While the US is toppling offensive symbols, what about the Democratic Party?

While the US is toppling offensive symbols, what about the Democratic Party? By John Kass.

Destroying public imagery and iconography isn’t the kind of thing Americans do. Actually, it’s the kind of thing that ISIS does.

But Sharpton, the noted race hustler, helped me see things in a different way.

History is important, but history can also be quite offensive.

But there’s one thing wrong with Sharpton. It’s not that he goes too far. It’s that he doesn’t go far enough.

Because if he and others of the Cultural Revolution were being intellectually honest, they’d demand that along with racist statues, something else would be toppled.

And this, too, represents much of America’s racist history:

The Democratic Party.

The Democratic Party historically is the party of slavery. The Democratic Party is the party of Jim Crow laws. The Democratic Party fought civil rights for a century.

And so by rights — or at least by the standards established by the Cultural Revolutionaries of today’s American left — we should ban the Democratic Party.

Not only get rid of it in the present, but strike its very name from the history books, and topple all Democratic statues of leaders who benefited, prospered and became wealthy by cleaving to the party. And shame Democrats until they confess the truth of it.

The Democratic Party’s military arm in the South was the KKK. The Democratic Party opposed the 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution, making the former slaves citizens of the United States and giving them the vote.

If the new Cultural Revolution was serious, wouldn’t it also demand that the Democratic Party be put in a museum somewhere, away from decent people, along with those Confederate statues? …

That’s how it is with history. You can’t say the Democratic Party wasn’t the slavery party. It’s historical fact.

Just as it is also historical fact that the Republican Party was the party of abolitionists.