What Gender Spectrum? By Matt of True Liberal News.
The so-called “gender binary”, where the world is viewed as male and female, is evil and wrong, we are instructed. We must all now embrace the “Gender Spectrum” (“GS”), which better reflects nature and most importantly, is “inclusive.” …
In contrast to the “static, binary model”, The Gender Spectrum is presented as a “more nuanced, and ultimately truly authentic model of human gender” that describes the “far more rich texture of biology, gender expression, and gender identity intersect in multidimensional array of possibilities.”
The concept has been around for about fifteen years. …
By adding up sex reassignment surgeries (SRS) performed in the US since the 1960’s, [Lynn Conway, a mathematician and a trans* zirself] arrives at a minimal transgender prevalence of 1:2,500, or 0.04%. Through a series of assumptions and back-of-the-envelope calculations, Conway extrapolates to a final estimate of 1:170, or <0.6%. …
A careful & comprehensive meta-study by UCLA’s Williams Institute, conducted in 2011, found that ~ 0.3% of US residents identified as trans* — all things considered, within the same ballpark as Conway’s figure. …
By design, each human comes equipped with either exclusively female, or exclusively male sex organs. We are not hermaphroditic, are incapable of parthenogenesis, nor do we self-pollinate.
Sex is determined by the X and Y chromosomes. Get two Xs and you’re female; an X and a Y, and you’re male — it’s either/or. …
Rarely, something goes wrong when the gametes merge, creating a zygote with a lone X, an XXY, XXYY, or an SRY gene that’s fallen off the Y chromosome or migrated to an X. A meiotic anomaly can create XYY. Individuals born with any of these karyotypes are known as intersex and (except XYY) are infertile.
In the womb, the precisely-timed delivery of precise amounts of hormones is required for the initially amorphous embryo to develop either male or female attributes. This process, too, infrequently goes awry, leading to individuals with genitalia and other physical sex attributes that are neither fully male nor female. They are also intersex and infertile.
It must be stressed that karyotypic and embryological anomalies are errors in the processes — fatal breakdowns, actually, from the perspective of the germ line — and in no way ‘natural’ variants of sex. (It’s noteworthy that intersex pregnancies spontaneously abort at a far higher frequency than average.) This should be an uncontroversial statement of fact, yet there are those who deny it.
Birth defects, not a “rich continuum”:
The group GenderSpectrum.org insists “… even if gender is to be restricted to basic biology, a binary concept still fails to capture the rich variation observed.” …
The graphics found in SJW literature give an idea of how they envision the Gender Spectrum:
… Evidence of this “biological continuum” presumably includes:
- 5-Alpha-Reductase Deficiency — incidence of births 1:40,000
- Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (XY female) — 1:20,000
- Cloacal Exstrophy — 1:400,000
- Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) — 1:14,200
- Klinefelter Syndrome (XXY males) — 1:1,000
- Mullerian Agenesis (congenital absence of a vagina) — 1:5,000
- Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (PAIS) — rare, incidence unknown
- Swyer Syndrome (XY gonadal dysgenesis) — 1:30,000
- Turner Syndrome (45,X0) — 1:2,500
This is idiotic. The above are all intersex conditions where the natural sex determinant processes have gone awry. Intersex people deserve our compassion and our support in developing their personal gender identity. Their conditions, however, are birth defects, not “rich variations.” …
In spite of all this evidence and logic, SJWs damn anyone who doubts the Gender Spectrum as ignorant and hateful.
Not atypically for SJWs, they conflate two separate arguments. The first, that trans* deserve equal treatment under the law, and don’t deserve ridicule or abuse, is one I heartily agree with, as would any fair-minded person.
Their other argument, over which they have launched a crusade, and against which they are experiencing considerable push-back, is that society must be restructured, our public institutions revamped, our very perceptions altered, to conform to a non-existent gender spectrum.
So people are shamed for finding trans* sexually unattractive, or for denying that they themselves secretly harbor homosexual feelings. “He” and “she”, “his” and “hers” are banned as Words of Intolerance™, and we are now expected ask each person what are zir preferred pronouns before addressing qi. Teachers and students receive indoctrination sensitivity training to embrace the legions of spectrum-queer in their midst.
Read it all.
With all the “gay-is-good” media talk for the last few decades, many have a very exaggerated view of how many people are gay. The answer is about 3% of males and less than 1% of females.