every mass slaughter carried out in the name of Marxism, there are always 5 to 15 years of public designation of a category of people as “the enemy to be taken down.”

Not a debate on public policies. Not a critique of inequalities. A methodical dehumanization of an entire class.

In the USSR in the 1920s, it was the kulaks. Lenin wrote as early as 1918 that the kulaks must be “exterminated as a class,” a phrase repeated word for word by Stalin ten years later. Result: 4 million peasants deported, several million dead in the Holodomor.

In Maoist China, it was the landlords and “class enemies.” Mao orchestrates public “struggle sessions” where neighbors, children, former employees are forced to denounce, humiliate, beat. Tally from the land reform alone: 1 to 2 million executions, not counting what follows.

In Cambodia, it was the “new people”: city dwellers, intellectuals, people wearing glasses. Khmer Rouge propaganda designated them for years as parasites before massacring them. 1.7 million dead in 4 years.

The United States in 2026.

Hasan Piker, who reaches millions of young men on Twitch, speaks openly of the “blood of f***ing capitalists.” Not in 1968 in a Trotskyist cell, in 2026 on the platform most watched by 18-25-year-olds.

Zohran Mamdani, elected mayor of New York, films viral videos in front of billionaires’ buildings, right at the spot where Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealthcare, was assassinated last year by Luigi Mangione. The latter was turned into a pop icon by a segment of the American left in less than 48 hours. T-shirts, fan art, romanticization of the murderer.

This isn’t “political passion.” It’s phase 1 of the protocol. The public designation of a category of humans as legitimately hateable, followed by the valorization of those who take action.

The “normal” reaction of a healthy democracy should be the immediate social and professional isolation of these voices. What’s happening: they top podcast charts, hold elected office, and get sympathetic media coverage.

History doesn’t stutter. It copy-pastes. And the first victims are always surprised to discover, too late, that the rhetoric they found “a bit excessive but oh well” was actually the clear warning that a pit was being dug for them.

Yes, you:

And if you’re reading this thinking, “This doesn’t concern me, I’m not a billionaire”, stop for two seconds and really think about it.

Because that’s exactly what the Russian peasants told themselves in 1918 when people started talking about the “bourgeois”. They applauded, or they looked the other way. It wasn’t their problem. They weren’t rich.

Ten years later, they were called kulaks. And “kulak“, in Stalinist practice, meant any peasant who owned one more cow than his neighbor, who had dared to hire a seasonal worker, who had a slightly better-kept barn. 4 million deported. Several million dead.

That’s exactly what the small Chinese shopkeepers told themselves in 1949, when Mao went after the “great landowners”. Not their problem. They just ran a little store. Five years later, they too were classified as “class enemies”, stripped of everything, publicly humiliated, sometimes beaten to death by their own neighbors.

That’s exactly what the Cambodian schoolteachers told themselves in 1970, when the Khmer Rouge talked about “urban exploiters”. Not their problem. They barely earned enough to live on. In 1975, knowing how to read was enough to sign your death warrant.

The communist mechanism NEVER stops at the ultra-rich. Never. It’s a historical law as solid as gravity.

Why? Because fundamentally, the communist doesn’t hate wealth. He hates individual emancipation. He hates the very idea that a man can build something that belongs to him, decide his own life, refuse the collective. Private property isn’t an economic detail to him — it’s the metaphysical enemy. Because someone who owns something is someone who can say no.

So if you have an apartment you spent 15 years paying off, you’re concerned. If you have a small business, a shop, a sole proprietorship, you’re concerned. If you have a savings plan, a bank book, stocks, you’re concerned. If you have a family home in the provinces, you’re concerned. If you work hard to pass something on to your kids, you’re at the top of the next lists.

Billionaires are just the first course. Always. Because there are few of them and they’re easy to point out. They’re the appetizers for the machine. The main course, historically, is you. …

Every time a society has tipped into this madness, it did so because the reasonable majority stayed silent too long, thinking it would all blow over on its own. It never blows over on its own.

They also try taking your stuff through excessive taxation, because they need it to redistribute to their supporters.