From a Danish study of vaccine effectiveness (VE) — which is the percentage reduction in likelihood of catching covid, compared to being unvaccinated.
The VE is significantly lower than that against Delta infection and declines rapidly over just a few months.
This graph shows that the vaccine effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines against omicron turns sharply negative after 90 or so days:
In other words, if you don’t have a booster, after three months your double jab of Pfizer makes you more likely than an unvaccinated person to catch omicron.
Which is why governments are so keen for everyone to have a booster every three months.
Everything about this first generation of “vaccines” turns out to be disappointing. Now we find out they make you more likely to catch the disease, after just three months? What next?? That they give you cumulative heart damage??? A little bit more scar tissue each time…
What if, for the next variant, the vaccine effectiveness turns negative after only two months? What happens when human immune systems start getting fatigued (as they will), after being stimulated so much?
NFI. Screwing it up every which way.
hat-tip Scott of the Pacific