Global Warming Was A Support Act

Global Warming Was A Support Act

by David Archibald

10 October 2025

 

There have been a couple of advancements in understanding global warming so far this year, thanks to the U.S. Government.

First there was the US Department of Energy report by Christy et al. saying that global warming was wrong in science and nothing to worry about. This was the first report by any government on the planet stating that. From now on, anyone saying that global warming is a cause for concern is ‘denying the science.’

More recently, the US Secretary of War gave a speech that recognised global warming as a religion that is worshipped. From that speech:

This administration has done a great deal from day one to remove the social justice, politically correct, and toxic ideological garbage that had infected our department, to rip out the politics. No more identity months, DEI offices, dudes in dresses. No more climate change worship. No more division, distraction or gender delusions.

Unfortunately for the warmers, the same sentence that recognised it as a religion banned it as the state religion — and therefore no more subsidies for their religion from taxpayers. This is a good development for humanity, because global warming wasn’t the sort of religion that was going to build orphanages, hospitals and schools in the manner of the better Christian denominations.

Many of the prominent worshippers of global warming were also prominent in the development of the covid virus. Bill Gates, for example, was an enthusiastic promoter of both. Others, including Boris Johnson’s father and Prince Philip, stated that they wanted to be reincarnated as a virus that killed a lot of people. They were more interested in the ‘killing people’ side of things.

Global warming, the religion, was hard to kill. It was completely immune to facts. Around the year 2015, it looked like it was weakening and we might be free from it at last. But then it suddenly became more vigorous than ever. That was the same year that Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill shipped transgenic mice with humanised ACE2 receptors to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Professor Baric was so sure of an imminent pandemic that he put out a couple of papers predicting that one was about to happen. Why so sure? — he designed it!

Coincidence? Possibly not just a coincidence. Some, like Bill Gates, structured things so that they created the disease and also profited from selling the vaccine for it. But at another level they needed vindication for the evil they were doing. That’s where global warming, the religion, came in. Having too many people was harming the planet, so the solution was to kill some of the people and to hobble the human species so that it wasn’t so efficient thereafter. The latter explains the SV40 sequence sewn into the vaccine genome. Global warming provided a moral fig leaf so they could feel better about themselves, while they caused an enormous amount death and suffering.

There is another enigma about this episode in humanity’s history. The engineered origin of covid was recognised early on, and by late 2020 in the pages of Watts Up With That? So, what did the foot soldiers of the covid rollout, in the CIA and the then Department of Defense, think of spreading a disease that was designed to kill them and their families?

It has taken five years but there is a now a sign that the foot soldiers understand what was done to them. One of them, Chase Hughes, a former CIA psychological profiler, released a video titledWhy evil people think they are saving the world’ in which he discusses the motivations of sociopaths. The term sociopath has the same meaning as psychopath. From the video (my transcription):

I don’t think empathy is the defining factor. Otherwise, everyone in Washington DC would be a sociopath. Most of them are narcissists. All sociopaths are narcissists but not all narcissists are sociopaths. If you have ever read Kafka, one of his famous sayings is that every man must be the hero of his own story.

If you were to sit Darth Vader down on a therapist’s couch, he’s not going to sit there and say ‘I just wish I could kill more people’. He’s going say ‘I want to preserve this, I want to save this society’. In a lot of evil people in real life, these people who are for depopulating the planet, they have a huge amount of empathy it seems but for future unidentified timelines and people. That’s their hero’s journey, then that’s their identity.

It’s ‘I am doing all these things. People are going to call me bad, but after I do that, all these good things are going to happen. And then at the end of this hero’s journey, I going to come back, I might be dead but they’re going to recognise me. And I am going to gain that notoriety after it’s done.’

One hundred year ago, psychopaths could join the Eugenics Society and kill some people in the name of species improvement. Now they have flipped to degrading the species to save the planet. Why do psychopaths want to kill people in the first place? A lot of human interaction is simply status-seeking, a show of relative status to indicate you are more successful than others. So what is a very wealthy psychopath to do? Buying a fourth jet won’t move the needle much. To improve relative status, it is far easier to make other people’s lives worse, including killing them.

In the Venn diagram of psychopathic interests, global warming and covid have a lot of overlap. Whether or not they were consciously aware of it, in the minds of psychopaths global warming served the covid cause. It was a support act. Yanked off the public teat, it will fade into a miasma. Some other belief system will replace it though. Let’s hope it’s a good one this time.

 

David Archibald is the author of The Anticancer Garden in Australia.