Globalist elite cooperation can defeat the “chronic violence” that is caused by real jihadism in France and supposed racism in police forces, President Barack Obama told a roomful of foreign ambassadors July 15.
For Obama, everyone – jihadis and cops, Catholics and capitalists, atheists and Australians — must subordinate their political, religious and legal affiliations to the greater authority of a single globalist power.
They can’t compete, fight, defend themselves, intermarry, argue, compromise on principles, form their own countries, convert their rivals, or even campaign for political gains, because then they’re just expressing primitive supremacist “impulses” that must be suppressed by international organizations, according to Obama.
And once their “impulses” are suppressed, then there will be nothing — no religion, no nations, no states, no races, no ethnicities — that can unite peoples against their rulers in the global government.
Obama has made similar globalism-before-nation-states declarations before. For example, in November 2014, he declared that Americans do not have the right to decide who can or cannot immigrate into the United States. In his statement, he used the term “tribe” and “race” to focus his criticism on white Americans;
But here, part of what’s wonderful about America is also what makes our democracy hard sometimes, because sometimes we get attached to our particular tribe, our particular race, our particular religion, and then we start treating other folks differently.
And that, sometimes, has been a bottleneck to how we think about immigration. If you look at the history of immigration in this country, each successive wave, there have been periods where the folks who were already here suddenly say, well, I don’t want those folks. Even though the only people who have the right to say that are some Native Americans.
Obama is still persisting with the religion-of-peace nonsense:
On Friday, Obama managed to praise Islam, even while he condemned unnamed people’s “impulses” that foster solidarity within their nation states or that also create various ethnic, racial or religious solidarities.
“Islam [is] a religion that teaches peace and justice and compassion,” said Obama, despite the evidence from his own federal agencies, and even though Islam expanded out of Arabia to Spain and India via warfare, starting in the year 630.
Obama did not say anything complimentary about Christianity or the United States, even though he is the commander-in-chief of the U.S. military and is the chief of law enforcement in the United States, whose members have been fighting for the nation against the nation’s enemies who describe themselves as Islamic armies.
Whose side is he on?
Victory against impulsive humanity’s obsolete disagreement will be achieved when global elites are able to offer decent jobs to people, Obama asserted.
In the Middle East, “we will defeat these [non-Islamic terrorist] ideologies by offering a better vision of development and economic progress, so people, especially young people, have more hope and opportunity and are less susceptible to extremism and violence in the first place,” said Obama.
The jobs-for-peace plan ignores the willingness of many well-off Muslims to subordinate economic benefit to Islamic piety. For example, the university-educated Mohamed Atta flew a civilian airliner — and its innocent passengers — into the crowded Twin Towers on 9/11.
Some people still don’t realize that the carbon-dioxide theory of global warming provides an excuse for globalization.
Obama is personally responsible for targeting, testing and deporting any would-be immigrant to the United States who is affiliated with a terrorist group, or who was a member of the repugnant communist and national socialist parties.
The exclusionary rule that Obama is supposed to enforce is found in the federal government’s N-400 citizenship form and in the citizenship oath. That’s where would-be citizens swear they have no link to communists or nazis, and promise to renounce loyalties to foreign power. The oath requires would-be citizens to swear “I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen…”
Instead of coherent nation-states where ordinary people can create enough political solidarity to cooperatively solve their own problems — such as excessive power by elites — Obama wants to transfer power from national peoples to elite-run international organizations.
Diversity is not what our countries were built on:
Actually, on Bastille Day, the French people celebrate the complete opposite of “diversity.”
They celebrate the ability of ordinary French people to create and keep their unique nation-state and their unique coherent culture, which emerged amid chronic violence with diverse neighbors and diverse ideologies, including Germany and Islam. Here are the combative words that French people sing on Bastille Day to strengthen and expand their mutual sense of French non-diverse, non-globalist national solidarity.
The US anthem is also about war, independence, and solidarity: