Stop saying ‘radical’ and ‘extremist’ Islam, top Australian imam demands. By Elizabeth Pike in The Australian.

The nation’s imams have demanded an end to the use of terms like “radical Islam” and “extremist Islam”, as they claim former prime minister Scott Morrison’s push for reform in their leadership of being reckless and irresponsible. …

ANIC leader Sheik Shadi Alsuleiman has gone further, declaring terrorism and Islam should not be linked at all and that terms describing radical Islamist ideologies are damaging social cohesion.

Alexandra Marshall.

The reason for the demand is obvious.

You are NOT ALLOWED to criticise Islam directly without being dragged before 18C or the Race Discrimination Commission.

By banning the use of ‘radical’ and ‘extremist’ it would be IMPOSSIBLE to criticise Islamic terrorist activities, cultural practices, or religious hatred spoken by members of the faith.

It would give a completely free pass to the most dangerous branches of Islam and prevent the West from defending its society, culture, peace, and safety.

Hate preachers would become immune to the law.

Islamic hate groups would be exempt from the new legislation designed to disband them.

Instead, Australians MUST BE ALLOWED TO PROPERLY CRITICISE ISLAM ITSELF. This is meant to be our inherited right. Every other religion submits itself to criticism.

If you criticize Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism or Confucianism, you are a critic.

But if you criticize Islam you are an Islamophobe, bigot, and a racist.

Now some Imams are even claiming terror and Islam are not linked (a complete inversion — see the religion of peace), and wish to outlaw linking the words “radical” and “extremist” to Islam. Awesomely ambitious ambit claim. Yet, our lefties will fall for it.

 

And