This week, with hardly a whisper from its chief public health officers, Australia largely abandoned its vaccine mandates. For the most part, they remain in force only for those working in health and aged care or with those with disabilities.
There has been no explanation given as to why unvaccinated workers can now be ‘welcomed back’ into workplaces. There has been no apology to those who lost their jobs for refusing to be jabbed, or who lost their lives, or their good health, following vaccination.
So far, 889 deaths have been reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) which may have been caused by vaccination and almost 133,000 people have reported a vaccine injury including more than 140 heart attacks, 360 myocardial infarctions, 500 strokes, 1,400 cases of deep vein thrombosis and 1,500 pulmonary embolisms.
So, why the sudden change in policy? Here’s one possibility. An Israeli study of 5.7 million people, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in June, shows that unvaccinated people who gained immunity through infection, were far better protected from Covid than people who were double vaccinated. And while the study did not have enough cases of severe Covid to be definitive, it showed that unvaccinated people with natural immunity were also better protected from severe Covid. …’
The crime of the Australian bureaucracy:
A year ago, health officials in Uttar Pradesh, the most populous state in India, with 240 million inhabitants, advised that they were using a multi-drug cocktail of repurposed medications including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid with astonishing success. From a peak of 34,455 on 29 April, cases plunged to 178 on 26 June. A year later there is an average of one death per day.
The contrast with Australia could not be more stark. Australia’s public health officers weren’t content simply to disregard the evidence of Uttar Pradesh’s success with a multi-drug therapy that included ivermectin, the TGA went further than any other country in the world and on 10 September 2021 banned the use of ivermectin for the treatment of Covid. …
If ivermectin and HCQ can treat covid, there was no justification for Pfizer’s expensive but experimental vaccines. Money and corruption have ruled.
Vitamin D and zinc? Don’t even mention it:
Public health officials in Australia pursued the same policy of persecuting doctors who dared to criticise official public health policy.
For example, Dr Paul Oosterhuis, a NSW anaesthetist with over thirty years experience in critical care and resuscitation, had his registration as a medical practitioner suspended on 3 September because of four anonymous complaints made to the Medical Council of NSW about his Facebook posts, which encouraged people to take vitamin D, zinc and seek early treatment with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine if they became infected with Covid.
It’s their democracy.
Btw, did you notice that there were modest demonstrations against the Roe versus Wade decision in Australia!?! The US is now transitioning to the same system as in Australia, where state governments decide abortion policies, and abortion is available to varying degrees in all states of Australia. Loopy to demonstrate here. Is it to influence US politicians — because they care how you vote? Or to influence our own politicians — to do what? As virtue signalling goes, this is at the stupid end of the spectrum.
These demonstrations were lovingly reported in generous detail by the ABC, for the last couple of nights. Contrast that with the much larger anti-vaccine-mandate demonstrations a few months ago in Australia, which were only briefly mentioned, if at all, by a contemptuous ABC. The ABC is a public broadcaster, paid for by all of us.