Migrants Committing Disproportionately High Crime In Germany While Media And Govt Focus on ‘Far Right’ Thought Crimes

Migrants Committing Disproportionately High Crime In Germany While Media And Govt Focus on ‘Far Right’ Thought Crimes, by Raheem Kassam And Chris Tomlinson.

Foreign nationals …[are]… 11 or 12 per cent of the total population of Germany … Illegal immigrants and asylum seekers account for around 2.5 per cent of Germany’s population…

Amongst total offences, non-Germans accounted for 27.6 percent while illegal immigrants and asylum seekers accounted for 5.7 percent. Of homicides, the figures are 29.3%/8.2%, and of sexual assaults, the figures were 20.5%/4.8%. …

hat-tip Stephen Neil

‘We will multiply our descendants’ Turkey PM says NO Muslim should use birth control

‘We will multiply our descendants’ Turkey PM says NO Muslim should use birth control, by Selina Sykes.

In a stunning speech broadcast live on television, [Trurkish President] Mr Erdogan also said women cannot be treated as equal to men.

The devout Muslim said women should have at least three children.

He said: “We will multiply our descendants. They talk about population planning, birth control. No Muslim family can have such an approach. …

Despite a decline, Turkey’s fertility rate is one of the highest in Europe and the population is just under 80 million.

Muslims openly talk about conquest by the womb, but our PC numbskulls choose not to understand.

Nor are western feminists protesting this outrageous blasphemy — “women cannot be treated as equal to men”. Imagine their outrage if George Bush, Tony Abbott, or Donald Trump had said this.

Demography is destiny, and Turkish citizens are about to be allowed to move anywhere in the EU. It’s all very exciting for the progressives.

See 12 million Turks say they’ll come to the UK once EU deal is signed.

UPDATE: Asylum seekers ‘sexually assaulted 18 women at free concert in Germany’. Like Cologne.

All the complainants claimed they were “surrounded” by their tormentors before being “touched and fondled” improperly at the annual free Schlossgrabenfest music festival over the weekend.

hat-tip Stephen Neil

The Political Roots of the Safe Schools Program

The Political Roots of the Safe Schools Program, by Mark Latham.

Having lost the battle for economic and foreign policy in the 1980s, Neo-Marxists embarked on a long march through the institutions of the public sector, especially universities and schools. …

Even though Australian students are falling down the international league tables in maths, science and English, teachers are devoting class-time to the mechanics of breast-binding and penis-tucking. …

Welsh academic Christine Weedon, in her book Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory, is apparently the academic scribbler behind this latest PC nonsense, the intellectual inspiration for the Safe Schools program.

She thinks that from our first moments alive, we are brainwashed into accepting the social order around us.

Governments, schools, churches, the media, popular culture and even fashion trends combine to reinforce the “power relations” and dominance of capitalism.

The things we know from observing nature and studying science are dismissed as “biological determinism”. So too notions of truth, commonsense and life-experience are disparaged as “historical constructs” — delivering “false consciousness” and tricking people into a misunderstanding of their best interests.

So having dismissed science, economics, and the Enlightenment, what does Weedon divine?

Individuals are said to be “sexual beings from birth”, reflected in the “initial bisexuality of the child”. …

“For young girls, the acquisition of femininity involves a recognition that they are already castrated like their mother”, forcing them to submit to patriarchy, or male dominance. No one is immune from the process of false gender identity.

Whew. Just as well Weedon and the neo-Marxists are setting our children straight. Oops, “straight” might not be the correct word.

It’s the new political correctness, comrade:

Education has been relatively free from ideological indoctrination. But this is not the view of the new curriculum designers, with Ollis depicting schools as “in a unique position to educate for social change”.

Weedon also said she wants to engineer an androgynous “ungendered” society through classroom tutoring. The other key Leftist battleground is for the control of language. …

This is why Safe Schools seeks to eradicate the use of terms like “his and her” and “boys and girls”. It believes genderless language will produce a genderless generation of young Australians, self-selecting their sexuality as a fluid identity.

Political correctness is not an accident, a random form of censorship. It’s a carefully targeted campaign designed to outlaw the language of observable facts in the discussion of race, gender and sexuality.

Mark Latham knew Gough Whitlam quite well.

Gough Whitlam must be turning in his grave. The Great Man dedicated his life to the principles of the Age of Enlightenment: that rational, evidence-based argument could create a better and fairer society. Not only is the post-structuralist agenda anti-reason, anti-science and anti-family, it is also anti-education. …

Australia’s political leaders are sleepwalking into an educational disaster.

hat-tip Matthew

The Three-way War Between Modernity, Post-Modernity, and Islam

The Three-way War Between Modernity, Post-Modernity, and Islam, by Charles Hill. We are in a worldwide, three-way, cultural war between:

  • Modernity — The Enlightenment, universal human rights, open trade, open expression, consent of the governed, an international system of states with restraints on the worst horrors of war, a determination that religions should not be inserted into political, military, and diplomatic world affairs, the doctrine of “the equality of states,” etc.
  • Post-modernism/PC — The EU is a new form of trans-national entity that eschews war, abolishes sovereign borders, exalts diplomacy, and supersedes the Westphalian system (the idea that countries do not interfere in each other’s domestic affairs). The EU has a new flag bearing no hint of national identity and a new currency depicting unidentifiable architecture of no discernible origin. It avoids any reference to Europe’s Christian heritage.
  • Islam — A meme designed to conquer the world, from seventh century Arabia. An implacable adversary of modernity and post-modernity. It cannot change, fundamentally, because the Qur’an is the unchallengeable word of God, dictated to Mohammed by the archangel Gabriel and not open to later re-interpretation.

The main battleground is Europe.

If Europe is where the siege is to take place, the drawbridge already is up:

  • Islamism abhors the state; the EU has emasculated it.
  • Islamism recognizes only one border: between itself and regions yet to become Muslim; Europe has opened its borders to the point of abolishing the concept altogether.
  • Islamism regards democracy as un-Islamic because it enacts laws other than Sharia; the EU from its inception has acted assiduously to prevent people from governing themselves democratically.
  • Islamists, like Machiavelli, know that armed prophets are victorious and unarmed prophets are destroyed; the EU has deliberately diminished its capacities to defend itself or to back its diplomacy with strength.
  • And while Islamists declare religion to be the answer the EU has seen religion as the problem. As Pierre Manent has pointed out, had Europeans maintained their identity as sovereign states with a Christian heritage, the assimilation of Muslims could have been possible on the basis of comity whereas now it lacks an answer to “assimilation to what?”

Americans need to understand that the Modern Age with its pluralistic structures, societies, and beliefs is under assault and that the enemies of modernity are … unwilling to accept others on an equal basis.

The postmodern PC crew are so focused on defeating modernity (basically the native western populations) that they are willfully blind to their greater enemy, Islam, and indeed assist it (the enemy of our enemy…).

Islam, of course, has no respect for political correctness and postmodernism, and detests it. However Islam respects modernity, having been dominated and beaten by modernism for hundreds of years. Seeing post-modernism emerge as a real threat to modernism, Islam can hardly believe its luck and has been quick to exploit post-modernism.