Harvard students debate whether whites should kill themselves due to ‘privilege’

THE LATEST IN PC: Harvard students debate whether whites should kill themselves due to ‘privilege’. According to a student debater/activist Miguel Feliciano, a respected debater in national competitions, white lives do not matter,  white people should kill themselves because of their “white privilege,” and white life is wrong because white life is based off black subjugation. When a white debater asked whether he should commit suicide, Feliciano said “I don’t see why not, it’s ethical” and “Affirmative suicide, that’s cool, it’s one little step in the right direction.”

Notice how swapping the words “white” and “black” in their recommendations of how to treat people transforms it from edgy trendiness to forbidden — the hallmark of PC racism.

UPDATE: The debate was about renewable energy!

The topic of the debate was supposed to be renewable energy — not race. The subject was: “Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially reduce restrictions on and/or substantially increase financial incentives for energy production in the United States of one or more of the following: coal, crude oil, natural gas, nuclear power, solar power, wind power.”

The white team chose to advocate wind turbines. Instead of addressing that issue, the black debaters began arguing that all whites should kill themselves and that their white opponents should die.

There it is on display, the very essence of PC tactics, trying to shut down their opponents rather than debate them — even in a formal debate at Harvard University!