Bill and Hillary Clinton looked down on Al Gore, but Al Gore made more money and isn’t under investigation by the FBI

Bill and Hillary Clinton looked down on Al Gore, but Gore made more money and isn’t under investigation by the FBI. Al Gore was Bill Clinton’s vice president from 1992 to 2000. The Clintons thought he was a bit thick, a bit nerdy, and more than a little boring — and were happy to see him busy himself with science stuff.

The Clinton’s recent pay-for-play corruption at the State Department, their extravagantly expensive speeches, and those the donations to the Clinton Foundation only earned the Clintons a few hundred million dollars. But Al Gore, after finishing 2000 with less than two million to his name, was a billionaire by about 2007 — from his movie, carbon deals, the carbon emission permits exchange, Apple directorship, and so on. So point 1 to Gore.

Gore’s fortune, shrunken somewhat as the carbon theory of global warming has floundered, was gained honestly, even if based on a mistake. However the Clinton’s modus operandi has landed them in hot water with the FBI, with years of investigation and evasions ahead. Point 2 to Gore.

For the third and final point, who is going to lose a presidential election by more — Hillary or Gore?

Al Gore recieving the Nobel Peace Price 2007

Al Gore receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007. No way Bill and Hillary are going to get one of those.

 Al Gore at The World Economic Forum, 2008

Al Gore upon learning about Weiner and the Dickileaks.

Bill Clinton Impeachment Chief Investigator: I’m ‘Terrified’ of Hillary

Bill Clinton Impeachment Chief Investigator: I’m ‘Terrified’ of Hillary, by Aaron Klein.

Dave Schippers, who served as the Chief Investigative Counsel for the House Judiciary Committee’s probe into whether Bill Clinton committed impeachable offenses, stated in an exclusive radio interview that he is “terrified” of Hillary Clinton.

During the interview … Schippers, unprompted, raised questions about the death of Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster. He further claimed, “We know that there were people who disappeared.

Regarding his stated fear of Hillary, Schippers said:

“Today, I am still terrified of Hillary. Absolutely I am terrified. Because if she gets into office. In fact, I’ve told my wife, I said, ‘If Hillary gets elected, look for the FBI or somebody to come and pick me up the next day.’

“And I think I’m the only one left. [Former Congressman] Henry Hyde is dead. [Independent Counsel Kenneth] Star didn’t really hurt her. Yeah. I was scared when I was out there… I’ve been terrified ever since. Because things happen. Things happen.”

Dark rumors of Clinton victims previously mentioned here.

Agents Accuse Feds of Covering Up Record Border Detainee Numbers for 2016 Election

Agents Accuse Feds of Covering Up Record Border Detainee Numbers for 2016 Election, by Brandon Darby.

A record number of illegal aliens have crossed the U.S.- Mexico border and are in U.S. Border Patrol custody in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley Sector (RGV), according to the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC).

Border Patrol Agent and NBPC President Brandon Judd: “We are at breaking point. We have the highest number of illegal aliens in custody in history in Border Patrol’s RGV Sector and this information has been kept from the American public.”

“The talk of amnesty has once again created pull factors and encouraged people from all over the world to cross Mexico and then cross our porous southern border to illegally enter the U.S. We are simply overwhelmed.”

Again, the media has conspired to keep pertinent facts from the public on behalf of the globalists/Democrats.

Will Google and YouTube do to the Internet what the Left has done to our universities?

Will Google and YouTube do to the Internet what the Left has done to our universities? by Dennis Prager. From the Wall Street Journal:

Tech giants like Google and Facebook always deny that their platforms favor some viewpoints over others, but then they don’t do much to avoid looking censorious. ..

Columnist Kimberley Strassel debuted a PragerU lecture on Thursday under the title “The Dark Art of Political Intimidation.” It’s a discourse on the First Amendment and the tactics that progressives are using to limit speech and political engagement by conservatives. Within several hours of PragerU posting the video, YouTube placed it in “restricted mode,” making it inaccessible to schools, libraries and young Americans whose parents have enabled YouTube technology filters.

We posted the video a couple of days ago. Highly recommended. The WSJ continues:

YouTube was proving Ms. Strassel’s point by censoring a video on free speech. Conservative radio host Dennis Prager started PragerU in part to provide younger Americans with viewpoints that they might not find in the liberal educational establishment. PragerU’s more than 100 videos—each a short lecture delivered by a guest—avoid foul language, violent images or indecency. YouTube has nonetheless restricted 18 of them, on topics from policing to university diversity to the Korean War. …

America’s social-media platforms are getting a reputation this election season for censoring conservatives. They can run their businesses as they choose, but the rest of us can also treat YouTube’s claim of supporting free expression with the skepticism it deserves.

The left increasingly shunned and ignored non-left content at universities, and now the universities pump out bzillions of graduates unable to understand the world around them but keen to be SJWs. The leftist tech monopolies are going the same way. We are going to need a “non-left YouTube” soon.