Liz Cheney’s Net Worth Ballooned from $7 million to $44 million in five years in Congress. By Wendell Husebo.

Rep. Liz Cheney’s (R-WY) net worth ballooned from an estimated $7 million when she first took office in 2017 to possibly more than $44 million in 2020, according to analysis from the Center for Responsive Politics and her most recent financial disclosure forms.

Depending on where she falls in the ranges in her latest financial disclosure forms, that could represent as much as a 600 percent increase in her net worth in just a few short years in Congress …

Cheney reported no earned income, gifts, or transactions. …

The median American household net worth is $121,700 …

Her congressional salary is $174,000 per year.

Chinese connection:

In 2018, Cheney’s top listed assets were Citibank ($3,000,000) and Latham & Watkins ($3,000,000). Latham & Watkins is Liz Cheney’s husband’s law firm, where Philip Perry, Cheney’s husband, has been a partner since 2017. … Perry’s firm has advised a Chinese Communist Party-linked technology company named TME and Exelon Corporation. The State Department in 2019 dubbed TME a tool of the Chinese government….

While Perry’s law firm has serviced Chinese clients, Cheney has sat on the Armed Services Committee with many powerful subcommittees dedicated to national security. …

Cheney is an enthusiastic uniparty supporter, leading the J6 show trials to stop Trump:

Cheney’s political approval is on a downward trend due to her fixation on fighting against former President Donald Trump on the partisan January 6 Committee. Fifty-four percent of voters were less likely to support Cheney’s reelection “because she’s part of the panel investigating the attack on the Capitol,” Casper Star-Tribune/Mason-Dixon found.

Cheney’s opposition to Trump has won her favor with many in the establishment uniparty. In recent weeks, Cheney has won endorsements from Hollywood elites and donations from Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama donors. …

Cheney has also received large amount of money from outside state donors looking to save Cheney from defeat. The incumbent has out-raised [her opponent in the Repulican primary] Hageman by nearly three to one. Yet Hageman has done very well with Wyoming voters, who have donated more than $1.2 million — more than four times as much as Wyoming voters have donated to Cheney, FEC data shows.

Pollsters vastly understated the magnitude of Cheney’s pending loss. She was not merely repudiated. She was crushed. By Scott Johnson.

Cheney was planning for her political future as anti-Trump hero long before the polls closed. She has millions of dollars stashed in a PAC that she will put to some use. However, she seems to me a woman without a party (assuming she doesn’t want to switch parties).

She is on a mission that might profitably be continued as a talking head on CNN or MSNBC.

Liz Cheney’s Concession Speech Was a Mentally Ill Cry for Help. By Stephen Kruiser.

For once, the polls were not just right, but really, really right. Liz Cheney’s political career met its inevitable ignominious end last night. The drubbing was spectacular, a most decisive end to the political tenure of the woman who just last year was the third-most powerful Republican in Congress.

The race was called for Harriet Hageman about 14 seconds after the polls closed. What followed were a few hours of every leftist media outlet in America making Cheney out to be the bravest American woman since Rosa Parks.

Lizzie herself thought she was more like Lincoln. … “Abraham Lincoln was defeated in elections for the Senate and the House before he won the most important election of all,” Cheney explained. “Lincoln ultimately prevailed, he saved our union, and he defined our obligation as Americans for all of history.” …

Cheney for President, says the Uniparty:

In a saner time, Liz Cheney would be ostracized by both parties for this kind of lunacy. Instead, we’ve got people from every big mainstream news outlet in America saying that Cheney’s almost 40-point defeat means that she should run for president in 2024.

Follow the money. Who makes (as in manufactures) the money, rules.

UPDATE: Scott of the Pacific took this photo yesterday:

Top Israeli Biological Research Scientist Blows the Whistle on mRNA Shots: Monkeypox, Increased Risk of Catching Covid, and Perhaps They Alter DNA. By Debra Heine.

Professor Shmuel Shapira, M.D., MPH, the former Director General of the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR), is one of the top medical scientists in the world, and since his “vaccine” injury, he’s become one of the world’s top critics of the COVID-19 shots.

“I received 3 vaccinations, I was physically injured in a very significant way as many others were injured,” Shapira tweeted on May 13, 2022. “And in addition, my trust in the nature of the decisions and in the processes of making them has been severely eroded.”

Qualified up the kazoo, at the top level in one of the most technologically advanced countries in the world, Shapira has obviously had enough and is speaking out. Before Twitter banned him, he made three main points.

1. Monkeypox outbreak after mass mRNA covid vaccination — not a coincidence:

“Monkey pox cases were rare for years. During the last years a single case was documented in Israel,” he tweeted.

