With the Hunter Biden Expose, Suppression is a Bigger Scandal Than The Actual Story

With the Hunter Biden Expose, Suppression is a Bigger Scandal Than The Actual Story, By Matt Taibbi.

The flow of information in the United States has become so politicized – bottlenecked by an increasingly brazen union of corporate press and tech platforms – that it’s become impossible for American audiences to see news about certain topics absent thickets of propagandistic contextualizing.

Try to look up anything about Burisma, Joe Biden, or Hunter Biden in English … and you’re likely to be shown a pile of “fact-checks” and explainers ahead of the raw information:

Other true information has been scrubbed or de-ranked, either by platforms or by a confederation of press outlets whose loyalty to the Democratic Party far now overshadows its obligations to inform. …

As has been hinted at by several prominent journalists, controversies erupted within newsrooms across New York and Washington in the last week. Editors have been telling charges that any effort to determine whether or not the Biden laptop material is true, or to ask the Biden campaign to confirm or deny the story, will either not be allowed or put through heightened fact-checking procedures.

On the other hand, if you want to assert without any evidence at all that the New York Post story is Russian interference, you can essentially go straight into print.

The traditional media’s lying by omission is where they only mention stories that would help the left. Google’s framing and downranking is a new twist in the evolving art of censorship.