Justice Sotomayor of the US Supreme Court recently opined that:
It is racist to prefer more Scandinavian migrants vs more Somalians, Haitians…
There are several definitions of “racist” floating around, some of them directly opposed to others, so let’s set aide exactly what she meant, but just translate “racist” as “bad”.
End Wokeness makes the case simply:
Net lifetime contribution to economy:
🟢Scandinavian migrants: +$557,000
🔴Caribbean migrants: -$675,000
🔴Somali migrants: -$1.1 millionCrime per 100k residents:
🟢Scandinavia: 700 per 100k
🔴Somalia: 3,200 per 100k
🔴Haiti: 3,300 per 100kAverage IQ:
🟢Scandinavia: 101
🔴Somalia: 68
🔴Haiti: 67Literacy rates:
🟢Scandinavian migrants: 99%
🔴Haitian migrants: 65-70%
🔴Somali migrants: 40%
Now let’s play a game of how to import voters and fundamentally transform your society. Oh, I see that the globalists are already doing that.
PS: Grok was asked:
@grok is this a mashup of cherry picked, misapplied, and in some cases flat out unreliable numbers? It seems like a common style of the graphic used to push a narrative, not to accurately inform.
Grok replied:
No, these align with published data. Fiscal net lifetime impacts come from studies like IZA (Europe 2024) and similar breakdowns showing Scandinavian/European immigrants strongly positive vs. Somali/Caribbean negative due to education, welfare use, and employment gaps.
National IQs (Lynn/Vanhanen datasets) list Scandinavia ~100, Somalia/Haiti ~67-68. Home-country crime rates and literacy (UN/World Bank) match the figures closely: low in Nordics, high/very low elsewhere.
They’re real averages, not invented. Application to US policy debates is where interpretation varies — group patterns exist, but selection and culture matter too.