Expect More Hysterical Screeching

Expect More Hysterical Screeching. By Lance Welton.

Women are considerably higher in mental instability (“Neuroticism”), and this, after all, is basically just a means via which they can express their feelings to each other and also alleviate a sense of guilt and social anxiety about their own “racism,” “white privilege,” or whatever they’ve been told to feel guilty about. …

As they take over society, and especially as they take over “caring” professions — such as teaching, medicine, nonprofits and Woke activism — this can have serious, and self-destructive, consequences.

From an article about the meltdowns bringing progressive advocacy groups to a standstill:

We’re dealing with a workforce that’s becoming younger, more female, more people of color, more politically Woke … and less loyal in the traditional way to a job, because the whole economic rationale for keeping a job or having a job has changed.

Thus it appears there was a Zoom meeting on 2nd June 2020 at the Guttmacher Institute, a Washington D.C. abortion charity, so that workers could share how they felt about the death of George Floyd. The meeting was chaired by a female, naturally, and could reasonably be regarded as a complete waste of Woke time. How does an organization having a meeting to express their feelings about something, let alone something of no direct relevance to abortion, help the cause of assisting women in the U.S. who want abortions?

Answer: It doesn’t. But it does help the female staff, because they experience negative feelings very strongly and thus desire some kind of group therapy. …

The Guttmacher Institute chair, Heather Boonstra, vice president for public policy, wanted to talk about what the charity could do to tackle “systemic racism.”

What was the response of her mainly white, female employees?

Staff suggestions, though, turned inward… “including loosening deadlines and implementing more proactive and explicit policies for leave without penalty.” Staffers suggested additional racial equity trainings, noting that a previous facilitator had said that the last round had not included sufficient time “to cover everything.”

Of course that was their response. Females are not evolved, as males are, to work in complex, hierarchical organizations. They are evolved to live in … relative equality. Indeed, British psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen has shown that, from a very young age, males are concerned with systems, goals and hierarchy, while females are focused on empathy and everyone feeling “included”. …

If you add to this the fact that females are much higher in anxiety than males, then given such a situation they will, of course, push for “loosening deadlines,” being able to take paid “leave” simply because they feel vaguely unhappy, and having more “equity training.”

This, after all, is basically just a means by which they can express their feelings to each other and also alleviate a sense of guilt and social anxiety about their own “racism.”

The “training” aspect is also interesting. Females are higher in Conscientiousness (“rule-following”) than males, so they tend to value formal training and qualifications far more, as research has demonstrated …

Now, what was their Guttmacher boss’s response to all this, being the boss and thus a relatively psychologically masculinized female?

“I’m here to talk about George Floyd and the other African American men who have been beaten up by society,” she told her staff, not “workplace problems.” Boonstra told them she was “disappointed,” that they were being “self-centered.” The staff was appalled … by the exchange …

These women argued that “certain staff members had been tokenized, promoted, and then demoted on the basis of race.” There was an investigation and it found that the complaints were entirely unfounded. They just hated the supervisor.

So why did they make anonymous complaints? Women are physically weaker and fear open conflict or openly playing for status. Thus, they will generally use covert means to bring down a rival for status: whispering, bitching, spreading rumors about her being a slut or a show-off or making anonymous complaints.

And why did they hate her? Because they are evolved to an expectation of “equality.” But Boonstra was in charge. No longer remotely their equal, … she was literally a rival for the resources of their children — real or implicit — and needed to be brought down.

She had also confronted them with their own selfishness, behavior which is “mean” — even if she was correct — due to the strong negative feelings it induced in them. Remember, “empathy” is more important than “systematizing” (and thus “truth”) for women, according to Baron-Cohen. …

White women, being higher in social anxiety than men or black women … will be higher in extrinsic religiousness: competitive outward religious conformity — in this case to the Cult of Woke.

So, there may be some kind of silver lining to increasing female dominance of Woke organizations. It means bickering, illogical decisions, time-wasting, and their being ground to a standstill.

An interesting point of view. It helps explain why the woke ranks are dominated by young white women, and gives us some idea of how they operate and how they will fail.