UK Legalizes Muslims Stabbing People If They’re Offended

UK Legalizes Muslims Stabbing People If They’re Offended. By Daniel Greenfield:

Hamit Coskun, a half-Armenian and half-Kurdish gentleman, both of whose halves have suffered from genocide under Turkish Islamist rule, decided to protest by burning a copy of the Koran outside the Turkish consulate in London while shouting “Islam is religion of terrorism”.

Moussa Kadri set out to prove him right by fetching a knife and stabbing at him while shouting, “I’m going to kill you”. The Muslim terrorist explained to the police that he was just out to “protect my religion” in the traditional Islamic fashion through violence.

 

 

 

And the British authorities were typically understanding of Muslim violence against non-Muslims.

Moussa Kadrhas, the Muslim stabber, was freed on bail, while Hamit Coskun, the non-violent non-Muslim stabber, was kept locked up.

In the UK, being stabbed by a Muslim is considered a more serious sign of guilt than the actual stabbing. And the authorities were much more worried about Coskun, a self-proclaimed “atheist” and “critic of Islam” on the loose, than just another one of the thousands of Muslim terrorists who are already freely running around the country. …

Even though Moussa had allegedly shouted “I’m going to kill you” while stabbing at another human being …, he was only charged with possession of a knife and common assault, not attempted murder. The authorities allowed the stabber to send in a picture of the knife and he sent in a picture of a palette knife rather than the bread knife he actually used. …

In the UK, ordinary people condemning Islamic violence and mass migration have been jailed, but Muslim violence against them is virtually a victimless crime.

David Shipley in The Spectator.

Kadri was charged with and pleaded guilty to assault and possessing a bladed weapon. Yesterday he was spared jail.

The judge, Adam Hiddleston, gave the game away in the third sentence of his remarks, where he said ‘You were clearly deeply offended by a man who was protesting outside the consulate and who as part of his protest had set fire to the holy Quran’.  … The judge went on to make excuse after excuse for Kadri. … So convinced of Kadri’s good character was the judge that he described this violent attack with a blade as ‘losing your temper and your self-control’.

This is frankly bizarre. A normal, civilised, decent person does not conduct a violent assault with a potentially deadly weapon because someone burns a book. Nor do they typically leave the area, find a knife and return. …

Green light for Muslims to attack us:

Toby Young, Director of the Free Speech Union went further, saying, ‘this sends a green light to any Muslim who wants to enforce an Islamic blasphemy code by taking the law into their own hands. The court is effective saying that if you attack a blasphemer with a knife you won’t have to spend a day behind bars.’

It’s hard to argue with Toby. We have a legal system where a man can be convicted of a crime for burning a religious book, while the Muslim who attacked him with a knife is treated as though his anger is entirely justified.

But saying a word against Islam can land you in jail:

The comparison, as always is with Lucy Connolly. We have a legal system in which a deleted tweet about setting fire to hotels ‘for all I care’ results in a 31 month sentence, while a Muslim who seeks to enforce a blasphemy code by threatening to kill someone and then attacking them with a knife spends not a single day behind bars.

Muslims are the left’s shock troops against normal whites. Stupid left — you’re next.

hat-tip Matthew M.