Adverse outcomes increase with each covid infection

Adverse outcomes increase with each covid infection. By David Archibald.

Some people have already been infected four times, irrespective of vaccination status. …

So the question is: does covid get better or worse with each reinfection? And some people are being reinfected within four weeks of their last infection, irrespective of vaccination status. Anecdotally, subsequent infections are worse.

The first hard data on this effect is from a paper using data from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. From that paper, this is a table of consequences (sequelae) of covid infection by number of infections per one thousand people in each cohort …


Adverse outcomes increase each time you are infected


What is apparent is that there is no immunity.  Prior infection is just a pre-existing condition. Each infection, on average, gives you half a sequela. Some of the whacking each infection gives your organs would be subclinical, and thus the hospitalization rate rises faster than total sequelae.

There is no flattening out in the statistics to date.  There is just a steady march to death by covid. The number of infections to get to that state is likely inversely correlated with age. But at a certain stage in their collecting sequelae, people will drop out of the workforce and become a burden on society.  The health system will collapse first, then things will get ugly.

The logical conclusion is that for Australia to survive we have to go zero covid.

It will be easier than you might think. If a place like Shanghai, with a population the same size as Australia’s living on top of each other, can achieve that status, however briefly, we can do it too.

Especially if we’re not stupid about. The previous Liberal Government seemed intent on maximizing Pfizer and Moderna’s profits, ordering millions of useless vaccines, and at the same time outlawing prophylactic molecules including ivermectin and hydrochloroquine. Ivermectin is still being seized by Borderforce at our airports.

Let’s reverse all that. The federal government should offer, not compel, three monthly blood tests aimed at quantifying each individual’s serum levels of vitamin D, zinc, selenium, vitamin C, and iodine. And then send each individual a three month course of tablets containing those molecules (plus quercetin, vitamin K2, and ivermectin) and elements made for their specific status. This will dramatically lower the covid viral load in the community and make other elimination efforts much easier.

In the interim, … warding off covid consists mainly of vitamin D supplementation and using cattle drench containing ivermectin. With respect to vitamin D, it is better to flirt with vitamin D side effects than get a whacking to your organs from covid. But you can take a hell of a lot of vitamin D with no ill effect. These tables from the FLCCC Alliance Covid-19 Management Protocol indicate how much Vitamin D you will need: …

I’m about 100 kg with a BMI of 28, so I’m taking 5,000 IU per day.

If and when our health system collapses, access to vitamin D may become problematic, so stockpile a lot in your fridge (the colder, the better). Ivermectin is even more benign than vitamin D [but is not currently available for humans in Australia — though it is available at veterinary suppliers].

Cannot rule out these nightmare scenarios. So be prepared.

The news about covid just seems to get worse as time goes by — except that omicron was much less deadly than delta.