The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment

The GAO Ruled Obama Broke the Law in 2014, But No One Called for His Impeachment. By Matt Margolis.

On Thursday, The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a legal opinion concluding that by withholding aid to Ukraine, the Trump administration broke the law because Congress had appropriated those funds and the executive branch, therefore, did not have the right to place any conditions on that aid being delivered.

Now, let’s forget the fact that Ukrainian officials were unaware there was ever any hold on the aid, or that said aid was actually delivered. The Washington Post claims that the foundation of the GOP’s argument against impeachment was “severely undermined” by the GAO ruling, and the left is foaming at the mouth on social media claiming this proves that Trump committed an impeachable offense and the ruling has justified impeachment.

Except, if a GAO legal opinion justifies impeachment, Obama should have been impeached.

obama thinking

That’s right, back in 2014, the GAO ruled that Obama’s prisoner swap of five detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison in exchange for deserter Bowe Bergdahl violated federal law. “The Department of Defense violated section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 when it transferred five individuals detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the nation of Qatar without providing at least 30-days notice to certain congressional committees,” the GAO explained. …

The GAO also found that Obama had broken the law for failing “to follow its own health reform law in a $5 billion dispute over compensating insurers for high costs from seriously ill patients.” That’s right, Obama didn’t just break the law, he violated his own law, Obamacare.

Impeachment for thee, but not for me.

Selective enforcement by the deep state. When there so many laws and regulations that no one could possibly even know what they all are, everyone breaks several laws a day. Then the rule of law is a corrupted sham and democracy has been subverted. Because whoever decides when the law should be applied, and when it should be overlooked, becomes all powerful. Rule by a “monarch” or “central committee” has been resurrected.