Why globalism is the enemy of freedom

Why globalism is the enemy of freedom. By Roger Kimball.

Globalism, I said, is the enemy of freedom. Why? Because globalism systematically attacks and undermines the moral and political filiations that make genuine freedom possible. …

“Globalism” … is the name of an aspiration not yet a reality. At the center of that aspiration are two impulses, one critical or negative, the other constructive. The negative side can be summed up in the great antithesis of globalism, which is national loyalty. The constructive side of globalism can be summed up in a single word, and that word is utopia. Utopian fantasies are as perennial as they are vain …

World government by bureaucrats, no mention of democracy:

Consider the apparently unkillable dream of “world government,” a sort of farm-team try-out for what we now call “globalism.” …

A sterling contemporary example is the Great Reset, recently proposed by the Davos-based World Economic Forum, which seeks … “to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.” Exploiting the panic caused by the Covid-19 crisis, the WEF demands that “every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.”

Here at last was an opportunity to enact a worldwide tax on wealth, a far-reaching (and deeply impoverishing) “green-energy” agenda, rules that would dilute national sovereignty and insinuate politically correct attitudes into the fabric of everyday life. All this was being promulgated for our own good, of course.

But it was difficult to overlook the fact that the WEF plan involved nothing less than the absorption of liberty by the extension of bureaucratic power.

The true political ends of such elite enterprises are generally swaddled in emollient rhetoric about freedom and democracy — what we have recently been taught to call “our democracy.” Thus the PR surrounding the WEF’s Great Reset is festooned with talk of “stakeholder capitalism,” “equality,” “sustainability,” and other emetic items from the lexicon of socialistically oriented political obfuscation. The reality is far darker. …

Increasingly, Western societies are reverting to a species of bifurcated society in which a tiny group of elites rules over a docile but imperfectly contented mass. What happens when the engines of prosperity falter is anyone’s guess.

The administrative state seeks world domination. They can only succeed if we let them.

Everyone knows this, right?