“It is well established the mRNA vaccines affect the natural immune system. A monkey pox outbreak following massive covid vaccination: Is not a coincidence.”

2. The risk of COVID infection increases with every new dose of the mRNA vaccine:

“According to official data from Australia the more you are injected the more likely you are to get sick as the fourth injection jumps the chance dramatically.”

(I trawled through the NSW health data website, but couldn’t find the graph above. Presumably someone constructed it from their spreadsheets of data. NSW only started rolling out 4th doses in early June, to the elderly and infirm first, which accounts for some of the jump when the 4th dose starts). Although the graph implies these are rates “per million people,” it must be “per million people with a given vaccination status” — because otherwise the first green bar would be minuscule, as only a few people would have the 4th dose when 4th doses started.)

The risk of 4-dose people catching covid in NSW is apparently 17 times higher than for the unvaccinated. This includes the effect of age and pre-existing health — deployment of the fourth dose only started in early June, and presumably the elderly and infirm are the only ones with four doses at this stage.

Even people with just one, two, or three doses are five times more likely to catch covid than the unvaccinated. Could it be that nearly all the unvaccinated are young and healthy, or don’t report it if they catch covid? That seems unlikely, given that NSW boasts that 96% of all adults are vaccinated.

“I am not anti-vaccine, I am anti-stupidity, anti-fake science, and anti-incompetent management.”

3. mRNA vaccines may be altering our DNA after all:

Professor Shapira also pointed to an alarming article in Genes, a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal. The article—mRNA Vaccines: Why Is the Biology of Retroposition Ignored?—was written by Domazot Lozo, a Croatian geneticist, whose fields of expertise are in evolutionary genetics, evolutionary developmental biology, macroevolution, and tumor evolution. …

“Here, I discuss the pervasive claim that mRNA-based vaccines cannot alter genomes,” Lozo wrote. “Surprisingly, this notion is widely stated in the mRNA vaccine literature but never supported by referencing any primary scientific papers that would specifically address this question. … At present, the insertional mutagenesis safety of mRNA-based vaccines should be considered unresolved.”

Dr. Eashwarran Kohilathas explained the significance of Lozo’s conclusions in layman’s terms: …

“Retroposition, in genetics, is a term that describes the integration of a sequence from RNA into a DNA genome, … In fact, retroposition produces a large number of functional genes in the genome and accounts for about 10,000 duplications in the human genome. …

“If more evidence amounts to the fact that DNA integration is possible via these vaccines, then we’re in big trouble. It essentially means that a large subset of the population could produce spike proteins naturally and others may pass this trait on to their children forever.”

The CDC continues to claim that the mRNA vaccines do not alter DNA, without offering any scientific research to back it up.

Shapira spits the dummy:

“Myocarditis, fatal arrhythmias, 20% increase in strokes, facialis, Herpes Zoster, tinnitus (ear ringing), gynecological excessive bleeding, monkey-pox, obscured long term side effects,” Shapira tweeted on August 2. “No worries. Be happy.”

mRNA vaccines had not been deployed before covid, because they were found to be too dangerous and ineffective.

Speculation:

Perhaps the real point of covid was to inject most everyone with mRNA vaccines, or get people accustomed to using mRNA vaccines.

Perhaps some government scientists from the West tricked and funded the Chinese to create covid in their bioweapons lab, because “gain-of-function research” was banned in the West. The Chinese might not have known the full agenda. (Interestingly however, the Chinese are the only people still pursuing zero-covid — do they know something we don’t?)

When covid first broke out around the world, over a hundred vaccine programs started up, many of them making vaccines the old fashioned way. By amazing coincidence, only the US and UK companies, mostly using mRNA vaccines, were approved and widely deployed in the west. All the rest were sidelined by some odd fault or other, or were subject to endless bureaucratic delays. Odd. Existing antiviral drugs that work against covid, principally ivermectin and HCQ, were pooh-poohed or banned in the west. Even odder. (Was that just the wall of lobbying dollars speaking, or was there more to it?)

So it just had to be untested mRNA vaccines. Over half the world has been injected now.

But as we found out more about the mRNA vaccines, it just kept getting worse and worse. They don’t kill covid if you have it, they don’t do much to protect you from catching covid, they aren’t really “vaccines” in the previously accepted meaning of the word, they quickly wane, they erode your immune system leaving you more vulnerable to other problems (like HIV does), the side effects are alarmingly common and sometimes fatal, they make you more likely to catch covid after they wane, they increase your all-cause mortality significantly, and it’s far from clear that they do much to lessen the severity when you catch the newer variants of covid.

What a disappointment. They don’t really work. So odd.

Now it appears that mRNA vaccines might alter our DNA. Hmmm. Is there anything else we should know?

End of speculation.

hat-tip Peter G.