US 2020 Election: Brunson vs Adams, et al. might get to the Supreme Court

US 2020 Election: Brunson vs Adams, et al. might get to the Supreme Court. By Jennifer Brown.

The Supreme Court might actually hear this:

It began in the state of Utah, then transferred to federal court when there were originally 3 defendants listed, Biden and Harris as well as Nancy Pelosi, and then 381 other defendents AND over 100 Jane/John Does to the defendent list. All are Federal Government members that are named so far. …

At this point, SCOTUS will usually dismiss back to the 10th circuit appeals waiting a decision from them. Essentially kicking the can down the road. But that did not happen.

Why was this court case filed?

The allegation is this: “for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.”. This is in reference to the 2020 election.

When the case came before congress to investigate the allegation of fraud put forward by 100 members of congress, the other 380+ members voted no. The senate did nothing to stop the certification without the 10 day investigation period either.

The oath of office they broke?

“”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

The question at hand:

How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don’t believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate?

Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims from from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully manipulated the 2020 election.

Is this lawsuit about a “rigged” election? No, it’s about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES. …

What remedy are they seeking?

They are asking that all 385 defendants [most  sitting members of Congress] be charged with Treason for failure to uphold the US Constitution, they be incarcerated for a period no less than 5 years, be fined no less than $10,000, they be removed from their government seat, and banned from ever holding a political position ever again.

No precedents:

Again, we have never in history seen a case such as this. There is no precedent of this magnitude. What will SCOTUS do with this? Who knows.

Howell Woltz:

A group of home-schooled brothers in the United States self-trained in law and Constitution (no longer taught in schools, universities or law schools) figured out how to get cases all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. …

These young bucks realised that thousands of affidavits alleging election fraud, filed with Congress by roughly 100 members demanding an investigation, precluded certification of the 2020 presidential election.

They were correct on this — as it only takes two witnesses/affidavits to convict someone of treason — yet these thousands of pieces of sworn evidence of foreign election interference and crimes were wholly ignored by those charged with the responsibility of preventing such. …

So, the Brunson Brothers have sought the high court to charge the members of Congress — Republicans, Socialists and Democrats alike — who certified the fraud anyway — and all those who participated, with criminal malfeasance and removal from office.

Wait for it:

Now comes the part that sends chills up my spine. … The Solicitor General has basically stood aside out of a seeming obligation to rule of law and Constitution and is letting this question about foreign election interference and criminal conduct by elected official move forward. …

The Supreme Court set its date for holding its private conference to vote on moving this case forward.

What date? January 6th of 2023 … the Supreme Court will vote to take up this case or reject it. …

On January 6th, all it takes is four of the nine justice to move this case forward. Though the radical left has tried every intimidation tactic including protests outside their homes and even attempted murder, it appears these justices are standing firm — another miracle. …

This is America’s last chance to save itself. Congress has become a brothel where votes go the highest paying ‘John’ and few if any follow the law when making it.

The Executive Branch is so far beyond its Constitutional skis and authority that it is a sick and dangerous joke — installed by foreign forces in collusion with domestic traitors.

The only branch that can save us — and their own jobs, by the way — is the United States Supreme Court …

The federal and state governments have refused to give these justices protection from mobs, threats and even attempts on their lives, on information and belief, to frighten them from doing the right thing.

It’s probably going to be strangled by the swamp, but there is hope.

hat-tip Phil