Today is more like the East German Disintegration Directive than the Chinese Cultural Revolution

Today is more like the East German Disintegration Directive than the Chinese Cultural Revolution. By Heywood Floyd.

Many have made analogies between the woke “cancel culture” phenomenon and the Chinese Cultural Revolution. I think this is a great analogy, but I think that another, perhaps better, analog has been overlooked, namely the “Disintegration Directive” of the East German Stasi.

Briefly, the Disintegration Directive … was the approach that the East German secret police (the Stasi) took from 1976 onwards to crush dissent, or even potential dissent.

Before 1976, the Stasi used the conventional gulag-and-torture methods to control political opinion in the DDR [East Germany]. But in the 1970s, the DDR was seeking international recognition, so they needed a lower-profile method of suppressing opposition to Communism. …

It specified a covert, much more psychological approach to maintaining the Communist monopoly on ideological discourse.

The goal was to destroy dissidents and potential dissidents socially and emotionally without resorting to arrest and imprisonment. The Stasi collected information about the victim’s private life, and proceeded to “disintegrate” their careers and their family and private life.

Damaging lies (or truths) would be conveyed to employers until the target was rendered unemployable. Relationships with spouses and kids would be poisoned with gossip by operatives, professional failure, and financial stress. Friends would be warned away through the grapevine.

The goal was to destroy the reputation of the target and make him so preoccupied with his personal difficulties and emotional turmoil that he had no will to question the government of the DDR. It was done covertly, and often victims weren’t believed even if they discovered it.

At this point, I think the parallels with the cancel culture of the modern West are obvious. To be clear, I’m not suggesting that the U.S. or other western governments are using these methods (yet). But I am suggesting that private groups and movements are doing so.

If a professor, journalist, or corporate executive isn’t communicating the political ideas that you want spread, what better way to silence him than to make him unemployable, with all of the personal and financial stress that goes with that?

Once you have a large enough movement established, spreading the lies about your target becomes easier — even those who know that the narrative about the “offender” is a lie won’t dare to speak up. We are now well into that phase of the operation.

Yep. It took decades for the East Germans to throw off that system, and they had outside help. But they were psychologically damaged. Even today, East Germany is poorer and the people more timid than in West Germany.